2006, Labour Inspection: Introduction


Description:(General Survey)
Convention:C081
Convention:P081
Convention:C129
Recommendation:R081
Recommendation:R082
Recommendation:R133
Subject classification: Labour Inspection
Subject: Labour Administration and Inspection
Document:(Report III Part 1B)
Session of the Conference:95
Display the document in:  French   Spanish
Document No. (ilolex): 252006G02

Introduction

Background

1. In accordance with the provisions of article 19, paragraph 5(e), of the Constitution of the International Labour Organization, the Governing Body of the International Labour Office decided at its 288th Session (November 2003) to request the governments of member States which had not ratified either the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), and the Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129), or the Protocol of 1995 to the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), to report on the present state of their laws and practices in regard to the matters dealt with in these instruments, showing the extent to which effect has been given, or is proposed to be given, to the respective provisions of the instruments by legislation, administrative action, collective agreement or otherwise and stating the difficulties which prevent or delay their ratification. As a result of this decision and in accordance with the provisions of article 19, paragraph 6(d), of the Constitution, the governments of all the member States were requested to report on the present state of their laws and practices in regard to the matters dealt with in the Labour Inspection Recommendation, 1947 (No. 81), the Labour Inspection (Mining and Transport) Recommendation, 1947 (No. 82), and the Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Recommendation, 1969 (No. 133).

2. This report is based on the reports provided pursuant to the above decision and on those reports that are regularly communicated to the ILO, under articles 22 and 35 of the Constitution, by virtue of ratification of any of the above Conventions or the Protocol. This is the sixth General Survey the Committee has produced, as requested by the Governing Body, on the effect given to ILO instruments on labour inspection. (Endnote_1) The Governing Body stressed how useful it would be to update this survey given the effects of socio-economic changes over the 20 years since the last one and to include labour inspection in the non-commercial services sector, as defined in the Protocol of 1995 to the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947. The Governing Body drew the attention of Members to the importance of Convention No. 129 for agricultural workers who make up a large proportion of the working population in many countries, and asked that the survey include an analysis of the obstacles to this instrument's ratification. (Endnote_2)

The history, context and terms of international labour inspection standards

3. Since its beginnings, the International Labour Organization has made labour inspection one of its priorities. The question of labour inspection was one of the general principles under article 427, ninth point, of Part XIII of the Treaty of Versailles which set up the ILO. It stipulates that "Each State should make provision for a system of inspection, in which women will take part, in order to ensure the enforcement of laws and regulations for the protection of the employed". Under article 10(2)(b) of the ILO Constitution, the International Labour Office shall assist governments in the improvement of labour inspection systems. At the very first International Labour Conference in 1919, a Recommendation was adopted with a view to establishing a system that would ensure factories and workshops were inspected effectively and establishing a public service in all member States, which, in cooperation with the International Labour Office, would be responsible for protecting workers' health. (Endnote_3) Four years later, in 1923, a new international Recommendation established the set of principles which remain the basis for the effective establishment and functioning of a labour inspection system. (Endnote_4) Convention No. 81, which applies to industrial and commercial workplaces, has been considered ever since its adoption in 1947 as the universal reference instrument on labour inspection and was enormously influenced by the 1923 Recommendation. In the majority of international labour Conventions on working conditions and the protection of workers adopted subsequently, there are provisions for the establishment of labour inspection or at least the appointment of authorities who will be responsible for ensuring the supervision of the application of relevant legislation. Finally, labour inspection plays an important role in applying a number of ILO codes of practice on occupational safety and health. (Endnote_5)

