|
The European Social Fund financed a research and development project called "Flexibility through six-hour shift". The model is based on work done by Professor Paavo Seppänen in1967. Seppänen suggests that, to promote both effectiveness and human considerations, productive organisations should operate for 12 hours, consisting of two six-hour daytime shifts, rather than the usual eight hours. In the project the model was applied in eight small size private firms and carried out on a shop floor in machine-bound work. Arrangements were agreed between the employer and employees and, in most cases, wages remained the same. Every firm in the study benefited in some way: production costs and absenteeism decreased, and productivity and flexibility increased.
|
|
Between 1996 and 1998, 20 municipalities participated in an experiment regarding shorter working time. 1,300 permanent employees reduced their working hours by an average of 20 %, resulting in an average workweek of 30 hours. The average wage loss was 7 %. 600 new part time employees were hired at the normal part-time wage to compensate for the loss of hours. The experiment was carried out primarily in female-dominated health and social services such as childcare, home care, dental care, and physiotherapy. Working time was reduced either daily or weekly. Some services benefited from the new working time arrangements: the availability of services improved and service times were lengthened. However, the research shows that the benefits of shorter hours were most visible in the improved quality of life and wellbeing of employees and in reduced stress.6 |