Judgment No. 1240

• Organization: International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV)
• Date: 10.02.1993
• Original: Français
• Judges: Carroll, Pescatore, Gentot
• Full judgment text (anglais) - Texte intégral du jugement

Decision

THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED.

Considerations 4-5

Extract:

The complainant objects to the Tribunal's decision in an interlocutory order to dismiss his claims in part. He alleges that "the circumstances of the case prevented him from pleading his case in full. He makes out that the Tribunal cannot have given due account to his pleas and may have committed an error of judgment. Those comments are not admissible. The complainant was given, in keeping with the Rules of Court, the opportunity of stating his views in full [...] so there is no basis for his challenging the authority of the interlocutory order insofar as it made a final ruling on most of his claims."

Keywords

application for review; res judicata; interlocutory order