L'OIT est une institution spécialisée des Nations-Unies
ILO-fr-strap
Plan du site | Contact English
> Page d'accueil > Triblex: base de données sur la jurisprudence > Par mots-clés du thésaurus > recevabilité de la requête

Jugement n° 4396

Décision

1. The impugned decision dated 15 March 2019 is set aside.
2. The case is remitted to the Appeals Committee on the basis of consideration 14 of this judgment.
3. The EPO shall pay the complainant costs in the amount of 2,000 euros.
4. All other claims are dismissed.

Synthèse

The complainant challenges the decision not to reimburse him the notary fees which he incurred for the certification of his signature on the annual declaration required for recipients of an invalidity allowance.

Mots-clés du jugement

Mots-clés

Requête admise; Recours interne; Renvoi devant l'organisation

Considérant 2

Extrait:

The complainant’s request for oral proceedings is […] rejected, as the Tribunal is sufficiently informed of all aspects of the case to consider it fully on the written submissions and documents which the parties have provided.

Mots-clés

Débat oral

Considérant 7

Extrait:

[A] complainant may not, in her or his rejoinder, enter new claims not contained in the original complaint (see, in particular, Judgment 3086, under 3(d), as well as Judgment 4092, under 10).

Référence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 3086, 4092

Mots-clés

Nouvelle conclusion; Réplique

Considérant 8

Extrait:

The Tribunal’s case law has it that a staff member who challenges an individual decision may, at the same time and in the same appeal, challenge the related underlying decision and that a staff member may, in challenging a decision that affects her or him directly, plead the unlawfulness of any general measure that affords the basis for it in law. A staff member may therefore impugn an administrative decision only if it directly affects her or him, but is not prevented from challenging the lawfulness of the general decision when impugning the implementing decision which generated their cause of action (see Judgment 3291, under 6 and 8).

Référence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 3291

Mots-clés

Décision générale; Intérêt à agir

Considérant 11

Extrait:

[S]ubstantiation or non-substantiation of a claim goes to the merits of the claim. It is not a function of receivability or irreceivability.

Mots-clés

Recevabilité de la requête; Organe de recours interne

Considérant 11

Extrait:

[A]s the complainant has not articulated the effects of the breach of the applicable rules upon him, he will not be awarded the incidental moral damages which he seeks.

Mots-clés

Indemnité pour tort moral

Considérant 12

Extrait:

Notwithstanding that there was unreasonable delay in the internal appeal process, the moral damages which the complainant seeks under this head will not be awarded, as he has not articulated the effects which the delay has caused (see, for example, Judgment 4100, consideration 7).

Référence(s)

Jugement(s) TAOIT: 4100

Mots-clés

Retard dans la procédure interne



 
Dernière mise à jour: 15.04.2021 ^ haut