












|

Report and Conclusions
of the Meeting
Report of the
Thirteenth Asian Regional Meeting
Introduction
- The Thirteenth Asian Regional Meeting of
the ILO was held in Bangkok, Thailand from 28 to 31 August 2001.
The Meeting was attended by 194
delegates and advisers from 30 member States and territories. These
included 108 Government representatives,43 Employer representatives
and 43 Worker representatives. Sixteen ministers or vice-ministers
attended the meeting. The Meeting was also attended by representatives
of 8 intergovernmental and 6 non-governmental international
organizations.
The Meeting set up a Working Party to
consider conclusions for submission to the Plenary, and it appointed a
Credentials Committee, in accordance with the Rules for Regional
Meetings.
The Conference unanimously elected as
its Chairman Mr. Alavi Mowlana, Minister of Labour and Acting Minister
of Muslim Affairs of Sri Lanka, and as its Vice-Chairmen Mr. Farhat
Hussain (Government delegate, Pakistan), Mr. Khalifa Khamiss Mattar
(Employer, United Arab Emirates), and Mr. Sukesada Ito (Worker,
Japan). Prior to the opening of the discussion in plenary, the Meeting
heard addresses by the Secretary-General and by Ms. Ladawan
Wongsriwong, Deputy Minister of Labour and Social Welfare speaking on
behalf of H.E. Dej Boonlong, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of
Labour of Thailand. The Deputy Secretary-General replied to the
plenary discussions at the close of the Meeting.
In his opening remarks the Chairperson,
Mr. Mowlana, congratulated the Director General and the ILO for a most
timely and incisive report on Decent Work in Asia, which brings
out many facets of the complex ILO mandate in a manner relevant to the
challenges and opportunities the region will face in the 21st century.
He hoped that the report may facilitate a constructive debate and
would lead to forward-looking conclusions to address the adverse
effects of globalization.
The Secretary-General, Mr. Juan Somavia,
in his inaugural address, expressed his strong conviction that Asia is
central to the future direction and sustainability of the global
economy. The Asia Pacific region has tremendous dynamism, energy and
resilience, even in the midst of social tensions and unresolved
development problems. Therefore, Asia’s potential ability to
influence the course of globalization is enormous.
The challenge of creating decent work in
Asia must be founded on the promotion and realization of shared values
within the community of people and a community of nations. Decent work
is a development strategy. It is a goal and not a standard. It does
not offer a "one-size-fits all" solution. It is a personal
goal for individuals and families, and a development goal for
countries. Decent work is a package, an integrated policy agenda which
includes rights, employment, social protection and social dialogue. It
is a common commitment of all ILO constituents, inextricably linked to
practical policy terms and the lives of the people.
The Secretary-General recalled his
report entitled Reducing the Decent Work Deficit: A global
challenge to the International Labour Conference in June 2001, in
which he had emphasized the need to reduce the decent work deficit,
since all countries, even the most developed ones, must continuously
pursue decent work as a goal to be reached. Decent work is a tool, he
underlined, that must respond to specific country circumstances, and
should be shaped by each country according to national needs. It also
provides a further platform for encompassing development objectives
embraced by the Asian Development Bank and other multilateral partners
in the region.
He further indicated that the way to
move forward is to identify priorities for action, to address decent
work deficits and to develop an integrated policy framework and
practical programmes at the national level. The meeting offered a good
opportunity to map out the regional priorities and to give the
International Labour Office guidance to support them.
The Secretary-General stressed that in
the global economy it must be a basic principle that every person who
works has rights at work. These rights are intrinsic even when the
economic conditions are inconvenient, and valid in all countries at
whatever stage of development. The promotion of rights needs to be
linked to sustained and sustainable economic growth and rising
productivity, and to an enabling environment for investment and
enterprise. This is because without work there are no workers’
rights.
He underscored the impact of the 1997
Asian financial crisis which not only exposed enormous social and
economic risks linked to speculation and financial volatility, but
also hurt the poorest and most vulnerable more immediately and deeply.
It hit women harder than men. Clearly serious problems lie ahead in
the global economy. Against this backdrop, he drew the attention of
the meeting to the loss of dynamism or even stagnation of the major
economies that have traditionally been the engines of economic growth.
Hence it is necessary to accelerate effort to realize decent work in
Asia and re-orient the governance of globalization so that it benefits
the poor and excluded. Globalization with equity is the major
commitment.
In this regard, the ILO has a unique
understanding of the complexities of the production process, taking
account of the policy-making function of governments, investment by
employers, and the labour contributed by workers. In order to tap this
potential, the ILO needs to forge a strong and cohesive partnership
through enhancing social dialogue, and finding the will to respect the
voice of "the other", and to find solutions that represent a
genuine consensus based on shared interests. This is crucial in the
face of looming uncertainties of the global economy. In conclusion,
the Secretary-General expressed a strong belief in the strength of
Asian society, in the capacity of its constituent members to
understand, work and grow together.
Following Mr. Somavia, Ms. Ladawan
Wongsriwong, Deputy Minister of Labour and Social Welfare, welcomed
the participants on behalf of the Deputy Prime Minister of Thailand, a
committed founding member State of the ILO. She recalled the Asian
financial crisis and its extraordinarily painful effects, especially
on the most vulnerable people. She added that recovering lost ground
has been hard work, and that moving forward has not been as fast or
easy as had been anticipated, as growth rates have not been high
enough.
