ILO Home
  
Go to the home page
Sitemap | Contact us
> Home > Information Resources > Termination of Employment >Profiles of National Legislation

Cyprus

Updated in 2007 by Angelika Muller, ILO.

Sources of regulation | Scope of legislation | Contracts of employment | Termination of employment | Dismissal | Notice and prior procedural safeguards | Severance pay | Avenues for redress | Further Information

Sources of regulation

The main source of legislation covering termination of employment contracts in Cyprus is the Termination of Employment Law, 1967 (TEL),[1] as subsequently amended, most recently in 2001.

Collective Dismissals Law No. 28(1) was adopted in 2001 in order to bring Cypriot legislation in line with the Collective Dismissals Directive 98/59/EC.

In 1985, Cyprus ratified the ILO Termination of Employment Convention, 1982 (No. 158).

Another instrument, the Industrial Relations Code (IRC), was negotiated and signed by the Government, employers and trade unions in 1977. It is a purely voluntary agreement, and any adherence to it is dependent on the goodwill of the parties. Nevertheless, at least its procedural part is of considerable importance in practice.

Collective labour agreements have a certain relevance. They are concluded by sectors of industry and also at company level.

Scope of legislation

The TEL regulates the termination of the employment of “every person working for another person either under a contract of service or under such circumstances from which the relationship of employee and employer may be inferred” (sec. 2, TEL). The TEL does not distinguish between private and public employment.

However, the ordinary unfair dismissal rules do not apply to public servants, as well as police and armed force personnel. Their employment is regulated by special legal provisions contained in Public Service Law No. 1/90 and Municipal  Corporations Law No. 111/85.

Contracts of employment

Contracts of employment can be concluded orally between the employer and the employee. There are no legal requirements for contracts to be evidenced in writing either by contract documents or by statements of terms and conditions. For employees at management level, individual agreements are in practice expressed in writing.

The contract can be concluded for a definite or an indefinite period, and it can provide for full- or part-time work, as well as temporary work.

Termination of employment

The contract of employment can terminate, not at the initiative of the employer, in certain circumstances, including by:

  • mutual agreement;
  • the expiry of a fixed term;
  • the employee reaching the age of retirement; and
  • force majeure.

Dismissal

The TEL makes no distinction between individual and collective termination of contract; both are subject to the same rules. However, it does distinguish between terminations of employment giving right to compensation, termination not giving right to compensation and termination giving right to redundancy payments.

The TEL stipulates that an employee is entitled to compensation if, and only if, the termination is not for one of the reasons stipulated in sec. 5 (see below) and:

  • he or she has been continuously employed by his or her employer for at least 26 weeks (sec. 3, TEL); and
  • he or she has not yet attained the age of 65 years (sec. 4, TEL).

The employer and the employee may, by agreement in writing made at the time the employee enters into the employment, extend this period of at least 26 weeks of continuous employment to a maximum of two years.

In its First Schedule, the TEL adds that the amount of the compensation cannot exceed one year’s wages and depends on other income of the employee, the length of his or her service, the loss of career prospects of the employee, his or her age and the actual circumstances of the dismissal.

Sec. 5 of the TEL stipulates that an employee is not entitled to compensation for termination of employment payable by the employer if:

  • the employee fails to carry out his or her work in a reasonably efficient manner (not due to temporary sickness or illness);
  • the employee has become redundant (see sec. 3, TEL);
  • the termination of employment is due to force majeure;
  • an employee’s fixed-term contract has expired;
  • the employee has reached the normal age of retirement; or
  • the employee’s conduct is such as to render him or her liable to dismissal without notice (e.g. cases of gross industrial misconduct, a criminal offence, immoral behaviour, serious or repeated contravention or disregard of works or other rules in relation to employment).

In sec. 6, the TEL stipulates that in any tribunal proceedings, the burden of proof is on the employer to show that the termination of employment has been for one of the above-mentioned reasons.

The same section sets out the grounds that may not, inter alia, constitute valid reasons for termination. Thus, an employer may never terminate employment for:

  • membership in trade unions or a safety committee established under the Safety at Work Law of 1988;
  • activity as a workers’ representative;
  • the filing in good faith of a complaint, or the participation in proceedings, against an employer involving alleged violation of laws or regulations, both civil or criminal;
  • race, colour, sex, marital status, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin; or
  • pregnancy or maternity.

Notice and prior procedural safeguards

Statutory notice periods are laid down in secs. 9 and 10 of the TEL. The minimum periods of notice to be given by the employer depend on the length of service in employment and are as follows:[2]

  • one week’s notice for six months to one year of service;
  • two weeks’ notice for one to two years of service;
  • four weeks’ notice for three years of service;
  • five weeks’ notice for three to four years of service;
  • six weeks’ notice for four to five years of service;
  • seven weeks’ notice for five to six years of service; and
  • eight weeks’ notice for more than six years of service.

An employee who has been given notice by his or her employer is entitled to time off without loss of pay during normal working hours (not exceeding eight hours per week and 40 hours in total), in order to seek new employment (sec. 12, TEL). The employer may give the employee a payment in lieu of notice.

