ILO Home
  
Go to the home page
Sitemap | Contact us
> Home > Information Resources > Termination of Employment >Profiles of National Legislation

Hungary

Updated in 2007 by Mr Lee Leviter, Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labour Relations, USA, and Ms Angelika Muller, ILO.

Sources of regulation | Scope of legislation | Contracts of employment | Termination of employment | Dismissal | Notice and prior procedural safeguards | Severance pay | Avenues for redress | Further Information

Sources of regulation

Hungarian labour law is regulated by Act No. 22 of 4 May 1992 on the Labour Code (in force since 1 July 1992, and as amended by 2006). In addition, art. 70(B) of the Hungarian Constitution guarantees the right to work and free choice of work and occupation.

Scope of legislation

Act No. 22 applies to all employment relationships under which work is performed in the territory of the Republic of Hungary, as well as those under which employees of Hungarian employers work abroad on missions. The employment relationships of employees working on vessels or aircraft are also governed by the provisions of the Act, provided that the vessel or aircraft bears the Hungarian flag or marking (sec. 1(1-2), Act No. 22). 

Certain provisions of Act No. 22 applies to employment relationships governed by the Civil Code, pertaining to employees under 18 years of age, or to contracts for the hiring out of workers between placement/temporary employment agencies and user enterprises (sec. 1(5), Act No. 22).

The Labour Code also makes special provisions for “executive employees” – an employer’s highest-ranking employees. Regarding such employees, employers are neither bound by the restrictions regarding ordinary dismissal as defined in sec. 90(1), nor must they justify such dismissals (sec. 190(2), Act No. 22). 

Employees in the public service and those in publicly financed institutions are governed by special provisions (sec. 2(1-2), Act No. 22). 

Provisions regarding collective redundancy do not apply to crews of seagoing vessels (sec. 94/G, Act No. 22).

Contracts of employment

Contracts of employment must be concluded in writing. They may not provide for less favourable working conditions than law and applicable collective agreements (sec. 76, Act No. 22).

In principle, the employment contract is established for an unlimited period of time (sec. 79(1), Act No. 22), and is for full-time employment (sec. 78/A, Act No. 22).

The probationary period established under the contract is 30 days. Under a collective or individual agreement, the parties may specify a different probationary period, but that period cannot exceed three months. The probationary period may not be extended. During the probationary period, either of the parties may terminate the employment relationship with immediate effect (sec. 81(1-3), Act No. 22).

The length of employment limited to a definite period of time cannot exceed five years, including the establishment of any new employment relationship (sec. 79(5), Act No. 22). If a fixed-term employment contract is renewed or extended with the aim of compromising the rightful interests of the employee, the employment will be deemed for an indefinite duration (sec. 79(4), Act No. 22).  Furthermore, a fixed-duration contract will be considered open-ended if the employee works for at least one extra day following the expiry of the contract with the knowledge of his or her supervisor. (sec. 79(4), Act No. 22).  However, if the original contract was for 30 days or less, then the contract will only be extended by the amount of time for which the original contract was established (sec. 79(6), Act No. 22).  

Another type of employment contract is the study contract, in which an employer agrees to provide financial support for a person.  In return, this person agrees complete his or her studies, while working for the employer for a set period of time (sec. 110(1), Act No. 22).  A beneficiary of a study contract is not bound by its provisions, if the employer fails to provide the contractually obligated financial support, or if the employer breaches the contract in any way.  If the employer breaches the study contract in any way, the beneficiary may seek compensation for any damages incurred by the breach of contract (sec. 113(1), Act No. 22). In case of non-respect of the study contract by its beneficiary, the employer is entitled to demand reimbursement of provided financial support (sec. 113(2), Act No. 22).

As regards temporary employment arrangements, an employee may be ordered to perform work for another employer by virtue of an agreement between his or her original employer and the new employer if (sec. 106(1), Act No. 22):

  • the owner of the other employer is the owner of the original employer;
  • at least one of the two employers holds some ownership in the other employer; or
  • the two employers have joint ownership of a third organization.

Only the original employer may terminate an employee who is performing such temporary assignment (sec. 106(3), Act No. 22).

Termination of employment

The contract of employment can terminate, not at the initiative of the employer, including by (sec. 86, sec. 86/B(1), Act No. 22):

  • the death of the employee;
  • the employer’s dissolution without a legal successor;
  • the expiry of a fixed term;
  • the changing of an employer who falls under the scope of Act No. 22, by the decision of the employer or founder, to become a public or civil servant; and by
  • mutual consent of the parties.