She indicated that, in constantly facing
major challenges, Thailand must look for new ways to improve people’s
livelihoods and security, and harmonize them with new models in the
face of global competition, new technology and innovation. Sustainable
growth and poverty alleviation as spelled out in the decent work
concept of the ILO, must be kept at the forefront of the national
agenda in Thailand. She underscored the importance of ensuring that
people have employment which is not exploitative and that working
people and their families live in dignity. In Thailand, the family is
right at the heart of the value system and of the society itself, and
where they are able to meet their basic needs, strong families emerge
to build a strong society.
She emphasized that competitiveness is
the key to successful participation in a global economy. Education and
training will play a vital role to provide young workers with skills
and knowledge to compete in the environment of today. She said that in
Thailand there is a need to build on existing strengths by developing
medium-sized enterprises, and without confining this development only
to the big cities. The ILO has been supportive in these endeavours.
For every country trying to come to grips with the global economy, it
must deal with the most essential factor in growth. "That factor
is people. People produce growth and people are the reason for that
growth," she concluded.
Discussion of the Report of
the Director-General
-
The general discussion was preceded by a
video presentation on Decent Work in Asia: Balancing the Decent Work
Deficit, and a briefing on the Report of the Director-General by Mr.
Ian Chambers, Director of the Bangkok ILO Area Office and
Multidisciplinary Advisory Team. Mr. Chambers indicated a range of
issues, related to the four strategic objectives on which the Report was
based and on which delegates may wish to guide the Office in planning
its programme in the forthcoming years, not least the matter of
integrating the components of the programme into a national decent work
agenda.
Mr. T. Suzuki in his capacity as the
Chairperson of the Employers’ group, pointed out that decent work is a
relative concept, affected by differing conditions in each country. The
ILO is attempting to identify shortfalls in the achievement of decent
work, and encouraging constituents to achieve it through giving effect
to the ILO’s strategic objectives. However, it needed to consider the
question of implementation. Decent work depends on the creation of
productive work, which must therefore have priority. Only healthy
enterprises can contribute to a sustainable social agenda. Social
protection is important, but has to be affordable. The ILO has given too
much emphasis to a very institutionalized form of social dialogue.
Dialogue is just as effective in other forms. Decent work should lead to
better living and working conditions for individual workers, and better
human relations at the workplace. The ILO’s priorities in this respect
should be determined locally. Autonomy for employers and workers at the
enterprise level should be protected.
Mr. Z. Rampak spoke as Chairman of the
Workers’ group. He identified a greater need to promote respect for
labour standards and the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and
Rights at Work. Speaking first on workers’ rights, he noted that the
ratification record of the fundamental Conventions of countries in the
region is not impressive. Implementation, too, needs to be improved with
ILO assistance. In particular, the right to organize is still restricted
in a number of countries and in particular in export processing zones (EPZs).
Much remains to be done to eliminate the worst forms of child labour,
discrimination and also forced labour. Turning to employment, he
insisted that macroeconomic policies and development planning should
include sustainable employment strategies. Employment strategies should
also ensure that education and training are available and sensitive to
changing circumstances. It is important to bring non-formal work into
the formal work arena. Migration issues need to be taken into account in
policy formulation. On social protection, he pointed out that it is the
duty of the state to provide social protection to its citizens.
Conditions of work should be improved in all sectors and areas. With
regard to social dialogue, this contributes to democratic governance, to
building resilient labour market institutions and to long-term social
and economic stability and peace. Much remains to be done in Asia to
utilise fully the potential of social dialogue. Finally, Mr. Rampak felt
that a thorough assessment should have been made of the implementation
of the conclusions reached at the 12th Asian Regional
Meeting. He urged the Office to implement fully the conclusions to be
reached at this meeting and to provide an assessment thereof at the
next, 14th , Asian Regional Meeting.
The discussion continued with
contributions, both verbal and written, from 54 delegates representing
member governments, employers and workers. There was strongly evident
consensus amongst them on a range of issues. Firstly, deep concern was
expressed about the weak recovery from the 1997 crisis, with the
prospect of stagnation or even the emergence of a new crisis, with
attendant adverse social consequences. As noted by Ms. P. Santo Tomas
(Government, Philippines), the economic downturn is already being felt
by the more prosperous countries in the region and the impact must
certainly be harder for the weaker economies. The experience of 1997
points to the urgent need for timely preventive action. This calls for
urgent implementation of the components of the decent work concept in an
integrated manner, taking proper account of the regional context.
The strongest agreement was on the need to
focus on employment creation and promotion for generating growth with
equity, and as the only sustainable solution to reducing poverty, which
was still prevalent after the crisis. Of particular importance was the
high rate of youth unemployment. A number of suggestions were made for
employment generation, emphasising a special role for small enterprises,
which account for the bulk of employment in the region, fostering an
enterprise-friendly environment and encouraging investment.
Macroeconomic policy for employment generation was recognised as an
essential tool. To this end, the ILO was encouraged to collaborate with
the international financial institutions notably the Bretton Woods
institutions and the Asian Development Bank, to prioritize action plans
for employment in the macro policy agenda. A number of delegates
emphasised in particular the crucial link between increasing
productivity and competitiveness, given the impact of globalization in
the region. It was pointed out that workers with multiple skills were
the least affected by the crisis. A number of workers’ representatives
drew attention to the need for vastly improved training to increase
productivity. Ms. C. Nohno (Government, Japan), related a poignant
example from as long as 130 years ago when a poor Japanese community
received a 100 bags of rice from their neighbours and chose, rather than
to feed the households, to invest in the schooling of their children.
