|
|
 |
|
|
Application for execution (5,-666)
You searched for:
Keywords: Application for execution
Total judgments found: 100
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | next >
Judgment 4324
130th Session, 2020
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: Le requérant demande l’exécution intégrale des jugements 3045 et 3792 ainsi que la reconnaissance de la nature professionnelle de la maladie à l’origine de sa mise en invalidité.
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint dismissed; illness; service-incurred;
Judgment 4315
130th Session, 2020
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant applies for execution of Judgment 3962.
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint dismissed;
Judgment 4294
130th Session, 2020
International Criminal Court
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant applies for execution of Judgment 3905.
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint dismissed;
Judgment 4284
130th Session, 2020
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: La requérante demande au Tribunal de constater la «défaillance» de l’UNESCO dans l’exécution du jugement 3936 et d’ordonner à celle-ci de procéder au réexamen de son affaire.
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint allowed;
Extract:
Le Tribunal rappelle que ses jugements, qui sont, en vertu de l’article VI de son Statut, «définitifs et sans appel» et sont, en outre, revêtus de l’autorité de la chose jugée, présentent un caractère immédiatement exécutoire (voir, par exemple, les jugements 3003, au considérant 12, et 3152, au considérant 11). Ne pouvant, hors l’hypothèse d’admission d’un recours en révision, être ultérieurement remis en cause, ils doivent être exécutés tels qu’ils ont été prononcés (voir, par exemple, les jugements 3566, au considérant 6, et 3635, au considérant 4). Les parties sont tenues de collaborer de bonne foi à cette exécution (voir, par exemple, les jugements 2684, au considérant 6, et 3823, au considérant 4). Cette exécution doit intervenir dans des délais raisonnables (voir les jugements 2684, au considérant 6 précité, et 3656, au considérant 3). Pour déterminer si tel a été le cas, il faut tenir compte de l’ensemble des circonstances de l’espèce et, en particulier, de la nature et de l’ampleur de l’activité exigée de l’organisation (voir, notamment, le jugement 3066, au considérant 6).
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 2684, 3003, 3066, 3152, 3566, 3635, 3656, 3823
Keywords:
application for execution; execution of judgment;
Judgment 4248
129th Session, 2020
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant filed an application for execution of Judgment 3446.
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint allowed; invalidity; medical examination; professional accident;
Judgment 4235
129th Session, 2020
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant filed an application for interpretation and execution of Judgment 4093.
Keywords:
application for execution; application for interpretation; complaint dismissed;
Judgment 4214
129th Session, 2020
Energy Charter Conference
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant filed an application for execution of Judgment 4008.
Keywords:
application for execution; cause of action; complaint dismissed; selection procedure;
Judgment 4202
128th Session, 2019
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant filed an application for execution of Judgments 3887 and 3986 and contests the implied rejection of his request for the execution of those judgments.
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint dismissed; res judicata; summary procedure;
Judgment 4093
127th Session, 2019
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant filed an application for execution of Judgment 3689.
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint allowed; illness;
Extract:
[T]he Tribunal’s judgments, which, under Article VI of its Statute, are “final and without appeal” and which, furthermore, have res judicata authority, are immediately operative (see, for example, Judgments 3003, consideration 12, and 3152, consideration 11). As they may not later be called into question except when an application for review is allowed, they must be executed by the parties as ruled (see, for example, Judgments 3566, consideration 6, and 3635, consideration 4). The parties must work together in good faith to execute judgments (see, for example, Judgments 2684, consideration 6, and 3823, consideration 4).
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 2684, 3003, 3152, 3566, 3635, 3823
Keywords:
application for execution; good faith; res judicata;
Judgment 4092
127th Session, 2019
World Health Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant asks the Tribunal to order WHO to comply with the obligations imposed on it by Judgment 3871 and, in particular, to reinstate him with all legal consequences.
