Judgment of the Tribunal (120, 22, 23, 121, 122, 123, 690, 871, 124, 125, 126, 842, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 127, 133, 134, 745, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 672, 825, 826, 140, 315, 644, 650, 676, 689, 692, 693, 665, 740, 886, 914,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Judgment of the Tribunal
Total judgments found: 144

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8

• Judgment 51

  
  8th Session, 1960
  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 6

  Extract:

  "The intervenors hold the same rights as the complainant and therefore their intervention must be declared receivable and the benefit of this judgment extended to them."

  Keywords:

  consequence; effect; intervention; judgment of the tribunal; receivability of the complaint;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 27

  
  6th Session, 1957
  International Telecommunication Union
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Consideration 1

  Extract:

  "The facts previous to the engagement of the complainant by the defendant organisation have already been the subject of a decision by the United Nations Administrative Tribunal and may therefore not be considered, in keeping with the principle of res judicata pro veritate habetur."

  Keywords:

  judgment of the tribunal; res judicata; unat;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 15

  
  4th Session, 1954
  United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  Considerations

  Extract:

  "The time limit of 15 days statutorily granted to the complainant to file an appeal against [the decision in question] is re-opened as from the date of the present judgment."

  Keywords:

  case sent back to organisation; internal appeal; judgment of the tribunal; new time limit; time limit;
  

  
  
  

• Judgment 13

  
  4th Session, 1954
  Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  Extracts: EN, FR
  Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

  On the substance

  Extract:

  The existence of a secret document vitiates the equitable application of the Regulations and affects both the interests of the staff as a whole and that of justice itself. "Vide, Judgment No. 15 of the United Nations Administrative Tribunal: 'the applicant cannot be penalised because certain information is considered by the respondent as confidential and the applicant has no opportunity either of knowing that the reason is or of challenging it."

  Keywords:

  case law; confidential evidence; disclosure of evidence; flaw; judgment of the tribunal; organisation; refusal; right to reply; unat;
  

< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8