ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations
ILO-en-strap
Site Map | Contact français
> Home > Triblex: case-law database > By thesaurus keyword

Interveners (847,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Interveners
Total judgments found: 3

  • Judgment 4249


    129th Session, 2020
    International Labour Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainants contest the implementation of the 2013 comprehensive local salary survey for New Delhi, India.

    Consideration 8

    Extract:

    A number of individuals applied to intervene in these proceedings. As the proceedings have been unsuccessful, the applications to intervene should be dismissed.

    Keywords:

    interveners; intervention; intervention by an individual not admitted;



  • Judgment 4160


    128th Session, 2019
    World Intellectual Property Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant seeks a redefinition of his employment relationship.

    Consideration 16

    Extract:

    Without excluding on principle the possibility of issuing an order of this type against interveners in proceedings, the Tribunal will not accept WIPO’s claim in this case. While the filing of these applications to intervene, which were bound to be dismissed, just before the case was included on the list for the session is surprising, this unfortunate procedural initiative cannot nevertheless be regarded as constituting a clear abuse of procedure.

    Keywords:

    costs; counterclaim; interveners;



  • Judgment 4159


    128th Session, 2019
    World Intellectual Property Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant seeks a redefinition of his employment relationship and the setting aside of the decision not to renew his last contract of employment.

    Consideration 17

    Extract:

    Without excluding on principle the possibility of issuing an order of this type against interveners in proceedings, the Tribunal will not accept WIPO’s claim in this case. While the filing of these applications to intervene, which were bound to be dismissed, just before the case was included on the list for the session is surprising, this unfortunate procedural initiative cannot nevertheless be regarded as constituting a clear abuse of procedure.

    Keywords:

    costs; counterclaim; interveners;


 
Last updated: 27.10.2020 ^ top