|
Dispute Prevention and Resolution
The dispute prevention and resolution process seeks to assist
parties in the employment relationship to settle their grievances
or disputes peacefully and orderly through agreed machinery with
minimum disruption of work. In a sense, it is a peace-making
arrangement. It assumes that disagreement will from time to
time occur, where there are different perceptions of what is fair
or equitable. At the same time, disputes can be managed, indeed
prevented. As such, the effective prevention and settlement
of labour disputes remains at the core of sound labour relations
and in creating a conducive environment for efficiency, economic
growth and development.
Disputes manifest themselves in many ways. Disputes of right
relate to the implementation or interpretation of an
existing right, whether embodied in law, collective agreement
or in an individual contract. Interest disputes usually arise when collective bargaining fails to lead to
agreement. At another level of analysis, a dispute may
involve an individual worker (individual disputes), or a group of workers (collective disputes).
The settlement procedures are most often established in national
legislation incorporating voluntary procedures reached
by the parties themselves. A key objective of the settlement
procedure is to promote collective bargaining, hence, where
possible, bipartite settlement is preferred. The
procedures fall into three categories, namely conciliation and
mediation, arbitration and adjudication through a tribunal or
labour court. In all cases there is an element in various
jurisdictions of a in-built voluntary approach, providing the
parties some freedom in the use of the specific machinery.
There is, in addition, a growing practice referred to as
"alternative dispute resolution" which
de-emphasizes the legalistic approach in favour of a type of
workplace justice outside the conventional channels.
Apart from helping member States to improve the mechanisms for the
settlement of disputes, the ILO has in recent years assisted some
countries to establish tripartite institutions for dispute
prevention and resolution. These institutions give
responsibility to the tripartite partners in managing relations in
the workplace. However, irrespective of which of the
institutional options is chosen, the overall aim of dispute
prevention and resolution is to contribute to deepening democratic
governance, and promoting social, economic and political stability.
Publications
The Contribution of Social Dialogue to Economic and Social Development in Zambia (pdf, 339KB)
Fostering economic development through social partnership in Barbados (pdf, 419KB)
Labour Administration inCanada (Ontario) (pdf, 418KB)
Labour Administration in Canada (Quebec) (pdf, 606KB)
Labour Administration in Finland (pdf, 305KB)
Labour administration in the United Kingdom (pdf, 439KB)
Promoting Democracy and Peace Through Social Dialogue: A Study of the Social Dialogue Institutions and Processes in Indonesia (pdf, 339KB)
Social Dialogue and Social and Economic Development in Kenya (pdf, 271KB)
Meeting of European Labour Court Judges
top 
ILO Conventions and Recommendations
Labour Relations (Public Service) Convention, (No. 151) 1978
Collective Bargaining Convention, (No. 154) 1981
Voluntary Conciliation and Arbitration Recommendation, (No. 92) 1951
Examination of Grievances Recommendation, (No. 130), 1967
Collective Bargaining Recommendation (No. 163) 1981
top 
Browse other topics:
|