Lighting in Underground Mines

Authors: Trotter, Don
in 74. Mining and Quarrying, Armstrong, James R.,Menon, Raji, Editor, Encyclopedia of Occupational Health and Safety, Jeanne Mager Stellman, Editor-in-Chief. International Labor Organization, Geneva. © 2011.

Light Sources in Mining

In 1879 a practical incandescent filament lamp was patented. As a result light no longer depended on a fuel source. Many startling breakthroughs have been made in lighting knowledge since Edison’s discovery, including some with applications in underground mines. Each has inherent advantages and disadvantages. Table 1 lists the light source types and compares some parameters.

Table 1. Comparison of mine light sources

Type of light source

Approximate luminance
2 (clear bulb)

Average rated life (h)

DC source

Approximate initial efficacy lm·W–1

Colour rendition

Tungsten filament

105 to 107

750 to 1,000


5 to 30



2 × 107

5 to 2,000





5 × 104 to 2 × 105

500 to 30,000




Mercury vapour

105 to 106

16,000 to 24,000

Yes with limitations



Metal halide

5 × 106

10,000 to 20,000

Yes with limitations



High-pressure sodium


12,000 to 24,000

Not advised



Low-pressure sodium


10,000 to 18,000

Not advised



cd = candela, DC = direct current; lm = lumens.

Current to energize the light sources may be either alternating (AC) or direct (DC). Fixed light sources almost always use alternating current whereas portable sources such as cap lamps and underground vehicle headlights use a DC battery. Not all light source types are suitable for direct current.

Fixed light sources

Tungsten filament lamps are most common, often with a frosted bulb and a shield to reduce glare. The fluorescent lamp is the second most common light source and is easily distinguishable by its tubular design. Circular and U-shaped designs are compact and have mining applications as mining areas are often in cramped spaces. Tungsten filament and fluorescent sources are used to light such diverse underground openings as shaft stations, conveyors, travelways, lunchrooms, charging stations, fuel bays, repair depots, warehouses, tool rooms and crusher stations.

The trend in mine lighting is to use more efficient light sources. These are the four high-intensity discharge (HID) sources called mercury vapour, metal halide, high-pressure sodium and low-pressure sodium. Each requires a few minutes (one to seven) to come up to full light output. Also, if power to the lamp is lost or turned off, the arc tube must be cooled before the arc can be struck and the lamp relit. (However, in the case of low-pressure sodium (Sox) lamps, restrike is almost instantaneous.) Their spectral energy distributions differ from that of natural light. Mercury vapour lamps produce a bluish white light whereas high-pressure sodium lamps produce a yellowish light. If colour differentiation is important in underground work (e.g., for using colour-coded gas bottles for welding, reading colour-coded signs, electrical wiring hook-ups or sorting ore by colour), care must be taken in the colour rendition properties of the source. Objects will have their surface colours distorted when lit by a low-pressure sodium lamp. Table 1 gives colour rendition comparisons.

Mobile light sources

With working places spread out often both laterally and vertically, and with continual blasting in these working places, permanent installations are often deemed impractical because of the costs of installation and upkeep. In many mines the battery-operated cap lamp is the most important single source of light. Although fluorescent cap lamps are in use, by far the majority of cap lamps use tungsten filament battery-operated cap lamps. Batteries are lead acid or nickel cadmium. A miniature tungsten-halogen lamp bulb is often used for the miner’s cap lamp. The small bulb allows the beam to be easily focused. The halogen gas surrounding the filament prevents the tungsten filament material from boiling off, which keeps lamp walls from blackening. The bulb can also be burned hotter and hence brighter.

For mobile vehicle lighting, incandescent lamps are most commonly used. They require no special equipment, are inexpensive and are easy to replace. Parabolic aluminized reflector (PAR) lamps are used as headlights on vehicles.

Standards for Mine Lighting

Countries with a well-established underground mining industry are usually quite specific in their requirements regarding what constitutes a safe mine lighting system. This is particularly true for mines which have methane gas given off from the workings, usually coal mines. Methane gas can ignite and cause an underground explosion with devastating results. Consequently any lights must be designed to be either “intrinsically safe” or “explosion proof”. An intrinsically safe light source is one in which the current feeding the light has very little energy so that any short in the circuit would not produce a spark which could ignite the methane gas. For a lamp to be explosion proof, any explosion triggered by the lamp’s electrical activity is contained within the device. In addition, the device itself will not become hot enough to cause an explosion. The lamp is more expensive, heavier, with metal parts usually made of castings. Governments usually have test facilities to certify whether lamps can be classified for use in a gassy mine. A low-pressure sodium lamp could not be so certified as the sodium in the lamp could ignite if the lamp were to break and the sodium came in contact with water.

