|
Regional Seminar Papers 1997
Tools and Equipment — Design, Development and
Specifications
Lessons
from the Compaction of Some Local Soils for Feeder Road Construction
in Ghana
Ampadu, S, K. (Ph.D., SM.GhIE), Civil Engineering Dept., School
of Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Kumasi-Ghana.
Summary
A comparative technical quality study of roads built with labour-based
and conventional equipment-intensive technologies in Ghana, showed
that on the average the level of compaction achieved on labour-based
projects were 10% lower than those achieved on equipment-intensive
projects. Using data from this and other studies, this paper discusses
some of the factors which might account for the lower levels of
compaction achieved on labour-based roads.
Introduction
In Ghana, the most common types of soils used as subgrade and base
material for highway pavement construction and as the wearing course
on unsurfaced roads, are the soils formed from the decomposition
of rocks known as granites and phyllites. In almost all the situations
in which these soils are used in road construction, it becomes necessary
to compact the material to very high levels of compaction. The normal
practice is to attempt to attain the Modified AASHTO level of compaction.
The specification adopted by the Ministry of Road and Transport
in Ghana requires that subgrades and bases be compacted to a minimum
of 95% and 98% respectively of the maximum dry density (MDD) obtained
with the Modified AASHTO standard. The rationale behind this is
that at the MDD, strength is known to be high and compressibility
low. However, this general observation has not been found to be
true for tropical soils, some of which are known to be very unstable.
Over the past few years, the ILO has assisted the Civil Engineering
Department of UST in building its capacity in the area of labour-based
road engineering. Part of the programme includes comparative studies
into the technical quality of roads being built with conventional
capital-intensive technology and those being built with labour-based
technology. This paper looks at the issues that the studies have
raised concerning some of the technical factors that affect the
compaction of these local soils
Brief Description of Methodology
A number of feeder roads in the country constructed using conventional
equipment-intensive method and those using labour-based methods
were selected for the technical quality studies. On each road, up
to three newly gravelled sections were selected and on each section,
the level of compaction achieved was determined using the sand replacement
method. Other tests included the determination of the thickness
of the gravel layer and the measurement of the camber of the road
section. In addition, samples of material were recovered from the
gravel pits and subjected to routine laboratory identification and
classification tests. The laboratory compaction characteristics
of each sample were also determined. In this paper, only the results
of the compaction measurements are presented and discussed briefly.
The details of the study and the results of other measurements are
reported elsewhere.
Discussion of Compaction
Results
The level of compaction achieved
The levels of compaction achieved on eight capital-intensive and
on six labour-based projects are shown in Table 1. It can be seen
that even though neither the equipment-intensive nor labour-based
projects achieved the minimum DFR specification of 98%, the field
densities achieved on the labour-based roads are on the average
10% lower than those achieved on the equipment-intensive roads.
Table 1. Summary of field and laboratory results on compaction
of feeder roads
|
Equipment-Intensive Projects
|
Labour-based Projects
|
|
OMC(1)
|
MDD(1)
|
Field Dry Density (2)
|
Level of Compaction
|
OMC
|
MDD
|
Field Dry Density
|
Level of Compaction
|
|
(%)
|
(Mg/m3)
|
(Mg/m3)
|
(%)
|
(%)
|
(Mg/m3)
|
(Mg/m3)
|
(%)
|
|
9.12
|
2.11
|
1.94
|
92
|
11.01
|
2.177
|
1.756
|
81
|
|
9.50
|
2.134
|
2.030
|
95
|
11.00
|
2.115
|
1.769
|
84
|
|
9.99
|
2.083
|
1.96
|
94
|
6.77
|
2.177
|
1.777
|
82
|
|
13.50
|
2.060
|
1.98
|
96
|
11.16
|
2.154
|
1.867
|
87
|
|
9.30
|
2.13
|
2.02
|
95
|
7.05
|
2.294
|
2.015
|
88
|
|
11.00
|
2.15
|
2.09
|
95
|
10.15
|
2.229
|
1.739
|
75
|
|
11.00
|
2.012
|
1.895
|
94
|
Average
|
83
|
|
9.20
|
2.241
|
1.870
|
83
|
|
Average
|
|
(1) MDD and OMC are
based on the Modified AASHTO specification using 55 blows per layer
(2) Field density was measured
by the sand-replacement method.
Two issues that arise from these results are :
- the appropriateness of the compaction plant being used for labour-based
compaction in Ghana, and
- the effectiveness of moisture conditioning during compaction,
which is related to the method of compaction being used in the
field.
The appropriateness
of labour-based compaction plant
The compaction plant
The method of compaction in the field is usually described by the
mechanical plant used. Compaction may be achieved by static pressure,
by impact loading, by vibration, or by a combination of these. Table
2 is a summary of the types of plant generally available for compaction.
Table 2: Summary of types of common compacting plant
|
Equipment
|
Type
|
Description
|
Suitable for
|
|
Rollers
|
Static smooth-wheel roller
|
Employs two or more smooth metal rollers. Provides compactive
effort primarily through static weight
|
All soil types except wet clays and uniform sands.
|
|
Static pneumatic roller
|
Consists of a number of highly inflated rubber tyres. Varies
from small rollers to large and heavy ones. Provides a smooth
finish to surface.
|
Clayey and silty soils
|
|
Sheep foot roller
|
Consist of drum with metal projection. Imparts high compaction
pressures and. compacts by kneading action.
|
Fine grained soils (clays and silts)
|
|
Vibratory rollers
|
Compacts by vibratory and pressure action
|
Granular soils
|
|
Tampers
|
|
Compacts by vertical blows
|
Areas inaccessible to rollers.
|
Generally, for compaction of feeder roads, vibratory rollers are
used. Vibratory rollers send pressure waves through the soil at
a wide range of frequencies depending on the size of the plant.
In normal soils, compaction is achieved by a combination of vibration
and pressure. Thus, in addition to the dynamic pressure, the static
weight of the roller is also an important factor in its performance.
Vibratory compactors range from a 135 kg vibrating plate to 13,000
kg towed vibratory roller and may be used for compacting a wide
range of material from sands and gravels to boulders.
The standard compaction plant which labour-based contractors use
in Ghana is the "Bomag 65S" pedestrian vibratory roller
with an operating weight of 600 kg. This compaction plant gives
a static linear load of 4.6 kg/cm and operates at a frequency of
58 Hz. On equipment-intensive projects, a range of compaction plant
including 10,000 kg (10-tonne) rollers was observed on site. For
a 10 tonne SAKAI SV100 vibratory compaction plant, the equivalent
static linear load is of the order of 24 kg/cm. It can be seen that
the capacity of labour-based compaction plant may be only a fifth
in terms of static linear load or only 6% in terms of the gross
static weight of the compaction plant being used on equipment-intensive
projects. The adequacy of such low capacity labour-based compaction
plant for compacting local soils, needs to be further evaluated.
Effect of Compactive Effort on Level of Compaction
In order to throw more light on the effect of compactive effort
on the compaction characteristics of local soils, the laboratory
compaction characteristics of the gravel material obtained using
10 blows, 25 blows and 55 blows of the Modified AASHTO specification
were determined. In addition to these tests, the laboratory compaction
characteristics using the Standard Proctor specification was also
determined. The results of two such tests are shown in Figs 1(a)
and 1(b). The index properties and the AASHTO classification of
the material are also shown in the figures. In Fig. 1(b), only the
curves for the modified AASHTO at 55 blows and the Proctor Standard
are available. The figures show the well known results of increasing
MDD (with a corresponding decrease in the OMC) as the number of
blows increases. It may be noted, however, that the increase in
MDD from the Proctor Standard to the Modified AASHTO (55 blows)
standard for test LB-BA-TT is larger than that for LB-WR-DL1.
Figure 1(a): Effect of compactive effort on A-2-6(2) Material

