EPO - European Patent Organisation
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 | next >
| Judgment No. |
Session No. |
Full text |
| 4443 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant argues that the President’s withdrawal of the final decision on his appeal was unlawful, that the referral of the appeal back to the Appeals Committee was equally unlawful, and that the Tribunal was wrong in considering the list of withdrawn decisions which had been provided, without consulting him, by the EPO. |
| 4442 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant filed an application for review of Judgment 4329. |
| 4435 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant, who is a former permanent employee of the European Patent Office, challenges the deductions from his remuneration that were made in respect of his absences for strike participation as well as the lawfulness of the general normative decisions on which those deductions were based. |
| 4434 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants challenge the refusal to organise a strike ballot under the new rules governing the exercise of the right to strike at the European Patent Office. |
| 4433 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to treat his participation in a strike as an unauthorised absence. |
| 4432 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to accept only part of the recommendations of the Appeals Committee on his appeal against the postponement of a strike ballot by the President of the European Patent Office. |
| 4431 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges a decision of the Administrative Council introducing new rules for employees of the European Patent Office concerning the right to strike. |
| 4430 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants challenge the new rules governing the exercise of the right to strike at the European Patent Office. |
| 4429 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants challenge a statement of the President of the European Patent Office alleging defamation. |
| 4428 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the refusal of her request to combine a half day of absence for strike participation with a half day of leave. |
| 4427 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to maintain his transfer to a patent examiner post. |
| 4426 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision not to retroactively promote her while she was on sick leave. |
| 4425 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant impugns the decision to reject her request for reimbursement of the cost of her spa cure as a type A cure undergone for “absolute medical necessity”. |
| 4424 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the outcome of his appeals concerning absences and reduced working hours for medical reasons. |
| 4423 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to consider as irreceivable his request to be entitled to 12 additional days of annual leave pursuant to Article 59(1)(b) of the Service Regulations. |
| 4422 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants are former permanent employees of the European Patent Office who challenge their January 2014 and subsequent payslips showing an increase in their pension contributions. |
| 4421 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the deductions made from her remuneration in respect of her absences due to participation in strikes. |
| 4420 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the Organisation’s refusal to recalculate his reckonable previous experience. |
| 4419 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants contest the appointment of members of the General Advisory Committee in 2012 and 2013. |
| 4418 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainants challenge the Administration’s failure to respect the statutory time limit for the submission of documents to the General Advisory Committee for the purposes of consultation prior to the adoption of a New Pension Scheme and a corresponding Salary Savings Plan for employees taking up their duties with the EPO on or after 1 January 2009. |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48 | next >
|
