ILO Home
  
Go to the home page
Sitemap | Contact us
> Home > Information Resources > Termination of Employment >Profiles of National Legislation

Cambodia

Last updated April 2006 by Anne ZIEBARTH, Labour Law Consultant, Better Factories Project, ILO, Cambodia.

Sources of regulation | Scope of legislation | Contracts of employment | Termination of employment | Dismissal | Notice and prior procedural safeguards | Severance pay | Avenues for redress | Further Information

Source of regulation

The Labour Law (LL), adopted on 10 January 1997, contains the legislative provisions on termination of employment in Cambodia. Additional sources of law include the Constitution, and regulations of the Royal Government and the Ministry in charge of labour.  An Arbitration Council (AC) has been established to resolve collective disputes that are not settled through conciliation. Although Arbitration Council awards are binding only on the parties involved in the dispute, these awards are useful in interpreting Cambodian labour law.  The Arbitration Council website contains the Cambodian Labour Law, many relevant regulations, and AC awards.

Scope of legislation

The LL covers all enterprises and establishments, whether public, semi-public or private. It also applies to professional offices and associations or groups of any nature. Nevertheless, some categories of workers are excluded from its scope. These are:

  • judges of the judicial branch;
  • permanent workers in public service;
  • personnel of the police, the army and the military police;
  • personnel in air and sea transportation industries; and
  • domestic or household servants. (Art. 1, LL)

Contracts of employment

Article 66 of the Labour Law distinguishes between two types of contracts: fixed duration contracts (FDCs) and undetermined duration contracts (UDCs).  FDCs are characterized by a fixed term, typically either a set period of time or a defined task.  UDCs do not contain a fixed term. An FDC must be in writing. If not, it is considered to be a UDC (Art. 67(7), LL).  Moreover, FDCs must be limited in duration to not longer than two years, or they will automatically be characterized as UDCs (Art. 67(2), LL).

The legal requirements relating to termination of employment contracts vary depending on whether the terminated contract is an FDC or a UDC.

The LL also contains specific provisions for termination of apprenticeship contracts (Arts. 63-64, LL).

Termination of employment

FDCs

An FDC normally terminates at the end of its specified term, or when the employee has performed the required tasks (Art. 73, LL).

An employee can terminate an FDC before its ending date:

  • if both parties agree in writing to terminate the contract early;
  • if the employer has engaged in serious misconduct; or
  • in case of force majeure. (Art. 73, LL)

If an employee terminates an FDC before the expiration of its term for reasons other than these, the employer is entitled to damages equal to the amount of harm sustained.

UDCs

A UDC can be terminated at will by either of the parties.  An employee can terminate a UDC for any reason, but the employee must give written notice to the employer (Art. 74, LL).

Dismissal

FDCs

An employer can terminate an FDC before its ending date:

  • if both parties agree in writing to terminate the contract early;
  • if the employee has engaged in serious misconduct; or
  • in case of force majeure.

(Art. 73, LL)

If an employer does not wish to continue to employ a worker after the expiration of an FDC of more than six months duration, the employer must inform the employee prior to the expiration of the contract.  Failure to provide such notice results in the automatic extension of the FDC for the same period of time as the term of the initial contract (Art. 73, LL).  The Arbitration Council has found that if the initial FDC plus any extensions exceed two years, the contract automatically becomes a UDC.

UDCs

Although a UDC can be terminated at will by either of the parties, an employer can only terminate a UDC for “a valid reason relating to the worker’s aptitude or behaviour, based on the requirements of the operation of the enterprise....” (Art. 74, LL).

Before dismissing an employee, the employer must provide written notice of termination. 

Serious misconduct on the part of the employee

Serious misconduct justifies the termination of both FDCs and UDCs.  If an employee engages in serious misconduct, the employer is not required to give prior notice of termination. However, the employer must dismiss the employee within seven days of learning about the serious misconduct (Arts. 26, 82 LL).

The following are examples of serious misconduct by the employee:

  • theft or embezzlement;
  • fraudulent acts upon hiring (e.g., presenting false documentation), or during employment (e.g., sabotage, divulging confidential information);
  • serious infractions of disciplinary, safety and health regulations;
  • threats, abusive language or assault against the employer or other workers;
  • encouraging other workers to engage in serious misconduct;
  • political propaganda, activities or demonstrations within the establishment;
  • committing violent acts during a strike; and
  • failing to return to work within 48 hours of a court declaring a strike illegal, absent a valid reason. (Arts. 83B, 330, 337, LL)

Prohibition on discrimination during termination

When terminating an employee, an employer cannot take into account the employee’s race, colour, sex, belief or religion, political opinions, trade union membership or activities, or participation in a strike (Arts. 12, 279, 333, LL).

Indeed, special rules apply to protect union activists as well as worker representatives known as shop stewards from unwarranted termination (Arts. 282, 293-295, LL; Prakas 313/00).

Collective dismissals

Special provisions govern collective dismissals, i.e., those resulting from a reduction of the establishment’s activity or from an internal reorganization (Art. 95, LL).