Figure 1(b): Effect of compactive effort on A-7-5(5) Material

In order to have a common basis for comparing the compactive effort
from different standards, the concept of specific energy was applied.
The specific energy is the energy applied to the soil per unit volume
during the compaction process. The values of the levels of compaction
using the MDD value at a specific energy of 1,727kNm/m3
as a base are shown plotted against the input specific energy in
Figure 3. The figure clearly shows that the effect of specific energy
on the level of compaction depends on the type of soil. Whereas
the material classified as A-2-6(2) in the AASHTO system gave a
96% level of compaction for a specific energy of 542 kNm/m3,
the same specific energy gave a level of compaction of only 80%
for a A-7-5(5) material
Table 2: Specific Energy for various compaction specifications
|
Compaction Specification
|
Specific Energy, E (kNm/m3)
|
|
Modified AASHTO using 55 blows/layer
|
1727
|
|
Modified AASHTO using 25 blows/layer
|
785
|
|
Modified AASHTO using 10 blows/layer
|
314
|
|
Standard Proctor using 25 blows/layer
|
542
|
Where N= number
of blows on each layer of
soil in the mould; n= the number of layers required to fill
the mould, W= the weight of the tamper; h= the height
from which the rammer falls and = the total volume of the mould.
Figure 2: Effect of specific energy on level of compaction

In the field, when rollers are used the specific energy depends
on the pressure and the contact area between the roller and the
soil, the thickness of the layers being compacted and the number
of passes. This laboratory result suggests that in general for good
quality road base material, relatively high levels of compaction
can be achieved with relatively lower levels of energy.
Moisture Conditioning During Compaction
The MDD and the corresponding OMC values in Table 2 are shown plotted
in Figure 3. It may be seen that the OMC values for the material
used on the road varied between 6% and 14%. However, the bulk of
the data fell between 9 and 11%. This suggests that in order to
achieve high levels of compaction, the water content of the material
must be controlled within 9-11%. Studies done in Ghana (GHA, 1970)
showed that whereas most of the OMC values fell between the relatively
narrow range of 6-12% confirming the results of our studies, the
in situ moisture content of lateritic gravel in the moist
sub humid climatic zone ranged from as low as 2% to 28%. This suggests
that it is not likely that the in situ water content would
fall within the desired 2% of the OMC. From considerations of strength
reduction on soaking, it has been suggested elsewhere (Gidigasu,
1991) that the concept of OMC and MDD be abandoned as a necessary
placement condition in favour of placing at least sub-grade layer
at a stable in situ moisture content.
Figure 3: Relationship between MDD and OMC for local gravel material

