2006, Labour Inspection: Chapter I - Evolution of the scope of labour inspection from 1947 to the present day: Towards broad coverage


Description:(General Survey)
Convention:C081
Convention:P081
Convention:C129
Recommendation:R081
Recommendation:R082
Recommendation:R133
Subject classification: Labour Inspection
Subject: Labour Administration and Inspection
Document:(Report III Part 1B)
Session of the Conference:95
Display the document in:  French   Spanish
Document No. (ilolex): 252006G03

Chapter I

Evolution of the scope of labour inspection from 1947 to the present day: Towards broad coverage

16. The labour inspection instruments of 1947 apply to workplaces in industry and commerce where workers are employed. Those adopted in 1969 cover commercial and non-commercial agricultural undertakings and the Protocol of 1995 extends the application of Convention No. 81 to activities in what is termed the non-commercial services sector. The purpose of the Conventions and the Protocol is the establishment, for each sector covered, of a system of labour inspection. While the general principles relating to labour inspection, as set forth in Recommendation No. 20, (Endnote_1) were taken up in all of the instruments on the subject subsequently adopted by the Conference, the coverage of inspection has evolved from one instrument to the other.

I. The 1947 instruments on labour inspection in industry and commerce

17. While stipulating that each ratifying Member shall maintain a system of labour inspection in industrial workplaces (Article 1) and commercial workplaces (Article 22), the scope of Convention No. 81 is limited, on the one hand, by permitting a number of possible exclusions that are strictly defined in terms of branch of economic activity or geographical considerations and, on the other, by affording a considerable degree of flexibility through the manner in which it defines the workplaces and workers actually covered (Article 2, paragraph 1).

A. Possibility of exempting mining and transport undertakings or parts of such undertakings

18. Under Article 2, paragraph 2, of Convention No. 81, national laws or regulations may exempt mining and transport undertakings or parts of such undertakings from its application. This does not mean, however, that the workers employed in these enterprises should not enjoy the same protection as other workers in industry. At the same session, the Conference adopted the Labour Inspection (Mining and Transport) Recommendation, 1947 (No. 82), which provides that each Member of the International Labour Organization should apply to mining and transport undertakings as defined by the competent authority appropriate systems of labour inspection to ensure the enforcement of legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers while engaged in their work. (Endnote_2) In countries where specific structures are responsible for supervising conditions of work in mines and/or transport, provision is often made for the involvement of labour inspectors. (Endnote_3)

B. Possibility of excluding commercial workplaces

19. Under Article 25(1) of Convention No. 81, any Member may, by a declaration appended to its ratification, exclude Part II on labour inspection in commerce from its acceptance of the Convention. In its previous General Survey on the subject, the Committee of Experts observed that out of the 105 countries that had ratified Convention No. 81, only 18 had availed themselves of this possibility. Twenty years later, the Committee notes that this number has not changed. (Endnote_4) Such a declaration does not exempt the Member from indicating in its report on the application of the Convention the position of its law and practice in regard to the provisions of Part II, and it may be cancelled by a subsequent declaration (see Article 25(2) and (3)).

C. Possibility of total or partial exclusion of certain areas

20. Under Article 29, paragraph 1, of Convention No. 81, large areas of the territory of a Member may be exempted from its application if the competent authority considers it impracticable to enforce its provisions by reason of the sparseness of its population or its stage of development. The competent authority may determine exceptions in respect of particular undertakings or occupations. Members must indicate the areas exempted as well as the reasons for its exemption in their first annual report under article 22 of the Constitution of the ILO. Members shall not subsequently extend such an exemption (paragraph 2), and shall indicate in subsequent reports any areas in respect of which they renounce the right to have recourse to the provisions of article 29 (paragraph 3).

D. Definition of workplaces covered and workers protected

21. Convention No. 81 does not define directly the workplaces to be covered by the labour inspection system. They are referred to in Article 2, paragraph 1, as those "in respect of which legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers while engaged in their work are enforceable by labour inspectors". This allows each Member to restrict the scope of the Convention to the extent defined by national laws and regulations; a resolution adopted at the same session of the Conference invites Governments "to apply to all workers employed in industrial and commercial undertakings the legal provisions for the protection of workers which are enforceable by labour inspectors". (Endnote_5)

22. In most countries, the scope of labour inspection is defined in general legislation such as labour codes, general labour acts, conditions of work legislation and industrial relations law. The determining factor for inclusion in the scope of labour inspection, at least in law, is often the existence of an employment or apprenticeship relationship. (Endnote_6) The Committee has observed that the terms used to refer to workplaces within the meaning of the Convention vary from one country to another: some examples are "enterprises", "workplaces", "work centres", "installations" or "organizations". In some countries, indications as to coverage by labour inspection are found in provisions regulating the function of the labour inspectorate. (Endnote_7) References in these texts to specific existing or forthcoming regulations sometimes indicate that legal provisions relating to conditions of work in certain sectors or economic activities are or will be enforceable by another system of monitoring. These are usually public sector enterprises and those in the mining, petroleum, nuclear power, airline, road transport or maritime sectors.