There was also widespread recognition of
the problems of an expanding informal sector in many parts of the
region, accounting for much of the employed labour force, especially in
South Asia. Again the sector was seen to be subject to low investment,
low productivity and competitiveness, leading to weak links with the
formal sector and low incomes. A number of alleviating schemes were
suggested for the informal sector, including micro credit, training, and
expanding its marketing links. Mr K. Ahmed (Worker, Pakistan), drew the
attention of the meeting to the complexities of the Asian continent,
housing more than half of the world’s population, with the largest
number of the poor, and the scourge of child labour. He urged that
special attention be focussed on the economic and social upliftment of
the rural poor, both through the political will of national governments,
as well as by efforts of international organizations like the ILO in its
future programme and activities within the framework of the Employment
Policy Convention, 1964 (No. 122), and the Rural Workers’
Organisations Convention, 1975 (No. 141).
The need to address the complex issues of
rights in the region attracted a strong consensus. The Vice-Ministers
for Labour from the Republic of Korea and Malaysia were emphatic, as
were many employers’ and workers’ representatives, that not only
should employment be generated but that there should be growing
recognition and implementation of fundamental principles and rights at
work. The issue of forced labour in Myanmar was a grim reminder of the
considerable work to be done.
An especially significant aspect of the
decent work deficit is evident in the conditions faced by women workers.
Ms. Halimah (Workers, Singapore) highlighted the increasing and
disproportionate share of women amongst the working poor in the region
and their concentration in the informal sector. They, together with
their children thus become extremely vulnerable to trafficking and the
problems of child labour, bonded labour and even HIV/AIDS. These
problems have been exacerbated by the 1997 financial crisis. Delegates
emphasised the need for a strong voice for women and advocated
mainstreaming this issue, with the development of a time-bound programme
for gender.
There was widespread consensus amongst the
constituents that social dialogue, as a basic value of ILO, must play a
central role in the relationship between workers, employers and
governments. Social dialogue played a very strong economic and socially
stabilising role for the economies beleaguered by the 1997 crisis. In
the face of looming recession, there will be a need to help countries to
reinforce their internal capacities for social dialogue to find
solutions which reflect common interests and true compromise.
The IPEC programme was viewed by all
constituents as an important plank of the ILO for children’s rights,
for their protection, and their development. The ultimate aim was the
elimination of child labour, starting with its worst forms, in line with
the Worst Forms of Child Labour Convention, 1999 (No. 182). The
time-bound programme for elimination of child labour received attention
from the delegates as a particularly efficient instrument of the
programme, which could be usefully expanded.
A number of issues gave rise to noticeable
diversity of opinion. Amongst these was the provision of increased
levels of social protection. Mr. S. Jatiya (Government, India) pointed
out the enormous challenge of raising social security coverage from its
current poor level of around 9 per cent of the total labour force. On
the other hand, a number of employers’ representatives emphasised the
need to give priority (over increased expenditure on social security) to
the speedy creation and maintenance of jobs, recognising the importance
of quality work and arguing that without work there can be no decent
work. The ILO must move from a document-oriented towards a more
action-oriented approach. There was an undeniable sentiment that while
nobody present would disagree with decent work, the many millions of the
unemployed across the region desperately seek work of any kind on almost
any terms. Decent work therefore presents a challenge which must be
taken up by each country in its own way. Given the wide economic, social
and cultural diversity across Asia, there can be no "one size fits
all" approach to the achievement of decent work. Decent work must
recognize and reflect that diversity.
Several government and worker delegates
drew attention to urgent issues of occupational safety and health,
especially the need to reduce the rates of work fatalities. Rates of
work injury are seen to be particularly high in small enterprises in the
unregistered, informal sector and amongst working children. Mr. E.
Chandraprasert (Government, Thailand), espoused as a model his
government’s programme to improve safety and health in the workplace.
Mr. M. Gammampila (Government, Sri Lanka) noted a further approach
through the development of a National Institute for Occupational Safety
and Health.
Further shades of opinion emerged in the
discussion on globalization. For many delegates, the crisis of 1997
crystallised a "dark side" to globalization with attendant
vulnerabilities to violent fluctuations in growth, employment, and
incomes. However, Mr. B. Noakes (Employers, Australia), noted that the
counterpart to the dark side is a "bright side". He wished to
see instead a stronger emphasis on the positive impact of globalization
on the growth of employment and the reduction of poverty. He also said
that if decent work was to be a goal developed by individual countries,
difficulties would be created by attempts to identify universal
criteria.
Migration was viewed from the points of
view of both the sending countries and the receiving countries. Sending
country delegates and indeed many receiving country delegates were
concerned foremost about the rights of migrant workers to organise,
their extreme vulnerability to downturns in terms of job and income
security, and the problems of undocumented migrants. The provision of
appropriate social security coverage across national borders presents
peculiar difficulties. Recipient country delegates from a number of Arab
States wished to emphasise that migrant workers may well find themselves
in a humane environment, easily able to repatriate their hard-earned
incomes, but that there is a considerable need for better management of
migrant labour flows by both sending and receiving countries.
A number of conflicts continue in the
region. Political considerations aside, these undeniably have adverse
consequences in the world of work. The most vulnerable groups include
those exposed to exacerbated levels of unemployment, cross-border
workers and children who may be involved in combat situations. Several
delegates from the Arab States referred to the effects of the sanctions
on Iraq which were reducing job opportunities, increasing unemployment
and bringing to a halt development programmes and human resource
development. The plight of Palestinian workers in the Occupied
Territories and the impact of the current crisis on employment and
poverty due to border closures was raised by several delegates. The
Office was urged to continue the implementation of technical assistance
programmes in the region.
The discussions were given a
forward-looking dimension by a number of recommendations to the Office,
including government delegates from Australia, France and New Zealand.