In cases of redundancies, the employer is required to notify the Minister of Labour and Social Security of the proposed redundancies at least one month prior to the date they are due to be implemented (sec. 21, TEL). The notification must include the number of employees likely to become redundant (and, where possible, their occupation, names and responsibilities), the branch which is affected and the reasons for the redundancies.

The TEL does not require employers who are contemplating redundancies to consult with and provide information to employees’ representatives. However, Collective Dismissals Law No. 28(1) adopted in 2001 introduced a new procedure under which the employer who contemplates mass redundancies must in good time inform and consult with workers’ representatives in order to reach an agreement on means of avoiding or limiting dismissals, as well as mitigating their adverse effects on the workers concerned.

Otherwise, provision for such information and consultation is made in Part II of the IRC. This Code is not legally binding, so no legal sanctions can be imposed on those not complying with its provisions. The IRC stipulates that the employer should notify the trade union at least two months before the date of redundancy. After notification, consultations should be – as early as possible – carried out with the unions and the employees in accordance with the provisions of the ILO Termination of Employment Recommendation, 1963 (No. 119).[3]

There is no special procedure in case of dismissal for disciplinary reasons. However, courts apply principles of natural justice. This means that the employee should be informed about the allegations made against him/her, as well as have sufficient time to prepare his/her defence.[4]

Any employee whose employment has been terminated for any reason is entitled to receive, on request at the time of termination, a certificate from the employer specifying the dates of his or her employment and the type of work at which he or she was employed. Nothing unfavourable to the employee may be inserted in this certificate (sec. 8, TEL).

Severance pay

Any employee who has been employed by the same employer for at least two years, who has not yet attained the age of 65 years and who is declared redundant within the terms of the statutory definition, is entitled to a redundancy payment out of the Government’s Redundancy Fund. This Fund is exclusively financed by employers’ contributions in respect of each employee (secs. 16-25, TEL). The TEL sets out in sec. 18 that an employee is redundant when his or her employment has been terminated:

  • because the employer has ceased or intends to cease carrying on the business (or business in the place) in which the employee has been employed;
  • because of modernization, mechanization or any other change in products or methods of production or of organization which reduces the number of employees necessary;
  • because of changes in the skills needed on the part of employees;
  • because of marketing or credit difficulties;
  • because of lack of orders or raw materials;
  • because of scarce means of production; or
  • because of contraction of the volume of work or business.

The redundancy payments are calculated according to years of employment as follows:

  • two weeks’ wages for each year of service up to four years;
  • two and a half weeks’ wages for each year of service from five to ten years;
  • tree weeks’ wages for each year of service from 11 to 15 years;
  • three and a half weeks’ wages for each year of service from 16 to 20 years; and
  • four weeks’ wages for each year of service beyond 20 years.

The employee’s compensation for redundancy is limited to 75,5 weeks’ wages.

Where an employer wishes to expand its workforce with employees of the same type and skill as those made redundant within the previous eight months, the employer must give priority to employees previously made redundant, subject to the operational needs of the enterprise (sec. 22, TEL).

Avenues for redress

All disputes and ancillary matters arising out of the operation of the TEL are dealt with by the Industrial Disputes Court set up by the Council of Ministers under sec. 12 of the Annual Holidays with Pay Law 1967. The complaint is to be brought within one year from the date of termination of employment.

The employee is also entitled to institute proceedings before the civil courts. Such actions for breach of the employment contract (wrongful dismissal) must be initiated within six years following the date of termination of employment.

In case of unjustified dismissal, the tribunal may award compensation and/or order reinstatement (sec. 3, TEL, as amended in 1994). Compensation for unfair dismissal is calculated following the scheme of redundancy payment. It depends on the numbers of years of service and is limited up to two years’ wages. As regards reinstatement, this right remains theoretical and is never ordered in practice.[5]

In any tribunal proceedings concerning termination of employment, the burden of proof is on the employer (sec. 6, the TEL). However, in case of constructive dismissal, the employee has to bring evidence that his/her resignation was forced and due to a serious breach of employment agreement by the employer.[6]

Procedures for the settlement of disputes in relation to collective agreements are provided for in the IRC.

Further information

[1] Long title: A Law to regulate the termination of employment at the initiative of the employer, to provide for minimum periods of notice for employed persons and to establish a fund for the payment of benefits to employees declared redundant. No. 24, dated 27 May 1967.

[2] These statutory periods are minima and longer periods may be applied where these are set out by custom, collective agreement or otherwise.

[3] This ILO Recommendation was revised and replaced by the ILO Termination of Employment Recommendation, 1982 (No. 166).

[4] Christophoros Christophi. 2006. Termination of Employment Relationships: the Legal Situation in Cyprus. Study of the European Commission, p. 19.

[5] Christophoros Christophi, op.cit., p. 21.

[6] Christophoros Christophi, op.cit., p. 3.

Employment protection legislation database - EPLex









 
Last update: 23 April 2007 ^ top