Countries also legislate standards for the amount of light required for various tasks but legislation varies greatly in the amount of light that should be placed in the various working places.

Guidelines for mine lighting are also provided by international bodies concerned with lighting, such as the Illumination Engineering Society (IES) and the Commission internationale de l’éclairage (CIE). The CIE stresses that the quality of light being received by the eye is as important as the quantity and provides formulas to ascertain whether glare may be a factor in visual performance.

Effects of Lighting on Accidents, Production and Health

One would expect that better lighting would reduce accidents, increase production and reduce health hazards, but it is not easy to substantiate this. The direct effect of lighting on underground efficiency and safety is hard to measure because lighting is only one of many variables that affect production and safety. There is well-documented evidence that shows highway accidents decrease with improved illumination. A similar correlation has been noted in factories. The very nature of mining, however, dictates that the work area is constantly changing, so that very few reports relating mine accidents to lighting can be found in the literature and it remains an area of research that has been largely unexplored. Accident investigations show that poor lighting is rarely the primary cause of underground accidents but is often a contributing factor. While lighting conditions play some role in many mine accidents, they have special significance in accidents involving falls of ground, since poor lighting makes it easy to miss dangerous conditions that could otherwise be corrected.

Until the beginning of the twentieth century, miners commonly suffered from the eye disease nystagmus, for which there was no known cure. Nystagmus produced uncontrollable oscillation of the eyeballs, headaches, dizziness and loss of night vision. It was caused by working under very low light levels over long periods of time. Coal miners were particularly susceptible, since very little of the light that strikes the coal is reflected. These miners often had to lie on their sides when working in low coal and this may also have contributed to the disease. With the introduction of the electric cap lamp in mines, miner’s nystagmus has disappeared, eliminating the most important health hazard associated with underground lighting.

With recent technological advances in new light sources, the interest in lighting and health has been revived. It is now possible to have lighting levels in mines that would have been extremely difficult to achieve previously. The main concern is glare, but concern has also been expressed about the radiometric energy given off by the lights. Radiometric energy can affect workers either by acting directly on cells on or near the surface of the skin or by triggering certain responses, such as biological rhythms on which physical and mental health depends. An HID light source can still operate even though the glass envelope containing the source is cracked or broken. Workers can then be in danger of receiving doses beyond threshold limit values, particularly since these light sources often cannot be mounted very high.



Mining and Quarrying Additional Resources

Click the Button below to view additional resources for this topic.


Mining and Quarrying References

Agricola, G. 1950. De Re Metallica, translated by HC Hoover and LH Hoover. New York: Dover Publications.

Bickel, KL. 1987. Analysis of diesel-powered mine equipment. In Proceedings of the Bureau of Mines Technology Transfer Seminar: Diesels in Underground Mines. Information Circular 9141. Washington, DC: Bureau of Mines.

Bureau of Mines. 1978. Coal Mine Fire and Explosion Prevention. Information Circular 8768. Washington, DC: Bureau of Mines.

—. 1988. Recent Developments in Metal and Nonmetal Fire Protection. Information Circular 9206. Washington, DC: Bureau of Mines.

Chamberlain, EAC. 1970. The ambient temperature oxidisation of coal in relation to the early detection of spontaneous heating. Mining Engineer (October) 130(121):1-6.

Ellicott, CW. 1981. Assessment of the explosibility of gas mixtures and monitoring of sample-time trends. Proceeding of the Symposium on Ignitions, Explosions and FIres. Illawara: Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.

Environmental Protection Agency (Australia). 1996. Best Practice Environmental Management in Mining. Canberra: Environmental Protection Agency.

Funkemeyer, M and FJ Kock. 1989. Fire prevention in working rider seams prone to spontaneous combustion. Gluckauf 9-12.

Graham, JI. 1921. The normal production of carbon monoxide in coal mines. Transactions of the Institute of Mining Engineers 60:222-234.

Grannes, SG, MA Ackerson, and GR Green. 1990. Preventing Automatic Fire Suppression Systems Failure on Underground Mining Belt Conveyers. Information Circular 9264. Washington, DC: Bureau of Mines.

Greuer, RE. 1974. Study of Mine Fire Fighting Using Inert Gases. USBM Contract Report No. S0231075. Washington, DC: Bureau of Mines.

Griffin, RE. 1979. In-mine Evaluation of Smoke Detectors. Information Circular 8808. Washington, DC: Bureau of Mines.

Hartman, HL (ed.). 1992. SME Mining Engineering Handbook, 2nd edition. Baltimore, MD: Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration.