23. Other limitations on the scope of labour inspection are based on various criteria relating to the scope of the labour legislation such as size, turnover or number of employees of the enterprise. (Endnote_8) As a result, the conditions of work of a varying substantial proportion of a country's workforce, scattered over a wide range of industrial and commercial activities, are excluded from any system of monitoring. Accordingly, some do not benefit from any technical advice or information from labour inspectors which would enable improvements to be made. Neglect of workers' rights, and exploitation of the vulnerability of some workers, are ultimately costly both in terms of reduced profits to the enterprise and for the economy as a whole. This is especially the case in the informal sector and in countries where there is a multitude of small enterprises excluded from the coverage of the legislation or where there are enterprises employing fewer than the threshold number of workers.

24. Whatever the coverage of labour inspection in law, in practice it is always limited to varying extents by factors related to the national or regional political and economic situation. The main cause is generally the lack of adequate financial resources assigned to this function of the state labour administration.

II. The 1969 instruments on labour inspection in agriculture

25. While Convention No. 81 provides many possibilities of restricting its scope, in the first two decades following its adoption, most countries have only excluded mining and transport enterprises from its application.

26. Encouraged by this fact, the Conference had no major difficulty in adopting in 1969 an instrument in the form of a convention on labour inspection in agriculture, whose coverage would automatically encompass a wide range of activities defined as agricultural activities in which workers or apprentices are employed. The Convention does not provide for any criteria for exclusion from its application; moreover, governments are encouraged to undertake to extend labour inspection in agriculture to workers who are not in an employment relationship or one of dependency or subordination. (Endnote_9)

A. Coverage of all agricultural undertakings in which employees or apprentices work

27. Convention No. 129 reflects the will of member States to ensure, through a legally binding instrument, protection of the greatest possible number of workers in a sector that is extremely diverse, not only in terms of the legal status as regards the ownership of farms, but also in respect of the forms of the employment relationship. Under Article 4, the system of labour inspection in agriculture shall apply to agricultural undertakings in which employees or apprentices work, however they may be remunerated and whatever the type, form or duration of their contract. Under Article 1, paragraph 1, the term "agricultural undertaking" means undertakings and parts of undertakings engaged in cultivation, animal husbandry, forestry, horticulture and the primary processing of agricultural products by the operator of the holding – an unlimited list that is left open to "any other form of agricultural activity". The idea of optimal coverage is even more explicit in paragraph 2 of the same Article, which stipulates that no agricultural undertaking shall be excluded from the national system of labour inspection. However, it also provides that, where necessary, the competent authority shall, after consultation with the most representative organizations of employers and workers concerned, define the line which separates agriculture from industry and commerce. Under paragraph 3 of the same Article, it is for the competent authority to settle the question in any case in which it is doubtful whether an undertaking or part thereof is one to which the Convention applies.

28. Convention No. 129 does not distinguish between agricultural enterprises for the purposes of their coverage by the labour inspection system. Thus it is intended to be applied in the same way to public, private or mixed agricultural enterprises, irrespective of their size, and to protect all workers who are employees or apprentices in such enterprises. In some countries, no agricultural enterprise is excluded under the legislation. (Endnote_10) Others have only recently adopted legal provisions to include them in the scope of labour inspection. (Endnote_11)

29. The fact is, however, that only a small proportion of agricultural enterprises worldwide are legally covered by inspection of their working conditions. This is due to various reasons, including the wide variety of enterprises, the way in which they operate, the legal and title framework governing their ownership and their economic mode of operation, their socio-economic situation and impact, geographical situation, and the characteristics of their workforce and its ability to organize in trade unions. (Endnote_12) In practice this proportion is even smaller, if not entirely non-existent.

