International
Labour Organization
SEAPAT
South-East Asia and the Pacific Multidisciplinary Advisory Team
ILO/SEAPAT's OnLine Gender
Learning & Information Module
Unit 1: A conceptual framework
for gender analysis and planning
Exercise: Gender roles identification
Introduction
The concept of gender roles¾ along
with this gender roles identification exercise¾
has been developed from the work of Caroline Moser. Gender roles identification
can be a useful planning tool. In Moser’s own words:
Existing gender relations manifest themselves through
the different roles played by men and women. Obviously the concept of the
triple role is a simplification of the complexities of the social construction
of gender relations and divisions of labour in specific socio-economic
contexts, and their changing dynamics over time. For planners, however,
this provides the first key principle for a gender planning methodology
that enables them to translate gender awareness into a tool for planning
practice.
Above all gender roles identification is a tool that makes
visible previously invisible work. The purpose of gender roles identification...is
not only to separate out the different tasks both men and women, and boys
and girls do. It is also to ensure the equal valuing of these tasks through
the identification of reproductive, productive, community managing and
community politics roles.
Objective
This exercise helps you identify gender roles through the various daily
tasks of men and women in low-income households in different regions of
the world.
Method
-
Consider the daily lives of a husband and a wife in a low-income household
in Africa, Asia or Latin America.
-
Decide on the location of your household (urban or rural) and specify the
members of your household (including their age and sex).
-
Consider the tasks that the husband and wife do on an average working day.
-
Chart these tasks during a twenty-four hour period in the respective columns
using Table 1 below.
Table 1
|
Time
|
Tasks done by women
|
Tasks done by men
|
|
5:00
|
|
|
|
6:00
|
|
|
|
7:00
|
|
|
|
8:00
|
|
|
|
9:00
|
|
|
|
10:00
|
|
|
|
11:00
|
|
|
|
12:00
|
|
|
|
13:00
|
|
|
|
14:00
|
|
|
|
15:00
|
|
|
|
16:00
|
|
|
|
17:00
|
|
|
|
18:00
|
|
|
|
19:00
|
|
|
|
20:00
|
|
|
|
21:00
|
|
|
|
22:00
|
|
|
|
23:00
|
|
|
|
24:00
|
|
|
|
1:00
|
|
|
|
2:00
|
|
|
|
3:00
|
|
|
|
4:00
|
|
|
-
List each of the above tasks again in Table 2 below, specifying F (female)
after each task if it pertains to the wife, and M (male) if it pertains
to the husband. Based on the definitions of gender roles given in Unit
1, determine which types of gender roles of the husband and wife are reflected
in each of these tasks. Enter this information into column 2 of the table,
using the symbols R (reproductive), P (productive), CP (community politics)
and CM (community managing). Also fill in the following columns for each
task:
column 3: is the task rewarded or not? (Y/N)
column 4: is the task routine or special? (R/S)
column 5: is the task biologically or culturally determined? (B/C)
column 6: is the task high or low status? (H/L)
Table 2
|
Task
(F/M)
|
Role
R/P/CP/CM
|
Rewarded
Y/N
|
Routine/special
R/S
|
Biological/
Cultural
B/C
|
Status
H/L
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
-
Consider what gender-based patterns, if any, are revealed through the tasks
you have identified¾ patterns, for example,
in the time, location, degree of social interaction, type of activity,
degree of routinization, status and rewards to the tasks identified.
-
Consider whether the fact that men and women play different roles, perform
different activities and therefore have different needs, may have implications
for labour-market-related policy, program, or project design. If so, how?
[Adapted from Caroline Moser and C. Levy, Training materials
developed for training in gender planning for development, 1984-90, in
Caroline Moser, Gender Planning and Development: Theory, Practice and
Training, Routledge, London, 1993; and Gender Issues in the World
of Work: Gender Training Package, ILO, Geneva, 1995.]
Module Homepage
For further information, please contact the South-East
Asia and the Pacific Multidisciplinary
Advisory Team (SEAPAT) at Tel: +63.2.815.2354
or Fax: +63.2.812.6143
E-mail: seapat@ilo.org



Copyright © 1998 International Labour Organization
(ILO)
Disclaimer
webinfo@ilo.org
Preferred : Netscape 3+ or MSIE
4.0
This page was revised by SF. It
was approved by WRB. It was last updated on 2 November 1998.