Judgment No. 651
THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED.
The complainant maintains that the organization denied him the priority he was entitled to under the reduction-in-force procedure in the Staff Rules. He refers to the existence of five posts, "but he fails to establish that he was qualified for any of them or better qualified than the incumbents. In other words, he has not shown that the conditions for granting him the priority he claims were fulfilled."
vacancy; qualifications; abolition of post; reassignment; priority; termination of employment; condition
The organization "terminated [the complainant] and it did not provide for replacing him: it abolished his post."
abolition of post; condition; definition