ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations
ILO-en-strap
Site Map | Contact français
> Home > Triblex: case-law database > By thesaurus keyword > discretion

Judgment No. 4370

Decision

The complaint is dismissed.

Summary

The complainant impugns the decision to retire him at the end of the month in which he reached the age of 62, even though he had not completed the five years of contributions required for the payment of a retirement pension by the United Nations Joint Staff Pension Fund.

Judgment keywords

Keywords

retirement age; complaint dismissed

Consideration 8

Extract:

[I]t should be borne in mind that the Tribunal has consistently held that a decision to retain an official beyond the normal retirement age is an exceptional measure over which the executive head of the organisation exercises wide discretion and which is subject to only limited review by the Tribunal (see, for example, Judgment 3884, consideration 2).

Reference(s)

ILOAT Judgment(s): 3884

Keywords

discretion; retirement age

Consideration 10

Extract:

[T]he Tribunal notes that, “[a]lthough the [executive head of an organisation] is empowered to extend a staff member’s appointment [beyond the mandatory retirement age], he is in no case bound to do so. He may exercise that authority to allow an exception only in the interests of [the service], not in the exclusive interests of the staff member. In deciding on the complainant’s case he [has] to bear in mind the possibility that the complainant might obtain a pension, but that [is] only one fact to be taken into account among others” (see Judgment 358). The Tribunal further clarified in Judgment 4037, consideration 11, that “an international organisation’s duty of care towards its officials does not compel it to extend an official’s appointment for the sole purpose of enabling her or him to draw a pension from the UNJSPF”. An organisation is therefore not required to depart from the Staff Regulations in the sole interest of the complainant.

Reference(s)

ILOAT Judgment(s): 358, 4037

Keywords

unjspf; retirement age

Consideration 12

Extract:

[I]nsofar as the impugned decision merely applies the normal rule of mandatory retirement for staff members who have reached the age limit, it cannot be considered that such a decision involves a misuse of authority or that it constitutes a measure which discriminates against the complainant.

Keywords

misuse of authority; discrimination; retirement age; abuse of power



 
Last updated: 19.08.2021 ^ top