1985, Labour Inspection: Chapter III. Organisation of labour inspection services and inspection staff


Description:(General Survey)
Convention:C081
Convention:C129
Recommendation:R081
Recommendation:R082
Recommendation:R133
Subject classification: Labour Inspection
Document:(Report III Part 4B)
Session of the Conference:71
Subject: Labour Administration and Inspection
Display the document in:  French   Spanish
Document No. (ilolex): 251985G05

Chapter III. Organisation of labour inspection services and inspection staff

I. Organisation of labour inspection

Administrative structures

(a) Principle of the control of labour inspection services by a central authority

109. The attachment of inspection systems to a central authority or body facilitates the establishment and application of a uniform inspection policy for the whole of the national territory. This is why both Convention No. 81, in Article 4(1), and Convention No. 129, in Article 7(1), stress the desirability of placing labour inspection under the supervision and control of a central authority or body "so far as is compatible with ... administrative practice". In the case of a federal State, the central authority or body may be established either at the federal level or at the level of a federated unit (Convention No. 81, Article 4(2), Convention No. 129, Article 7(2)).

110. The foregoing provisions have been so drafted as to permit some measure of flexibility in application in order that account may be taken of certain special arrangements that have been found useful in national administrative practice. (Endnote 1)

111. Moreover, Convention No. 129 lists, in Article 7(3), four possible formulae to give effect to the principle of control by a central authority in agriculture:

(a) by a single labour inspection department responsible for all sectors of economic activity;

(b) by a single labour inspection department, which would arrange for internal functional specialisation through the appropriate training of inspectors called upon to exercise their functions in agriculture;

(c) by a single labour inspection department, which would arrange for internal institutional specialisation by creating a technically qualified service, the officers of which would perform their functions in agriculture;

(d) by a specialised agricultural inspection service, the activity of which would be supervised by a central body vested with the same prerogatives in respect of labour inspection in other fields, such as industry, transport and commerce.

112. The application of Convention No. 129 does thus not necessarily imply the establishment of special inspection services for agriculture, contrary to the impression which certain governments appear to have. (Endnote 2)

(b) National practice

113. The administrative structure of labour inspection systems may be considered either with reference to the economic sectors covered or with reference to the object of the supervision exercised. In the vast majority of countries national labour inspection systems apply to all branches of economic activity, (Endnote 3) subject to a few exceptions, particularly mining and transport. (Endnote 4) There is often a certain specialisation within this general inspection system; this may take the form either of assigning specialised inspectors to agriculture, (Endnote 5) or of creating a service technically qualified to deal with this sector. (Endnote 6) In other countries, on the other hand, there are separate inspection systems for each branch of activity, or at least for some branches, particularly agriculture. (Endnote 7)

114. All these solutions are expressly provided for by Article 7(3) of Convention No. 129, and take as a starting point the principle that labour inspection services are to be attached to a single central authority, generally the ministry responsible for social or labour affairs. In certain less frequent cases, however, independent inspection services attached to separate national authorities have been set up for agriculture. (Endnote 8)

115. Moreover, in a very large number of countries, the labour inspection system is in principle empowered to perform all the duties of a labour inspection service; (Endnote 9) in many others, the inspection services are specialised with reference to the subject-matter of supervision. This is, for instance, the case in a European country where the inspection system is composed of several specialised inspection services: technical inspectorate (responsible for ensuring accident prevention in undertakings); medical inspectorate (responsible for hygiene and health questions); social legislation inspectorate (responsible for supervising working conditions); social inspectorate (responsible for supervising the payment of social security contributions). (Endnote 10) Generally speaking, specialisation by subject is found in inspection systems based on the British model, where officials entrusted with the application of the legal provisions relating to wages and other conditions of work and with the protection of women, children and young workers exist side by side with the competent health and safety factory inspectors.

