Write
your e-mail address to receive news from this site
Last update:
8/07/2009
Woman,
training and work
Gender! A Partnership of
Equals
Geneve:
International Labour Office, 2000. 115 p.
Control over Finances Who controls the purse strings?
Women have increasingly become a key target group for
microfinance programs. Providing women entrepreneurs with access to microfinance
contributes not only to poverty alleviation but also to women's empowerment. Moreover,
because poor women are increasingly recognized to be better borrowers, regular financial
institutions are starting to show interest in them.
It is widely assumed that microfinance will have a positive
impact on women's livelihood by leading to higher income, which will help women to perform
their role as agents of the health, nutritional and educational status of other household
members, by increasing women's employment in microenterprises and improving their
income-generating productivity, and by enhancing their self-confidence and status within
the family as independent producers and providers of valuable cash resources to the
household economy.
On average, however, women's access to formal institutional
credit is much more restricted than men's. Women's microenterprises have lower sales
revenues, fewer assets and smaller profit margins which, under conventional financial
criteria, make them high-risk ventures. Because of tradition, customary law and state law
on property and land rights, women rarely have property under their names which they can
offer to secure loans. Transaction costs are also likely to be higher for women than men
because women tend to have a greater workload, face social restrictions to travel and
often lack cash to cover pre-loan expenses, etc. Analysis of the limited number of
assessments which exist on the impact of microfinancing demonstrates both positive and
negative effects:
Improvements in women's economic security, bargaining power
within the household, self-confidence and health and education of other family members
Positive effects on the schooling of girls, increase in
women's asset holdings (except land) and total household expenditure
Negative effects of microfinance have been detected with
regard to women's workload, repayment burden and the unpaid employment of daughters
Women'scontrol over financial resources is
increasingly seen as a key factor in explaining these mixed results. The limited evidence
available highlights that a significant proportion of women who may have access to
financing, may not have control over the loans obtained. However, the loss of control over
financial resources does not necessarily mean that women are worse off in terms of
increased social and economic opportunities:
Even when women lose control over the use of their loans,
their overall status in the household may improve due to their role as a financial
mediator
Handing over loans to men may help to secure family
stability by easing cashflow bottlenecks in the household
Women may also use credit as a bargaining chip to gain
access to other opportunities offered by financial institutions, such as training,
education and information
However, the impact of microfinance services is stronger
when women actually control the financial resources acquired in their names. Increased
control is likely to contribute to women's empowerment, facilitate women's
entrepreneurship, assist them in their household roles and ease their repayment burden.
Lessons learned: The way forward
To effectively address the constraints faced by women in
their access to and control over finances, support measures are required at many levels.
Support measures
Policy level: Surveys and other data collection
methods to determine the needs, demands and debt capacity of women, land reform and other
legal measures to abolish gender differences in commercial and civil law, the provision of
interest rate subsidies, directed credit and portfolio quotas, etc., and, most
importantly, the gender-sensitization of policymakers.
Institutional level: Creation of dedicated
lending schemes, of gender-specific windows in financial institutions or
gender-sensitization of existing financial institutions.
Direct support: Literacy campaigns,
primary education of girls and the dissemination of sensitization information about
financial sector institutions and available targeted schemes, encouragement and support to
group-based savings and credit functions and organizations which promote women's
associations.
Other strategic options
Loans in kind, small amounts of credit and savings, regular
occasions for deposits
Supporting activities which are controlled by women, which
can be marketed from the home and/or result in income during the season when the woman is
acting as the head of the household
Numeracy and literacy training for women, skills-training,
especially bookkeeping and accounting
Legal literacy and awareness-raising for both men and women,
more women staff at all levels of financial institutions
Group formation for economy of scale (access to markets,
land and other productive resources) and federation for leadership training
Registering and insuring assets acquired through loans on
borrower's name, insist on proof of managerial control over enterprise, close monitoring
of loan use by financial institution, and mandatory savings on women's individual accounts
Self-Support: A case study
TheWorking Women's Forum (WWF) in India was set up in 1978 to
organize poor working women in the slum areas of Madras. Its membership has since expanded
and now also covers three other states. Members are engaged in a variety of trades. WWF
field workers encourage women to form groups of 20 to 30 members usually along
occupational and neighbourhood lines. Each group elects a leader; the group leaders elect
an area leader to sit on the WWF Governing Board.
Loans were obtained initially from commercial banks, but
due to constraints met in dealing with them, the WWF set up its own credit cooperative in
1981, the Working Women's Credit Society (WWCS). Loans are granted at an
effective rate of interest of about 8%. Groups begin with small short-term loans. Less
formal procedures are applied than at commercial banks, such as accepting photographs in
place of signatures for identification. Each group leader assumes liability for the
members' loans and supervises loan applications and repayment, while the group exerts peer
pressure to ensure repayment. The repayment rate stands at over 96%.