If the employee does not terminate his/her employment according to the provisions of Act No. 22, he or she must pay the employer compensation equal to his or her average wages for the amount of time that his/her earnings failed the due notice period (sec. 101(1), Act No. 22).

If an employee is working for an employer through a placement agency, the open-ended employment relationship may be terminated by notice from both the placement agency and employee (sec. 193/J(1), Act No. 22).

 The employee can terminate the employment relationship if there is a serious breach of employer regulations, or if the placement agency agrees to the employment relationship’s termination (sec. 193/K). 

The placement agency may terminate the employment contract with an employee by notice if (sec. 193/J(3), Act No. 22):

  • the employee’s performance is inadequate;
  • the employee is unable to perform the required tasks;
  • the placement agency was unable to arrange employment within thirty days; or
  • the placement agency’s technical operation prohibits maintaining the employment relationship.

In the event of such termination, the placement agency has to attach an explanation of discharge (sec. 193/J(2), Act No. 22).  The period of notice has to be fifteen days, unless the employment relationship existed for at least one calendar year, in which case the notice period is thirty days (sec. 193/J(4), Act No. 22).

Regardless of who terminates the employment relationship, upon termination, the placement agency has to pay the employee his or her average wages during the required notice period (sec. 193/J(6), sec. 193/K(7), Act No. 22), in addition to all other due benefits (sec. 193/L). 

If the termination of employment relationship by the placement agency is unlawful, and the employee was party to a fixed-term contract, then the employee may request the agency to pay wages due for the remaining period of employment, or a maximum of six months wages (sec. 193/M(5), Act No. 22).

Dismissal

During the probationary period, either party may terminate the employment without prior notice (secs. 81(3) and 88(1), Act No. 22).

A contract for a definite period of time may be terminated by mutual consent or by extraordinary dismissal. The employer may also terminate the employment by paying the average wage due to the employee for the outstanding period in advance (sec. 88(1-2), Act No. 22).

A contract established for an indefinite period of time may be terminated by the giving of normal notice (sec. 89(1), Act No. 22).  An employer may only dismiss an employee because of:

  • the employee’s ability;
  • the employee’s behaviour in relation to the employment relationship; or
  • reasons relating to the employer’s operations.

An employee may not be terminated by ordinary dismissal (sec. 90(1), Act No. 22):

  • if an employee is incapacitated because of illness, up to a maximum of one year following the expiration of the sick leave period;
  • during entire time of eligibility of sick pay because of incapacity due to a work-related accident or illness;
  • while the employee is using sick leave in order to care for a sick child;
  • if the employee is on a leave of absence without pay in order to care for a close relative;
  • during pregnancy, for three months after giving birth, or during maternity leave;
  • if the employee is taking a leave of absence without pay in order to nurse or care for
  • children;
  • while the employee is fulfilling military duties or civil service; or
  • if the given reason is the change of employer by legal succession (sec. 89(4), Act No. 22).

Either party may terminate the employment relationship under extraordinary dismissal if the other party (sec. 96(1), Act No. 22):

  • wilfully or by gross negligence gravely violates obligations arising from the employment relationship; or
  • engages in conduct that renders further existence of the relationship impossible.

There are special provisions for “collective redundancies” which are defined as a dismissal of (sec. 94/A):

  • at least ten workers, when the average number of employees over the past six months is more than twenty but less than one-hundred;
  • at least ten per cent of the workforce, when the average number of employees over the past six months is greater than one hundred, but less than three hundred; or
  • at least thirty workers, when the average number of employees over the past six months is three hundred or more, over a period of thirty days.

The Labour Code protects trade union activity by making illegal any termination or discrimination based on trade union affiliation or activity (sec. 26(3), Act No. 22).  Furthermore, the employer needs prior consent of the higher-ranking trade union body to terminate an elected trade union official by ordinary dismissal. In case of an extraordinary dismissal of such an employee, the employer has to ask a prior opinion of the relevant trade union (sec. 28(1), Act No. 22).  In both cases, the trade union must communicate its position in writing (sec. 28(2), Act No. 22). 

The employer is given some leeway if the employee is reaching or is at an age where he or she may receive a pension.  If the employee is sixty-two years old and is qualified to receive or is currently receiving a pension, then the employer is not required to give a reason for the ordinary dismissal of the employee (sec. 89(6), Act No. 22).  However, employees between fifty-seven and sixty-two years old receive special protections.  The employer may only terminate such employees in “particularly justified cases,” unless the employee is already receiving pension benefits (sec. 89(7), Act No. 22). 