116. It would appear from the national practice of certain countries that there has been a trend towards regrouping the inspection services in recent years. (Endnote 11) The idea behind this seems to be that the unification of inspection services should permit a better utilisation of available resources and a reduction in overlapping of on-the-spot inspections. Moreover, in separate inspection systems the conduct of separate activities by different inspection services in a single enterprise may leave certain matters neglected. Needless to say, however they are organised, inspection services have a growing need to have available the whole range of professions and specialisations required by the complexity of present-day production activities.

117. In certain countries the local authorities or municipalities may be called upon to play an important role in labour inspection. Article 12(2) of Convention No. 129 provides that certain inspection functions at the regional or local level may be entrusted to appropriate government services or public institutions on condition that this does not prejudice the application of the principles of the Convention. (Endnote 12) This is, for instance, the case in a Scandinavian country, where the local authorities appoint municipal inspectors to supervise small plants using no machinery. (Endnote 13) Elsewhere, this delegation of authority may be of a more comprehensive nature, certain inspection functions being performed by the local authorities in the place of the state services. Thus, in one country, the supervision of the safety and health provisions in shops and offices is entrusted to the local authorities. (Endnote 14) In another, the functions hitherto performed by the labour inspectorate as regards occupational health and safety have been transferred to the local health authorities under a recent administrative reform. (Endnote 15) In practice, this transfer results in the creation of two labour inspection services: one depending on the Ministry of Labour, which is responsible primarily for the supervision of the application of social legislation; the other, which will be an integral part of the national health service, is in principle competent to deal with health and safety questions. It is still too soon to judge the effects of this reform. The Committee has addressed certain questions to the Government on this subject.

118. In federal States, whatever the criterion of specialisation adopted, authority is generally shared between the inspection service of the federal State and those of its constituent units, although the inspection services of certain countries may depend directly on the federal authority. (Endnote 16)

119. The various systems described above all imply the attachment of the labour inspection services to an administrative authority. In several socialist countries the responsibility for supervising conditions of work rests in large measure on the action of the trade unions, whose supreme bodies constitute the authority on which the inspection services depend, although the State nevertheless retains certain prerogatives in this field. This delegation of authority is exercised in varying degrees. In one country the law has conferred upon the trade unions the sole responsibility for supervising labour protection. (Endnote 17) Elsewhere, the inspection system is of a markedly dualistic nature, a state inspectorate exercising its functions in parallel with an inspectorate provided by the trade union organs. It may be of interest to describe the inspection system of a State that is particularly representative of this type. (Endnote 18) In this federal State the unions enjoy very broad powers as regards the drafting of labour legislation and the defence of the workers' interests and are responsible for the technical inspection of labour and the general inspection of the application of labour legislation. For this purpose they have at their disposal a large body of permanent full-time inspectors, who are assisted by social inspectors at the level of the establishment. On the state side there is a whole system of supervisory and control organs whose functions are somewhat more specialised than those of the trade unions. These organs include the State Committee for Safety in Industry and Mines, which is responsible for the industrial sectors with the highest risks, the health and epidemiological services of the public health service, which are responsible for adopting and securing the application of measures to eliminate or prevent pollution of the working environment, the inspection services of the Ministry of Energy, the corps of inspectors of fire-fighting services, etc. In addition, many ministries administering a particular branch of economic activity have their own services responsible for supervising safety at work in the branch concerned. The operation of this relatively complex system is ensured thanks to the close co-ordination existing between the state inspection services and those of the trade unions, from the level of the union down to the local level. The principal characteristics of this system are to be found in a number of other countries. (Endnote 19) In other countries labour inspection is carried out mainly by a state service, the action of the trade unions being confined more particularly to the undertaking. (Endnote 20) Two countries have recently adopted a similar system, while strengthening the action of the social inspectorates. (Endnote 21)

120. Trade unions are also associated in the supervision of social legislation in other countries with a centrally planned economy. One government (Endnote 22) indicates that the Central Federation of Trade Unions and other organisations as well as the governmental authority conduct labour inspection. Besides regular supervision and inspection, there are often additional joint ones organised by the Party, the State and mass organisations. However, according to the Government's information, labour inspection is less developed in agriculture, although it is constantly being improved.

