ILO Home
  
Go to the home page
Sitemap | Contact us
> Home > Information Resources > Termination of Employment >Profiles of National Legislation

Nepal

Updated in 2007 by Angelika Muller, ILO.

Sources of regulation | Scope of legislation | Contracts of employment | Termination of employment | Dismissal | Notice and prior procedural safeguards | Severance pay | Avenues for redress | Further Information

Sources of regulation

In Nepal, termination of employment is governed by the Labour Act, 2048 (1991) (LA). Exercising powers conferred by the LA, the Government has issued the Labour Regulation, 2050 (1993) (LR), and, with a more limited scope, the Labour Rule Relating to Tea Estates, 2050 (1994) (LTE), both expanding upon the LA in minor respects.

Scope of legislation

The LA’s Preamble indicates that the Act applies to workers and employees in enterprises of various sectors. The LA applies only to enterprises where at least ten workers or employees are employed, unless the enterprise is situated in industrial districts established by the Government (sec. 2(b), LA).

The employer is defined as “manager”, which means a person appointed for performing the business of the enterprise, as well as “establishment”, which means a person having final authority on the activities of the enterprise (secs. 2(e) and (f), LA).

“Employees” are defined as persons engaged in the administrative functions of the enterprise. “Workers” are defined as persons employed, in return for the payment of salary or wages, in production, in providing services, or in any work related or incidental thereto, including work on a piece-rate, contract or agreement basis (sec. 2(d), LA).

Apprentices are covered by the Industrial Apprenticeship Training Act, 1982, and as such are not considered to be workers or employees.

Contracts of employment

The employment contracts can be concluded as permanent, temporary, seasonal, contract, on daily-wage or piece-wage basis.

Prior to recruitment, the employer must classify the posts of the workers and employees according to the nature of the production process, service or work of the enterprise. The Labour Office to which the classification must be notified may direct the employer to amend the classification of posts (sec. 3, LA). 

Workers and employees, including those engaged in any piece-rate or contract work, must be granted a permanent appointment after they complete one year of uninterrupted service, if their performance, honesty, discipline, dedication to work, attendance and so on are satisfactory (probationary period). The mandatory appointment letter issued by the employer must explicitly mention the post, remuneration, and conditions of service for the worker or employee concerned. The employer has to inform the competent Labour Office of the appointment (sec. 4, LA).

In the event that any enterprise needs to increase production or services immediately, it may employ any person on contract for any fixed work of the enterprise, except for the work or permanent nature by prescribing the period of service, remuneration and other work conditions in the contract. (sec. 7, LA).

It follows from the foregoing that the probationary period is a maximum of one year, irrespective of the type of employment relationship established.

Termination of employment

The contract of employment can terminate, not at the initiative of the employer, in certain circumstances, including by:

  • mutual agreement of the parties,
  • the expiry of a fixed-term contract, and
  • force majeure.

Any worker or employee who causes turbulence or besiege illegally, or directly or indirectly instigates others to do so, in any enterprise other than the one in which he or she is working, or in any government office, may be dismissed from service by the Department of Labour (sec. 54, LA). Both the enterprise and the Department of Labour[1] have to follow the procedure set out in sec. 53 of the LA (see below) before dismissing a worker or an employee on such disciplinary grounds.

The employer may compel any worker or employee who has attained the age of 55 years to retire. However, the service of any worker or employee who is indispensable to the operation of the enterprise may be extended for an additional period of five years (sec. 15, LA).

Dismissal

It is unlawful to terminate the employment of a permanent worker or employee of the enterprise, unless the procedures and rules prescribed under the LA or regulations issued under it are followed (sec. 10, LA). As a result, an employer can only give notice of termination to a permanent worker or employee in accordance with the procedure set out in cases of redundancy and misconduct.

If the production or services of an enterprise need to be curtailed, or if the entire enterprise needs to be closed down due to “special circumstances” for a period of up to three months, all permanent workers and employees must be “kept in reserve” with half the salary they normally receive and with all appropriate benefits which they have been receiving. “Special circumstances” relate to production stoppages due to damage to machinery, shortage of energy or raw materials, natural disaster or lack of customers. Permission must be obtained from the Labour Office if the period of curtailment is 15 days or less, and from the Department of Labour if the period exceeds 15 days (sec. 11, LA).

A different regime applies to workers or employees of a seasonal enterprise when it closes during the off-season period notified to the Labour Office. Permanent workers or employees of such enterprises receive an allowance amounting to at least 25 per cent of the remuneration to which they are normally entitled (sec. 13, LA).

If the need for curtailment or closure exceeds three months, the employer may dismiss all or part of the enterprise’s employees after obtaining permission from the Department of Labour. If it becomes necessary to subsequently fill the posts vacated by retrenched workers and employees, priority must be given to the retrenched workers or employees as far as possible.

It is lawful to terminate the employment of any worker or employee who has not recovered from an occupational accident within a year, or who has been found to be permanently disabled by a certified physician (sec. 21, LR).

