 |
 |
 |
Return to main page on
Violence and stress at work
Health services:
Sector-specific information on violence and stress
The health service environment
Several health sector occupations, such as doctors, nurses
and social workers, appear high in the list of occupations with high stress level,
and healthcare workers are particularly at risk of workplace violence –
almost one quarter of all violent incidents at work are concentrated in this sector.
Ongoing restructuring in the health sector, varying from country to country and
situation to situation, exacerbates this. People’s access to health care
is endangered if health workers feel under strain in work situations where staff
shortages, low pay, shift work, transport to work, and other conditions make them
particularly vulnerable to stress and violence; many leave the profession for
such reasons.
Scope and impact of violence and stress
For health workers, who have direct contact with people in
distress, experiences of stress and of violence are so common that they may be
considered an inevitable part of the job.
In the United Kingdom, recent reports show that between one
quarter and one half of National Health Service (NHS) staff report significant
personal distress, with many stressors being unique to health care. Levels of
occupational stress are reportedly higher in the NHS than in otherwise comparable
professions, with 28% of nurses suffering at least minor mental health problems,
compared to 18% in the general employed population. The costs are high in terms
of sickness rates (5%, costing the NHS £700 million each year) and loss
of staff: over 30,000 nurses left the profession in 1996 alone, increasing the
strain on those who remain.
Violence at work against health personnel is a widespread
problem in developing, transition and industrialized countries. While ambulance
staff are reported to be at greatest risk, nurses are more likely on average to
experience violence at the workplace than other occupational groups. Since the
large majority of the health workforce is female, the gender dimension of the
problem is evident.
According to recent country surveys, a majority of healthcare
workers experienced at least one incident of physical or psychological violence
in the previous year: 75.8% in Bulgaria; 67.2% in Australia; 61% in South Africa;
in Portugal, 60% in a health centre and 37% in a hospital; 54% in Thailand; 46.7%
in Brazil. In several countries, the pattern seems to be that patients are the
main perpetrators of physical violence, while staff are the main perpetrators
of psychological violence. The country surveys confirm the difficulty of establishing
a profile of people committing acts of workplace violence, and highlight the risks
associated with generalization and stereotyping in this area. Psychological violence
is more prevalent than physical violence, and is widespread throughout the health
services: verbal abuse was the main area of concern, reportedly experienced by
between 27% and 67% of respondents, followed by bullying and mobbing, reported
by 10% to 30% of respondents.
Workplace violence is recognized as an important generator
of post-traumatic stress disorder. According to surveys, between 40% and 70% of
its victims report significant levels of PTSD symptoms, such as being super-alert
and watchful, trying not to think or talk about what happened, feeling chronic
fatigue or being bothered by repeated memories of the incident. An Australian
study identified a significant relationship between exposure to bullying at work
and emotional injury, highlighting the importance of psychological violence in
stress generation.
This correlation between violence and stress is significant
not only in assessing the overall impact on the individual but also in determining
their global impact in terms of cost and efficiency for organizations and effectiveness
of health systems. According to a survey of the American Nurses Association, 76%
of 7,251 responding nurses reported increased patient load, 75% said this is resulting
in declining quality of care. An American Medical Association report notes that
many nurses leave their job, that nurses’ burnout rises with growing caseload,
and that high nursing caseloads may account for 20,000 unnecessary deaths per
year.
Causes
The reasons for workplace violence and stress are identified
at organizational, societal and individual levels, showing complex interrelationships.
The accumulation of stress and tension in demanding health occupations –
under strain from societal problems and the pressure of health system reforms
– contribute to emerging violence. At an individual level, health workers
tend to rank the personality of patients as the leading factor generating violence,
followed by the social and economic situation in the country and, well behind,
work organization and working conditions. However, when categorized into individual,
societal and organizational factors, all three contributing factors appear to
be of equal importance in the analysis of risks of violence and stress, with organizational
factors playing a key role.
Strategies addressing stress and violence
Analysing the origins and risk factors of workplace stress
and workplace violence in the health sector is a precondition for developing policies
and action in an appropriate way, identifying priority areas and allocating resources.
With regard to workplace violence, current measures focus on a more immediate
response, such as security measures and improvement of the physical environment,
rather than on strategic and organizational factors. In the event of a violent
incident, the support of victims should have first priority, providing medical
and psychological aid at different stages, including peer and management support,
as well as complaint procedures, legal aid and rehabilitation measures.
Recommendations from country reports on how to address workplace
violence in the health sector reflect an approach that integrates interventions
at organizational, societal and individual level, with a clear focus on preventive
action. Interventions should focus on (a) general conditions in society and the
legal framework; (b) normative interventions, such as guidelines and management
competencies; and (c) interventions at the environmental and individual levels.
In many countries, strategies could start by raising awareness and building understanding
among health personnel and other parties concerned at all levels. The crucial
role of social dialogue in defusing work-related stress and violence at work in
the health sector is increasingly recognized. Consequently a participatory approach,
whereby all parties concerned have an active role in designing and implementing
anti-stress and anti-violence initiatives, is highly recommended.
Additional information related to workplace violence and stress in the Health
services
- The relationship between
stress and workplace violence in the health sector (pdf,
500k), Working paper of the Joint ILO/ICN/WHO/PSI Programme on Workplace
violence in the health sector, Geneva,
2003.
- Framework
Guidelines for addressing workplace violence in the health sector
(pdf, 777k),
Joint ILO/ICN/WHO/PSI Programme on Workplace violence in the health sector,
Geneva, 2002.
- Workplace violence in
the health sector: State of the Art (pdf, 391k)
Working paper of the Joint
ILO/ICN/WHO/PSI Programme on Workplace violence in the health sector,
Geneva, 2002.
- Workplace violence
in the health sector, Country case studies: Brazil, Bulgaria,
Lebanon, Portugal, South
Africa, Thailand and an additional Australian study - Synthesis Report
(pdf, 325k),
Working paper of the Joint ILO/ICN/WHO/PSI
Programme on Workplace violence in the health sector, Geneva,
2002.
|