Notice and prior procedural safeguards

FDCs

If an employer wants an employee to stop work at the end of an FDC, the employer must inform the employee prior to the end date of the contract as follows:

  • For FDCs with a term of over 6 months to one year: 10 days notice
  • For FDCs with a term exceeding one year: 15 days notice

No notice is required for FDCs of 6 months or less (Art. 73, LL).

UDCs

When an employer (or employee) terminates a UDC, prior written notice is required.  The amount of notice required depends upon the length of continuous service:

  • For employment less than 6 months: 7 days notice
  • For employment from 6 months to 2 years: 15 days notice
  • For employment more than 2 years and up to 5 years: 1 month notice
  • For employment more than 5 years and up to 10 years: 2 months notice
  • For employment more than 10 years: 3 months notice (Art. 75, LL)

The length of the notice period can be extended by agreement, but it cannot be reduced (Art. 76, LL).  An employer can provide payment in lieu of notice for all or part of the notice period. The amount of this payment should equal the wages and benefits that the employee would have received if the notice requirement had been respected, based on average earnings over the previous 12 months (Art. 77, LL; AC 51/04). During the notice period the employee is entitled to two days’ paid leave to look for a new job (Art. 79, LL).

Exceptions to notice requirements

No notice is required:

  • for termination of probationary contracts and internships (although Phnom Penh garment industry employers must provide probationary employees 7 days notice, and apprentices 1 day notice prior to termination (Notice 06/97));
  • in the event of serious misconduct on the part of one of the parties; or
  • in case of force majeure, which makes one of the parties unable to fulfil the conditions of employment (Art. 82, LL). For the employer, this could include closure of the establishment due to the employer’s death or pursuant to an order by a public authority, or a catastrophe leading to material destruction (Art. 85, LL). (Art. 82, LL)

However, employers must always give notice when an employee becomes chronically ill, insane or permanently disabled (Art. 86, LL).

Collective Dismissals

An employer must inform employee representatives in writing prior to a collective dismissal in order to seek their advice on minimizing the adverse impact upon employees.  The Labour Inspector should be informed of this process. In exceptional cases, the Ministry in charge of labour can suspend the dismissals to give the parties time to negotiate an agreement (Art. 95,  LL).

An employer first must terminate employees with the lowest professional qualifications, and then terminate those with the least seniority.  An employee’s seniority is increased by one year for married employees, and by one additional year for each dependent child.  Employees terminated through collective dismissals have priority in rehiring for 2 years (Art. 95, LL).

Severance pay

FDCs

At the expiration of the contract (the end of the term or completion of the task), the employer must pay the employee severance pay, which may be fixed by collective agreement but should not in any case be less than 5 per cent of the total wages paid during the length of the contract (Art. 73, LL).

UDCs

If the worker is dismissed for a reason other than serious misconduct, the employer must pay an indemnity for dismissal. The amount of the indemnity depends upon the employee’s length of continuous service:

  • For employment from 6 to 12 months:     7 days wages and benefits
  • For employment over 1 year:  15 days wages and benefits for each year of employment, up to a maximum of six months’ wages.

(Art. 89, LL)

The Arbitration Council has found that employers should use the employee's average earnings over the previous 12 months, not minimum wage, when calculating the indemnity for dismissal.

An employer does not have to pay an employee who resigns the indemnity for dismissal, unless the employer pushed the employee to resign.  An employer must pay the indemnity for dismissal if the employer treats the worker unfairly or repeatedly violates the terms of the contract (Art. 90, LL).

Avenues for redress

Damages under FDCs

If an employer terminates an FDC before the agreed term, absent serious misconduct by the worker or force majeure, the employee is entitled to damages. These damages should at least be equal to the remuneration that the worker would have received through the duration of the contract (Art. 73, LL).

Damages under UDCs

If the employee is dismissed without a valid cause, the employer must pay damages (Art. 91, LL). To fix the amount of damages, the court should consider local custom, the type and importance of the services rendered, the employee’s seniority and age, any deductions or payments made to a retirement plan, and other circumstances establishing the existence and the extent of the harm incurred (Art. 94, LL). Instead of providing proof of damages in court, the worker can ask for a lump sum payment equal in amount to the indemnity for dismissal (Art. 91, LL).

Settlement of Disputes

Prior to any judicial action, an aggrieved employer or employee can opt to refer a dispute to the Labour Inspector for conciliation. The conciliation procedure is not compulsory, and should be initiated by one of the parties by reporting the dispute to the Labour Inspector. Once notified of the dispute, the Labour Inspector must set a hearing date for within 3 weeks to conciliate the dispute. The Labour Inspector must write a report containing the result of the conciliation, whether there is an agreement or not. Although the initial referral to the Labour Inspector is voluntary, a conciliated agreement is enforceable by law.  If no agreement is reached, the parties may file a complaint in a court of competent jurisdiction within two months, after which time the claim expires (Arts. 300 and 301, LL; Prakas 318/01).

Further information

Employment protection legislation database - EPLex









 
Last update: 11 June 2007 ^ top