ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations
ILO-en-strap
Site Map | Contact français
> Home > Triblex: case-law database > By thesaurus keyword

Application for execution (5,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Application for execution
Total judgments found: 104

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 | next >

  • Judgment 4413


    132nd Session, 2021
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant filed an application for execution of Judgments 3887 and 3986, and the EPO filed an application for interpretation and execution of Judgment 3887, as clarified by Judgment 3986.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    application filed by the organisation; application for execution; execution of judgment;

    Consideration 10

    Extract:

    The application for interpretation filed by the EPO, as based on the impossibility to execute Judgments 3887 and 3986, raises a threshold issue. The Tribunal finds that the two facts reported above under consideration 7 and proven by the EPO, have rendered impossible the complete execution of the two judgments. In the unusual circumstances of this case, the Tribunal will make no further orders for the execution of Judgments 3887 and 3986. Firstly, forcing Mr B. to undergo a medical examination would impair his fundamental rights to dignity and health. Secondly, the refusal of psychiatric experts to carry out an examination only on the basis of documents was an objective obstacle that made it impossible to fully execute the judgments. Neither of these obstacles can be attributed to the EPO. Accordingly, the Tribunal finds that the EPO could do nothing more to execute the judgments, and Mr Blondel’s application for execution must be dismissed.

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 3887, 3986

    Keywords:

    application for execution; execution of judgment; medical opinion;



  • Judgment 4410


    132nd Session, 2021
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant filed an application for execution of Judgment 4065.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    application for execution; complaint dismissed;

    Consideration 5

    Extract:

    [T]he pleadings of the parties in the present proceedings show that they still hold differing views as to what should be done as the next step to complete the process by complying with the discussion mandated in Manual paragraph 330.3.26. This does not provide a basis for the Tribunal to entertain an application for the execution.

    Keywords:

    application for execution;

    Consideration 5

    Extract:

    [A]s it is not open to the Tribunal, when examining an application for execution, to modify the content of the provisions of the judgment in respect of which the application is made (Judgment 4093, consideration 9).

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 4093

    Keywords:

    application for execution;



  • Judgment 4409


    132nd Session, 2021
    Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant filed an application for interpretation of Judgment 4215.

    Considerations 3-5

    Extract:

    It should be noted that OTIF, by a decision adopted by its Administrative Committee at its session on 27 and 28 June 2017 and notified by its Secretary General to the Director-General of the International Labour Office (ILO) by a letter of 17 January 2018, has withdrawn its recognition of the Tribunal’s jurisdiction.
    In accordance with the Tribunal’s case law, as set out in Judgments 1043, consideration 3, and 4141, considerations 2 to 4, that withdrawal took effect on the date of the deliberation of the Governing Body of the ILO taking note of the decision in question, which in the present case took place on 13 March 2018.
    Although the Tribunal had jurisdiction to rule on the complaint that gave rise to Judgment 4215, which had been filed before that date and which OTIF had expressly excluded from the scope of its withdrawal decision, since that date, the Tribunal has no longer been competent to hear new complaints against that Organisation.
    However, it must be considered that, where, as in this case, the Tribunal has delivered a judgment on a complaint against an international organisation which has since withdrawn from the Tribunal’s jurisdiction, it nevertheless remains competent to hear any applications for interpretation of that judgment. The Tribunal is, by definition, the only body capable of interpreting its judgments, should that be necessary. For similar reasons, the Tribunal also remains competent to hear applications for execution or review that may be brought in respect of a judgment delivered in the same circumstances.
    Notwithstanding the date on which it was filed, this application does therefore fall within the Tribunal’s jurisdiction, and it is noted that the Organisation does not raise any objections on this point in its reply.

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 1043, 4141, 4215

    Keywords:

    application for execution; application for interpretation; application for review; competence of tribunal;



  • Judgment 4387


    131st Session, 2021
    World Intellectual Property Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainants filed applications for execution of Judgment 4155.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    application for execution; complaint dismissed;



  • Judgment 4324


    130th Session, 2020
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The applicant seeks execution in full of Judgments 3045 and 3792 and recognition that the disease which led to his invalidity status is occupational.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    application for execution; complaint dismissed; illness; service-incurred;



  • Judgment 4315


    130th Session, 2020
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant applies for execution of Judgment 3962.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    application for execution; complaint dismissed;



  • Judgment 4294


    130th Session, 2020
    International Criminal Court
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant applies for execution of Judgment 3905.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    application for execution; complaint dismissed;



  • Judgment 4284


    130th Session, 2020
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant asks the Tribunal to find that UNESCO has failed to execute Judgment 3936 and to order the Organization to review her case.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    application for execution; complaint allowed;

    Consideration 5

    Extract:

    The Tribunal recalls that its judgments, which, according to Article VI of its Statute, are “final and without appeal” and which also have res judicata authority, are immediately operative (see, for example, Judgments 3003, under 12, and 3152, under 11). As they may not later be called into question except when an application for review is allowed, they must be executed as ruled (see, for example, Judgments 3566, under 6, and 3635, under 4). The parties must work together in good faith to execute judgments (see, for example, Judgments 2684, under 6, and 3823, under 4). Judgments must be executed within a reasonable period of time (see Judgments 2684, under aforementioned consideration 6, and 3656, under 3). In order to ascertain whether that has occurred, all the circumstances of the case must be taken into account, especially the nature and the scope of the action which the organisation is required to take (see, in particular, Judgment 3066, under 6).

