ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations
ILO-en-strap
Site Map | Contact français
> Home > Triblex: case-law database > By thesaurus keyword

Selection procedure (660,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Selection procedure
Total judgments found: 86

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5



  • Judgment 1549


    81st Session, 1996
    International Atomic Energy Agency
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 11

    Extract:

    "When an organisation wants to fill a post by competition it must comply with the material rules and the general precepts of the case law."

    Keywords:

    appointment; case law; competition; due process; general principle; international civil service principles; organisation's duties; post; selection procedure; staff regulations and rules;

    Consideration 13

    Extract:

    "The purpose of competition is to let everyone who wants a post compete for it equally. So precedent demands scrupulous compliance with the rules announced beforehand: patere legem quam ipse fecisti."

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 107, 729, 1071, 1077, 1158, 1223, 1359

    Keywords:

    appointment; case law; competition; due process; equal treatment; organisation's duties; patere legem; selection procedure; staff regulations and rules; vacancy;

    Consideration 13

    Extract:

    "Although an organisation [may consider] late applicants, it must, whenever a competition is required or desired, announce a new deadline in the same way as it did the vacancy. It will then commit no breach of equality and the competition will be seen as fair."

    Keywords:

    appointment; candidate; competition; delay; due process; equal treatment; internal candidate; new time limit; organisation's duties; receivability of the complaint; selection procedure; time limit; vacancy; vacancy notice;



  • Judgment 1436


    79th Session, 1995
    International Telecommunication Union
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 6

    Extract:

    "As was said for example in Judgment 1223, the Tribunal will not interfere with comparison of candidates in a competition. Only when it appears that the choice rests on a mistake of fact or law or that there has probably been misuse of authority will the Tribunal order the defendant to produce further evidence so that it may review such comparison."

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 1223

    Keywords:

    abuse of power; burden of proof; candidate; case law; competition; due process; evidence; further submissions; judicial review; mistake of fact; misuse of authority; presumption of innocence; qualifications; selection procedure;



  • Judgment 1077


    70th Session, 1991
    Pan American Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 10

    Extract:

    There was a further potential flaw in the process. Since the candidates had to write their names on the test papers, the person in charge of quantifying the results would, had she marked the papers, have been aware of their identity, and there would have been a risk that the examiner might, even involuntarily, be influenced by knowing the candidates. The process of evaluation must not only be fair, as provision 344 requires, but also be seen to be fair.

    Keywords:

    candidate; competition; flaw; impartiality; selection procedure;



  • Judgment 619


    53rd Session, 1984
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 8

    Extract:

    "The Tribunal is not competent to compare the candidates' merits; it will merely determine whether there was any prejudice in the impugned decision. There is no reason to suppose that in preferring [Mrs. X] the FAO was actuated by any considerations other than merit. Indeed its impartiality is borne out by the fact that [...] the majority of the selection board were in favour of the successful candidate."

    Keywords:

    appointment; competition; selection procedure; vacancy;



  • Judgment 556


    50th Session, 1983
    International Labour Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 4

    Extract:

    The complainant is not entitled to consult any record of discussion by the Selection Board. "Members of selection boards would not feel free to discuss candidates independently in future if they were at risk of having their personal views divulged."

    Keywords:

    competition; confidential evidence; disclosure of evidence; interlocutory order; order; report; request by a party; selection board; selection procedure;



  • Judgment 174


    26th Session, 1971
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Preamble

    Extract:

    The complainant contests an appointment made to fill a vacancy. The person appointed to the post is regarded as co-defendant. "Considering [...] the observations made by [Mr X] who was notified of the complaint on the decision of the President of the Tribunal[...]"

    Keywords:

    appointment; candidate; co-defendant; selection procedure; vacancy;

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5


 
Last updated: 07.12.2021 ^ top