Judgment No. 4367
The applications for review are dismissed.
The complainant seeks a review of Judgments 4255 and 4256.
application for review; summary procedure; complaint dismissed
Concerning the alleged omission to rule on a claim, the complainant submits that the Tribunal failed to rule on his claim that his complaints were receivable at the time they were filed. However, this is not a claim but a plea inherent to all complaints submitted to the Tribunal, as all complainants necessarily consider that their complaints are receivable. Moreover, once the Tribunal had found that the complaints in question had become without object, there was no reason to deal with the question of their receivability at the time they were filed. Accordingly, this ground for review is rejected.
omission to rule on a claim