Hertzberg, M. 1982. Inhibition and Extinction of Coal Dust and Methane Explosions. Report of Investigations 8708. Washington, DC: Bureau of Mines.

Hoek, E, PK Kaiser, and WF Bawden. 1995. Design of Suppoert for Underground Hard Rock Mines. Rotterdam: AA Balkema.

Hughes, AJ and WE Raybold. 1960. The rapid determination of the explosibility of mine fire gases. Mining Engineer 29:37-53.

International Council on Metals and the Environment (ICME). 1996. Case Studies Illustrating Environmental Practices in Mining and Metallurgical Processes. Ottawa: ICME.

International Labour Organization (ILO). 1994. Recent Developments in the Coalmining Industry. Geneva: ILO.

Jones, JE and JC Trickett. 1955. Some observations on the examination of gases resulting from explosions in collieries. Transactions of the Institute of Mining Engineers 114: 768-790.

Mackenzie-Wood P and J Strang. 1990. Fire gases and their interpretation. Mining Engineer 149(345):470-478.

Mines Accident Prevention Association Ontario. n.d. Emergency Preparedness Guidelines. Technical Standing Committee Report. North Bay: Mines Accident Prevention Association Ontario.

Mitchell, D and F Burns. 1979. Interpreting the State of a Mine Fire. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor.

Morris, RM. 1988. A new fire ratio for determining conditions in sealed areas. Mining Engineer 147(317):369-375.

Morrow, GS and CD Litton. 1992. In-mine Evaluation of Smoke Detectors. Information Circular 9311. Washington, DC: Bureau of Mines.

National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). 1992a. Fire Prevention Code. NFPA 1. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1992b. Standard on Pulverized Fuel Systems. NFPA 8503. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1994a. Standard for Fire Prevention in Use of Cutting and Welding Processes. NFPA 51B. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1994b. Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers. NFPA 10. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1994c. Standard for Medium and High Expansion Foam Systems. NFPA 11A. Quncy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1994d. Standard for Dry Chemical Extinguishing Systems. NFPA 17. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1994e. Standard for Coal Preparation Plants. NFPA 120. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1995a. Standard for Fire Prevention and Control in Underground Metal and Nonmetal Mines. NFPA 122. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1995b. Standard for Fire Prevention and Control in Underground Bituminious Coal Mines. NFPA 123. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1996a. Standard on Fire Protection for Self-propelled and Mobile Surface Mining Equipment. NFPA 121. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1996b. Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code. NFPA 30. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1996c. National Electrical Code. NFPA 70. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1996d. National Fire Alarm Code. NFPA 72. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1996e. Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems. NFPA 13. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1996f. Standard for the Installation of Water Spray Systems. NFPA 15. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1996g. Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems. NFPA 2001. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

—. 1996h. Recommended Practice for Fire Protection in Electric Generating Plants and High Voltage DC Converter Stations. NFPA 850. Quincy, MA: NFPA.

Ng, D and CP Lazzara. 1990. Performance of concrete block and steel panel stoppings in a simulated mine fire. Fire Technology 26(1):51-76.

Ninteman, DJ. 1978. Spontaneous Oxidation and Combustion of Sulfide Ores in Underground Mines. Information Circular 8775. Washington, DC: Bureau of Mines.

Pomroy, WH and TL Muldoon. 1983. A new stench gas fire warning system. In Proceedings of the 1983 MAPAO Annual General Meeting and Technical Sessions. North Bay: Mines Accident Prevention Association Ontario.

Ramaswatny, A and PS Katiyar. 1988. Experiences with liquid nitrogen in combating coal fires underground. Journal of Mines Metals and Fuels 36(9):415-424.

Smith, AC and CN Thompson. 1991. Development and application of a method for predicting the spontaneous combustion potential of bituminous coals. Presented at the 24th International Conference of Safety in Mines Research Institutes, Makeevka State Research Institute for Safety in the Coal Industry, Makeevka, Russian Federation.

Timmons, ED, RP Vinson, and FN Kissel. 1979. Forecasting Methane Hazards in Metal and Nonmetal Mines. Report of Investigations 8392. Washington, DC: Bureau of Mines.

United Nations (UN) Department of Technical Cooperation for Development and the German Foundation for International Development. 1992. Mining and the Environment: The Berlin Guidelines. London: Mining Journal Books.

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 1991. Environmental Aspects of Selected Non-ferrous Metals (Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn, Au) in Ore Mining. Paris: UNEP.

Home >> Part XI. Industries Based on Natural Resources >> Mining and Quarrying >> Lighting in Underground Mines