Specific suggestions included the need for the Asian Regional Meeting to
formulate a clear plan of action to be implemented by the Office over
the period to the next Asian Regional Meeting. Strong emphasis was
placed on the need for observable progress to be measured against
indicators and targets through decent work programmes which could be
ensured by enhanced communication and responsiveness between the Office
and the constituents.
Tripartite panel discussion
on standards, rights at work,
and social dialogue
-
Mr. T. Jamasevi (Government, Thailand)
opened the discussion by pointing out that the decent work concept
provided broad guidelines for policy formulation on labour standards and
social dialogue. Furthermore, he was convinced of the importance of the
fundamental principles and rights at work, which carry a strong impact
on the success of social dialogue in the region.
The ILO supervisory mechanisms require
transparency and objectivity. Issues such as the criteria for the
selection of members of the supervisory bodies, the criteria and process
for the selection of individual cases in the Committee on the
Application of Standards of the International Labour Conference, and the
interpretation of compliance with ratified Conventions should be
addressed in the same spirit. Other delegates reiterated that the
evaluation of the application of standards should observe fairness, and
take into account a broad range of issues, without being confined to the
fundamental Conventions.
The second panellist, Mr. B. Noakes
(Employer, Australia) stressed that standards should be relevant to
workplace needs, flexible to accommodate the diversity of national
characteristics, capable of being ratified by a large majority of member
States, and in a form which can be fully and properly implemented. He
indicated that employers are committed to, and supportive of, the
Declaration since it meets these criteria. Turning to social dialogue,
he mentioned that this can only be meaningful if it is initiated and
conducted between employers and employees at the workplace level. This
will provide a foundation for its success in representative forms and at
the regional, sectoral, national and international levels.
The third panellist, Mr. K. Ahmed (Worker,
Pakistan) pointed out that with increasing globalization and
liberalisation, there is an urgent need to put in place standards to
ensure social justice and equity. He expressed concern at the poor
record of ratification of conventions, and the lack of implementation of
standards in the region, because rights at work represent an important
element in social development. He urged ratification and implementation
of the Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155). He
drew attention to implementation difficulties in various areas,
including child labour, forced labour, discrimination against women and
migrant workers, and in EPZs. He stated that social dialogue cannot be
achieved without representative trade union organisations able to work
in conformity with the Freedom of Association and Protection of the
Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) and the Right to Organise
and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98). Good governance,
transparency, and sharing of information are necessary prerequisites for
effective social dialogue at national, subregional and regional level.
He urged that social dialogue can only be meaningful if it is
participated in by top representatives of the government and social
partners. Social dialogue must encompass all critical social and
economic issues. The ILO must strengthen the institutional framework for
social dialogue with more resources at all levels.
Many speakers pointed out that although
the ratification of international labour standards is important, more
emphasis should be placed on their implementation and application. It is
necessary for member States to undertake adequate preparation prior to
ratification of conventions, with an emphasis on the methods by which
they would implement their conventions. This would reduce shortcomings
and pitfalls in compliance. The role of labour inspection and labour
administration in the region needs to be enhanced and strengthened, to
facilitate and support better implementation of standards.
The on-going reform of standards setting
was welcomed by some delegates. They noted that considerable progress
has been made in this process, and a degree of understanding and
consensus has been reached among the tripartite constituents.
Some delegates referred to the dilemma of
balancing the priorities of developing countries to alleviate poverty
and generate employment while recognizing the universality and
immutability of fundamental principles and rights at work. This dilemma
is most pressing in the informal sector, which comprise the bulk of the
workforce in a number of Asian member States.
Many speakers observed that social
dialogue was becoming increasingly important and that the institutions
of social dialogue were pivotal for enhancing the quality of decisions,
building trust, and securing consensus in relation to policy reform. To
ensure the effectiveness of social dialogue, governments must play a
facilitative and supportive role. Ratification of the Tripartite
Consultation (International Labour Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 144)
can play an instrumental role in this process. Reference was also made
to informal mechanisms of social dialogue, which could prove very
effective in reducing the backlog of cases pending before the labour
courts in Punjab, India, as mentioned by Mr I.P. Anand (Employers,
India).
Recognizing the importance of freedom of
association and collective bargaining as the fundamental foundations for
constructive social dialogue, some governments and workers’ delegates
urged member States to ratify and fully implement Conventions No. 87 and
No. 98. The delegates acknowledged that social dialogue has been
instrumental in minimizing the social costs during the Asian financial
crisis. In the light of looming global economic downturn, the delegates
therefore urged the ILO to provide timely technical assistance to member
States in strengthening the capacity of social partners to engage in
constructive dialogue and in improving social dialogue mechanisms at all
levels.
Tripartite panel discussion
on employment and social protection
-
The panel discussion opened with a
presentation by Mr. M. Li (Government, China) on Recent Employment
Policies in China. He estimated that of a labour force of 711 million,
the urban unemployed number 6 million, another 6.6 million had been laid
off in the urban areas through restructuring of state-owned enterprises,
while rural surplus labour is estimated to amount to around 150 million.
To address this overwhelming problem of unemployment, an employment
policy has been built on several planks. These include a macro plan to
ensure employment growth in economic development, attracting foreign
direct investment, incentives for small and medium-sized enterprise
development and a community-based jobs training programme, employment
services and social protection for the most vulnerable.
The second panellist, Mr. V.T. Nathan
(Employer, Malaysia), expanded on the theme of the dependence of
employment and social protection on enterprise development. He argued
that employment growth and enterprise growth were both dependent on
increasing enterprise efficiency as measured by Total Factor
Productivity. Moreover, the endeavour should be to increase this Total
Factor Productivity based on input productivity rather than input
growth. Human resource development is perhaps the single most important
factor in raising productivity.
