6. CONCLUDING REMARKS
Unlike what people might think, what is novel about labour competency
is not its theoretical support (which dates from the 1970s), nor is
it the focus on results rather than on the educational credential. Training
institutions award vocational aptitude certificates that are widely
recognized by companies, and implicitly carry the seal of quality of
the training received.
The analysis of work is the first new aspect to focus on results rather
than on tasks and operations. But one of the crucial aspects of the
application of this focus is its effect on management systems in training
institutions, and its impact on the analysis and certification of competencies
as an element of equity and the recognition of knowledge acquired at
work.
Training institutions which have adopted the competency focus in the
generation of their programs have quickly realized how this has become
an excellent alternative for the orientation of their institutional
modernization programs, and for generating real technical unity when
it comes to needs identification, the structuring of responses, and
the execution and evaluation of training.
Experiences like the SENAI in Brazil and INTECAP in Guatemala show
the need for and the advantages of fitting the training system into
a clear institutional framework which works in favor of the modernization
of management and of technical and operative unity.
Furthermore, if certification is taken not as a credential awarded
at the end of an educational cycle but as evidence that the possessor
is competent, this ensures that his knowledge, skills and understanding
are relevant to a job. A worker's competencies, such as the capacity
to analyze, to solve unforeseen problems and commitment to the objectives
of the job, are now being recognized along with his knowledge and skills.
The analysis of competencies has been a breath of fresh air for the
pedagogy of training, and in fact it has varied the way training programs
are made. With the competency focus, training institutions are drawing
closer to companies and workers when it comes to preparing their programs.
This makes the new offers of training highly relevant.
It has also allowed the well-known subject of the recognition of knowledge
to be introduced. It is true that in the 1970s and 1980s some institutions
improved mechanisms for evaluating and "validating" certificates,
but now the perspective is one of recognition, the idea that work allows
acquired knowledge, which is undoubtedly a vehicle for labour competency,
to be developed and transferred.
Some big challenges remain, like the continuous optimization of the
offer of training by competencies and its relation to the new information
and communication technologies, and institutional capacity to offer
open, modular and flexible training.
The actors in the field of training have found new methodologies to
make radical innovations in the ways in which training takes place and
in its ultimate objective of developing the capacity to apply knowledge,
attitudes and comprehension in work situations to get results. This
works in favor of better programs which should facilitate access to
more participants. To this end, the administration of education is fundamental.
The capacity to manage human and physical resources in new training
schemes which lend viability to the enormous renewing potential of the
competency model will be one of the crucial areas in the training panorama
in the years to come.
