Fresh Research
Reveals Serious Human Rights Violations
of Young Foreign Migrant Workers in Thailand
Year-long Study
Finds Exploitation, Coercion and Intimidation
in Homes, Farms, Factories and Fishing Boats
13 December 2006 (Thai
Version Here in PDF)
Bangkok – More than
half of foreign migrant domestic workers
recently surveyed in Thailand, and one-in-five
migrant teens on fishing boats, were either
prohibited from ever leaving their workplace
or forced to work – virtual slaves
to the whims of their Thai employers, a
new study revealed today.
This in-depth report – believed the
first of its kind in Thailand – has
uncovered significant human rights violations
of young migrant workers ranging from physical
assault, forced labour, a denial of freedom
of movement, children in hazardous work
– definable as worst forms of child
labour – and routine psychological
and verbal abuse. In some cases the labour
exploitation is tantamount to that found
in situations of human trafficking.
Often out of the sight of both the authorities
and most members of the Thai public, 82%
of migrant domestic workers and 45% of young
migrants toiling on fishing boats said they
were required to work more than 12 hours
per day, often seven days per week, according
to the study..
The research conducted by the Institute
for Population and Social Research (IPSR),
Mahidol University was published today with
the support of the International Labour
Organization’s Mekong Sub-regional
Project to Combat Trafficking in Children
and Women. It underlines “an urgent
need for effective labour inspection”
particularly in work sectors where children
under the age of 18 are concerned.
The study, released today as a two-volume
set titled “The Mekong Challenge –
Underpaid, Overworked and Overlooked: The
realities of young migrant workers in Thailand,”
found that only one-in-five migrant workers
in the fishing boat/fish processing sector
had ever encountered an official from the
labour department. Most knew little if anything
about their rights under Thailand’s
Labour Protection Act – a law which
in any event does not extend protection
to those working on fishing boats or in
domestic service.
The majority of workers was paid below
the legal minimum wage – and while
this fact may not come as a surprise –
it is nonetheless a clear violation of Thai
law. Many Thai employers also preferred
to hire children and younger migrants as
they were deemed more obedient and easier
to control.
One of the most troubling aspects of the
report is the attitude toward migrants by
Thai employers as it relates to freedom
of movement. More than half of all the employers
interviewed agreed with a statement that
they should ‘lock migrants in at night
so they don’t escape.’ Indeed,
eight percent of migrant domestic workers
confirmed their employers had locked them
in before.
More than one-thousand people participated
in this year-long survey, including 320
domestic migrant workers and 376 migrants
in three other employment sectors: agriculture,
fishing/fish processing and small-scale
manufacturing. In all four sectors 75% of
the sample were female. A further 316 employers
across all four sectors were surveyed. In-depth
interviews were also conducted with all
groups and ten ‘recruiters’
were also interviewed.
Most of Thailand’s migrant workforce
comes from Myanmar (Burma), Cambodia and
Lao PDR.
Young Burmese migrants were commonly found
working in small manufacturing operations
and in fish processing plants in Samut Sakhon
while girls and young women from Burma were
also commonly found working in the homes
of Thais as domestic workers (the IPSR study
focused on Burmese in Chiang Mai and Tak
Provinces). In the latter category, 60%
were forbidden from leaving the house and/or
receiving visitors making their isolation
and reliance on the employer virtually complete.
While many of the migrants interviewed
were working in Thailand legally (their
employers had registered them with the Thai
authorities as migrant workers) others were
working in the country without authorization
(undocumented). While this undocumented
nature made them more vulnerable to abuses
like employer threats and coercion, it was
also discovered that many registered migrants
also faced significant abuses – particularly
restrictions placed on their movements by
employers.
While workers in the agriculture sector
reported the least problems overall, three-quarters
of those working on fishing boats had their
identity/working documents withheld by their
employers.
The research also contradicts a commonly
held belief that ‘recruiters’
or job brokers/agents are often traffickers.
Indeed fewer than 10% of all migrants interviewed
claimed to have found a job via recruiters.
The exploitation of migrants, when it occurred,
seemed to be primarily at the hands of employers.
While the role of recruiters was not part
of the survey involving most domestic workers,
findings in the other three sectors show
that when recruiters were used they could
in fact play a positive role in terms of
maintaining an ongoing relationship with
the migrants. The recruiters were able to
make more commission by offering other services
such as arranging remittances and communication
to family members back home. Some recruiters
also negotiated better pay or working conditions
for migrants they had recruited, or were
able to remove them from workplaces where
there was abuse.
The report makes a total of 29 recommendations
suggesting both separate and coordinated
action by a number of actors to rectify
the present situation.
Those actors include the Royal Thai Government,
the Ministry of Labour, Ministry of Social
Development and Human Security, Ministry
of Education, Ministries of Justice and
Interior, the Royal Thai Police, the International
Labour Organization, workers’ and
employers’ organizations both in Thailand
and internationally, as well as a number
of other groups including civil society.
The call to action covers areas of improved
labour protection, an end to the withholding
of workers’ legal documents by their
employers, improved law enforcement to end
abuses by employers, greater collaboration
between Government and NGOs working with
migrant groups, a complaints mechanism for
migrants who feel they have been cheated
or abused, greater access to education,
the encouragement of streamlined, inexpensive,
safer migration channels to deter employers
from abusing undocumented migrants and to
encourage migrants to enter Thailand ‘legally’
and safely. It also calls for a recognition
of agriculture, domestic work and work on
fishing boats as ‘employment’
within the definitions set out by the Labour
Protection Act.
The Mekong Challenge – Underpaid,
Overworked and Overlooked: The realities
of young migrant workers in Thailand is
published in both Thai and English, and
in two volumes. Volume 1 is a summary of
the research findings, complete with all
the recommendations, while Volume 2 contains
a closer examination of the results from
the research conducted within each of the
four employment sectors.
|