(c) Collaboration between the different inspection services

121. In the event that an inspection system is composed of a number of different bodies, it is necessary for the various services to maintain close links with each other. This collaboration is all the more desirable when there is no technical unit in which the missions carried out by the different services can be co-ordinated. (Endnote 23)

122. Collaboration between inspection services may take more or less institutionalised forms. Thus, for example, in certain French-speaking African countries where the supervision of safety in mines is the responsibility of a special technical service, the officials responsible for this supervision are obliged by law to inform the labour inspectors of the results of their visits. (Endnote 24) The latter may at any time ask to take part in the inspection visits. In another country, the legislation, which authorises the creation of a specialised body to ensure the supervision of the legal provisions relating to occupational safety and health, provides that all the inspection authorities of the Ministry of Labour and Social Security, the Ministry of Health, and the National Insurance Institute must collaborate in the exercise of their activities. (Endnote 25) Elsewhere, collaboration is achieved through a committee entrusted with co-ordinating the activities of the various executing authorities. (Endnote 26)

123. When authority is shared between a number of institutions, it may become necessary to adopt certain principles in order to avoid large numbers of separate verifications of compliance, which are often looked on with disfavour in the undertaking. In certain countries regulations exist for the purpose. (Endnote 27) Collaboration between supervisory bodies may also be the subject of agreements setting forth the principles to be followed in this connection. In one case of this kind, a government indicates that the bodies concerned, apart from being able to carry out joint visits, are under the obligation to inform each other of any infringements of legal provisions respecting workers' protection that have come to their notice, and of cases where the measures ordered by another body have not been complied with. (Endnote 28)

124. In the socialist countries of Eastern Europe, where the system of supervision involves, as has been seen, many authorities of both the State and the trade unions, special measures are taken to co-ordinate the activities of these various bodies. (Endnote 29)

125. The need for strict co-ordination between the administrations concerned has been particularly keenly felt in cases where certain functions of the inspection services are exercised by local authorities. This is why the Health and Safety Commission of one country has made certain recommendations to the local authorities regarding inspection priorities and methods. In addition, a local and national liaison system has been set up between the Health and Safety Executive and the local authorities to promote a more consistent interpretation of the legal provisions. (Endnote 30)

126. Finally, in federal States, the existence of systems of consultation between federal inspection authorities and the authorities of the constituent units has been mentioned by a number of governments as strengthening the effectiveness of inspection services. (Endnote 31)

II. Collaboration of the labour inspectorate with other institutions

127. Under Article 5(a) of Convention No. 81 the competent authority must make appropriate arrangements to promote effective co-operation between the inspection services and other government services and public or private institutions engaged in similar activities. A similar provision is found in Article 12(1) of Convention No. 129.

128. The importance of collaboration between inspection services and other authorities or institutions seems to be recognised by all governments, even though the information available does not always enable the methods and extent of such collaboration -- which vary from one country to another -- to be determined with precision.

129. In many countries there is collaboration with the different administrations responsible for the technical matters that come under the supervision of the inspection services, such as the directorates, departments or ministries of agriculture, mining or education. (Endnote 32) A number of governments have also referred to collaboration between the inspection services and ministries of health, which are often called upon to play an important role in the prevention of occupational risks. (Endnote 33)

130. It also seems normal that inspection services should have continuous contacts with the other services of the labour administration at both the central and the local levels. It is interesting to note in this connection that the inspection services of one country co-operate closely with the employment services in order to ensure that the level of wages and conditions of service offered to jobseekers is in conformity with the requirements of the legislation and the arbitration awards. (Endnote 34)

131. The action of the labour inspectorate and the social security services is often complementary in the field of occupational accident and disease prevention, even though their activities may have different aims. It is therefore particularly important that, as is the case in certain countries, close contacts should be maintained between these two institutions, (Endnote 35) both at the level of information and at the level of supervision properly speaking. Thus, in one country, the regional sickness insurance funds must supply the labour inspectorate with the information at their disposal on occupational hazards and they may request action by the inspectorate to ensure the application of the preventive measures provided for by the legislation. Regional co-ordination committees have been set up to ensure the harmonisation of these activities, the co-ordination of programmes of visits and the exchange of information and documents. (Endnote 36)

