ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations
ILO-en-strap
Site Map | Contact français
> Home > Triblex: case-law database > By thesaurus keyword

Intervention (70, 804, 805, 806, 807, 808, 809, 810, 811,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Intervention
Total judgments found: 67

1, 2, 3, 4 | next >

  • Judgment 4249


    129th Session, 2020
    International Labour Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainants contest the implementation of the 2013 comprehensive local salary survey for New Delhi, India.

    Consideration 8

    Extract:

    A number of individuals applied to intervene in these proceedings. As the proceedings have been unsuccessful, the applications to intervene should be dismissed.

    Keywords:

    interveners; intervention; intervention by an individual not admitted;



  • Judgment 4195


    128th Session, 2019
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainants challenge the decision to modify the conditions governing sickness insurance for employees’ spouses.

    Consideration 12

    Extract:

    Given that these joined complaints will be dismissed because they are unfounded, the applications to intervene must also be dismissed.

    Keywords:

    intervention;



  • Judgment 4135


    128th Session, 2019
    World Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainants challenge the decision to apply to their salaries the post adjustment multiplier determined by the ICSC on the basis of its 2016 cost-of-living survey for Geneva, with the result that their salaries were reduced.

    Consideration 5

    Extract:

    There are 90 applications to intervene [...]. WHO argues that a number of the interveners are not in the same position of fact and law as the complainants and they should not be permitted to intervene. The identified differences appear to be that some of these interveners did not seek a review of the impugned decisions or, alternatively, did but then failed to lodge a complaint with the Tribunal. These arguments should be rejected. The threshold for intervention created by Article 13, paragraph 1, of the Rules of the Tribunal is that the intervener “is in a situation in fact and in law similar to that of the complainant” (emphasis added). That is undoubtedly true in the present case. Moreover the failure to exhaust internal remedies (either in whole or part) is not a disentitling factor (see Judgment 2236, consideration 13) nor is the failure to pursue a complaint in the Tribunal. Indeed, had that happened, intervention would not have been possible. The interventions are allowed.

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT reference: Article 13, paragraph 1, of the Rules
    ILOAT Judgment(s): 2236

    Keywords:

    intervention;



  • Judgment 4119


    127th Session, 2019
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant contests the decision of the President of the Office to amend the wording of a circular in respect of the age limit for the payment of a dependants’ allowance.

    Consideration 5

    Extract:

    Given that this complaint will be dismissed because it is irreceivable, the applications to intervene will also be dismissed.

    Keywords:

    intervention; intervention by an individual not admitted;



  • Judgment 4035


    126th Session, 2018
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant accuses her former supervisor of moral harassment.

    Consideration 14

    Extract:

    Mr E. Z. has submitted an application to intervene in this case. However, under Article 13, paragraph 1, of the Rules of the Tribunal, the sole purpose of such an application is to obtain an order that a judgment on a complaint shall apply to an official who is in a similar situation in fact and in law to the complainant. In this case, however, neither the fact that Mr E. Z. lodged an internal complaint against the Director of the Office for similar conduct to that alleged by the complainant nor the fact that he lodged another internal complaint on the complainant’s behalf supports a finding that he is in a similar situation in fact and in law to the complainant which would justify ordering that this judgment be applied to him. His application to intervene will therefore be dismissed.

    Keywords:

    intervention;



  • Judgment 4028


    126th Session, 2018
    International Telecommunication Union
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainants challenge Service Order No.14/10 changing the health insurance scheme at the ITU, as well as individual decisions implementing that service order.

    Consideration 16

    Extract:

    Several applications to intervene have been filed. The procedural flaw affecting the internal appeal of Ms D. and Mr D. concerns only these two complainants. As the remaining pleas have been dismissed, the applications to intervene must also be dismissed.

    Keywords:

    intervention;



  • Judgment 4003


    126th Session, 2018
    International Criminal Court
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant seeks compensation for damages related to her arrest and detention in Libya while on an official mission.

    Consideration 18

    Extract:

    Since the complainant succeeds, she is entitled to an award of costs, as is Mr P. L., whose application to intervene is allowed. The Tribunal sets the award of costs for Mr P. L. at 500 euros as he was not represented by a lawyer and did not need to provide extensive submissions in his application to intervene. The complainant, considering the complexity of the case, is awarded costs in the amount of 20,000 euros.

    Keywords:

    costs awarded; intervention;

    Consideration 12

    Extract:

    The application to intervene of Mr P. L. is allowed insofar as it relates to the claim of breach of the organization’s duty of care and was accepted by the ICC. Mr K.’s application to intervene is rejected as he is not in a similar situation in fact and in law to that of the complainant, inasmuch as the complainant filed a timely claim for compensation whereas Mr K. did not.