30. The Committee has often had occasion to regret the lack of information communicated by governments on the measures taken in law and in practice to give effect to the provisions of Convention No. 129. The statistics of agricultural undertakings, their geographical distribution and the number of persons working therein required under Article 27(c) of the Convention rarely feature in the annual reports from the central authority or the periodical reports on the activities of the labour inspection services, which makes it difficult to assess their effectiveness in the light of needs. Some countries regularly provide relevant information in their annual reports on inspection. (Endnote_13)

B. Optional clause on extension of coverage by the labour inspection system to unpaid agricultural workers

31. Article 5, paragraph 1, of Convention No. 129 provides that any Member may, in a declaration accompanying its ratification, undertake also to cover by labour inspection in agriculture one or more categories of persons working in agricultural undertakings who are not already covered under Article 1, i.e. tenants who do not engage outside help, sharecroppers and similar categories of agricultural workers; persons participating in a collective economic enterprise, such as members of a cooperative; and members of the family of the operator of the undertaking, as defined by national laws or regulations. In the absence of such a declaration, Members bound by the Convention are still required to indicate in their reports to the Office on the application of the Convention to what extent effect has been given or is proposed to be given to the relevant provisions (Article 5, paragraph 3).

32. Latvia is the only country that has made a formal declaration concerning extension of the system of labour inspection as provided in the Convention, referring to members of cooperatives. The Government's declaration was accompanied by a statement of its intention to extend it to the other categories mentioned in the Convention. Some countries have made the extension without making a formal declaration to that effect. Workers mentioned by some governments as being covered by the labour inspection system under Article 5 of the Convention do not always belong to the categories listed in subparagraphs (a) to (c) of that Article. In this regard, the Committee would like to emphasize that the option of extending the system of labour inspection to unpaid agricultural workers does not always imply an obligation for the inspectorate to provide these persons with all of the services available for the protection of workers in the sector. In some European countries, for example, the labour inspection services provide occupational safety and health training to self-employed agricultural workers, farmers, sharecroppers and family members working on the farm. (Endnote_14) In Norway, a Royal Decree of 1986 extended the application of the Work Environment Act to the many agricultural enterprises that do not employ workers. (Endnote_15)

III. Protocol of 1995 to the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947: Extension of the labour inspection system to the non-commercial services sector

33. Following a suggestion made by the Committee of Experts in its General Survey on labour inspection published in 1985, (Endnote_16) the Governing Body of the International Labour Office decided at its 258th Session (1993) to include in the agenda of the 82nd Session (1995) of the International Labour Conference an item on extending the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), to activities in the "non-commercial services sector", most branches of economic activity being already covered by international standards on labour inspection. (Endnote_17)

A. Definition of non-commercial services

34. The preliminary report prepared by the Office for the 82nd Session of the Conference contains a number of useful elements for identifying the services targeted by the instrument envisaged for adoption. Rather than providing a universal definition, it lists a wide range of services and activities that might be covered, under a new instrument, by the system of labour inspection established in accordance with Convention No. 81. Given the specific national situations cited by Members in their replies to the Office questionnaire on the subject, an indicative list of services and activities in what is termed the "non-commercial" services sector was proposed. It includes public administration (national, regional or local), which, depending on the country, consists of national (federal) ministries and their administrative services; provincial/regional/federal governments and administrations; district/local/municipal administrations; the armed services; police and other public security services, prison services; fire brigades and other rescue services, which are generally not in the commercial or industrial sector; and often education services, such as universities and tertiary colleges, secondary and primary schools; health services including national and local hospitals and clinics, laboratories and pharmacies; postal services and telecommunications; railways and other public road, air and water transport services (covered in principle by Convention No. 81 but often excluded from its coverage by national law or practice); public utilities such as gas, water and electricity supply, refuse collection and disposal and other essential services; welfare and social services; cultural and recreational services such as theatres, parks, leisure centres, zoos, museums, libraries, religious institutions and charities.

35. Criteria such as the public or private status of the employer, social or for-profit aim of the enterprise soon proved inadequate as a basis for drawing a distinction between commercial and industrial activities, on the one hand, and non-commercial services, on the other. There are too many areas of overlap for them to be relevant.

36. The preliminary report also observed that the more removed from central government executive power an organization, service, institution or enterprise is, the greater the likelihood that it will be covered by existing labour protection legislation supervised by labour inspection. Where government-owned firms or public enterprises producing or selling goods or services in a market are usually fully subject to existing systems of labour inspection, conversely, institutions or activities considered to constitute the very core of executive power, such as the central government administration, the armed services, the police, etc., are often completely exempt from the purview of labour inspection.