132. The development of technology renders the task of the labour inspectorate increasingly complex. Even when they belong to a high-level service, the inspectors cannot keep abreast of all technical progress. For this reason collaboration between the inspection services and public or private research bodies or institutions is increasing in importance. This collaboration may take place informally, but it is often institutionalised, as in countries where research institutes are integrated in varying degrees into the occupational safety and health supervisory machinery. (Endnote 37)

133. When approved bodies are entrusted with the supervision of certain installations, such as lifting apparatus and steam boilers, the inspection services should work in close contact with these bodies. (Endnote 38) Generally speaking, the results of these verifications must be entered in a special register in the undertaking, which may be consulted at any time by the inspectors. The latter may also request the intervention of specialised bodies if they consider it necessary. (Endnote 39)

134. In the exercise of their functions, the labour inspectors are called upon to maintain relations with other bodies or institutions, such as courts and police forces, particularly when investigating occupational accidents. They may also be called upon to collaborate with the town planning authorities during the procedure for the issue of building permits, as is the case in a number of countries. (Endnote 40)

135. Finally, the Committee stresses that, as certain recent catastrophes have shown (Bhopal in India (1984), Three Mile Island in the United States (1979), Seveso in Italy (1976)), it is important for the inspection services to work in close collaboration with the bodies responsible for the environment.

III. Inspection staff

A. Status and conditions of service

(a) Status

136. Under Article 6 of Convention No. 81 the inspection staff must be "composed of public officials whose status and conditions of service are such that they are assured of stability of employment and are independent of changes of government and of improper external influences". Article 8(1) of Convention No. 129 contains a similar provision. This is an essential principle on which the efficacy of inspection systems rests. Inspectors cannot act in full independence if their service or their career prospects depend on political considerations.

137. In most countries labour inspectors are generally public officials or equivalent officers (Endnote 41) and in this capacity are guaranteed security of employment. This does not, however, appear to be the case in certain Latin American countries, where labour inspectors are not always administrative officials and hence do not enjoy the guarantees of security of employment enjoyed by such officials. (Endnote 42) According to a recent study the tendency to make labour inspection a regular and permanent career whose officials are appointed on the basis of their personal merits does, however, appear to be gaining ground in this region. (Endnote 43) Moreover, in some countries legislation to regulate the conditions of service of labour inspectors has not yet been adopted. (Endnote 44)

138. As can be seen from the preparatory work on Convention No. 81, the status of public officials was considered necessary for inspection staff as being the best fitted to guarantee them the independence and impartiality necessary to the exercise of their functions. (Endnote 45)

139. Other arrangements may, however, be considered satisfactory for guaranteeing the independence of the inspectors; (Endnote 46) the real test of this independence, however, as the Committee has pointed out on repeated occasions, "is to be found in the inspector's unquestioned ability to point out, without fear of open or covert reprisal, that the methods followed in a given undertaking are contrary to the law and must therefore be changed". (Endnote 47)

140. In particular, trade unions in Eastern European countries, which are responsible for a large share of the supervisory activities, appoint and operate their own inspectorates. So far as these inspectors enjoy, under national legislation, the stability of employment guaranteed to officers of public supervisory bodies, this situation was considered to be in conformity with the spirit of Convention No. 81. (Endnote 48) Moreover, it was to take account of the evolution in the actual situation and in the practice of the supervisory bodies of the ILO that a provision was introduced into Convention No. 129 expressly to allow States to "include in their system of labour inspection in agriculture officials or representatives of occupational organisations" on condition, however, that such officials or representatives were assured of stability of tenure and independence (Article 8(2)).