The third panellist, Mr. B. Mansfield
(Worker, Australia), listed some priorities amongst the employment
concerns of the Workers’ group. The declared position of the group was
that employment should be available for all those who seek it. The
provision of such employment depends critically on growth; the gains
from growth should be shared between labour and capital based on
dialogue between them. Macro policy was seen as an important enabling
condition for sustainable economic growth. Coordination between the ILO
and international financial institutions must be seen as essential to
prioritise employment in the macro policy agenda.
Many speakers expressed concern about the
high and even rising levels of poverty in the region, and a strong
consensus emerged that employment represents the only sustainable route
out of poverty. Mr. T. Suzuki, the Chairperson of the Employer’s
group, wished to dispel the misconception that unemployment is typically
imported as a result of globalization. On the contrary, he emphasised
the role of domestic demand as the predominant base for employment in
the region. Many Government delegates endorsed the panellists’ view
that employment generation must be linked to productivity increases,
which themselves required investment; policy incentives may be required
to attract capital. Several delegates stressed the importance of
education and training on increasing productivity.
A number of Workers’ delegates expressed
concern that while to a large degree the recovery in employment, for
example in the Republic of Korea, has focussed on non-standard forms
such as daily and casual work, sub-contract and home-based work; this is
highly insecure, and difficult to protect through formal social security
schemes.
Regarding social security, the first
panellist Mr. Li noted the importance of developing effective
"social safety nets". He emphasised the particular needs of
women and disabled workers. The training needs of disabled workers were
equally emphasised by other speakers, including the Government delegate
from Bahrain.
Mr. Nathan expanded on the theme of social
protection. He stressed the need to ensure that employers are not asked
to take over from government a financial burden which could damage
competitivity.
The third panellist Mr. Mansfield
reiterated the view of the Workers’ group that a higher level of
priority should be accorded to social security. Within that context, it
is essential that social security systems must be comprehensive and
directed to all those in need, and moreover that schemes should be
publicly funded. It was felt amongst the workers’ representatives in
general that for Asian countries, in contrast to, say, those of Europe,
schemes based on public funding will potentially be more successful than
those based mainly on contributions from employment income. The ILO
should endeavour to make available adequate resources to address these
issues, but since those resources are inevitably limited, they should be
concentrated on the substantive reform of systems, rather than piecemeal
programmes devoted to relatively small, and perhaps privileged, groups.
Several contributors to the ensuing
discussion noted that there remains a role for the traditional means of
social protection through extended family and kinship relationships.
However, at the national level, government in each country is and will
necessarily remain the guarantor of the country’s social security
system. The discussion of social security at the 89th
International Labour Conference in 2001 demonstrated the increasing
importance of this subject for the ILO. A particular emphasis stands to
be placed on matters of governance, involving together all of the social
partners and not least local administrations and community groups.
The 1997 Asian financial crisis
demonstrated that countries which had built up appropriate systems of
social protection in advance, in particular protecting those who lost
their jobs in such circumstances, gained a major advantage in their
subsequent recovery. However, few schemes in the region make any
provision for unemployment benefits at present. An awareness of these
issues, expressed in many countries through proposals to develop
"social safety nets", is growing in the region.
A number of countries have taken steps to
review their social protection systems in the light of current needs and
realities. These include Pakistan, where a Task Force has been
established and will report shortly, and Sri Lanka where studies and
consultations have been carried out into the possibility of developing a
national pension scheme alongside or in partial replacement of the
existing provident fund system. In each case, however, the implications
for enterprise competitivity and job creation of the costs of any
extension of social protection must be clearly recognised. Mr. Suzuki
pointed out that, in particular, domestic demand and production is
crucially important to maintaining viable enterprises. Ultimately, as
noted by Mr. V. Vaish (Government, India), access to a job may be seen
as the most important means of social security, in the broadest sense,
for any able-bodied individual.
Several delegates remarked, however, on
the difficulties of making suitable social security provisions for the
ever-increasing numbers of workers – over 90 per cent of the work
force in many Asian countries – working in the informal or unorganised
sectors, or whose work is increasingly carried out on a casual basis.
The workers’ representative from Thailand, winding up the discussion,
suggested that ILO should consider the possibility of developing new
standards in this area.
On occupational safety and health, the
first panellist, Mr. Li, emphasised that employment policies should
include adequate measures of occupational safety and health. The second
panellist, Mr. Nathan, remarked on the fact that employers had continued
to ensure compliance with the relevant laws, even at the height of the
1997 crisis, and had played a full role in workplace safety committees.
Finally, Mr. Mansfield commented that there was much work to do in many
countries to improve occupational safety and health standards.
In the subsequent discussion, several
delegates pointed out that there are numerous work-related health and
safety problems prevailing in the region. Workers engaged in hazardous
jobs, or vulnerable groups of workers such as women suffer most. The
need to formulate and implement safety and health measures workable in
the local context were emphasized in order to make positive changes. The
different cultural and socio-economic climates of individual countries
require due attention if occupational safety and health programmes are
to be successful.
The roles of government in improving
occupational safety and health standards and enforcing relevant
legislation were stressed. For example, Thailand had enacted the Labour
Protection Law in 1998; this covers various issues of occupational
safety and health. The ILO was requested to provide assistance to
governments in establishing feasible measures to enforce legislation.
