CASE STUDY
Improving OSH service for female workers
Promotion of personal
protective equipment among female workers spraying pesticide
by Dr.
Luu Van Chuc, National Institute of Labour Protection
1. Introduction
Pesticide use in Viet Nam is growing, with imports soaring
from 21,400 tonnes in 1991 to 37,000 tonnes in 1997. The number of farmers
directly exposed to these hazardous chemicals has increased in proportion.
Of the approximately 58 million workers engaged in
agricultural production in Viet Nam, 60 per cent are women. Personal protective
equipment (PPE) is one the most effective means of safeguarding their health.
In 1997-1998, State Project KHCN 11-08 – "Study impact
of hazardous chemicals used in agricultural production on workers health:
Preventive measures" – proposed activities to raise awareness and promote
the use of PPE among agricultural workers, most of them women, in the village of
Van Noi, Dong Anh District, Hanoi.
Measures included a survey of the use of pesticides and PPE,
preparation of training materials and courses, provision of PPE for workers, and
assessment of PPE use among female workers.
2. Programme content
Survey: Use of pesticides and PPE
Target location
vegetable-growing village in Van Noi, Dong Anh, Hanoi
total cultivated area: 280 ha
area for cultivating vegetables: 145 ha
total number of households: 2,000 with a population of 8,500 persons
labour force: 3,000 persons, 60 per cent of them female
annual income: 8 billion VND, of which 4.2 billion VND is derived from
vegetable cultivation
Currently, the land under cultivation is infested with pests,
and workers feel they have to use more pesticides. The number of workers
directly exposed to pesticides is increasing, and many cases of accidental
poisoning have been reported in the village. For this reason, Van Noi was
selected for the project field study. At the same time, the project aimed to
improve working conditions and raise awareness of OSH issues among female
workers using pesticides.
Survey method
random selection of studied objects.
direct interviews with and distribution of questionnaires to village
authorities and members of 50 households, collecting information on crop
types, kinds of pests, types of pesticides used, methods of spraying
pesticides, and use of PPE
direct observation and photography
expert consultations
Research team
NILP researchers
staff from the Plant Protection Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and
Rural Development
Van Noi village managers
Survey results
Vegetables and pests:
In Van Noi village, a variety of vegetables – including cabbage,
tomato, kohlrabi, cauliflower, and Chinese pea – are planted year-round.
Eight different kinds of pest – including Phitella maculipennes
curtis, Erwinia carotovora and Phytophthora injecstans – threaten
these crops.
Use of pesticides:
All households reported the use of a variety of pesticides for killing
insects and other pests. Research indicates that 17 different kinds of
pesticides are in local use, of which 13 are insecticides and 4 are
fungicides. Seventy per cent of these pesticides incorporate organo
phosphates and carbamates, which are World Health Organization
(WHO) category 1 and 2 substances and are dangerous to humans. Banned
pesticides such as Wofatox and Monitor are also used occasionally.
The quantity of pesticides used, on average, is 9 kg ai/ha/crop, which
exceeds the producers’ recommended limit by 6 times.
Crops are sprayed an average of 10 times each, which exceeds the
producers’ recommended limit by 4 times.
On average, workers are exposed 150 hours per year.
Villagers use portable, backpack-mounted pumps for spraying pesticide.
Fifty-seven per cent of these pumps are old and leak liquid pesticide,
which can be absorbed through the skin. Workers’ hands, arms, faces,
chests, and backs are continually exposed to pesticide during spraying
operations.
Pesticide poisoning:
Among the 50 households surveyed, 31 per cent of the people who were
directly exposed to pesticides were female. Of the respondents, 80 per
cent had been poisoned at least once, reporting symptoms such as itching,
nausea, and dizziness.
Use of PPE:
All of those surveyed understood that spraying pesticides entailed the
risk of poisoning, and that they should use PPE. What remained in question
was the proper use of PPE and which PPE was most appropriate. Eighty-two
per cent of the people used PPE, but the equipment was often used
inappropriately (for example, the use of torn clothing or simple cotton
respirators). Producers and suppliers typically provide inadequate
training and guidance on the safe use of both pesticides and PPE.
Promoting OSH awareness and PPE
Proposing appropriate PPE for spraying operations
Given types of pesticides in use, types of cultivated land,
crop plants, techniques of pesticide use, and existing forms of protective
equipment, several types of PPE have been proposed as appropriate for local
agricultural activities, among them the following:
face shields for protection against dust and pesticide mist
respirators for dust, pesticide mist or vapour, and organic solvents
aprons for resistance to pesticides
general-purpose overalls
gloves for protection against organic solvents and pesticides
general-purpose rubber boots
Preparation of training materials
Based on the survey results and the list of needed PPE, two
kinds of training materials for raising awareness among agricultural workers
have been prepared:
For managers and trainers
.
General information concerning the
use, handling, and storage of pesticides; the ways pesticides are absorbed
into the body; and proper use of PPE.
For workers directly exposed to pesticides
.
Simple information
focused on types of PPE available and criteria for choosing one or the
other.
Organization of training courses
Training courses were organized in the survey village.
Participants numbered 40 persons, including village managers, medical
staff, and the survey subjects, 60 per cent of whom were female workers.
Trainers presented lectures with visual aids, introducing the proper use
of PPE in the fields, and then organized small working-group discussions.
All trainees were involved in discussions during the course.
At the conclusion of the course, all trainee understood the safety and
health issues related to pesticide use, and how to use PPE.
In a follow-up activity, five persons selected from these
participants were provided with PPE for three months and monitored. Observations
confirmed that these people used the PPE properly, and that use of the PPE was
effective in protecting against exposure to pesticides. Most of the local
farmers have subsequently ordered appropriate PPE.
3. Assessment
Pluses
The selection of the target community and the timing of the survey was
appropriate.
The background research and field survey were well organized, and there
was effective collaboration between researchers and village staff during
project implementation.
A variety of methods were effectively combined during implementation.
Financial resources, research equipment, and training activities were all
well prepared.
Minuses
The budget was limited, so training courses have not been extended to
other villages. The training materials and PPE are inadequate.
PPE is still too expensive for the farmers.
An appropriate system for distributing PPE to agricultural workers is
still needed.
4. Follow-up activities
We suggest that the Government, when establishing agricultural service
cooperatives including anti-pest services, should officially approve the
proposed list of PPE for use in mixing and spraying pesticides in rural
areas.
The two sets of training materials referred to above should be printed in
large numbers and distributed.
More training courses should be conducted in other rural areas.
Official policy should act at the local village level to encourage
adequate provision of PPE as well as use of less hazardous pesticides.
References
1. Jan H. Oudejans. Agro-pesticide and functions in
integrated crop protection (Bangkok, ESCAP, 1994). 2. Joint Decision of the MOH, MOLISA, and Ministry of
Police No. 89/QD/LB. Regulations on safety and hygienic use of pesticides
(18 February 1972). 3. List of PPE (Hanoi, 1990) 4. Tran Quang Hung. Pesticide (Agro-Publish House,
1992). 5. Abu Bakar che Man; David Gold. Safety and health in
the use of chemicals at work (Geneva, ILO, 1993). 6. TCVN 5507-1991. Hazardous chemicals: Safety
regulations in use, handling and storage. 7. Luu Van Chuc, et al. Study for establishing a list
of PPE for different occupations. 8. Final report of the State Project KX-07-15 (Hanoi,
1995).
Updated by PAP/SUT/TRS.
Approved by BKL. Last updated on 15 November 2000