Write your
e-mail address to receive news from this site
Last update:
13/08/2008
Modernization in
Vocational Education and Training in the Latin American and the Caribbean
Region
Employers' organisations and vocational training
At present, in all countries of the region employers are being encouraged
to play a leading role in various spheres, vocational training among
them.
Historically, the move to create vocational training institutions started
in the region with the birth in Brazil of two bodies associated to employers'
organisations: the National Industrial Training Service SENAI
in 1942, and the National Commercial Training Service SENAC- in
1946. These institutions that, as pioneering experiences, left a deep
mark in the region, were since their inception attached to the respective
employers' federations of the industrial and commercial sectors,
and remain so to this day.
Along subsequent decades, the corporate sector continued to have great
influence on vocational training, and although most of the institutions
created later did not adopt the management pattern of their Brazilian
forerunners, they did opt for tripartite mechanisms wherein employers
lent permanent support and co-operation.
The changes described earlier concerning the way in which regional
economies became internationalised through open trade strategies, brought
about new imperatives and challenges. Significant among them were those
relating to the speed of technological innovation and the requirements
for updating occupational skills and qualifications. Training then appeared
as a central element in strategies to raise the productivity and competitiveness
of enterprises. This led enterprises and their organisations to become
increasingly involved in aspects like the management, financing and
methodologies of training, and to participate more actively in vocational
training institutions. They also took the lead in processes whereby
the management of former public institutions was taken over by employers'
organisations, or in some cases training bodies issued forth from those
organisations.
In any event, and whatever the nature of training institutions (public
or private), those that have most successfully adapted to the current
productive, labour and technological context invariably owe their success
to a permanent dialogue and interaction with enterprises, that have
become priority objects of their attention.
Apart from these corporate initiatives and efforts, training practices
implemented by enterprises have expanded. Sometimes, services are outsourced,
but on other occasions in-house training is developed. This is a growing
trend, empirically associated to the most successful competitive strategies.
On the other hand, the interest of employers in training goes beyond
the concept of a tool solely devoted to improving workers' skills.
Quite the contrary, it is seen as an instrument that can also upgrade
middle managers, executives and even employers themselves.
But the influence of corporate players covers more aspects than those
directly related to management, financing and implementation. Employers'
organisations have also introduced their own concepts and notions of
training in the diverse spheres where the subject is discussed, whether
they be national tripartite or bipartite agreements, sectoral arrangements
or bargaining at enterprise level. It is probably in this respect that
there is the greatest asymmetry between employers' and workers' organisations.
This disparity has only been lessened in the last few years, owing to
the new measures taken by trade unions, as we saw above.
The following can be mentioned among the many examples of employers'
participation in the field of training in Latin America and the Caribbean:
The management of some vocational training institutions
has been directly taken over by entrepreneurial chambers.
This was already the case of SENAI and SENAC, in Brazil, but
in recent years they have been joined by ICIC (Mexico), INACAP
(Chile), INFOCAL (Bolivia), SENATI (Peru), SENAT (Brazil),
CIED (Venezuela), and others. This has given corporate organisations
an extremely powerful instrument regarding both infrastructure
and coverage, as well as in the prior accumulation of human
capital, methodologies, teaching material and knowledge.
Various sectoral chambers have been enlarging the repertory
of services they offer to their members. For instance, they
have entered the areas of research and development, and technical
education and training. By way of example, we can mention:
In Chile, the services offered by the Chilean Construction
Chamber, through three corporations (Construction Research
Corporation; Construction Educational Corporation and Construction
Training Corporation); action by employers of the agricultural
sector under the National Agricultural Society, that
through its Social Development Corporation for the Rural
Sector (CODESSER) and just in the area of educationlends support to formal schooling, training, teachers'
further training and technological transfer; and the far reaching
activities of the Production and Commerce Confederation,
through INACAP. In Venezuela, the above mentioned initiative
of the companies of the SIVENSA Group, through the FUNDAMETAL
Foundation and the International Centre for Education
and Development (CIED) dependent on the State enterprise
Petróleos de Venezuela. In Mexico the National Chamber
of the Textile Industry (CANAINTEX) through the Textile
Training Centre (CATEX), which besides training services
has technological and quality management services; as well
as ICIC, dependent on the National Chamber of the Construction
Industry. In Argentina, the companies under the Graphic
Arts Chamber of Buenos Aires have provided strong support
to training in their sector through the Gutenberg Foundation.
In Colombia, there are entrepreneurial initiatives in the
graphic arts, plastics and rubber sectors, with their Technological
Development Centres IFTAG and ICPC, respectively,
that promote training, among other activities.
Besides initiatives directly related to employers' organisations,
there is a great number of experiences of in-house training
programmes, particularly in the larger enterprises.
Experiences in bipartite management are beginning to be
known, as mentioned in the previous paragraph, in sectors
like construction and pulp and paper (Uruguay); or new management
formulas at enterprise level (Chile, Bipartite Training Committees).
Finally, the tripartite arrangements at the level of Labour
Ministries where employers take active part: JUNAE (Uruguay),
CODEFAT (Brazil) and Naional Training Council (Chile), among
others.
The main conclusion that can be drawn from this brief outline of entrepreneurial
participation in vocational training, is that employers have assumed
a leading role and are the players that have increased their influence
to the largest extent, whether in terms of infrastructure, knowledge,
conceptualisation or political influence.
Having said this, however, we must not overlook two great problems
that underlie this strong entrepreneurial sway in training. The first
one is that, from the point of view of the general interests of society,
it is advisable that the other players involved should also have a solid
presence, that can be felt in the various decisions regarding training,
in order to reserve its dual role of contributing both to the competitiveness
and productivity of enterprises, and to social integration, cohesion
and equity.
The second problem lies in the very diversity of the entrepreneurial
universe of the region. In that respect, there is undeniable evidence
that very large entrepreneurial sectors are still barred from access
to technology, credit and training. Considering that those sectors,
made up by formal or informal small and micro enterprises, not only
give employment to the majority of our countries' populations, but are
the only ones where employment grows to a certain extent (though not
much), it is clear that they should be the object of active modernisation
policies. Many of the corporate organisations mentioned above are implementing
action for their benefit, but it seems obvious that in order to overcome
these situations, a combination of efforts, resources and experience
is required that must also come from the State, workers' organisations
and civil society.
The Inter-American Centre for Knowledge Development
in Vocational Training (ILO/Cinterfor)
Avda. Uruguay 1238 - Montevideo - Uruguay - Tel: (5982) 908 6023 - 902 0557
- 908 0545 - Fax: (5982) 902 1305
webmaster@cinterfor.org.uy