Any worker or employee committing any of the following forms of misconduct may ultimately be dismissed from service (sec. 51, LA):

  • causing physical injury or harm, tying up or detaining the employer or colleagues, or engaging in destructive activities within the enterprise in respect of any labour dispute or any other issue;
  • any criminal offence involving moral turpitude for which the worker or employee is convicted or imprisoned;
  • taking or instigating others to take action in such a way as to adversely affect the production of or the provision of services by the enterprise, or preventing the supply of food and water, or cutting telephone or electricity service, or obstructing movement within the enterprise;
  • stealing any property of the enterprise;
  • offering or accepting bribes;
  • participating or forcing others to participate in a strike which has been declared irregular or illegal;
  • participating in a strike without fulfilling the legal requirements, or wilfully slowing down work so that the interests of the enterprise are harmed;
  • wilfully destroying or damaging any asset of the enterprise, or carrying outside the premises of the enterprise and using or allowing unauthorized persons to use such assets without obtaining permission from the competent authority;
  • frequently and intentionally violating any order or directive issued under the LA or the rules established under the LA, or any work rules made by the enterprise, or misbehaving in relation to the clients of the enterprise;
  • frequent absence from work without having obtained permission or frequent late arrivals for work;
  • committing any action which violates the secrecy of the enterprise relating to any special technology, with the objective of causing losses to the enterprise where the worker or employee is employed; and
  • wilfully misusing or damaging any object or facility kept to ensure the welfare, health and safety of workers or employees.

The LA provides for different punishments depending on the type of misconduct. Any worker or employee who behaves in a manner mentioned above may be dismissed from service at once or after being punished twice. The punishment for some types of misconduct may be a suspension of three months, the withholding of the annual salary increment or a warning (secs. 51 and 52, LA).

If an employee remains absent from work for more than 30 days without informing his or her employer about the extension of the leave or without obtaining leave, he or she can be dismissed from service with a reduction of salary commensurate with the number of days of absence (sec. 37, LR).

During the probationary period, the contract of employment may be terminated by either party without notice.

Notice and prior procedural safeguards

The length of the notice period can be defined in the individual contracts of employment. A notice has to be served to the worker/employee personally in the presence of three witnesses or sent by registered mail to this/her last recorded address.

In case of dismissals for economic reasons, the employer has to obtain the approval of the Department of Labour, which has to give its decision within two months. In such event of retrenchment, the workers or employees performing similar work who were appointed last must be dismissed first, unless the reasons are given for proceeding differently (sec. 12(2), LA).

The LR lays down the following particulars (sec. 8, LR):

  • non-Nepali nationals must be retrenched first, even if they have not been employed last;
  • workers and employees who are absent for a long period due to poor health must be retrenched first; and
  • other reasons can be given for the need to deviate from the last in, first out order.

Pursuant to the LTE, the same selection criteria for retrenchment apply to tea estate workers.

In case of collective redundancies, permanent workers or employees are entitled to one month’s advance notice indicating the reasons for retrenchment, or payment in lieu of the notice (sec. 11(3)(a), LA). This rule does not apply to workers or employees appointed under contract service (sec. 11(4), LA).

As regards the disciplinary procedure for misconduct, any worker or employee must be served a notice explicitly referring to the alleged misconduct and the punishment that might be imposed. The employer must grant the worker/employee with an opportunity to submit his/her explanation. This reply period is of seven days within which the employment relationship cannot be terminated. If the worker or the employee concerned does not submit an explanation within the time limit prescribed, or if the explanation submitted by him or her is not found to be satisfactory, the worker or employee may be punished for misconduct. No disciplinary action can be taken by the employer after expiry of two months from the date of commitment of this misconduct. If the worker or the employee concerned does not accept the notice, or remains absent, he or she is deemed to have been duly notified, provided it is sent to his or her address by registered post and the copy is posted on the public notice board of the enterprise witnessed by at least three persons and subject to the sending of another copy to the Labour Office (sec. 53, LA).

Severance pay

In case of retrenchment, permanent workers or employees are entitled to lump-sum compensation at the rate of 30 days’ salary for every year of service completed in the enterprise. In this regard, a service period of at least six months constitutes a service period of one year (sec. 12, LA).

Permanent workers or employees who have served for at least three years and whose employment is terminated are entitled to a lump-sum gratuity the amount of which increases with seniority (sec. 23, LR). Those dismissed from service by the employer or the Department of Labour for any of the above-mentioned forms of misconduct are not entitled to this gratuity (sec. 23(3), LR). Retrenched workers or employees can choose between the gratuity and the compensation mentioned in the previous paragraph. Permanently disabled workers can claim separate compensation, in addition to the gratuity (sec. 21, LR). The LTE applies these principles to tea estate workers.

Avenues for redress

Individual claims or complaints regarding employment matters must be submitted to the employer in writing (sec. 73, LA). If the employer fails to resolve the problem through discussions within 15 days, the claim may be submitted to the competent Labour Office, which will arrange bilateral negotiations within seven days between the employer and the worker or employee concerned. If the problem is still not resolved, the chief of the competent Labour Office must settle the dispute, but this decision is subject to an appeal to the Labour Court within a period of 35 days from the date of receiving notice of the decision.

A worker/employee dismissed on disciplinary grounds may file a complaint to the Labour Office within 35 days from the date of receipt of the dismissal notice. He or she can appeal against the decision of the Labour Office within 35 days after receiving notice of the decision (sec. 60, LA).

Terminating the employment of a permanent worker or employee without observing the legal prescriptions (“illegal breach”) is void and no compensation can substitute for the specific remedy of reinstatement.[2]

Workers and employees can appeal against an order to wind up an enterprise to the Supreme Court within 35 days of such an order.

Further information

[1] The Labour Officers are appointed per region. Among his or her functions are conducting inspections in enterprises, providing advice with a view to improving labour relations and solving disputes between the workers or employees and the employer (sec. 65, LA). Whereas the Ministry of Labour devises labour policy, the Department of Labour coordinates the implementation of policy. Regional Labour Offices are the first-level contact institutions for employers and employees/workers.

[2] Mathur Ajeet N.: “Nepal”, in R. Blanpain (ed.): International encyclopaedia for labour law and industrial relations (The Hague, Kluwer Law International, 2003), p.111.

Employment protection legislation database - EPLex









 
Last update: 14 May 2007 ^ top