A new
pedagogic model at SENAC: polyvalence as a guiding principle
In an effort to meet the challenges of
a context of incessant change, many Latin American and Caribbean vocational training
bodies are prey to an uncertainty that sometimes undermines their potential for
forecasting and reaction. Some of them have opted for staying as close as possible to
their original field of action, i.e. the training of manpower for specific work posts in
the labour market. Others have instead forayed into new terrain and try to meet the needs
of firms and enterprises by expanding non-traditional services such as technical
assistance and consulting services, aiming at increasing productivity, reducing costs,
improving business management, etc.
Vocational training institutions are thus
taking part in the manifold changes that occur in economic, social, cultural and political
spheres; their action goes in new directions at different rates.
Within that picture, the SENAC of Brazil is
no exception and has expanded and diversified the services it offers in connection with
the specific delivery of training. It has carried out a critical analysis of its own past
experience, endeavouring to strike a balance between the two types of services. The
current situation calls for an in-depth review of the pedagogic and methodological basis
upon which actual vocational training activities rest, in order to establish where
reformulation is most urgent in the light of transformations in the organisation of
labour.
Documents embodying the philosophical
conception of SENAC reflect signs of the need to adapt educational action to the changes
having taken place in the world f labour, particularly regarding occupational profiles.
This requires vocational training to extrapolate the specific know-how of a given job.
In that respect, polyvalent training is
the proposal that SENAC considers to be best suited to the training of human resources in
a context of work organisation that changes constantly. Besides taking into account
technical / operational competencies, polyvalent training favours the development of
cognitive, social and communication skills.
For SENAC, permanent education is a
strategy that "(...) trains in the performance of a qualified job cluster and,
above all, teaches to understand the general, social, economic, scientific, technical,
social and economic foundations of production as a whole; it should promote the learning
of generic and specific skills and develop intellectual and aesthetic capacities. In
summary, it should unify theoretical and practical training".
Polyvalent training SENAC
maintains presupposes a wide grounding in general education and calls for a
new relationship between teacher and student through a critical pedagogy favouring
the building up of knowledge.
Another aspect worthy of note is the review
of the concept of work that had pervaded the Institutes educational activities. In
that respect, a new approach has been proposed encouraging critical and creative
attitudes, underlining the human dimension, to make possible the conscious intervention of
individuals in the productive process, and enable them to exert their citizens
rights.
At a time when the social repercussions of
labour transformations are becoming more acute, and large contingents of persons are left
out, the SENAC feels it must reinforce its social role, by offering individuals vocational
information helping them to face the challenges of the new organisation of labour. It
contends that progress in polyvalent training (...) is one more factor to resist the
tendency towards the degradation of work processes.
Adoption of this notion of polyvalence
necessarily entails a review of the Institutes pedagogic practices, discarding
technical slants that were based on a partial analysis of social realities and
consequently transferred to education the responsibility for solving the structural
problems of society. Implementation of a polyvalent vocational training implies taking up
a new teaching approach, based on a more precise definition of the links between
education, society and work. There is in that respect a clear understanding that education
is not a determining factor for development, although it may be capable of bringing about
changes in socio-economic relationships.
In order to establish new quality standards
for vocational training, the critical review launched by the SENAC reinforces a reference
outline of the pedagogic changes that the polyvalent model determines and which, at the
same time lead back to it.
This critical review reaches all aspects of
educational practices. Its incidence is greatest on two particular elements: curricular
model and structure, teaching contents and procedures.
The curricular model of
polyvalent training aims at overcoming the limitations of previous paradigms. It
presupposes a structure open to multiple combinations, involving the many spheres of the
human drive (technical side, consensus, emancipation).
Technical interest relates to work
as the first of mans fundamental drives, enabling him to bring influence to bear
upon his physical and social environment.
Consensual interest refers to
language and other aspects that make culture transmissible in an institutional manner;
accord, understanding and interpretation of the meaning of action and of life itself.
Emancipation refers in this case to the
manner in which man develops a critical awareness, in order to rid himself of ties and
achieve autonomy.
In the SENAC viewpoint, human interests
must be seen not as watertight compartments but as possible parts of a curriculum, to be
brought together and co-ordinated into a consistent whole.
In the new curricular structure teaching
contents acquire a new significance and greater scope. Besides the specific knowledge
and abilities of a given job, they also include concepts, ideas, principles and scientific
laws of a more general kind; generic skills; methods of understanding and applying
knowledge; work and study habits; social and professional values and attitudes.
In selecting contents, it is no longer
enough to string together a number of phenomena, rules and facts, however important and
relevant they may be. It is necessary to pick out those that unveil the whys and
wherefores of the different work processes; that reveal the mechanisms for the
occurrence and transformation of phenomena; that explain and relate facts to each other
and, in sum, those that can be used as theoretical - practical instruments for
decision-making in the various situations of an occupational life.
An analysis of teaching procedures
is another essential part of the review of pedagogic activities being carried out by SENAC
to implement polyvalent vocational training. Teaching contents even when well
selected require an adequate methodological treatment to ensure effective
perception of reality. This fresh approach proposes a break with the compartmentalised
model and cognitive learning process. What really matters is to bring about conditions to
instil into trainees a capacity for abstraction and reflection concerning the activities
they carry out. It is not enough for the student to perform accurately in theory or
practice. He will only make progress when he is consciously capable of justifying and
explaining what he has done. According to true cognition, knowledge does not come from
practice but from a reflective abstraction of what it rests upon. In the last resort, the
process tries to develop "meta cognition" abilities, i.e. getting the
student to think about his own learning mechanisms. |