Extract:
The complainant presents, for the first time in his rejoinder, various claims for compensation for injuries that he considers he has suffered as a result of WHO’s conduct. However, according to the Tribunal’s case law, a complainant may not, in her or his rejoinder, enter new claims not contained in the original complaint (see, for example, Judgments 960, consideration 8, 1768, consideration 5, and 2996, consideration 6). This case law also applies to applications for execution (see Judgment 3207, consideration 6). These new claims must therefore be dismissed.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 960, 1768, 2996, 3207
Keywords:
application for execution; new claim; rejoinder;
Extract:
It should be recalled that the Tribunal’s judgments, which according to Article VI of its Statute are “final and without appeal” and which have res judicata authority, are immediately operative (see, for example, Judgments 3003, consideration 12, and 3152, consideration 11). As they may not later be called into question except when an application for review is allowed, they must be executed by the parties as ruled (see, for example, Judgments 3566, consideration 6, and 3635, consideration 4). The parties must work together in good faith to execute the judgment (see, for example, Judgments 2684, consideration 6, and 3823, consideration 4).
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 2684, 3003, 3152, 3566, 3635, 3823
Keywords:
application for execution; good faith; res judicata;
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3871
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint allowed; reinstatement;
Judgment 4079
127th Session, 2019
Universal Postal Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The UPU filed an application for interpretation and review of Judgment 3930 and the complainant in that case filed an application for execution of that judgment.
Keywords:
abolition of post; application filed by the organisation; application for execution; application for interpretation; application for review; complaint allowed; permanent appointment; termination of employment;
Judgment 4078
127th Session, 2019
Universal Postal Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The UPU filed an application for interpretation and review of Judgment 3929 and the complainant in that case filed an application for execution of that judgment.
Keywords:
abolition of post; application filed by the organisation; application for execution; application for interpretation; application for review; complaint allowed; fixed-term; termination of employment;
Judgment 4077
127th Session, 2019
Universal Postal Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The UPU applies for interpretation and review of Judgment 3928 alleging errors of fact, inter alia, and asserts that it is impossible to give effect to the Tribunal’s order to reinstate the complainant. The complainant applies for execution of Judgment 3928.
Extract:
The Tribunal recalls that an application for review does not suspend the execution of the judgment (see Judgment 1620, consideration 7).
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 1620
Keywords:
application for execution; application for review; suspension of the execution of a judgment;
Keywords:
abolition of post; application filed by the organisation; application for execution; application for interpretation; application for review; complaint allowed; reinstatement;
Judgment 4076
127th Session, 2019
Universal Postal Union
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The UPU filed and application for interpretation and review of Judgment 3927 and the complainant in that case filed an application for execution of that judgment.
Keywords:
application filed by the organisation; application for execution; application for interpretation; application for review; complaint allowed; disciplinary procedure; suspension of the execution of a judgment;
Judgment 4044
126th Session, 2018
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for execution of Judgment 3695.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3695
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint dismissed;
Judgment 3989
126th Session, 2018
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The EPO has filed an application for interpretation of Judgment 3972.
Extract:
The other questions entail, in substance, a request for an advisory opinion from the Tribunal [...]. However, it is not for the Tribunal to advise the parties with any particularity about what they should do or refrain from doing and whether a proposed course of conduct is in conformity with, or violates, provisions in the Service Regulations. In the event that either party, and the EPO in particular because it is amenable to proceedings against it in a further complaint or other proceedings, behaves unlawfully, the conduct is open to review.
Keywords:
application for execution; competence of tribunal;
Judgment 3986
126th Session, 2018
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for execution of Judgment 3887.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3887
Keywords:
application for execution;
Judgment 3985
126th Session, 2018
International Labour Organization
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainants have filed an application for execution of Judgment 3883 and the ILO has filed an application for interpretation of that judgment.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3883
Keywords:
application filed by the organisation; application for execution; application for interpretation; complaint dismissed;
Judgment 3895
125th Session, 2018
European Patent Organisation
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for interpretation and execution of Judgment 3694.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3694
Keywords:
application for execution; application for interpretation; complaint dismissed;
Judgment 3826
124th Session, 2017
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Extracts: EN,
FR
Full Judgment Text: EN,
FR
Summary: The complainant has filed an application for execution of Judgment 3593.
Reference(s)
ILOAT Judgment(s): 3593
Keywords:
application for execution; complaint dismissed;
1, 2, 3, 4, 5 | next >
|
|
|
|
|