If an executive employee’s close relative becomes involved with a business that engages in the same or similar activities as the employer or is in regular business contact with the employer, then the employer is entitled to terminate the employment relationship with the executive employee (sec 191(5), Act No. 22).

Notice and prior procedural safeguards

As a general rule, the requirement of notice applies to contracts that are concluded for an indefinite period of time (secs. 89 et seq., Act No. 22). The minimum period of notice is 30 days, and it is extended by (sec. 92):

  • five days after three years of employment with the employer;
  • 15 days after five years of employment with the employer;
  • 20 days after eight years of employment with the employer;
  • 25 days after ten years of employment with the employer;
  • 30 days after 15 years of employment with the employer;
  • 40 days after 18 years of employment with the employer; and
  • 60 days after 20 years of employment with the employer.

Under no circumstances can the notice period exceed one year.

Once the employer uses ordinary dismissal to terminate an employee, the latter is relieved of his/her duties for one-half the notice period (sec. 93(1), Act No. 22).  During this time, the employee is entitled to his/her average earnings (sec. 93(3), Act No. 22). 

If an employer wishes to terminate an employee for reasons that are prohibited under ordinary dismissal in sec. 90(1), he or she must give fifteen days’ notice if the employee is unable to come to work for at least fifteen days, or thirty days’ notice, if the employee is unable to come to work for at least thirty days (sec. 90(2), Act No. 22).

In the case of an extraordinary dismissal, the employer must provide just reasoning for the dismissal, as it is required in sec. 89(2) for ordinary dismissal.  Before the employer announces an extraordinary dismissal, the employee must be given the opportunity to learn about the charges brought against him or her, and to speak in his or his own defence (sec. 96(2), Act No. 22).

Extraordinary dismissal may be exercised within fifteen days and up to one year of gaining knowledge of the grounds for the dismissal.  If extraordinary dismissal is because of an employee’s criminal action, the dismissal may not be applied after the statute of limitations of the crime expires.  If a committee has the right to exercise extraordinary dismissal, than the date of gaining knowledge is the date that the committee, acting as a body that can exercise employer rights, learns of the action (sec. 96(4), Act No. 22).

If an employer wishes to implement a collective redundancy, he/she has to consult the workers’ council or, if a council does not exist, a committee set up by the local trade union branch and the workers’ representatives.  The employer must consult one of these bodies fifteen days prior to the implementation of a redundancy, and has to continue negotiations until the implementation or until an agreement is reached (sec. 94/B(1), Act No. 22).  In view of coming to an agreement, the consultation must cover the ways to avoid such a redundancy, the principles of redundancies, the ways to mitigate the consequences of the redundancy, and how to reduce the number of employees affected by such an employer’s action (sec. 94/B(5), Act No. 22).   

At least seven days before such a consultation, the employer is required to inform the workers’ representatives in writing regarding the reason for the redundancy, the number of workers made redundant, and the number of workers employed under the applicable part of sec. 94/A (sec. 94/B(3), Act No. 22).  During the consultations, the employer has to inform, in good time, the workers’ representatives in writing of the period over which the projected redundancies are to be affected, the criteria proposed for choosing which workers will be made redundant, and the criteria for determining severance pay, outside of that determined by legislation and/or collective agreement (sec 94/B(4), Act No. 22). 

Should the employer actually implement the redundancy, this notification must also be sent to the employment centre of the area affected by the redundancy (sec. 94/D(1), Act No. 22). 

Employees must be notified of the employer’s intent of collective redundancy at least thirty days prior to the delivery of the statement as required by sec. 88(2).  A copy of this notice must be provided to the workers’ representatives and to the relevant employment centre (sec. 94/E(1), Act No. 22).

Following the consultation, if the employer decides to implement a collective redundancy, he or she must specify the number of workers affected by the redundancy and a timetable for the implementation of the redundancy (sec. 94/C(1).  Redundancies should be implemented over 30-day periods. 