37. The replies to the questionnaire sent to Members reflected a wide diversity of national perceptions of what constituted the "non-commercial services sector". In these circumstances, the Conference defined the term "activities in the non-commercial services sector" as activities in all categories of workplaces that are not considered as industrial or commercial for the purposes of Convention No. 81 (Article 1, paragraph 2, of the Protocol). This considerably broadened the national remit of labour inspection systems covered by binding international instruments, which already included industrial and commercial workplaces, as well as commercial and non-commercial agricultural enterprises, since the non-commercial services sector was estimated to employ between 10 and 50 per cent of the labour force, depending on the country, which means hundreds of millions of people worldwide. These workers are exposed to most occupational risks of a technical, medical or social nature, including the most serious hazards. In addition to the same risks found in industry, commerce and agriculture, they often face unique risks of their own. In many countries workers in the non-commercial services sector do not enjoy the minimum protection that external and independent labour inspection affords to those in industry and commerce in regard to their conditions of work and labour rights.

38. Referring to the existing international instruments, the preamble to the Protocol of 1995 emphasizes the need, having regard to all the risks to which workers in the con- commercial services sector may be exposed, to ensure that this sector is subject to the same or an equally effective and impartial system of labour inspection as that provided in Convention No. 81.

B. Possibility of excluding certain categories of non-commercial services from the scope of the Protocol and special aspects of labour inspection

39. Under Article 2 of the Protocol, a Member which ratifies it may, by a declaration appended to its instrument of ratification and after consultation with the social partners, exclude wholly or partly from its scope essential national (federal) government administration, the armed services, whether military or civilian personnel, the police and other public security services, and prison services, whether prison staff or prisoners when performing work, if the application of the Convention to any of these categories would raise special problems of a substantial nature (paragraphs 1 and 2).

40. The reasons for the exclusion made by a declaration appended to the instrument of ratification shall be indicated by the Government in its next report on the application of the Convention. In accordance with the terms of the Protocol, these services must be covered nonetheless, to the extent possible, by alternative inspection arrangements. Information on any measures taken with a view to extending the Protocol to them must be communicated in subsequent reports (Article 2, paragraph 3). The Member may modify or cancel the declaration of exclusion at any time by a subsequent declaration (paragraph 4).

41. Members who do not avail themselves of the possibility of excluding one or more of the abovementioned categories of services may none the less make special arrangements restricting the powers of labour inspectors as provided in Article 12 of Convention No. 81 with regard to these categories or some of their activities (Article 4).

C. National practice

42. Only ten of the 135 countries bound by Convention No. 81 have ratified the Protocol (Endnote_18) and information sent to the ILO on measures taken to give effect to it in law and in practice is still scarce. Moreover, the Committee observes that despite the flexibility of its provisions, most countries have expressed some concerns with regard to ratification prospects, and the obstacles referred to often lie in the difficulty of identifying the activities, enterprises and services covered by the instrument. The Committee has, however, noted the interest in ratification expressed by some employers' and workers' organizations. (Endnote_19)

43. Among countries that have not ratified the Protocol, Burkina Faso indicated that parts of establishments or military establishments employing civilian workers and in which national defence interests rule out the entry of external inspection staff are listed in an Order issued by the Ministry of Defence, after consulting the Minister responsible for labour affairs; labour inspection in these cases is carried out by officials or officers specially assigned to the task by joint order of the abovementioned ministries. In Latvia, central and local government bodies, as well as public bodies and religious institutions, fall within the remit of the Public Labour Inspectorate that is competent for other sectors. (Endnote_21) The Government of France has indicated that only public administrations and establishments engaged in the administration of the State and local communities are exempt from any system of labour inspection within the meaning of the relevant ILO Conventions. They are not covered by the Labour Code, with the exception of the parts relating to occupational safety and health and conditions of work, which are implemented through regulations applicable to the public service. (Endnote_22)


Endnotes

Endnote 1

Labour Inspection Recommendation, 1923 (No. 20).

Endnote 2

See Preamble to Recommendation No. 82.

Endnote 3

For example, in Burkina Faso, mines and quarries are not excluded from the remit of labour inspectors. Technical inspections for workers' safety are carried out in this sector by specialized staff who are vested with the powers of labour inspectors for this purpose; the latter may, under section 371 of the Labour Code, ask to participate in inspections at any time. In Comoros, under section 168 of the Labour Code, technical inspectors of mines and quarries must inform labour inspectors of the results of inspections and measures ordered. Labour inspectors are also allowed to take part in inspections.

Endnote 4

One of the countries that had excluded Part II from its ratification subsequently made a declaration cancelling that declaration.