(b) Conditions of service

141. As a rule, the conditions of service of labour inspectors are governed by the general conditions of service of the public service, which in some countries are supplemented by special regulations applicable to the inspection staff. (Endnote 49)

142. It is not the intention of the Committee to make a general study of the conditions of employment of inspection staff, as this would go outside the limits of the present study. Nevertheless, certain aspects of their conditions of service, namely their period of appointment, remuneration and career prospects, directly affect their stability of employment and independence.

143. Regarding the first point, available information shows that, as public servants, labour inspectors are generally appointed permanently on the expiry of a probationary period whose duration varies from one country to another. (Endnote 50) Accordingly, it should be possible to dismiss them only for a serious professional misconduct, which should be defined in as precise terms as possible in order to avoid arbitrary interpretations. Moreover, it is important that a decision to dismiss an inspector, like any other decision to apply a sanction with important consequences, should be taken, or at least confirmed, by an organ offering the necessary guarantees of independence or autonomy with respect to the hierarchical authority and in accordance with a procedure guaranteeing the right of defence and appeal. This would appear to be the case in many countries. (Endnote 51) Given the fundamental importance attached to the principle of stability of employment and independence of inspection staff, one government indicated that inspectors enjoyed better protection than other civil servants in the matter of dismissal. (Endnote 52)

144. While the enjoyment of security of tenure in a permanent administration is the prime guarantee of the independence of the labour inspection staff, the efficiency of the inspection services also demands levels of remuneration and career prospects that are sufficient to attract and retain high-quality personnel and to safeguard them from any undue influence. This objective, however, is not always attained.

145. The information available on the remuneration of labour inspection personnel and their career prospects is limited and does not make it possible to give an overall picture of the situation. Besides, it would be very difficult to make comparisons of any value between the various national scales of remuneration without a thorough study of the purchasing power they represent. Certain general remarks may, however, be made.

146. In most countries the salary systems of public servants are established with reference to public service structures based on the classification of public servants in groups according to the level and nature of the qualifications required. There is usually an official scale fixing the rates applicable to all officials of different bodies and different grades. It is therefore desirable that the classification of labour inspectors in the grade structure should correctly reflect the importance of their tasks and their responsibilities. However, according to a recent CIAT study, it appears that labour inspectors' salaries in certain countries are lower than those of officials of other bodies with equivalent activities, such as social security inspectors. (Endnote 53) Moreover, since the base salary often represents only one element of remuneration, it is important that labour inspectors should also enjoy the bonuses and allowances paid to other officials. This does not always appear to be the case, and labour inspectors are placed at a disadvantage with respect to their colleagues in other administrations. (Endnote 54)

147. Good career prospects are a factor not without significance in contributing to the stability and quality of the inspection staff. (Endnote 55) One government refers to the necessity of reconsidering its policy in this respect with a view to improving the status of the profession. (Endnote 56) This presupposes, on the one hand, that the promotion of labour inspectors is based on objective criteria independent of factors extraneous to their professional competence and, on the other hand, that the administrative structure of the inspection services offers adequate opportunities for advancement. According to the information available, the principle of advancement to a higher grade on the basis of merit appears to be recognised in many countries at the same time as advancement on the basis of seniority within a grade. Moreover, in certain countries the current regulations reserve a percentage of posts in the labour inspectorate for internal promotions. (Endnote 57)

148. The sometimes very low level of labour inspectors' salaries, combined with the absence of career prospects, may cause inspectors to turn from the labour inspectorate towards other administrations with more prestige or the private sector. This is particularly common in developing countries, where the budget of the Ministry of Labour does not make it possible to offer inspectors sufficient incentives to remain in the inspection services, though it is not entirely unknown in the industrialised countries. (Endnote 58) Where the country concerned is bound by Convention No. 81 or Convention No. 129 the Committee has always drawn the attention of the government to the need to improve the conditions of service of labour inspectors so as to avoid their departure. Certain governments have indicated that they have taken appropriate measures. (Endnote 59)