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 2684, 3003, 3066, 3152, 3566, 3635, 3656, 3823

    Keywords:

    application for execution; execution of judgment;



  • Judgment 4248


    129th Session, 2020
    International Labour Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant filed an application for execution of Judgment 3446.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    application for execution; complaint allowed; invalidity; medical examination; professional accident;



  • Judgment 4235


    129th Session, 2020
    World Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant filed an application for interpretation and execution of Judgment 4093.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    application for execution; application for interpretation; complaint dismissed;



  • Judgment 4214


    129th Session, 2020
    Energy Charter Conference
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant filed an application for execution of Judgment 4008.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    application for execution; cause of action; complaint dismissed; selection procedure;



  • Judgment 4202


    128th Session, 2019
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant filed an application for execution of Judgments 3887 and 3986 and contests the implied rejection of his request for the execution of those judgments.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    application for execution; complaint dismissed; res judicata; summary procedure;



  • Judgment 4093


    127th Session, 2019
    World Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant filed an application for execution of Judgment 3689.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    application for execution; complaint allowed; illness;

    Consideration 3

    Extract:

    [T]he Tribunal’s judgments, which, under Article VI of its Statute, are “final and without appeal” and which, furthermore, have res judicata authority, are immediately operative (see, for example, Judgments 3003, consideration 12, and 3152, consideration 11). As they may not later be called into question except when an application for review is allowed, they must be executed by the parties as ruled (see, for example, Judgments 3566, consideration 6, and 3635, consideration 4). The parties must work together in good faith to execute judgments (see, for example, Judgments 2684, consideration 6, and 3823, consideration 4).

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 2684, 3003, 3152, 3566, 3635, 3823

    Keywords:

    application for execution; good faith; res judicata;



  • Judgment 4092


    127th Session, 2019
    World Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant asks the Tribunal to order WHO to comply with the obligations imposed on it by Judgment 3871 and, in particular, to reinstate him with all legal consequences.

    Consideration 10

    Extract:

    The complainant presents, for the first time in his rejoinder, various claims for compensation for injuries that he considers he has suffered as a result of WHO’s conduct. However, according to the Tribunal’s case law, a complainant may not, in her or his rejoinder, enter new claims not contained in the original complaint (see, for example, Judgments 960, consideration 8, 1768, consideration 5, and 2996, consideration 6). This case law also applies to applications for execution (see Judgment 3207, consideration 6). These new claims must therefore be dismissed.

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 960, 1768, 2996, 3207

    Keywords:

    application for execution; new claim; rejoinder;

    Consideration 4

    Extract:

    It should be recalled that the Tribunal’s judgments, which according to Article VI of its Statute are “final and without appeal” and which have res judicata authority, are immediately operative (see, for example, Judgments 3003, consideration 12, and 3152, consideration 11). As they may not later be called into question except when an application for review is allowed, they must be executed by the parties as ruled (see, for example, Judgments 3566, consideration 6, and 3635, consideration 4). The parties must work together in good faith to execute the judgment (see, for example, Judgments 2684, consideration 6, and 3823, consideration 4).

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 2684, 3003, 3152, 3566, 3635, 3823

    Keywords:

    application for execution; good faith; res judicata;

    Judgment keywords

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 3871

    Keywords:

    application for execution; complaint allowed; reinstatement;



  • Judgment 4079


    127th Session, 2019
    Universal Postal Union
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The UPU filed an application for interpretation and review of Judgment 3930 and the complainant in that case filed an application for execution of that judgment.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    abolition of post; application filed by the organisation; application for execution; application for interpretation; application for review; complaint allowed; permanent appointment; termination of employment;



  • Judgment 4078


    127th Session, 2019
    Universal Postal Union
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The UPU filed an application for interpretation and review of Judgment 3929 and the complainant in that case filed an application for execution of that judgment.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    abolition of post; application filed by the organisation; application for execution; application for interpretation; application for review; complaint allowed; fixed-term; termination of employment;



  • Judgment 4077


    127th Session, 2019
    Universal Postal Union
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The UPU applies for interpretation and review of Judgment 3928 alleging errors of fact, inter alia, and asserts that it is impossible to give effect to the Tribunal’s order to reinstate the complainant. The complainant applies for execution of Judgment 3928.

    Consideration 23

    Extract:

    The Tribunal recalls that an application for review does not suspend the execution of the judgment (see Judgment 1620, consideration 7).

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 1620

    Keywords:

    application for execution; application for review; suspension of the execution of a judgment;

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    abolition of post; application filed by the organisation; application for execution; application for interpretation; application for review; complaint allowed; reinstatement;



  • Judgment 4076


    127th Session, 2019
    Universal Postal Union
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The UPU filed and application for interpretation and review of Judgment 3927 and the complainant in that case filed an application for execution of that judgment.

    Judgment keywords

    Keywords:

    application filed by the organisation; application for execution; application for interpretation; application for review; complaint allowed; disciplinary procedure; suspension of the execution of a judgment;



  • Judgment 4044


    126th Session, 2018
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant has filed an application for execution of Judgment 3695.

    Judgment keywords

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 3695

    Keywords:

    application for execution; complaint dismissed;



  • Judgment 3989


    126th Session, 2018
    European Patent Organisation
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The EPO has filed an application for interpretation of Judgment 3972.

    Consideration 5

    Extract:

    The other questions entail, in substance, a request for an advisory opinion from the Tribunal [...]. However, it is not for the Tribunal to advise the parties with any particularity about what they should do or refrain from doing and whether a proposed course of conduct is in conformity with, or violates, provisions in the Service Regulations. In the event that either party, and the EPO in particular because it is amenable to proceedings against it in a further complaint or other proceedings, behaves unlawfully, the conduct is open to review.

    Keywords:

    application for execution; competence of tribunal;

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 | next >


 
Last updated: 15.09.2021 ^ top