Quality management in vocational training
Seminar on the
dissemination and analysis of quality management experiences
in a number of countries of Latin America. Lima, 15 to 17 November,
2000.
This seminar aimed at bringing together experiences on
criteria that have been adopted by vocational training institutions
and systems in the region in connection with quality management.
It served the purpose of disseminating
the lessons learned in each case.
The seminar agenda included presentations
of several experiences of Vocational Training Institutions (VTIs) in
quality certification.
In general, such presentations underlined
several driving forces that motivate institutions to work on the basis
of a quality approach. They pivoted mainly round institutional modernisation
procedures, clear-cut guidelines to strengthen an organisational culture
and the storing of knowledge gathered in processes of design, development,
implementation and evaluation of training.
The Council for the Standardisation
and Certification of Occupational Competencies of Mexico (Spanish acronym
CONOCER) underlines from its experience the need for teamwork with all
workers. Quality implies a shared vision and a common attitude by each
and every member of an institution. The CONOCER
presentation (powerpoint, 733kb) recalled the Councils
main achievements regarding standardisation and certification and stressed
the fact that certification implied constantly learning about the various
processes and improving upon them. In an organisation working on the
basis of quality you have to "do what you say" and "say
what you do" so that in "keeping a record of what is said
and done" all processes and activities leading to institutional
objectives are reflected.
The National Training Institute of Costa
Rica (Spanish acronym INA) underscored in its presentation the importance
of a real commitment to quality preached by the example of an institutions
directors and managers themselves. In vocational training bodies, procedures
to ensure quality and subsequently certify it require a clear definition
of institutional products and the idea of "clients" that are
really "interested parties". The INA focused on improving
performance rather than on certification itself. Along the lines of
quality enhancement it has developed a service for the accreditation
of other institutions that dispense training, so that they may rise
to levels similar to those demanded by INA itself, and has validated
them for users. The work of INA in quality certification has also included
consultant services to small and medium enterprises wishing to comply
with such standards. The INA
presentation (powerpoint, 703 kb) referred to some aspects of
the new version of the ISO 9000 standard for the year 2000.
The National Training and Employment
Service of Chile (Spanish acronym SENCE) is an outstanding example of
quality support by the State through its Ministry of Labour. In this
particular case SENCE has implemented efforts to upgrade the quality
of the training offered by the OTEC agencies that dispense it. SENCE
endeavoured to improve OTEC accreditation procedures and to make them
more transparent, having certified them under ISO 9000.
One of the striking aspects of SENCE
certification is that it has been the first public organisation in Chile
to obtain an ISO 9000 standard. The SENCE
presentation (powerpoint, 33 kb) also shows a concern with improving
the quality and productivity of social programmes.
The Technical Training and Productivity
Institute of Guatemala (Spanish acronym INTECAP) undertook a modernisation
process that included all its administrative and operational areas.
As a part of it, the management of INTECAP has tried to promote an institutional
"quality culture". Besides reforms aimed at improving departments
and procedures, it implemented a programme of 5 "ss"
based on the Japanese quality management philosophy. The INTECAP
presentation showed how institutional change processes were
integrated in preparation for quality certification, i.e. how the ground
was prepared for an organisational culture based on quality.
The National Service of Industrial Training,
of Peru, (Spanish acronym SENATI) has brought about a significant change
on the basis of quality certification under ISO standards. On the premise
that "if the process is well performed, a good product will be
obtained" SENATI implemented a system for the storing of institutional
knowledge. People do their work but many efforts are often lost when
procedures are not documented or optimised. Once certification has been
introduced, however, the careful application of clear processes becomes
a reality, transparent methods for doing things are recognised by everyone.
By standardising and raising the efficiency of processes for the design,
implementation and evaluation of training, greater confidence and credibility
in those services is generated, costs are abated and productivity is
boosted. The SENATI
presentation (powerpoint, 997 kb) also points to some interesting
institutional motivations for adopting a quality management system based
on ISO standards, namely: greater co-ordination, better use of resources
and the confidence and credibility of users.
The National Industrial Training Service
of Brazil (Portuguese acronym SENAI) has embarked on processes to raise
the quality of training for some years now. Noteworthy in this respect
is its internal management grading in centres of the CENATEC (Technology)
and CEMEP (Vocational Education) types. It has adopted three grades
or categories (Gold, Silver and Bronze) according to quality requirements.
This SENAI approach has enabled participating centres to attain high
levels of certification with ISO standards. In fact, the SENAI internal
management grading system for CENATEC and CEMEP institutes combines
the criteria of national (Brazilian) quality awards with those of ISO
standards.
In its long-term strategic plan (1996-2010)
SENAI has foreseen a revamping of its educational model and of its organisational
structures, together with a personal management policy. Such is the
course followed by the Pernambuco SENAI, which has the objective of
becoming a reference centre for excellence in occupational education
and technical assistance. The experience of the Pernambuco SENAI shows
that centres subject to CENATEC-CEMEP grading have all obtained ISO
certifications. A patent example of the commitment of the SENAI directors
with quality management can be seen in the organisations system
of incentives to Centres having achieved certification. Such incentives
are in the form of allocations of more resources for investment or specific
projects.
The SENAI
presentation (powerpoint, 2416 kb) shows the main characteristics
of SENAIs involvement with quality internally and externally,
with links that go from its connections with the Brazilian Quality and
Productivity Programme to its definition of occupational training as
its main concern. An important feature of SENAIs interest in quality
is the emphasis it places on the process of improvement and the certification
thereof.
Participants also heard the presentations
of two certifying bodies of Peru: Bureau
Veritas Quality (powerpoint, 414 kb) and SGS
(powerpoint, 525 KB), which underlined the versatility of ISO standards
that can be applied in different environments with well defined products,
processes and users. ISO certifications centre on the control of processes
and on providing evidence that the various stages of such control are
carried out. All aspects of certification must be designed taking into
account the specificities of each organisation.
The representative of INFOTEP, Maura
Corporán, submitted a presentation
(powepoint 167 kb) on that institutions quality management
system in vocational training, that focuses on productivity.
By way of conclusion, Cinterfor/ILO
made a summary of the main driving ideas that had come to light in the
seminar. It stressed that attesting to quality was not a new concern
in vocational training; the new aspect was the application to it of
ISO 9000 standards. In all the cases analysed it could be seen that
"quality begins at home" and not in the requirements of some
external auditor; that institutions should be legitimately committed
to quality and not to certification for its own sake.
The conclusions
presented by Cinterfor/ILO (powerpoint 59 kb) also included
some comments on the concept of quality management, its general process,
key aspects and general prospects.