In practice, however, when the in situ moisture content
of the gravel material is low, it may be necessary to add water
to the material before compacting. On the other hand, where the
material is wetter than the optimum, it may be necessary to reduce
the moisture content by aeration. However, it appears the direction
of water content change has some effect on the compaction characteristics.
Figure 3 is a summary of the results of a study to investigate the
effect of direction of water content change on the compaction characteristics
of residual soils derived from granites and phyllite (Ampadu, 1997).
The results suggest that the effect of the direction of water content
change on the compaction characteristics depends on the type of
material. For materials derived from granites, the effect on the
MDD is negligible, but for those derived from phyllites, the change
can be as high as 4% of MDD.
Fig. 4: Effect of direction of water content change on MDD of two
local soils

Effect of Compaction on Particle Breakage
Figures 5(a) and 5(b) show the effect of laboratory compaction
on the grading curves for granites and phyllites respectively. The
figures are for re-used samples but a similar trend was observed
even when fresh samples were used. The figures show clearly that
compaction leads to particle breakage for both granites and phyllites,
but the effect is much larger on phyllites than on granites.
Figure 5a: Effect of compaction on grading of decomposed granite

The issue of whether higher or lower densities would be obtained
in a particular compaction method depends on whether the breakdown
of particles during compaction leads to an improvement or a deterioration
of the grading. These results suggest that high compactive pressure
may lead to particle breakage, which can affect not only the level
of compaction, but also other properties of the pavement as well.
Fig. 5b: Effect of compaction on grading of decomposed phyllites

Field Compaction Control
Finally, the results of a field compaction control for the subgrade
in decomposed phyllites for a construction project are shown in
Fig. 6. The compaction plant was a 10-ton HAMM smooth drum vibratory
roller and several passes were applied to the imported material.
The laboratory compaction curves obtained by the Modified AASHTO
for two samples of the material are superimposed. This figure serves
to illustrate some of the problems encountered in the compaction
of local soils.
Fig. 6: Typical compaction control in decomposed phyllites

- With the possible exception of one point, all the field dry
density points fell below the laboratory compaction curve even
for water contents close to the optimum (for Sample No. 2).
- Except for one point, the placing water content was higher than
the optimum moisture content for the particular material illustrating
the importance of moisture conditioning.
- Despite the high capacity compaction plant utilised (10 ton
vibratory roller) the levels of compaction achieved ranged from
a low 86% to 95% of modified AASHTO
- The compaction characteristics of the material from the gravel
pit changed with depth as evidenced by the different compaction
curves for Samples No. 1 and No. 2. Such changes have been observed
over profiles of phyllites.
It is suggested that the lower levels of compaction achieved on
labour-based roads in Ghana may be attributed partly to the rather
low static weight of compaction plant being used. On the other hand,
the availability of high capacity compaction plant does not necessarily
guarantee a high level of compaction.
Conclusion
From the results of our studies into the levels of compaction achieved
on equipment-intensive and on labour-based projects on local soils,
the following preliminary conclusions may be drawn:
- The 600-kg BOMAG 65S currently being used on labour-based projects
appears too light to achieve the required levels of compaction
under field conditions. There is a need for further study into
the optimum capacity of compaction plant for compacting gravel
on labour-based roads.
- The use of high capacity plant by itself does not guarantee
a high level of compaction. Moisture conditioning during compaction
of local soils is an important factor.
- There is the possibility of particle breakage arising from high
pressures and this can lead to difficulties with achieving high
levels of compaction. This should be taken into account in selection
of plant for compaction.
References
Ampadu, S. K. 1997. The compaction characteristics of residual
soils. Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Structural
Engineering Analysis and Modelling, Accra, Sept 9-11, 1997
Ampadu, S. K. 1996. Effect of soaking on strength and deformation
of a local soil. Proceedings of Annual General Meeting of Ghana
Institution of Engineers, 1996
Gidigasu, M. D. 1991 Characterization and use of tropical gravels
for pavement construction in West Africa
Gidigasu, M. D. and Mate-Korley E. N. 1980. Highway geotechnical
characterisation of residual micaceous soils over granite. 7th
Regional Conference for Africa on Soil Mechanics and Foundation
Engineering, Accra, 1980.
Ghana Highway Authority (Public Works Department) 1970. Detailed
engineering and design materials report, Contract 2. Report
prepared by Ingeroute Engineers (France), Ghana Highway Authority,
Accra.
|