When an employer gives notice, he or she must provide a clearly comprehensible explanation for doing so. In the event of disagreement, the validity and rationality of the reason for giving notice must be proven by the employer. Prior to notice of termination, the employee must be given an opportunity to defend him or herself against criticism. Legal proceedings may be initiated concerning decisions made by an employer, but the parties have to attempt to reconcile their views prior to going to court. Conciliation procedures are initiated in writing within 15 days from the date that the measure is disclosed. If conciliation fails to result in an agreement within eight days from its commencement, court proceedings can be initiated within 15 days from the date that the conciliation procedure has failed (secs. 89(2), (5) and (4); 199(3); 200(1); 201 and 202(1), of Act No. 22).

The right to extraordinary dismissal can be exercised within three days from the date upon which the underlying cause becomes known, or a maximum of six months from the occurrence of the cause; or within a maximum of one year if there are relevant provisions in the collective agreement, or within the statutory limitation period if a crime was committed. A legal challenge may be initiated against a decision made by the employer, but the parties have to attempt to reconcile their views prior to going to court. Conciliation procedures are initiated in writing within 15 days from the date the measure is disclosed. If conciliation fails to result in an agreement within eight days from its commencement, court proceedings can be initiated within 15 days from the date that the conciliation procedure has failed (secs. 96(3); 199(3); 200(1); 201 and 202(1), of Act No. 22).

If an employee’s capacity to work has been compromised during the course of employment, employers are required to reassign those employees to positions that their conditions allow (sec. 85(3), Act No. 22).

Severance pay

The employee is entitled to severance pay if employment is terminated through normal notice by the employer or because of the liquidation of the employer without a legal successor. If the employment relationship is terminated because of liquidation, the employee is paid a sum equal to his/her average wages due for the period of exemption from work during the notice period, unless the employee is not entitled to severance pay (sec. 86/A).

Severance pay (sec. 95(4), Act No. 22) is equal the amount of:

  • one month’s wages for up to three years of employment with the employer;
  • two months’ wages for up to five years of employment with the employer;
  • three months’ wages for up to ten years of employment with the employer;
  • four months’ wages for up to 15 years of employment with the employer;
  • five months’ wages for up to 20 years of employment with the employer; and
  • six months’ wages for up to 25 years of employment with the employer.

An employee is not eligible for severance pay if he or she is entitled to a retirement pension (sec. 95(1-5), Act No. 22), nor may the period applicable for pay eligibility include:

  • time that the employee spent imprisoned;
  • time that the employee spent doing public service work; or
  • time from a leave of absence for over thirty days, except when that time was used to care for a close relative or a child under ten years of age.

In addition to the above provisions, an employee who has unused vacation time at the time of his or her termination must be paid financial compensation for unused vacation time (sec. 136(1), Act No. 22).

If an employer terminates the employment of an executive employee during bankruptcy or liquidation proceedings, the executive employee gets standard severance, in addition to a maximum of six months’ average wages (sec. 190(4), Act No. 22).

Avenues for redress

As a general rule, the term of limitation of any claims relating to employment relationships is three years.  Claims against criminal activity can be brought within the period of five years (sec. 11(1), Act No. 22).  This time can be extended if the claimant is unable to enforce his or her claim for an excusable reason; he or she may still enforce his/her rights within six months of cessation of the hindrance (sec. 11(3), Act No. 22).

If a court of law declares that the employment was illegally terminated, the employee must be reinstated to the original position if he or she so requests (sec. 100(1), Act No. 22). At the employer’s request and under some conditions, the court may refrain from reinstating the employee to the original position (secs. 100(2) and (3) of Act No. 22).

In case of unlawful dismissal, the court orders the employer to compensate the employee. The amount of this compensation depends on particular circumstances of the case, but cannot be less than two and no more than twelve months’ average wages of the employee concerned (sec. 100(4), Act No. 22).

If an employee has been unlawfully terminated by the placement agency, the employee may request a minimum of one month and a maximum of six months of average pay, depending on the severity of the unlawful termination (sec. 193/M(2), Act No. 22). In addition, the employee is compensated for any lost wages and benefits and for damages (sec 193/M(3), Act No. 22).  If the employer does not give notice when he or she terminates the employment relationship, the employee is also entitled to his or her average wages due for the period when relieved from work duty (sec. 193/M(4), Act No. 22). 

In the case of a labour-related legal dispute, the affected parties may file a lawsuit within thirty days of notification of the action (sec. 202, Act No. 22).

Trade unions are entitled to contest any unlawful action by the employer by demurrer, if such an employment action directly affects the employees or the employees’ representation (sec. 23(1), Act No. 22). 

Further information

Employment protection legislation database - EPLex









 
Last update: 12 March 2007 ^ top