Number 151 of the Inter-American Technical Boletín
on Vocational Training is devoted to the close relationship that exists
between the concepts of decent work and vocational training.
The notion of decent work, launched by the ILO Director
General in 1999, has proved to be a useful tool to bring together various
strategies and objectives, revaluing the ethical component of the world
of labour, in times when old paradigms are being questioned. The fact
that the new concept is essentially fertile is shown by the enthusiasm
with which it has been welcomed by those involved in the debate and
development of ideas in the realm of labour, who have analysed it from
many different angles. Proposing decent work as a fundamental objective
does not mean graciously granting a free gift but, quite the contrary,
proclaiming it as the only valid way for societies to develop, for reincorporating
into them excluded and underprivileged sectors, and boosting productivity
and wealth. What the different articles of the present Boletín look
into is precisely the kinship of vocational training with this concept.
None of these papers is definitive, as they deal with a concept under
construction, that no one can yet fully encompass and will no doubt
bear new fruit in the near future. This number of the Boletín is but
another contribution by Cinterfor/ILO to the task already initiated
with the publication of the book Training for decent work. Many
other actors will no doubt join in this effort.
By way of introduction, this Boletín starts with a
succinct but weighty communication by Oscar
Ermida Uriarte. He points to the implications of defining decent
work and introduces vocational training as a fundamental human right,
but also a strategy for economic growth, in that way bridging the false
dichotomy between the interests of workers and those of employers. He
likewise underlines the role played by vocational training in achieving
the goal of decent work; in fact, training is an essential component
of it. This is illustrated by the contribution of training as such in
combating child labour, discrimination, the rolling back of social security
services in the world, the problem of unwanted migrations. It is also
a privileged way of increasing productivity and adding value to products,
investing in knowledge and making it universal, as unavoidable corollary
to the globalising paradigm.
The paper submitted by Philippe Egger and Werner
Sengenberger, Decent
work issues and policies, could very well be subtitled
"the theory of links". The authors steer clear of generalising
the theoretical pronouncements of constitutional texts, international
conventions and treaties, although they take them as a basis to provide
a political framework for the agenda of decent work. They reject the
excessive universalisation of a concept they feel must be attuned to
national and local realities, lest it be devoid of content. Along these
lines, they build a multidimensional model resulting from the ten vectors
that make up decent work (access to employment, fair and equal treatment,
decent remuneration, fair labour conditions, safe work environment,
social security, job and training opportunities, participation and motivation
and a voice in collective bargaining) which they call "the peoples
aspirations" (that figure in most textbooks on labour rights).
They add the objectives pursued (decent work is one of them) and the
political frame required to turn aspirations and goals into results.
For that purpose, the authors propose a single road: the institutional
one. Only institutions (public and private, national, local or international,
belonging to employers or workers) are capable of overcoming the obstacles
in the way. Only institutions can set themselves the right goals, make
the necessary measurements and be properly monitored.
Madhuri
Supersad, of the Ministry of Labour, Development of Human Potential
and Industrial Relations of Trinidad & Tobago, points out that although
the term "decent work" is not much used, it has many possibilities
and is already embodied with different names in the objectives of the
National Training Agency of T.&T.: support of underprivileged sectors,
lessening of segregation, promotion of competence and quality principles
and standardisation thereof in the Caribbean, endorsement of lifelong
education, etc.
The contribution by Javier Ferrer Dufol conveys
the employers viewpoint in that respect. Some differences can
be detected in the vocabulary itself: the author prefers the adjective
dignified to decent: "The expression decent work
is not favoured by the employers sector", he explains,
and further on he explains that no job can be considered undignified
per se, "
despite the fact that there may exist
social, cultural or economic structures that perpetuate undignified
working conditions". In the second place, he vindicates globalisation,
that he sees as irreversible, although not its consequences "that
depend on the political responsibility of governments, on investments
in education and infrastructures" He also ascribes great importance
to training ("More than ever before, knowledge nowadays counters
exploitation") as a positive factor in social and personal
development and in the struggle against poverty and informality.
It is encouraging that from a union point of view,
José Olivio Miranda Oliveira should gloss over the terminological
differences of the preceding article and uses the terms decent work
and dignified work as synonyms. Quite naturally, his presentation
lays stress on freedom, representativeness and trade-union responsibility
in the management of vocational training systems.
Regarding concrete results, Enrique Brú and
Mario Hugo Rosal propose an operational framework to appraise
decent work, of use not only for the Central American region but easily
adaptable to other realities. It is a stride in the direction of measuring
outcomes.
The "youth paradox", (i.e. the fact that
never has a young generation been so well trained as the present one,
in spite of which it accounts for a high percentage of the unemployed
in the world) is the subject of Pekka
Aros article. In such circumstances, the concept of decent
work blends with the idea of a Youth Employment Network, on the understanding
that vocational training has to play a fundamental role, but not an
exclusive one, in the incorporation of young people into the societies
whose future they represent.
In the following presentation Sara Silveira and
Ana Clara Matosas focus on gender discriminations, that still
persist although women workers are already 40% of the economically active
population of our planet. Torn by the conflicts between family life
and self-realisation (perhaps more than any other social group), women
workers are driven towards informality and low remunerations, while
the best educated among them try to break through the "glass
ceiling" with which an age-old segregation is preventing them
access to the executive jobs they are entitled to by rights. In that
respect, vocational training must not only ensure them equal access
to training, but also do away with the occupational segmentation by
gender that discriminates them even before they reach the labour market.
The role of safety and hygiene in vocational training
as promoters of decent work is analysed in the two following articles.
Carlos Aníbal Rodríguez makes a persuasive analysis that goes
beyond the usual economic and probabilistic considerations in that field
He vindicates workers bodies as "subjects of feelings and
intellectual creation" and not mere working tools, pointing to
the shortcomings of vocational training in that respect, and suggests
ways for managing and revaluing that kind of knowledge. Héctor Babace
offers a detailed analysis of safety and hygiene hazards at work,
and of the legal regulations adopted by different countries to prevent
them. He then recounts what the SENA of Colombia is doing in connection
with curricular training on the subject.
A study by Hugo Barreto Ghione centres on basic
social protection and the rights of workers in firms and enterprises,
as the real expression of the notion of decent work. Additionally, the
author rejects the difference made between wage-earning workers and
workers "driven", so to speak, into informality and out-sourcing
by the new modes of production resulting form labour deregulation. He
maintains that the aims of decent work include them all without exception,
and should guarantee their rights.
Finally, there is an account of the intervention by
María Carmen Ferreira at the closing session of the 35th
Meeting of the Cinterfor /ILO Technical Committee, held at Brassilia
on 30th August and 1st and 2nd September
2001, one of whose main topics was the relationship between decent work
and vocational training. Also appended are two articles by Juan Somavía,
ILO Director General: Reducing
the deficit of decent work: a global challenge, that summarises
the ILO General Conference of 2001, and Promoting
decent work in times of uncertainty, a speech given at the Global
Employment Forum in September the same year.
Together with Training for decent work, the
contents of this Boletín are aimed at fleshing out the concept of decent
work and underlining the role of vocational training in attaining it.
We hope it will help along in the debate of a subject
that is by no means closed, and will serve as a signpost: "Men
at work. Decent work: a concept under construction".