|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Woman, training and work Gender! A Partnership of
Equals
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Indicators | Both sexes (%) |
Boys (%) |
Girls (%) |
| Industries with economically active children: Agriculture, hunting, forestry and fishing Manufacturing Wholesale and retail trade, restaurants and hotels Community, social and personal services Transport, storage and communication Construction Mining and quarrying |
70.4 8.3 8.3 6.5 3.8 1.9 0.9 |
68.9 9.4 10.4 4.7 3.8 2.0 1.0 |
75.3 7.9 5.0 8.9 - 1.9 0.9 |
| Economically active children Boy/girl ratio at work |
25 100 |
27 56 |
22 44 |
| - Children attending school Of whom with economic activity - Not attending school Of whom in economic activity only Of whom in housekeeping activity only |
39-87 00-33 13-61 39-56 12-32 |
49-50 00-25 10-51 56-74 8-14 |
23-84 00-42 16-77 23-38 15-49 |
| Children in hazardous work | 34-68 | 33-67 | 27-69 |
Although IPEC's action programmes deal with boys and girls alike, the work girls do is often "invisible" and their problems and "survival strategies" are different from those of working boys. Girls usually start working at an earlier age than boys, particularly in rural areas where the majority of child labour is located (Ashagrie, 1997: 6). In addition, on average girls work longer hours than boys, and they are paid less for the same type of work (ILO 1997). Girls are also less likely to receive payment for their work, and therefore to receive the benefits and bargaining power that come with access to economic resources, including the ability to access an income with which to get an education. If they do receive payment, they are also less likely to keep the income they earn. For example, one piece of research found that more than 50 per cent of employed girls received no cash payment for their work, as compared to only 7 per cent of boys and where they did receive payment, 96 per cent handed over their entire salary to their family, as compared to 52 per cent of working boys (Chatterjee Schlachter 1993 quoted in Moore 1994: 23).
| The new Convention on the Worst Forms of Child Labour,
1999 (No. 182), and Recommendation, 1999 (No. 190) The concern regarding the specific vulnerabilities of girls is reflected in the new Convention and Recommendation on the Worst Forms of Child Labour, which were adopted unanimously by the constituent members of the ILO in June 1999. In particular, several Articles and paragraphs make explicit reference to the need to take account of the special situation of girls, while others make implicit reference to areas where girls are likely to be found working. |
Girls also are far less likely to receive any form of basic education. In fact, girls account for two of every three children in the developing world who do not receive a primary education (approximately 73 million of the 130 million out-of-school children) (UNICEF 1999: 8). Even if they are attending school, girls are almost twice as likely to be tired from the burden of housework, to the extent that full participation in class is limited. This leads to higher dropout rates, lower school enrolment rates and early marriages for girls compared to boys.
How does IPEC identify and target working girls?
|
The early discrimination that girls face, results in their growing up to be women with greater constraints and fewer choices and opportunities. They in turn are less able to positively influence the lives of their daughters (and sons), thereby perpetuating the vicious cycle of poverty and exploitation from one generation of women to the next. This is not to minimize the experience of boys, nor to suggest that boys should be excluded, but it is only through a gender perspective that captures the different experiences of child labourers, that the special needs that arise from those experiences can be addressed.
So far, IPEC programmes have been carried out for working girlsin bonded labour, prostitution, domestic work and manufacturing. Where the forms of work are clearly hazardous, the most immediate recourse is to remove them from such work, rehabilitate them and reintegrate them into family, community and society.
| Girls vs. boys Girls are more likely to:
|
Working girls withdrawn from their work are given basic education or vocational training, medical help and nutritional support. Their families are offered support, including skills-training (Nepal), livelihood and income generation (Bangladesh and Brazil), nutrition and health support (Pakistan, Indonesia and Kenya). Action programmes carried out by local NGOs with the support of the ILO have set up transit homes and temporary shelters for girls at risk of being tricked into prostitution (Nepal and Thailand) and for street girls (Kenya). Activities to inform girls of their rights and the setting up of crisis hot lines have also been supported (Kenya, Tanzania, and the Philippines), while in Tanzania an agency of women journalists and lawyers has extended its outreach programme to halt violence against women to include a campaign highlighting the situation of child domestic workers. In the Mekong Basin countries, (Thailand, Cambodia, China and Vietnam) and the south Asian countries (Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Sri Lanka), IPEC is implementing a second phase major regional programme to stop child trafficking for prostitution and other extreme forms of child labour.
IPEC's goal is not just the removal of individual children from work in which they are exploited, but the long-term goal which will be achieved when new generations of children are effectively prevented from entering the labour market. To achieve this, a change in social attitudes is important, particularly towards girls, their special vulnerabilities and their right to education. IPEC is developing a strategy for making gender issues an integral part of its programmes by incorporating a gender component into IPEC's structure, sub-programmes and operations. At the national level, this will be extended to include a gender component into national plans of action, and into its problem analysis and programme design. In addition, strategies will be reviewed to ensure that support and incentives given to the family of a working child are not gender-biased, especially in the area of skills-training and access to microcredit resources.
The Inter-American Centre for Knowledge Development
in Vocational Training (ILO/Cinterfor)
Avda. Uruguay 1238 - Montevideo - Uruguay - Tel: (5982) 908 6023 - 902 0557
- 908 0545 - Fax: (5982) 902 1305
webmaster@cinterfor.org.uy
Copyright © 1996-2008 International Labour Organisation (ILO) - Disclaimer