B. Recruitment and training of inspectors

149. The effectiveness of labour inspection depends in large measure on the competence and quality of its personnel. For this reason, Article 7(1) and (2) of Convention No. 81 and Article 9(1) and (2) of Convention No. 129 lay down the principle that labour inspectors shall be recruited with sole regard to their qualifications for the performance of their duties, the means of ascertaining such qualifications to be determined by the competent authority. In connection with training, Article 7(3) of Convention No. 81 and Article 9(3) of Convention No. 129 stipulate that labour inspectors must be adequately trained for the performance of their duties. Such training is to be given not only on their entry into service, but also, as Article 9(3) of Convention No. 129 expressly stipulates, in the course of their employment. Recommendation No. 133 contains certain details regarding the requirements to be fulfilled by candidates for posts of inspectors in agriculture. According to Paragraph 5, candidates for senior positions should be in possession of appropriate professional or academic qualifications or have acquired thorough practical experience in labour administration. As for candidates for other positions (such as assistant inspectors and junior staff), they should, if the level of education in the country allows, have completed secondary general education, supplemented, if possible, by appropriate technical training, or have acquired adequate administrative or practical experience in labour matters. The requirements are, however, lower for countries where education is not sufficiently developed (Paragraph 7).

(a) Recruitment

150. The principle that labour inspection staff should be selected on the basis of merit is generally recognised, candidates who fulfil the general conditions for eligibility (such as age or nationality) being selected according to the procedures in force on the basis of their personal competence and qualifications.

151. In most countries candidates for senior positions in the labour inspection services must hold a diploma of higher education (from a university, an establishment of higher technical education or a national school of administration). Moreover, there is an increasing tendency to require candidates to have a knowledge of labour matters. In this connection it is interesting to note that in one country (Endnote 60) the regulations in force reserve a percentage of labour inspectors' positions for candidates who have acquired experience either in labour-management relations or in the prevention of occupational accidents. Middle-level staff must generally have completed secondary schooling when the level of education in the country allows.

152. In some cases, the lack of qualified staff has led the competent authority to resort to certain stopgap measures. Thus, in certain countries, students have been appointed who divide their time between inspection tasks and the continuation of their studies. (Endnote 61) Elsewhere, young unemployed persons have been temporarily enrolled and police officials have been placed at the disposal of the inspection services. (Endnote 62) Although these situations are relatively exceptional, the Committee must point out the risk they entail for the proper operation of inspection systems, which require a stable and experienced staff.

153. In general, the procedure for recruiting inspection staff is that applicable to the public service. One government indicates that, given the very high moral and professional qualifications required of labour inspectors, their conditions of appointment are more stringent than those of other public servants. (Endnote 63) Competitions are the most usual method of verifying the aptitudes of candidates, who have to undergo written or oral tests or both, supplemented by interviews. In other cases, inspection personnel are appointed by the competent authority after the qualifications of the candidate have been verified by means of an examination. (Endnote 64) Another method, which seems, however, to be less frequently used, consists in recruitment on the basis of diplomas. This is the case in certain countries, where candidates who can present a diploma from a national school of administration, unlike university graduates, do not have to take other examinations. (Endnote 65)

(b) Training

154. The growing complexity of the tasks of inspection services due to technological change makes the systematic training of inspectors indispensable, as never before. It is therefore encouraging to note that most governments indicate that they have taken measures in this field. Some of them have also supplied information on the training and qualifications of inspection officials exercising functions in agriculture. (Endnote 66) Several, however, report a lack of qualified personnel. (Endnote 67) Initial training is undertaken by a variety of methods, which are often used simultaneously. Many governments have indicated that training is done in the field, new inspectors being paired with more experienced officials. This arrangement should, however, be supplemented by theoretical and practical courses for new candidates. The frequency, duration and curricula of courses vary substantially from one country to another. They may be given within inspection services or as part of the training programmes of the ministry responsible for social or labour affairs, with the possibility of special arrangements with specialised institutions. (Endnote 68) In certain countries special training centres for labour inspectors have been established so as to ensure a permanent structure. (Endnote 69) Thus, the training of inspectors in one country is carried out in an institute specially established for this purpose. (Endnote 70) The training, which lasts 18 months, alternates between theoretical courses and practical work. The instruction given is divided into two branches: first, legal, administrative and economic subjects; second, scientific and technical courses. The training of labour inspectors may also be given by national institutes covering all civil servants. These institutes sometimes have specialised sections for inspection personnel. (Endnote 71) When this is not the case, complementary measures must be taken to complete the general training given in national administration schools. In developing countries the absence of adequate budgetary resources sometimes makes theorganisation of regular training courses very difficult. In such cases the training of inspectors relies mainly on international co-operation, in particular on the action of inter-regional institutes such as those set up in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean with the assistance of the ILO. (Endnote 72)

