Statements by the workers' sector
at Cinterfor/ILO events
Report of Workers' Representatives in the Thirty-Seventh Meeting
of the Technical Committee
Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, 19th to 21st October, 2005
The group of workers representatives:
1. Reaffirm what was expressed by the workers representatives
group during the 37th Meeting of the Technical Committee, in the sense
of defending training institutions and aspiring to their strengthening,
by improving the quality of their work. Therefore, we share the equity,
quality and relevance values promoted by this Meeting.
2. We welcome the development and the contents of ILO Recommendation
195 on Human Resources Development: education, training and lifelong
learning, as a development in the required articulations for workers
development and request the support of the employer and government sectors
in order to elaborate public policies within the social dialogue framework.
Likewise, it is necessary to generate relevant mechanisms so that the
Recommendation can be evaluated in a permanent way, paying attention
to worker development within the context of the daily change produced
in the world of work.
3. We recognize the invaluable contribution of Cinterfor/ILO for the
consolidation of the conceptual baggage of vocational training in our
countries and in particular in our trade unions.
4. Despite this consolidation, an exception must be established for
our poor active participation in the 2003-2004 biennium in the development
of joint actions and activities with Cinterfor/ILO to address workers
situation. This is reflected in the diminished representation of workers
groups in this Technical Committee Meeting, which is of deep concern
to us.
5. We recognize the effort of Cinterfor/ILO in calling the meeting
and in the development of the activities. Nevertheless, we believe that
the workers movement should strengthen its participation, the
development of activities and the seeking of effective economic resources
in order to fulfil the goals estimated in this and the previous meetings.
6. Based on this diagnosis, we formally request the development, by
Cinterfor/ILO, of a line of action to specifically address the workers
group demands. In order to do that, we believe that Cinterfor/ILO should
give this line the same level of development and characteristics as
the other areas of activities being performed by the institution.
7. This line should contemplate, among others, the following issues:
a. Develop strategies from the trade union movement that allow to
defend and represent the interests of those workers that work in the
informal labour market through alliance and organization policies
that use vocational training as one of its instruments.
b. Training of members from the board of directors and representatives
of trade unions to guarantee the effectiveness in adopting and monitoring
the decisions.
c. Promote the development of a joint action strategy of the Latin
American and Caribbean trade unions, in defence of the social control
over the economic resources devoted to vocational training, guaranteeing
the effective participation of trade unions in the decision-making
instances related to management, control and application of budgets
to vocational training programmes and institutions.
d. Develop the existing mechanisms, as well as build new ones, aimed
at favouring information sharing and exchanging knowledge and technical
cooperation among trade unions of different countries.
e. Support the calling of meetings with trade unions, to address
the issues of vocational training, labour education and occupational
health and safety, with regards to the two last issues as specific
spaces of concern and work. For this purpose, it is necessary to strengthen
the continuity of Cinterfor/ILO in the research, development and assistance
to these issues.
8. In order to obtain these objectives and with regards to ILO we demand
that the economic resources and technical capacity be facilitated to
Cinterfor/ILO to make this possible. In this regard, the workers
group agrees to ask representatives from ILO Governing Body to make
all the necessary efforts to make this a reality.
9. We request that National Governments contribute to the specific
financing of the lines of action designed for workers; we also propose
that labour education be thought of as vocational training of the collaborating
workers and trade union delegates and
therefore, eligible for being financed as any other training by different
institutions.
10. It is important to highlight the importance that Cinterfor/ILO
has acquired for vocational training institutions and we request them
to increase their support to improve the quality, equity and relevance
of the programmes designed for workers. In this sense, we promote the
development of actions to address the new realities of the labour market
and the requirements of the economic integration processes that our
countries are undertaking.
11. Finally, and in order to implement the proposed actions, we request
that Cinterfor/ILO may soon hold a meeting that will allow workers to
analyze, get consensus and evaluate the requested programmes and lines
of action and generate mechanisms and
strategies to obtain the necessary economic and technical resources.
The Group was integrated by:
Gustavo Gándara, CGT, Argentina
Ulric Sealy, BWU Labour Collage, Barbados
María Cadena, SECAP, Ecuador
Fredis Vásquez, INSAFORP, El Salvador
Everildo Revoltorio Torres, INTECAP/CUSG, Guatemala
Agustín Vargas Saillant, CTU, Dominican Republic
Julio César García, INFOTEP, Dominican Republic
Jorge Mesa, PIT/CNT, Uruguay
Anaclara Matosas, Cinterfor/ILO