    Keywords:

    intervention;



  • Judgment 3941


    125th Session, 2018
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges a Circular that implements amendments to the Rules of the Medical Benefits Fund.

    Consideration 7

    Extract:

    As the interveners are in the same position in fact and in law as the complainant, their applications to intervene are accepted and they are also entitled to moral damages.

    Keywords:

    intervention; moral injury;



  • Judgment 3908


    125th Session, 2018
    International Criminal Court
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant contests the decision to abolish his post and terminate his appointment.

    Consideration 22

    Extract:

    There are three applications to intervene. Two of the applicants signed separation agreements agreeing not to contest the terms of the agreement. This is a material factual and, potentially, legal difference which justifies refusal of the applications to intervene. The third applicant has separate proceedings ongoing before the Tribunal challenging the termination of employment. Intervention in the present proceedings is not, in those circumstances, warranted. The applications to intervene are dismissed.

    Keywords:

    intervention;



  • Judgment 3761


    123rd Session, 2017
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainants challenge a circular that implements amendments to the Rules of the Medical Benefits Fund.

    Consideration 15

    Extract:

    As the interveners are in the same position in fact and in law as the complainants, their applications to intervene are accepted and they are also entitled to moral damages.

    Keywords:

    intervention; moral injury;



  • Judgment 3522


    120th Session, 2015
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainants contest the lawfulness of two communiqués suspending the application of a circular on the protection of the dignity of staff.

    Judgement keywords

    Keywords:

    complaint allowed; decision quashed; intervention; joinder; respect for dignity; staff representative;



  • Judgment 3520


    120th Session, 2015
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the appointment of eight directors within the EPO.

    Judgment keywords

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 3513

    Keywords:

    appointment; complaint dismissed; intervention;



  • Judgment 3514


    120th Session, 2015
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant, who was an Ombudsman contact person, contests the attitude of the President who, he considers, interfered with the Ombudsman's independence.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    complaint allowed; decision quashed; independence; intervention; ombudsman;



  • Judgment 3495


    120th Session, 2015
    European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the fact that she was not promoted in the 2012 promotion exercise.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    complaint dismissed; intervention; promotion;



  • Judgment 3429


    119th Session, 2015
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The Tribunal dismissed the complaint but awarded damages to the complainant because of the delay in the appeals procedure.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    administrative delay; complaint allowed; intervention; moral injury; removal expenses;



  • Judgment 3427


    119th Session, 2015
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainants unsuccessfully challenge a series of decisions concerning pension issues, those being decisions of general application.

    Consideration 38

    Extract:

    Numerous applications to intervene were filed with the Tribunal. As all the complaints will be dismissed, the applications to intervene will also be dismissed.

    Keywords:

    intervention;



  • Judgment 3411


    119th Session, 2015
    International Fund for Agricultural Development
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainants successfully impugn the decision not to extend their contracts upon expiry.

    Consideration 10

    Extract:

    "Of the initial ten applications to intervene, six have been withdrawn. As the remaining four interveners are in a similar legal situation to that of the complainants, they must be granted the benefit of the rights recognised by this judgment (see Judgment 2985, under 28). The interveners are legally represented and they are entitled to costs."

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 2985

    Keywords:

    costs; intervention;



  • Judgment 3375


    118th Session, 2014
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant claims, on the basis of an alleged acquired right, the application of the invalidity pension scheme in force prior to his placement on non-active status on grounds of invalidity.

    Consideration 5

    Extract:

    "The Tribunal dismisses the applications to intervene. This is because, in the capacities in which the applicants filed them, their factual and legal positions are neither identical nor similar to those of the complainant."

    Keywords:

    intervention;



  • Judgment 3369


    118th Session, 2014
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant impugns the application of deductions to her dependant’s allowance for participation in a strike and the amount deducted from most elements of her remuneration.

    Consideration 20

    Extract:

    "Applications to intervene were filed by three EPO employees. [...] It may be deduced from the defendant’s comments that the three employees in question have never worked on a part time basis. As their situation in fact and in law thus differs from that of the complainant, the present judgment cannot affect them. It follows that the applications to intervene must be dismissed as irreceivable (see, for example, Judgments 2190, under 10, 2237, under 10, or 3212, under 11)."

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 2190, 2237, 3212

    Keywords:

    intervention;



  • Judgment 3034


    111th Session, 2011
    European Organisation for the Safety of Air Navigation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 44

    Extract:

    The interveners who filed transfer applications as a safeguard and who are thus in a similar legal situation to that of the complainants referred to in consideration 41 [...] shall be granted the rights conferred on the latter by the present judgment. The Agency must carry out the requisite checks with regard to the intervener who claims to be in this category, but whose applications do not appear to be in its records. The person concerned shall assist it in this matter.

    Keywords:

    intervention;

1, 2, 3, 4 | next >


 
Last updated: 02.07.2020 ^ top