Productivity
Giving all workers an opportunity to contribute their full potential
Gender discrimination in the workplace can have a negative
effect on productivity. Sources of discrimination and ways to improve fairness of
treatment are not always easy to identify, but action to eliminate unfairness based on
gender and to improve the opportunities offered to women can make a difference to an
organization's efficiency.
Forms of discrimination
Much discrimination is not deliberate and simply arises
from implicit, traditional assumptions about men and women, and what certain jobs require.
Direct discrimination involves a
preference for men over equally qualified women for given positions, and offering women
less development opportunities. Evaluation is always subjective to some extent, and
equivalent qualifications may be regarded less favourably for women than for men.
Assumptions about women being less ambitious, less able to speak in public, less able to
exercise authority, etc., may be built into the assignments given to women. The same
characteristics may also be assessed differently in women and in men. For example, what is
regarded as leadership in a man may be seen as a domineering attitude in a woman, and
reserve may be interpreted as wisdom in a man but as shyness in a woman.
Indirect discrimination occurs
when procedures and criteria for selection, promotion, access to benefits, etc., are such
that the majority of women end up being excluded even though they were not intended to be.
For example, employees may be recruited through networks of professional acquaintances so
that for the most part only men will be contacted for a given position. Only employees on
long-term or full-time contracts may be eligible for benefits, etc. Indirect
discrimination may also occur when social patterns of behaviour which are more often found
among men than among women are considered the right way to do things.
How can discrimination affect productivity?
Pay: To many people, pay is a
measure of fairness and a measure of the value their employer puts on their work. Women
who are paid less than men with similar qualifications are likely to feel less motivated
and may not stay with their employer as long.
Choosing the best person for the job: Discrimination,
whether direct or indirect, means that hiring and promotions are based on a restricted
group of potential applicants. Removing discrimination implies selecting from a larger
pool of talent, with a better chance of finding the best person for the job. In many
cases, this may require more open and systematic procedures, which can further improve the
selection process.
Encouraging people to contribute to their full
potential: Good work often involves initiative and creativity, even in
carrying out apparently simple tasks. Many human resource practices are designed to
encourage employees to do good work by providing them with opportunities to exercise
initiative and creativity, and with incentives to do so. For example, enterprises may set
up problem-solving groups or quality circles and offer employee share-ownership plans or
incentive pay schemes. However, some of these schemes have been less than successful
because management involved women less than men in participatory processes. Teams were
formed and the team leaders appointed were men, or it was not thought necessary to include
certain units or certain skill groups in consultative processes, and those happened to be
primarily female. Women may also work in jobs which are not covered by incentive pay
schemes, whether because they are lower down in the organization or because they do not
meet eligibility criteria based on hours, duration of contract or length of service.
Discrimination-related stress: Feeling
underutilized, unfairly treated or undervalued creates stress, and perceptions of
discrimination have been associated with extra stress among discriminated groups.
Discriminatory environments also foster sexual harassment, with the attendant ill effects
on health, absenteeism and resignations among victims.
By underutilising their employees' skills and exposing a
share of their workforce to demoralisation and stressful harassment, discriminatory
workplaces undermine their potential efficiency and productivity. Furthermore,
discriminatory organizations may be exposed to costly lawsuits in an increasing number of
countries. Gender-conscious enterprises may also be better able to respond to changing
markets, as shown by the recent example of sports equipment manufacturers' development of
products adapted to women's anatomy.
What can be done?
Management of public and private sector
workplaces have a crucial role in improving fairness of treatment by
actively implementing comprehensive equal opportunities measures in their organizations.
Over two decades of experience in several countries have shown a number of practices to be
effective in correcting and preventing discrimination in the workplace. Available evidence
suggests fair treatment policies have been associated with better performance.
| Practices to improve fairness of treatment in the
workplace Examples of effective practices include:
- Training employees in equal-opportunity issues
- Monitoring the composition of the workforce at all levels
- Setting quantitative objectives for improving the gender
balance at all levels
- Reviewing hiring and promotion procedures
- Reviewing eligibility criteria for benefits
- Ensuring that women sit on all evaluation committees
- Requiring all "short lists" for hiring and
promotion to include female applicants
- Setting up hotlines and formal complaint procedures for
sexual harassment
- etc.
In all cases, making management accountable for the
implementation of these policies has been found especially important to their success. |
Back to index