Employers are encouraged to support
occupational safety and health programmes because of the potential for
enhanced productivity. Mr. Nathan noted that employers have a vested
interest in safety and health in their establishments if they are to
enjoy the benefit of improved productivity and profitability. Safety and
health activities such as the zero accident programmes in Malaysia, or
safety and health committees, contributed to such success. Workable
models and best practices formulated in the region would provide clear
ideas for employers to improve safety and health. The ILO was asked to
provide technical assistance in this regard.
Discussion on Activities of
the ILO in Asia, 1997-2000
-
In his statement, Mr. I.P. Anand
(Employer, India), speaking on behalf of the Employers’ group,
observed the importance of qualitative assessment of ILO activities, and
stressed that in the future there will be a need for the ILO to develop
integrated socio-economic policies, reflecting a shared national vision
that goes beyond a political agenda. While certain parts of Asia were
affected by the 1997 Asian financial crisis, the whole of Asia now faces
an economic downturn. Therefore, it is important for member States not
only to counter the negative impact of the crisis, but also to design a
preventive self-reliance strategy, as proposed by the Director-General.
He emphasized that poverty eradication and
employment generation are at the heart of the ILO mandate and that this
needed to be reflected in the quality of the debate and the conclusions,
pointing the way to decisive and speedy action. In view of the pervasive
unemployment, under-employment and poverty in the region, the way
forward for the future is through employment creation, a life-long
skills and knowledge development culture, and creation of competitive
and sound enterprises. The appropriate means for addressing economic
problems and finding solutions jointly lies in social dialogue. This has
been demonstrated positively by countries which were most successful in
addressing the earlier financial crisis. Therefore, the ILO must
strengthen the capacities of the employers and other social partners,
which will put effective social dialogue institutions and facilitate
employment generation at the forefront of the ILO’s future programmes.
Mr. Rampak (Worker, Malaysia), speaking on
behalf of the Workers’ group, reaffirmed the suggestion made by the
employers that there should be a qualitative impact analysis of ILO
activities in the region to measure progress towards attainment of the
objectives of the decent work agenda. He proposed the setting up of a
Working Party to assess the implementation of the conclusions emanating
from regional meetings in Asia. Furthermore, he proposed that in order
to meet the challenges posed by globalization in regard to social
justice and equity, more effort should be extended in assisting
countries. In this regard, he urged the ILO to speed up the process of
filling vacancies in Multi-Disciplinary Teams and project personnel at
country levels.
He also encouraged governments to engage
promptly in the Follow-Up to the ILO Declaration on Fundamental
Principles and Rights at Work . Full compliance with the principles
enshrined by the Declaration would further alleviate the erosion of
workers’ rights posed by trade agreements such as the Asian Free Trade
Agreement (AFTA), and help prevent the violations of the right to
freedom of association and collective bargaining in EPZs.
A majority of the speakers underscored
that, in the years to come, employment generation must be placed at the
forefront of ILO technical cooperation, in view of the pervasive
unemployment and poverty, accentuated by the informalization of the
economies in the region. They urged the ILO to intensify assistance, as
part of an integrated policy package, in human resource development,
occupational safety and health, social protection, labour market
information, enterprise development and cooperatives, strengthening
social dialogue mechanisms and the capacities of the social partners.
Some delegates noted that the management
of migration flows, both documented and undocumented, and the adoption
of credible migration policies was a major challenge in the region.
Although migration could have positive aspects, more systematic and
organized measures should be adopted in collaboration between the
sending and receiving countries. It was recommended that member States
should be encouraged to ratify the Migration for Employment Convention,
1949 (No. 97), and the Migrant Workers Convention, 1975 (No. 143).
Several speakers pointed out that a
time-bound programme on gender equality should be seriously considered
for implementation in the near future. This proposal was inspired by the
example of the time-bound programme to eliminate the worst forms of
child labour, launched under IPEC.
It was suggested by a number of delegates,
including India, Japan, New Zealand and Singapore, that for a more
effective delivery of ILO technical cooperation activities, a clear
identification of countries’ specific needs must be accompanied by a
recognition of the ILO’s capacity to address these needs. This can be
achieved through clear formulation of indicators and targets, in the
context of the ILO’s four strategic objectives, leading crucially
towards an integrated policy agenda.
Interactive dialogue should form an
important component of regional meetings, which in turn should benefit
from the feedback obtained from informal meetings at sub-regional level.
Region-based research on existing and emerging issues, documentation of
best practices, dissemination of qualitative assessments, and increased
budget allocations will further contribute to more effective and
coherent ILO assistance.
In response to the debate, Mr I.P. Anand,
speaking for the Employers’ group, stated that the discussion on
future ILO activities had not generated adequate attention to the
requisite priorities in programmes the ILO should undertake to promote
diversified employment generation towards poverty eradication. This is
particularly necessary in the context of persisting poverty and the
deteriorating economic situation. He hoped that an appropriate specific
message in this regard will go to the Governing Body.
Consideration and adoption
of the Report of the Credentials Committee
-
The meeting took note of and adopted the
Report of the Credentials Committee.
Consideration and adoption
of the Conclusions
-
Mr. Suzuki, Chairperson of the Employers’
group said that in the light of the protracted discussions by the
Working Party on Conclusions, the Employers’ group was satisfied that
the draft Conclusions, comprising 21 paragraphs which he reviewed in
sequence, could be adopted with the proviso that the Meeting delete the
sentence: "The formation of a Confederation of Asia-Pacific
Employers (CAPE) is welcomed as a counterpart to ICFTU-APRO".
Mr. Rampak, Chairperson of the Workers’
group, also commended the work of the tripartite Working Party on
Conclusions, and stated that the Workers’ group, although preferring
to see the adoption of the draft in its entirety, would agree to the
modification proposed by the Employers’ group, and adopt the
conclusions in that form.