Endnote 5

See ILO: Record of Proceedings, ILC, 30th Session, Geneva, 1947.

Endnote 6

For example, in Belgium and Mali.

Endnote 7

The establishments covered by labour inspection are indicated in Angola in section 2 of Decree No. 9/95 regulating the labour inspectorate, in Latvia in section 4 of the State Labour Inspection Law of 28 December 2001 and in Uruguay in section 3 of Decree No. 680/977 of 6 December 1977 concerning the implementation of international labour Conventions Nos. 81 and 129.

Endnote 8

For example, in India, under section 2 of the Factories Act, 1948, labour legislation applies only to enterprises with at least ten employees; in Zimbabwe, the threshold under section 3 of the Factories and Works Act, 1996, is five employees; in Nigeria, under section 87 of the Factories Act, 1987, ten employees.

Endnote 9

Furthermore, the recently adopted Convention No. 184 on safety and health in agriculture expands the scope and need of labour inspection in agriculture. Joint notification and implementation campaigns of Conventions Nos. 129 and 184 are under way.

Endnote 10

In Latvia, under Regulation No. 53 concerning the statutes on state labour inspection, dated 14 March 1995, the common inspection system covers all enterprises without distinction, as far as agriculture is concerned. The criterion for determining the coverage of labour inspection is the existence of an employment relationship in any registered enterprise. In the Bahamas, Cambodia and Côte d'Ivoire, the Labour Code applies, in principle, to all economic activities without distinction, under the oversight of the labour inspectorate.

Endnote 11

For example, in Bolivia the application of the General Labour Act was extended to rural workers in wage employment in 1996 by a provision of Act No. 1715 of 19 October respecting the National Service of Agrarian Reform.

Endnote 12

In Indonesia, plantations, aquaculture, forestry and livestock enterprises in the formal sector are covered by inspection under the Labour Inspection Act, No. 3 of 1951; in Yemen, certain agricultural workers are covered by labour inspection under section 3(2)(j) of the Labour Code. The definition of agricultural workers who are not excluded from the labour code includes technicians who repair and maintain equipment and machinery, as well as shepherds in wage employment. Seasonal agricultural workers are excluded in so far as they are not referred to among the agricultural workers covered by the Labour Code. In Switzerland, agricultural enterprises are excluded from the scope of the Labour Act (except with regard to the provisions on minimum age for admission to employment), and there are no structures for labour inspection in this area. Supervision of compliance with minimum age provisions is assigned by the State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) to the Fondation Agri- sécurité Suisse (AGRISS), which is also tasked by the National Swiss Accident Insurance Fund (CNA) with supervision of the application of provisions on accident prevention in this branch; in Lesotho, under sections 2 and 14 of the Labour Code Order 1992, agricultural enterprises appear to be covered by enforcement of provisions on working conditions.

Endnote 13

For example, France and Spain.

Endnote 14

In Croatia, some of the categories of workers referred to in Article 5 are covered by labour inspection under the legal provisions on occupational safety and health (sections 4 and 5 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1996); in the Republic of Moldova, members of cooperatives are covered by the Labour Protection Act; in Slovenia, self-employed agricultural workers and their family members are covered by section 3(1) and (2) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1999. The Government of Poland stated in its first report on the application of Convention No. 129 that, although the categories referred to in Article 5 are not covered by inspections by the labour inspectorate, they benefit from many preventive activities in the area of occupational safety and health in the form of advice and information.

Endnote 15

Royal Decree of 21 March 1986.

Endnote 16

General Survey, 1985, para. 319.

Endnote 17

ILO: Extension of the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), to activities in the non-commercial services sector, Report VI(1), ILC, 82nd Session, Geneva, 1995.

Endnote 18

Azerbaijan, Cyprus, Finland, Guyana, Ireland, Republic of Moldova, Norway, Russian Federation, Sweden and the United Republic of Tanzania.

Endnote 19

In Mali and Portugal.

Endnote 20

Section 372 of the Labour Code.

Endnote 21

Section 4, para. 1, of the State Labour Inspection Law of 28 December 2001.

Endnote 22

Book II, Title III, of the Labour Code.

Cross references
Constitution: Article 22
Survey reference:251985G12 General Survey 1985


ILO Home NORMES home ILOLEX home Universal Query NATLEX

For further information, please contact the International Labour Standards Department (NORMES) by email:
Copyright © 2006 International Labour Organization (ILO)
Disclaimer
webinfo@ilo.org