![]() |
ILO-TOKYO INTERNET FORUM 2004ONSAFETY AND HEALTH CULTURE AT WORKCOLLECTION OF INFORMATION NEEDS |
![]() |
|
(Original information posted in Japanese is under translation into English. They will be gradually carried on web, posting by posting, upon completion.)
| Information needs for practices/actions or ideas: | Suggested information needs for case reports or ideas concerning safety and health culture that are sought to solve safety and health problems in workplaces.
|
| Posting No. 9 | Received on 23 May 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sender(s) : | Tetsuo MORI | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject Keyword(s) : | General safety and health | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title : | Method to intensify public interest in safety and health matters | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contents : | More people need to recognize the importance of safety and heath problems at work and actively participate in order to develop a safety and health culture.
In "Strategy for Workplace Health and Safety in Great Britain to 2010 and Beyond" issued by the Health and Safety Committee of Great Britain, the following are defined to be necessary in the future:
Since only a few people are interested in safety and health at work in Japan as well, it is very important to intensify the interest. For example, it is shown in the implementation status report of occupational safety and health framework, http://europa.eu.int/comm/employment_social/health_safety/publicat/com_2004_62_en.pdf, that the total loss due to occupational accidents reaches to the 2.6 to 3.8 percentages of the GNP, and that is widely recognized overseas. However, that is not well recognized in Japan. Therefore, we need to discuss methods to generally enhance public interest, especially interest in industries. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Dialogue to Posting No. 9 -
- Dialogue to Postings Nos. 1-25 -
- Dialogue to Postings Nos. 1-27 -
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Posting No. 10 | Received on 23 May 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sender(s) : | Tetsuo MORI | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject Keyword(s) : | General safety and health | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title : | Enhancement of Reactive Monitoring Systems | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contents : | According to "Successful health and safety management HSG65" and the simplified version "Successful health and safety management INDG275" (http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg275.pdf) by the Health and Safety Executive of Great Britain, Active Monitoring, preventive measures before accidents occur, and Reactive Monitoring, measures after accidents occur, should be both used for monitoring performance, and the guideline for investigating root causes of accidents is attached. Since there are always management defects when accidents occur or injuries and fatal accidents are avoided by a hair's breadth, if root causes are investigated and management defects are found and improved, we can prevent accidents with similar causes in larger areas based on the above-mentioned measures. Various guidelines in workplace for investigating root causes in connection with management have been made, and the following is examples.
It seems that measures for occupational safety and health problems depends on only active monitoring and reactive monitoring are less interesting in Japan. Therefore, it is necessary to provide cases of actions and ideas about measures to surely implement reactive monitoring in workplace. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Dialogue to Postings Nos. 1-25 -
- Dialogue to Postings Nos. 1-27 -
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Posting No. 11 | Received on 23 May 2004 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sender(s) : | Tetsuo MORI | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject Keyword(s) : | General safety and health | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Title : | Numerical evaluation of safety and health performance | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Contents : | It is very difficult to numerically evaluate safety and health performance at work and, thus only qualitative evaluation has been considered to be available. However, as shown in the following examples, approaches for numerical evaluation seem to be gradually developing abroad. It is hoped that cases of actions and ideas to implement such approaches are provided in Japan as well.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
- Dialogue to Postings Nos. 1-25 -
- Dialogue to Postings Nos. 1-27 -
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||