The Labour Minister of Iraq, supported by
the government delegate of Jordan, proposed an amendment to the
Conclusions; this was not supported by the Employers’ and the Workers’
groups, who confirmed that the Conclusions should be adopted as agreed,
noting the Minister’s Reservation.
The Conclusions were then adopted by the
Meeting, subject to the agreed modification, the Reservation entered by
the government delegate from Iraq and the approval of the Governing
Body.
Consideration and adoption
of the Report of the Meeting
-
Several delegates submitted amendments
which were incorporated in the final version of the Report. The Report
was then adopted, subject to the approval of the Governing Body.
Closing of the Meeting
-
The Deputy Secretary-General, Mr. Nodera,
presented the response of the Director-General to the discussions in the
Meeting. He noted that the discussion has embraced all aspects of decent
work, with a view to putting these into practice effectively in the
region. He picked out a number of comments which had framed the
discussions in the Meeting and which will guide the decent work agenda in
the region within an integrated policy framework: that there can be no
decent work without work; that unemployment is the greatest exploiter of
labour; that employment is the best antidote to poverty; that there can
be no decent work without equality of rights and opportunities between
women and men; that social protection must accompany employment and that
social dialogue plays the fundamental role in times of crisis. Finally
he looked forward to increased consultations with the constituents
across the region, for guidance in the implementation of the decent work
agenda at the national level.
The Chairperson, the Vice Chairpersons,
the Chairs of the Employers’ group and the Workers’ group and the
Regional Director all thanked the delegates for their contributions to
the Meeting.
ANNEX
Conclusions of the Thirteenth ILO Asian Regional Meeting
The delegates at the Thirteenth Asian Regional
Meeting of the ILO endorse the general purport of the Report of the
Director-General, Decent Work in Asia.
The delegates urge all member States in the region to
define, through a tripartite process, a national plan of action for
decent work, that integrates fundamental rights at work, greater
opportunities for women and men to secure decent work, social
protection, including occupational safety and health standards, for
the greatest possible number of workers, as well as increased social
dialogue.
The delegates call attention to the fact that
globalization can have positive as well as negative impacts. In light
of the current global economic downturn, which is already causing
lower economic growth in many countries of the region, the delegates
request the Director-General, as a matter of urgency, to prepare, in
consultation with the tripartite constituents of the region,
guidelines and proposed programmes aimed at preventing, or at least
significantly attenuating, the negative impacts of the current
economic slowdown, as well as programmes aimed to assist member States
to participate successfully in the global economy to achieve
sustainable economic growth.
The delegates recall that respect for international
labour standards is fundamentally important for reduction of the
decent work deficit in their countries. The ILO Declaration on
Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work will provide a positive
framework within which to fashion more adequate responses to social
problems and structural changes which may result from economic
fluctuation and globalization. The delegates call on all member States
to bring their legislation into conformity with the principles of the
fundamental Conventions and to take steps to ratify these Conventions,
if they have not done so, and to apply them fully. The delegates note
the disparity between ratification and implementation of fundamental
Conventions and urge that measures be taken to address this issue.
The delegates welcome the ongoing review of standards
policy. In order to facilitate the process it would be useful to
follow a more systematic approach focusing on the revisions of
existing standards, as well as the development of relevant new
standards. Delegates also call on the Office to provide assistance to
constituents both in preparing for ratification and in applying
ratified standards.
The delegates take note of the significant expansion
of the International Programme on the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC)
in the region and of the remarkable results achieved in some
countries. They express the hope that IPEC will extend its activities
to appropriate countries in the region in the course of the next
biennium. While urging IPEC to deploy every possible effort to
eliminate child labour, in particular in its worst forms, the
delegates encourage it to devote particular attention to combating
trafficking of children and to bonded labour.
The delegates wish to stress the importance of
employment generation as the central element in the Decent Work Agenda
and as the principal means to reduce poverty. They call on the
Director-General to give priority to this issue in the ILO programme
in both the Asia-Pacific region and the Arab states. The delegates
urge the Office to work with constituents to enable member States to
establish development plans and training programmes to alleviate the
problem of unemployment. They call on the ILO to assist countries to
identify their needs, undertake research, and develop, in
consultation with them, an employment framework in accordance with the
Decent Work Agenda. Delegates note the significant increase in
flexible work arrangements – subcontracting, casual, fixed-term,
part-time, temporary and home-based work. The delegates stress
the need both for the creation of decent work and the establishment
and maintenance of a policy framework favourable to economic growth
and to the development and expansion of both large and small
enterprises and to provide appropriate training, credit and other
support services, especially to small enterprises. The delegates note
the importance of raising productivity, increasing competitiveness of
enterprises and establishing a conducive environment for investment,
job creation and improved quality of life.
The delegates consider that it is important to
promote policy integration for employment through better co-operation
among government agencies as well as with social partners. By giving
high priority to employment issues in the overall policy agenda, it is
hoped that forward-looking strategies may be developed to avert
and mitigate the social repercussions of economic downturns on
employment and income in the region. In order to promote employment
the delegates stress the importance of partnerships among the ILO,
relevant international agencies and international and regional
financial institutions.
- The delegates note that there are still many
countries in the region where equality between women and men in
employment, education and training, remuneration, social security
entitlements, facilities to establish their own enterprises and other
aspects of work, has not yet been achieved. Delegates also note that
women account for a disproportionately large group of the working
poor. They stress that gender issues should not be marginalized.
