|
Although the monitoring of both actions and evaluation of results
have always been present as concern and as requirements in the
design of social policies, they are generally considered to be
external controlling dimensions, coming after the development
and implementation processes. However, without them we wouldn't
have access to incoming information which contribute to lead the
way and even less, to assess the continuous improvement.
|
Toolbox
>> Conceptual
materials
>>
Strategies
/ applications
>> Results
and impacts
|
|
Only by knowing what is happening we will be succeed
in transforming it. Therefore, a systemic and integral conception
of the policies requires to incorporate both: Monitoring and Evaluation
as necessary managing components since both are interdependent
and basic tools, and as such they cannot be seen as separate actions
to be faced only after the intervention has been finished but
on the contrary, they have to be perceived as essential tools
for both individual and institutional training.
The Monitoring, perceived as the continuous process and systematic
pursuit of all that has been acted, it is a condition for the
rectification or deepening of the execution and also as a way
of ensuring the feedback among objectives, theoretical budgets,
and the knowledge acquired from the practice. Also, it bears the
responsibility of preparing and contributing the information that
enables results and processes being systematised and, therefore,
it is considered to be a basic tool for Evaluation. On the other
hand, Evaluation, is considered as a transformation tool since
it let us know what has been happening and the reasons behind
it (How and What) and, above all, it throws a light on the alternatives
for the permanent improvement of the present and future interventions,
meaning that enables for good practices transference. Therefore,
seen from this conception, both : Monitoring and Evaluation have
to be coherent with the object of their analysis, which in our
case, means the training policies and, therefore, both should
place the target subject within its context as the central point
and core of their analysis, thus enabling for gender perspective
incorporation as an essential tool towards ensuring the inclusion
and the participation of all the different protagonists.
From these convictions, the FORMUJER Programme included among
its objectives the development of a Monitoring system and of an
Evaluating Model placing gender perspective in such way as to
enable to act as a reference which is permanently sending data
inputs to the training system.
As it can be visualised in the enclosed
Toolbox, related to the Monitoring process, through the execution
of FORMUJER a whole battery of instruments have been devised -
covering from the enrolment date and follow up of the students
(subsequently part of Information and Guidance subsystem) the
ensuing surveys among the players, to the instrumentation of National
and Regional Annual Workshops for Monitoring and Evaluation that
have become fundamental management tools.
Also, through the joined efforts and resources of both IADB and
the European Union, was prepared an Evaluation model on gender
perspective, containing all necessary instruments together with
more sensitive and pertinent indicators to characterise and to
analyse the appropriation and institutionalising of employability,
equity and gender perspective approaches, as well as going through
the diverse dimensions and policies components thus defining and
analysing the destination target's objective and subjective profiles
as well as the changes and results achieved by training, in terms
of employability improvement, the civic participation and the
gender conscience. This Model was applied in the: Intermediate
Evaluation of the FORMUJER Programme, where it served as a base
and was nurtured for the Final Evaluation, has also been transferred
to the PROIMUJER Programme, as well as to other interventions
within the region and in Spain. In that way and with the contribution
of all the different parties, a new process for the validation
and evaluation of: constant improvement of applied methodologies,
of evaluation instruments, of contribution for the quality and
in the vocational training context has opened up.
|