155. Whatever the value of the training given to inspectors on their entry into service, it is advisable that it should be periodically supplemented, not only in order to refresh their knowledge but also to keep them abreast of new technologies. Many governments have referred in this respect to the measures taken to ensure the further training of inspectors by means of various courses or seminars at home or abroad. (Endnote 73) Depending on the availability of resources, further training courses are organised more or less systematically. For this reason, the activities of the regional training centres, which periodically organise courses for adaptation and further training, are particularly welcome. It is to be hoped that there will be a gradual increase in the number of such courses, which is unfortunately too limited to meet all demands.


Endnotes

Endnote 1

In this connection see ILO: The Organisation of Labour Inspection in Industrial and Commercial Undertakings, Report IV, International Labour Conference, 30th Session, Geneva, 1947, p. 127.

Endnote 2

For example, Belize, Cameroon, Chad, Congo, Ecuador, Egypt, Mali.

Endnote 3

For example, Belgium, Brazil, Cape Verde, Chile, Colombia, Cuba, Egypt, Honduras, Japan, Kuwait, Luxembourg, Mexico, Mozambique, New Zealand, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Spain, Somalia, Uruguay. This is also the case in most French-speaking African countries and in those following the British administrative tradition.

Endnote 4

See above, para. 39.

Endnote 5

For example, Denmark, Guyana, Venezuela.

Endnote 6

For example, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Morocco, Poland, Romania.

Endnote 7

For example, El Salvador, United Kingdom (the inspection of shops and offices is entrusted to the local authorities).

Endnote 8

This is, for example, the case in Bolivia, where labour inspection in agriculture is part of the General Directorate of Labour and Peasant Justice of the Ministry of Peasant and Agricultural Affairs (Dirección General de Trabajo y Justicia Campesina del Ministerio de Asuntos Campesinos y Agropecuarios); it was also the case in France before the administrative reform of 1975, which set up an interministerial labour inspection corps.

Endnote 9

For example, France, Luxembourg, Switzerland; this is also the case in French-speaking African countries.

Endnote 10

Belgium.

Endnote 11

In France, for example, the main inspection corps were in 1975 amalgamated into a single interministerial corps under the direction of the Ministry of Labour; in the United Kingdom the health and safety inspection services, which belonged to five different ministries, were regrouped in 1975 under the Health and Safety Executive.

Endnote 12

The text of Article 12(2) is as follows: "Where necessary, the competent authority may either entrust certain inspection functions at the regional or local level on an auxiliary basis to appropriate government services or public institutions or associate these services or institutions with the exercise of the functions in question, on condition that this does not prejudice the application of the principles of this Convention."

Endnote 13

Sweden. The Government indicates, however, that the system is being re-examined with a view to the possible integration of the municipal inspectorate into the labour inspectorate. In addition, it will be noted that the municipal inspectorate of Norway was in 1972 replaced by the municipal workers' protection commissions, whose principal function is to promote labour protection at communal level and to provide advice and information. On the other hand, in Finland, the communal health boards supervise industrial and commercial undertakings with less than ten employees.

Endnote 14

United Kingdom.

Endnote 15

Italy (Act of 1978 to organise the national health service).