4. Following a resolution of the Conference in 1936 calling for labour inspection to be "embodied in the text of a Convention guaranteeing strict and effective application" of national and international social legislation, the matter was placed on the agenda of the 26th Session of the Conference in 1940, which could not be held on account of the war. The subject having been placed on the agenda of the 30th Session of the Conference in 1947, the Office had carried out an up-to-date analysis of the situation of the laws and practices in various countries and come to the conclusion that the basis for international regulations on labour inspection had not changed sufficiently to warrant substantial amendments to the 1939 questionnaire. It was however suggested that the objective of labour inspection be broadened in such a way that it would cover not only inspection functions but also the provision of technical information and advice to employers and workers. Thus, labour inspection's mission of providing information and advice was going to be clearly established in the future. Higher levels of resources have since been increasingly allocated to this aspect of labour inspection in many developed countries, and more recently in a number of countries in transition. 5. Since mining and transport were regarded as strategic industries just after the Second World War, the Conference admitted the possibility of excluding these industries from the scope of Convention No. 81. However, in the Labour Inspection (Mining and Transport) Recommendation, 1947 (No. 82), adopted at the same session, the Conference confirmed the principle of setting up labour inspection systems that would be responsible for enforcing legislation on the conditions of work and the protection of workers in mining and transport. Also at the same session, the Conference adopted the Labour Inspectorates (Non-Metropolitan Territories) Convention, 1947 (No. 85). (Endnote_6)

6. In its General Survey of 1966 on labour inspection, the Committee considered that "it would be highly desirable for the ILO to examine the possibility of adopting an instrument on labour inspection in agriculture which would supplement Convention No. 81". (Endnote_7) Experience over the previous 20 years had clearly shown the relevance of setting up labour inspection systems at a national level. The effectiveness of monitoring their development and functioning by an international supervisory body had also been shown, as had the support the ILO had given to the development of labour administration on this matter. The adoption in 1969 of the Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129), and the Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Recommendation, 1969 (No. 133), were thus greatly facilitated. The objective of these two instruments is the setting up of a system of labour inspection in agriculture, be it as a specialized agricultural inspection service or as a part of a labour inspection department covering other sectors. Although in 1947 the constituents had wanted to allow flexibility as to the scope of Convention No. 81 to take account of different national situations, they had no difficulty agreeing, after the discussion leading to the adoption of the above instruments in 1969, to the principle of a system that would apply to all agricultural undertakings in which employees or apprentices worked, and that such a system could be extended to gradually cover other categories of persons working in agricultural undertakings. (Endnote_8) Indeed, labour inspection duties, powers, prerogatives and its field of intervention have been substantially expanded in the agricultural sector.

7. The guarantee to protect the largest number of workers possible by labour inspection was further strengthened by the adoption in 1995 of a Protocol, the ratification of which is open to Members bound by Convention No. 81, and which applies to activities in the non-commercial services sector, (Endnote_9) and in 1996 by a Convention on labour inspection for seafarers. (Endnote_10)

8. The instruments examined in this survey are part of the wide and varied context of the body of international labour standards, all of which aim to guarantee a minimal universal threshold of protection for workers in the sectors covered. They do not seek to impose a uniform labour inspection system. They set the organizing and functioning principles that should underlie labour inspection as an institution that is responsible for, on one hand, ensuring the application of legislation on conditions of work and the protection of workers, and on the other hand, contributing to the development of this legislation in step with developments in the national and international labour markets. Apart from the supervisory role with its powers and prerogatives to punish violations of the laws and regulations, the instruments give labour inspection a role of providing technical information and advice, in addition to the duty to notify the competent authority of defects or abuses not covered by existing legislation. Lastly, an annual report on inspection has to be published and a copy transmitted to the ILO. This report should contain information on the laws and regulations relevant to the work of labour inspection in the country concerned, on the composition and distribution of the staff of the labour inspection service, on its work and its activities, and on occupational accidents and diseases.

