BULLETIN
152
Labour competency and
the evaluation of learning
Inter-American Technical Bulletin on Vocational Training, 2002
(Full
text available only in Spanish)
THIS
ISSUE
THIS ISSUE
This bulletin looks at a current reality in this so-called information
and knowledge society; namely the way in which the acquisition of labour
competencies are accepted and valued.
It is clear that the better preparation of workers and their full development
are decisive factors in a country's competitiveness. In general, certificates,
diplomas and qualifications have been the best references both for workers
and for employers when taking decisions about contracting, qualifying,
remunerating and promoting people in the market and in the company itself.
The way in which these forms of recognition are obtained is being analyzed
in greater and greater depth.
Enormous changes are taking place, regional integration processes and
free trade treaties are weakening national borders. In this production
situation, knowledge is acquiring new value as a key factor in productivity
and therefore in competitiveness.
In the face of countless changes of all kinds, the recognition of competencies
has been seen as a response to the need to explicitly value what people
know and what they can do, irrespective of the ways in which they developed
their capabilities or acquired their knowledge.
Many countries have had to face up to the reality of reforming and
updating their institutional arrangements to adjust training to meet
these new demands. Against this background, work experience has been
clearly identified as a source of competency, and there is acceptance
of the need to set up clear recognition mechanisms which would facilitate
workers' mobility and their access to offers of training in a trajectory
that continues throughout life.
Increasingly, education and training are being identified as producers
of citizens capable not only of working but also of relating effectively
and participating in social and family life. The paths which bring these
two worlds, education and work, closer together tend to merge in the
philosophy of lifelong training. The valuation of competencies has,
and in the future will have, a lot to do with this.
In addition, the raising of qualification levels in many occupations,
as well as intensified demand for jobs that are often scarce, are putting
the spotlight on the need to recognize and value competencies irrespective
of how they might have been acquired and under the different modalities
of training. This is why this bulletin includes a number of articles
on conceptual discussions and national experiences that have to do with
the way in which competencies are recognized through what is often called
the certification process.
To this end, this bulletin is organized in two parts; the first has
been called "Conceptualization" and includes various studies
which look at the origins, characteristics and challenges of certification
and related processes. The second part aims at presenting a sample of
focuses and national experiences, which are all the fruit of the unceasing
work and activity that is currently under way throughout the region.
To open the analysis, we have an article by João Carlos
Alexim, who, after presenting a brief account of the subject, tackles
the ideal construction of a model of vocational certification. In this
he describes the methodologies, institutionalization and components
of certification, its role in the world of work and adjustment to the
new economy, and the recognition of knowledge acquired by people throughout
their whole lives. In the last paragraph he sounds a warning about those
who seem to prefer spontaneous sectorial initiatives by economic agents,
which could lead to exclusion and social inequity.
In Policies of competency certification for Latin America, Daniel
Hernández concentrates on the reasons which moved the various
actors to interest themselves in the subject; these are not the same
for all of them, and they demand different kinds of responses. Certification
cannot be transplanted from one country to another because it is not
only an economic and educational phenomenon, it goes far beyond that,
it has to do with how societies, work and people perceive themselves
and communicate with each other.
Raimundo Vossio Brígido analyzes the various factors
which gave rise to the subject of competency standardization and certification,
represented by the Japanese Toyota model and the Volvo factory in Sweden,
and the crisis in vocational training systems. These should not still
be training people for the redundant Fordist-Taylorist model of work,
but allow people to be capable, competent and competitive in a world
of dizzying changes, and provide society with people who are equipped
to face up to them.
The article by María Irigoin and Fernando Vargas
deals with a typology of the different competency certification systems.
The authors abstract general concepts from the different experiences
that there are so as to construct an abstract model of the processes,
profiles, levels and technical components which a national certification
system must have, avoiding mystification and arbitrary transliterations
which do not respond to the need but to individual cases with characteristic
traditions.
In The evaluation of acquired experience, Edith Kirsch
asserts that all evaluation has a contingent component and this presents
a paradox for competency certification: that general norms are used
to evaluate informal knowledge born of experience that is necessarily
unique. A certificate, she says, is above all a consensual convention
between a number of social actors.
The certification and legibility of competency is an extensive
work produced by a group of researchers from the European Center of
Vocational Training (CEDEFOP in Spanish). Because of its depth, it constitutes
a key component in this part of the consideration of the certification
and standardization of competencies. As a way of reviewing national
peculiarities and clearing the way towards the essentials of the subject,
the authors analyze the history of certification in five European states.
They show the close links that unite the world of production and training
arrangements, and also the fundamental role that states play when it
comes to constructing educational systems that are coherent and adapted
to their immediate needs.
Francisca María Arbizu Echavarri, director of the National
Qualifications Institute of Spain, opens the second part of this bulletin,
which centers on different concrete experiences of the construction
of national systems of competency standardization and certification.
Recently, in Spain, an organic legal framework was enacted which will
allow formal systems of vocational training to be linked to people's
recognized, evaluated and certified learning. This will help them to
move from one system to the other so as to improve their employability,
foster permanent training, return to a more competitive economy, and
facilitate worker mobility inside the European Union in line with the
economic and demographic needs of the region.
Next there is a paper issued by the Ministry of Labor and Social
Security of Peru. In that country, the state is trying to mobilize
a heterogeneous situation. Although the modern companies need a system
of correctly evaluated and accredited vocational competencies, the real
situation obliges us to bear in mind other aspects and training arrangements
which are oriented to the informal and marginal sectors of the economy.
This again raises the question of the existence of mixed training systems
which reflect the different economic realities inside a nation seeking
to reconstruct areas for conciliation between the various social actors
after the interruption of democracy.
The third paper is a summary of the results of the Project of Labor
Competency Certification and Qualification Quality in Chile. This
is a case of an economy which is growing and expanding. The project,
which is financed by a loan from international organizations, concentrates
on a number of key economic areas that are important for the economic
life of the nation, and is directed by the Chile Foundation. Its aim
is to construct a system in these areas, and then to demonstrate its
efficiency and viability and extend it to the rest of the country in
the near future.
The next article is a declaration by European employers'
and union associations, both public and private, whose objective is
to evolve a framework for lifelong training which would develop competencies
and qualifications, and coordinate the scattered efforts being made
in this field in the European Union.
After that there is the transcript of the presentation made by Mr.
G. Gamerdinger at the Tripartite Inter-American Seminar on Vocational
Training, Productivity and Decent Work, held in Rio de Janeiro from
15 to 17 May 2002. This deals with experience in this field in the English-
and Dutch- speaking Caribbean, which covers many heterogeneous nations
that are all facing a common challenge: to meet the need to develop
their human resources in order to cope with the decline in agricultural
production and tourism, and the emigration of their qualified workers.
The last article in this bulletin is by Francisco Cordão;
it reiterates his presentation at the National Seminar on Vocational
Certification held at the ILO headquarters in Brasilia in April 2002,
and contains a series of reflections on the subject which illustrate
the Brazilian experience very well.
We believe that the ways in which society recognizes and values competencies
should not only represent the needs of the key sectors and accredit
the quality of people, it goes further than that: it should also be
a democratizing tool which would take account of what people have learned
throughout their lives, recognize their knowledge and help them in the
transition from backward and informal sectors of the economy to more
modern and more competitive areas. This does not only have an economic
goal, it is also one of the many ways to make people's work decent.
To buy this publication
Sale
of publications