Judgment No. 966

• Organization: European Patent Organisation (EPO)
• Date: 27.06.1989
• Original: Anglais
• Judges: Ducoux, Carroll, Douglas
• Full judgment text (anglais) - Texte intégral du jugement

Decision

THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED.

Consideration 3, Summary

Extract:

The complainant argues that because she had 55 months' seniority at step 11, the upper limit, in her original grade, she should have been granted two further steps on promotion. The Tribunal observes that the Staff Regulations do not provide for the calculation of notional steps in dealing with promotion.

Keywords

top step; promotion; seniority; consequence