Integration vs. Segregation - Hungary

ILO Home
  
 

Navigation bar

Integration vs. Segregation - Hungary

Source: National Institute for Public Education


The purpose of the present paper is to reveal the basic features of segregation and introduce the principle of integration of Romany pupils into the Hungarian education system. Based on the ideas collected by the help of stakeholder workshops we try to define the objectives of “integration” within the Hungarian context, in order to identify reform options, as well as specific policy, legislative and school-financing changes needed to achieve these goals.

The issues covered in the paper include:

  1. Description of the situation of Romany children at all the levels of general education,
  2. Description of the four types of educational segregation,
  3. Analysis of data gained by stakeholder workshops,
  4. Identifying policy options (legal changes, financing models, pedagogical services),
  5. Offering recommendations for improving the educational level of Romany children.

In 1993–94 90% of the whole 15-year-old or older population finished their primary education by the end of the eighth year of schooling as set in the law. According to the representative research on Romany students revealed the fact that only 44% of the 14-year-old Romany children did so. Statistical data (Havas–Kemény–Liskó, 2002) show that educational segregation of Romany pupils has increased in primary education since 1990. In 1992 every 12th or 13th Romany child (7,1%) learnt in an institution dominated by Roma. Nowadays this is true for every 5th or 6th pupil of Romany origin (18,1%).

There are four common types of segregation in the education system:

The majority of those Romany students who finish the primary school enter secondary educational level. The most of them continue their studies at vocational schools. At the grade of 9 and 10 the 50% of Romany students drop out, which means that only 32% of them enter 11th grade. It can be supposed that dropping-out is also continuing in this grade, so the proportion of those who finally finish their secondary education is about 24%.

In order to be able to support the above-described facts by own data we were conducting focus group discussions with various actors involved in the process of integration. Eight discussions were conducted in so-called homogeneous groups (parents, teachers, pupils, self-government representatives, heads of special schools and members of committees assessing mental abilities, civil organizations, ministry officials responsible for Roma issues and representatives of the academic sphere). The suggestions formulated in these groups were brought up again in a new, this time a mixed group (where persons from each of the previous eight target groups were present) to be discussed in the form of another focus group discussion.

According to the results of stakeholder workshops and our background analyses of legislation, school financing and the previous policies we have defined our policy options and recommendations. We are convinced that along with making changes in the legal framework and in the financing system and with developing new pedagogical view and practices the measure of segregation can be decreased.

According to our legislative analysis we feel the need to give voice to our criticism and express the necessity of legislative changes in connection to the following topics:

In our view there are three possible financing models dealing with the education of disadvantaged students:

  1. “integration grant” (a supplementary per student grant),
  2. project based financing, and
  3. the market-type financing models (voucher system and quasi-market financing).

Our recommendation can be well summarised by the following: integration of Romany children should be implemented in an integration package, based on the following principles:

  1. special concern on pre-school level,
  2. involve parents in the school work,
  3. school-development with conscious strategy, well-articulated mission, project-orientation, PR and marketing strategies for appealing pupils,
  4. minimise regulation, in order to be able to take the local specifics into consideration,
  5. program and project-financing, continuous and long-run support of special projects,
  6. organising in-service trainings for teachers (anti-discrimination and new pedagogical methods),
  7. the regional specifics should be considered as well, (smaller settlements can provide less money for education, the school-conditions are worse).

[Top]

Navigation bar



EMP/SKILLS - Skills and Employability Department