Gender mainstreaming should be a priority item on the employment
agenda and should be monitored regularly to determine whether concrete
progress has been made. The ILO, in consultation with constituents,
should also assist member States to introduce time-bound programmes
for gender equality.
Multi-skilling, skills training and upgrading are
crucial to enhancing access to employment and improving productivity
and competitiveness in the global economy. The rapidly increasing
reliance on information and communication technology and a general
trend towards knowledge-based economies require a more educated,
skilled and adaptable workforce. The delegates note that education
systems and skills training should be linked to market demand through
improved labour market information and labour market analysis.
The delegates note that migration, as a manifestation
of the globalizing world, cannot in most cases be conceived as
favouring the sending country alone, but as benefiting also many
receiving countries by providing much needed workers. Migrant workers
are often the least protected. Irregular migration and trafficking
expose workers to the worst forms of abuse and exploitation. Even
legally admitted workers do not enjoy the same rights and level of
social protection as the national workforce in most countries.
Recognizing that bilateral and multilateral approaches are
prerequisite for safeguarding the least protected, the delegates
request the Office to take a lead in developing and facilitating
appropriate policy measures for migrant workers within the framework
of Decent Work. It is suggested that the respective ILO Regional
Offices carry out activities on labour migration and provide a forum
to discuss migration issues. The delegates note that the ratification
and full implementation of the Migration for Employment Convention
(Revised), 1949 (No. 97) and the Migrant Workers (Supplementary
Provisions) Convention, 1975 (No. 143) constitute a positive step
towards ensuring decent work for migrant workers.
The delegates note the importance of providing
appropriate training and productive employment opportunities for
members of vulnerable groups, including disabled persons, indigenous
people, women, older workers and unemployed youth. Of particular
concern is the high level of youth unemployment.
The delegates note that social protection must
complement national employment policies. They note with concern that
limited social protection is one of the greatest decent work deficits
in the region. Of particular concern is the widespread absence of
social protection for workers in informal employment – both rural
and urban. Recognizing the high social cost of the Asian crisis of
1997 and relatively low public spending on social protection in the
region, the delegates call upon the ILO to support the development of
comprehensive, inclusive and sustainable social protection programmes.
The delegates note that social protection is the responsibility of the
State in order to achieve effective redistribution of national
resources through both contribution-based social insurance and
public-financed social assistance programmes.
Considering the conclusions of the general discussion
on social security at the 89th Session of the International
Labour Conference, the delegates stress the importance of building the
ILO research and knowledge base about the extension of social security
benefits to more workers. In this regard, the delegates urge the
Office to allocate adequate resources to assist constituents in the
region to address these issues.
Delegates note that although governments need to play
a major role in implementing and improving the framework for
occupational safety and health, it is also the role of the social
partners to ensure that occupational safety and health is addressed as
a priority in the workplace. In this regard, the Occupational Safety
and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155), the ILO Guidelines on
Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems, as well as the
newly adopted Code of Practice on HIV/AIDS and the World of Work
should be promoted.
Recognizing the importance of the right of freedom of
association and the right to collective bargaining as the foundations
for social dialogue, the delegates urge all member States to implement
fully the rights set out in the Freedom of Association and Protection
of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) and the Right to
Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98)
throughout their national territory. The delegates acknowledge that
social dialogue has been instrumental in attenuating negative social
impacts during the Asian financial crisis. In the light of looming
global economic downturn, the delegates urge the ILO to provide timely
technical assistance to member States for strengthening the capacity
of social partners to engage in dialogue and improve social dialogue
mechanisms at all levels. The delegates further call upon all member
States to take steps to ratify the Tripartite Consultation
(International Labour Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 144). While
taking note of the great diversity of institutional arrangements for
social dialogue at all levels in member States, the delegates request
the Office to make the provision of assistance to strengthen dialogue
at the level of the work place a priority.
The delegates reiterate that the most effective way
to define and implement a national policy to reduce the decent work
deficit is through tripartite social dialogue and that such dialogue
is only possible when the participants are equal partners. The
delegates call upon the ILO to play a more effective role in
strengthening the social partners through research and training.
While expressing concern at the lack of information
on, and evaluation of, the follow-up to the conclusions of previous
regional meetings, the delegates urge each member State of the
Asia-Pacific region to establish, through tripartite discussion and
consensus, a national plan of action for decent work, which should
define, within the overall framework of the ILO Decent Work Agenda,
national priorities, a timetable for implementation and a set of
indicators for the purposes of regular tripartite monitoring and
evaluation. The delegates request the Office to provide such
assistance to the tripartite constituents in the design of these
national plans of action as they may consider necessary.
The delegates request the Office to give priority to
assisting, where necessary and requested, the tripartite constituents
to implement the national plan of action for decent work. In this
regard, ILO capacity in the region should be strengthened. Further,
the delegates express the hope that other member States in the region
will respond positively to requests for technical assistance and
advice to replicate or adapt their own best practices for the benefit
of less advanced countries.
To facilitate the design, implementation and
monitoring of national plans of action for decent work, the delegates
request the Office to establish a regularly up-dated website which
reflects actions and activities undertaken in each country in pursuit
of the Decent Work Agenda, both by the Office and the constituents. In
this connection, the delegates call upon the Office to design, as soon
as possible, appropriate measures for collecting information annually
and disseminating this to all constituents, including qualitative
assessment of the effectiveness of ILO activities in the region.
As regards elements of the Decent Work Agenda which
are most appropriately dealt with at the subregional and regional
levels, the delegates invite the tripartite constituents to consider
the establishment of corresponding subregional or regional fora to
design and implement appropriate programmes. The Office should include
information on such programmes in the website mentioned above.
|