Development, diversification and trends in labour inspection

9. Many and various economic, social and technical changes have affected not only each and every country but also the whole world of work through the effects of economic globalization. Thus, at the beginning of the third millennium, questions have been raised not so much about the need for inspection systems to be developed but about the opportunity to reflect on a possible change of direction in terms of the role and the objectives of labour inspection, and also in terms of the distribution of expertise and responsibility concerning inspection, having regard to such factors as an increasingly diverse workforce and the need to take steps to prevent discrimination. In the industrialized countries, the role of labour inspection has been gradually changing over the last ten to 15 years, particularly as a result of the increased responsibility taken by enterprises with respect to occupational health and safety. Mechanisms for the self- evaluation of occupational hazards have been implemented to this end and labour inspection can now concentrate on preventative and advisory activities. The extension of inspection to the psychological and psychosomatic aspects of the employment relationship, such as stress, harassment and bullying in the workplace, means that labour inspectorates in some industrialized countries are now focusing more attention on these aspects.

10. In the least developed countries, the basic objective remains the setting up and the functioning of a labour inspection system, with the assistance of the social partners, along the lines and principles set out in the relevant ILO standards. The ILO, through its technical assistance, contributes to projects on the strengthening of labour administration (Endnote_11) and labour inspection capacities with respect to this in a number of countries. (Endnote_12)

11. Given the positive impact over time of improvements in working conditions and the promotion of workers' rights on economic development and growth, it is essential that labour inspection systems evolve through cooperative relationships with a multitude of economic, social and judicial partners, and with universities and research centres. National systems should also develop additional exchange networks at the regional and international levels, such as the International Association of Labour Inspection (IALI), to provide a coherent and collective response to the need for protection of growing numbers of mobile workers who are increasingly vulnerable as they find themselves in forms of employment relationship that are not covered by the different national legal systems.

State of ratification

12. The ratification of the Conventions and the Protocol on labour inspection provide the legal basis for international supervision of the application of these instruments at a national level. Regular supervision is carried out by the Committee of Experts biennially and is based on reports due under article 22 of the ILO Constitution, and also by the Committee on the Application of Standards of the International Labour Conference. Although the Recommendations that accompany Conventions are not mandatory, they contain highly relevant directions and practical advice, as is evidenced by the information on laws and practices that many countries transmit to the ILO. At the time the Committee was finishing its work on this survey, Convention No. 81, which is one of the four priority Conventions, (Endnote_13) had been ratified by 135 Members, that is 29 more since the previous survey on labour inspection in 1985. For many years it has been one of the ILO instruments with the most ratifications, and requests from a number of countries for ILO technical assistance with a view to ratifying it are evidence of the interest it continues to generate. It is undoubtedly significant that support from the majority of Members for the principle of international supervision of their inspection systems was not sufficient for there to be a similar move for the ratification of the Protocol of 1995 to the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947, which applies to the non-commercial services sector. Only ten countries have ratified it.

13. The Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129), has been ratified by the 43 member States bound by Convention No. 81. Another positive sign is the interest shown in the simultaneous ratification of the two instruments by some Central and Eastern European countries in transition. (Endnote_14) Collective awareness of the need to develop labour inspection systems in agriculture is increasingly noticeable even if it is somewhat belated. This is borne out by the ILO's technical cooperation and assistance activities, as well as in a certain number of international initiatives in which the ILO is involved.

Information available

14. The Committee received information from the reports transmitted under article 19 of the Constitution by the governments of 100 countries. It also used the documents and information provided under article 22 of the Constitution by countries bound by one or the other of the Conventions and the Protocol. The Committee also duly took account of observations from the employers' and workers' organizations. (Endnote_15) Lastly, relevant information for the purposes of this survey was received from the International Programme for the Elimination of Child Labour (IPEC), and the technical departments of the ILO responsible for labour inspection (SAFEWORK) and social dialogue (DIALOGUE).

