116th Session,
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4 | next >
| Judgment No. |
Organization acronym |
Extracts |
Full text |
| 3285 |
EPO |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | In his first complaint, the complainant impugns the decision denying him an extension of employment beyond the age of 65. By his second complaint, he seeks to challenge the appointment of his successor. |
| 3284 |
OPCW |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainant successfully challenged the decision not to conduct a review of the grade assigned to his post. |
| 3283 |
EPO |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenged the decision not to promote him earlier to grade A3. |
| 3282 |
ESO |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainant successfully challenged the decision not to renew his contract based on an "overall assessment" that his performance was below the acceptable level. |
| 3281 |
UNESCO |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | Tax refunds due as a result of tax credits. |
| 3280 |
Eurocontrol |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainant requests that the 2010 promotion exercise, which was allegedly cancelled for budgetary reasons, be held. |
| 3279 |
Eurocontrol |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complaints regarding the classification of the complainants’ duties following an administrative reform were dismissed by the Tribunal. |
| 3278 |
Eurocontrol |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainant unsuccessfully impugns the decision confirming the classification of his employment in a new grade bracket. |
| 3277 |
Eurocontrol |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainant unsuccessfully challenges the classification of her employment in a new grade bracket following an administrative reform. |
| 3276 |
Eurocontrol |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainants unsuccessfully impugn the reclassification of their posts following the reform of the Staff Regulations, which allegedly deprives them of any career advancement. |
| 3275 |
Eurocontrol |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainants challenge the reclassification of their posts as inadequate, not equivalent to their former positions and depriving them of any career advancement. |
| 3274 |
Eurocontrol |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complaint about a post reclassification resulting from an administrative reform was dismissed by the Tribunal. |
| 3273 |
EPO |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to place his post in a certain grade group following an allegedly flawed assessment process. |
| 3272 |
CTBTO PrepCom |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainant successfully challenges the decision not to appoint her to a vacant post due to procedural flaw and violation of her right to due process. |
| 3271 |
Eurocontrol |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The application for interpretation of Judgment 2938 is rejected by the Tribunal, while the application for execution of the same judgment is allowed. |
| 3270 |
WIPO |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the date on which her classification in grade G5 took effect. |
| 3269 |
WIPO |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainant alleges that she was submitted to harassment and denounces flaws in the inquiry relating to her harassment allegations. |
| 3268 |
EPO |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainant successfully impugns the establishment of a staff report containing negative comments. |
| 3267 |
WIPO |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainant impugned the decision not to waive the time limit for lodging an internal appeal, claiming that his heavy workload constituted an exceptional circumstance justifying the grant of a waiver. |
| 3266 |
WIPO |
EN, FR |
EN, FR |
| | The complainant successfully challenged the decision not to promote him on the ground that the standard used was too demanding (exceptional performance). |
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4 | next >
|
