Judgment No. 1159

• Organization: World Health Organization (WHO)
• Date: 29.01.1992
• Original: Anglais
• Judges: Ducoux, Ruda, Carroll
• Full judgment text (anglais) - Texte intégral du jugement

Decision

THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED.

Consideration 6

Extract:

"As to the lack of proper notice, the Director-General's decision [...] to grant him another two years' appointment affords ample compensation".

Keywords

contract; fixed-term; non-renewal of contract; notice; compensation

Consideration 15

Extract:

WHO Staff Rule 1050.2.3 "distinguishes between holders of a career-service appointment and temporary staff. Whereas the former 'shall be given priorities', the Director-General enjoys discretion to 'establish priority' among the latter. He was therefore under no obligation to give any particular priority to the holder of a temporary appointment like the complainant."

Reference(s)

Organization rules reference: WHO STAFF RULE 1050.2.3

Keywords

organisation's duties; career; contract; fixed-term; priority; discretion