THIS ISSUE
The labour competence approach has been, at least for the past five
years, a key concept in the vocational training scene of Latin America
and the Caribbean. Labour competence models and its renewed promises
have been increasingly present in the daily actions of institutions.
The concepts associated with labour competence have been present, in
one way or another, in almost all training experiences. In effect, these
concepts have informed, either implicitly or explicitly, training experiences
that stretch all the way from Mexico to Argentina, as well as the English-speaking
Caribbean.
The competence approach has contributed to the generation of knowledge
in the field of vocational training. Many institutions have reconsidered
their approach regarding identification of training needs, programme
planning and design, teacher training, attainment appraisal and certification.
This issue of the Cinterfor/ILO bulletin intends to be an additional
contribution to the already extensive range of experiences and concepts
developed in the region about vocational training and labour competence.
This publication constitutes another effort to spread new perspectives,
experiences and particular aspects of the labour competence approach
in Latin America and the Caribbean.
The first article, written by Fernando Vargas Zúñiga,
offers an understanding of the development of competence as a concept.
The article then analyzes the strong relationship between organizational
evolution and labour competencies. The author pays particular attention
to information technology. The incorporation of information technology
changes competence demands. According to this essay, labour competence
goes beyond the individual highlighting its collective dimension.
The next essay by Maria Conceicao Aruda argues that
the new model of occupational qualification not only implies a major
break from the previous training paradigm but that it also modifies
the behavioural requirements imposed on the labour force. She describes
how the traditional isolation and fragmentation of tasks were replaced
by increasing communication, interaction and group work. On the one
hand, the new characteristics of work organization impact on what workers
need to know. On the other hand, these new features imply new behaviours
at the interaction level among peers.
McDonald, Boud, Francis and Gorzi analyze attainment
appraisal. The article examines the following issues: the relations
between appraisal and learning, the need for targeting appraisal on
competencies, the recognition of nonformal educational competencies,
and, the creation of external evaluation systems for vocational training
institutions.
Hector Masseilot offers a trade union perspective on
the issue of competencies. The author describes different methodologies
for the identification and standardization of competencies. He combines
this descriptive approach with the assessment of what competence-based
training should be according to criteria of functionality for workers
and society as a whole.
The paper by Agustín Ibarra-Almada deals firstly with
the new demands regarding vocational training caused by technical change
and the new forms of work organization. In the second part of his essay
Almada presents the functioning, activities and achievements made by
the Mexican Council of Standardization and Certification of Labour Competence
(CONOCER).
Mónica Sladognas essay analyzes the way in which
vocational training is present in the structure of the educational system
in Argentina. She, then, focuses her study on the system of technical
education and the incorporation of the competencies approach in comprehensive
schooling (educación polimodal) and in vocational training programmes.
An important part of this work is devoted to the National Institute
of Technical Education (INET). The author highlights the experience
of this institute regarding the links between education and labour as
well as the competence based training programmes.
The next essay presents background information, technical
features and primary results of the application of the competence-based
approach in the Fábrica Nacional de Papel of Uruguay (FANAPEL). The
author, Fernando Vargas Zúñiga is a consultant of Cinterfor/ILO in Labour
Competence and as such he had a major role inthe restructuring process
at FANAPEL.
George Gamerdinger documents, firstly, the challenges
that vocational training institutions in the Caribbean face in order
to provide adequate technical content to their programmes given present
day labour requirements. Secondly, he describes how vocational training
programmes of the region have incorporated the competence approach.
The article written by Bonifacio Perdraza López tackles
the system of vocational qualifications in Spain. In this article he
argues that such a system is a good example of how qualifications can
be defined and articulated based on a methodology of functional analysis.
Particular attention is given to how the productive sector demands are
met as well as to the participation of social actors in vocational training.
Ute Laur-Ernst describes the German system of education
and professional training. She highlights the dual character of this
system (off the job training and on the job training) and the importance
of social actors participation. The author argues that flexibility and
standardization are not contradictory features of training systems.
The last article of this bulletin focuses on labour
competence and was written by Marc Tucker and Betsy Brown. They analyze
the development and implementation of a system of standardization and
certification of competencies in the United States. The article describes
the foundations on which the system is being built, identifies the obstacles
it is confronting and, lastly, presents the achievements made so far.
After these articles there is a second section that
presents short descriptive documents. Through them the reader can approach
a wide diversity of experiences of competence-based training, which
in many cases differ from those that were analyzed in depth in the previous
section.
The first document presents INTECAP from Guatemala.
The article was written by Edgar Barrios, director of the technical
division of INTECAP.
The second article describes actions developed by INSAFORP
from Salvador. This institution is now implementing a system of normalization
and certification of competencies. This system intends to raise the
training levels of the work force in Salvador.
Raúl Enrique Rossainz Zárate, responsible of STRM
(Comisión Nacional de Capacitación del Sindicato de Telefonistas de
la República Mexicana) and president of the , wrote the last
article. The article describes the implementation of the system of identification,
standardization and certification of competencies in the telecommunications
sector in Mexico.
The bulletin ends with a book review. The book is a
collection of presentations of the CONOCER Seminar held in Mexico in1999.