15. This survey attempts to describe the situation with regard to national laws and practices, in addition to the regional and international cooperation on labour inspection in the economic sectors covered by the instruments in question. Throughout the survey the Committee attempts to identify and highlight the good practices observed as well as the difficulties that prevent or hinder the implementation of the provisions of these instruments. Chapter I deals with the evolution of the scope of international labour instruments on labour inspection from 1947 to the present, Chapter II discusses the mandate of the labour inspection and Chapter III deals with the preventive functions of the labour inspection. The organization and the structure of labour inspection is examined in Chapter IV, and Chapter V deals with the principles and the criteria for determining the composition, the status and the conditions of service of labour inspection staff. Chapter VI looks at the material means of the labour inspectorate and the general methods used in workplace inspections are studied in Chapter VII. Chapter VIII deals with the prosecution and penalties for violation of legislation. Chapter IX reports on the obligation of reporting on the work of the labour inspectorate, and Chapter X analyses the ratification prospects. In its conclusion to this survey, the Committee sets out some final remarks.


Endnotes

Endnote 1

The previous general surveys on labour inspection were produced in 1951, 1957, 1966, 1969 (on 17 selected Conventions), and 1985. The last General Survey was the only one to deal with labour inspection in agriculture.

Endnote 2

GB.288/LILS/7.

Endnote 3

Labour Inspection (Health Services) Recommendation, 1919 (No. 5), which was withdrawn by the Conference in June 2000.

Endnote 4

Labour Inspection Recommendation, 1923 (No. 20).

Endnote 5

For example, Safety and health in ports (2005), Guidelines for labour inspection in forestry (2005), Safety and health in the iron and steel industry (2005).

Endnote 6

Five States are parties to Convention No. 85. In virtue of its Article 9, the provisions of this Convention cease to apply to a territory when the provisions of Convention No. 81 are declared applicable to that territory.

Endnote 7

Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations, ILC, 50th Session, Geneva, 1966, Report III (Part IV): Labour inspection in industry, para. 235 (hereafter called "General Survey on labour inspection, 1966").

Endnote 8

Article 5 of Convention No. 129.

Endnote 9

Protocol of 1995 to the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947.

Endnote 10

Labour Inspection (Seafarers) Convention, 1996 (No. 178), not included in this survey.

Endnote 11

For example, Belize, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama and the Dominican Republic, which received assistance under the project on modernizing the labour administrations of Central America (MATAC).

Endnote 12

Armenia, Bulgaria, Costa Rica, Kazakhstan, Serbia and Montenegro and Viet Nam. Endnote 13

Apart from the eight fundamental Conventions, the other priority Conventions are: the Employment Policy Convention, 1964 (No. 122); the Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129); the Tripartite Consultation (International Labour Standards) Convention, 1976 (No. 144).

Endnote 14

Azerbaijan (2000), Bosnia and Herzegovina (1993), Croatia (1991), Estonia (2005), Hungary (1994), Kazakhstan (2001), Latvia (1994), Poland (1995), Serbia and Montenegro (2000), Slovenia (1992), The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (1991), Ukraine (2004).

Endnote 15

Barbados: Barbados Workers' Union (BWU). Brazil: National Confederation of Commerce (CNC). Finland: Central Organization of Finnish Trade Unions (SAK); Finnish Transport Workers' Union (AKT). Lithuania: Lithuanian Trade Union Confederation. Mexico: Confederation of Industrial Chambers of the United States of Mexico (CONCAMIN). New Zealand: Business New Zealand; New Zealand Council of Trade Unions (NZCTU). Norway: Confederation of Trade Unions (LO). Portugal: Confederation of Retail and Services of Portugal (CCP); Confederation of Portuguese Industry (CIP); Portuguese Confederation of Tourism (CTP); General Union of Workers (UGT). Trinidad and Tobago: Employers' Consultative Association of Trinidad and Tobago (ECA).

Cross references
Constitution: Article 19
Constitution: Article 22
Constitution: Article 35
Conventions: C085 Labour Inspectorates (Non-Metropolitan Territories) Convention, 1947
Conventions: C178 Labour Inspection (Seafarers) Convention, 1996
Not in ILOLEX: General Survey 1966, para. 235


ILO Home NORMES home ILOLEX home Universal Query NATLEX

For further information, please contact the International Labour Standards Department (NORMES) by email:
Copyright © 2006 International Labour Organization (ILO)
Disclaimer
webinfo@ilo.org