Endnote 16

For example, Austria (as regards the inspection services established by the Labour Inspection Act of 1974). (The Austrian Conference of Presidents of Agricultural Chambers has indicated that the enactment of Act No. 280 of 1980 on the conditions of service of agriculture and forestry workers of the federal State has led to a division of the supervision of social legislation in agriculture and forestry, since the inspectorates in the Länder are no longer responsible for the sectors covered by Act No. 280; this responsibility is now assigned to the general federal labour inspectorate.)

Endnote 17

Bulgaria (Act of 1973 to entrust the Bulgarian trade unions with the supervision of labour protection).

Endnote 18

USSR.

Endnote 19

For example, Byelorussian SSR, German Democratic Republic, Mongolia, Ukrainian SSR.

Endnote 20

For example, Czechoslovakia, Romania.

Endnote 21

Hungary (Decision No. 1010 of 1984), Poland (State Labour Inspection Act of 6 March 1981).

Endnote 22

China.

Endnote 23

In this connection see ILO: Report of the Tripartite Mission to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Labour Inspection in Belgium (Geneva, 1978) (French only), p. 24.

Endnote 24

For example, Ivory Coast (Labour Code, s. 132), Mali (Labour Code, s. 355), Rwanda (Labour Code, s. 156).

Endnote 25

Costa Rica (Labour Code, ss. 268 and 298).

Endnote 26

For example, Switzerland (Federal Accident Insurance Act, s. 85).

Endnote 27

For example, Denmark, Norway.

Endnote 28

Poland.

Endnote 29

For example, Czechoslovakia (according to the Government's report, there is co-operation among the technical supervisory bodies of the State, the organs of public health services, the social control bodies of the revolutionary trade union movement and those of the Union of Peasant Co-operators), German Democratic Republic, Poland (the Government's report indicates that under the Order of 22 March 1983 the state labour inspectorate collaborates with 11 state control organs and with the social inspectorates of labour and the trade unions), USSR (the Government indicates that the various state and trade union inspection services carry out their functions in close collaboration since their objectives are identical, aiming at guaranteeing the workers the most favourable conditions of work). According to the regulations in force, the technical inspectorates of the trade unions must collaborate with the Statutory Labour Inspectorate, the State Committee for the Inspection of Industry and Mines, the State Energy Inspectorate, the state public health supervisory organs and the other state control organs).

Endnote 30

United Kingdom.

Endnote 31

For example, Australia, India, Switzerland.

Endnote 32

For example, Algeria (under s. 2 of Ordinance No. 75-33 of 1975 respecting the terms of reference of the Labour and Social Affairs Inspectorate, the supervision of conditions of work is carried out in technical collaboration with (a) the Directorate of Mining and Geology of the Ministry of Industry and Energy for workers in mines and quarries, (b) the Ministry of Agriculture and Agrarian Reform as regards agricultural workers), Bahrain, Guyana, Israel, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Malawi.

Endnote 33

For example, Bahrain, Cyprus, Ghana, Mauritius, Mexico, Mozambique, Saudi Arabia.

Endnote 34

Australia (Commonwealth Arbitration Inspectorate).

Endnote 35

For example, Bolivia (s. 46(g) of Decree No. 05202 of 1959 regulating the establishment of the Ministry of Labour stipulates that it is the task of the general inspector of labour to co-ordinate the activities of the labour inspectorate with those of the social security inspectors), Federal Republic of Germany (Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs Directives of 1977), Switzerland (Ordinance respecting accident prevention of 1983, s. 49); see also para. 87 above.

Endnote 36

France (Social Security Code, ss. L-422 and 424, and Ministerial Circular of 6 May 1965 respecting the policy of prevention of occupational accidents and diseases).

Endnote 37

For example, Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, German Democratic Republic, Hungary, India, Norway, Poland, USSR, United Kingdom.

Endnote 38

This is the case, for example, in the following countries: Austria (Workers' Protection Act, s. 5), France (the labour inspector may, if he considers it necessary, require the enterprise to have certain installations, such as electrical installations or lifting apparatus, checked by an approved body; this is also the case where ionising radiations and asbestos are used), Kenya (under s. 38(9) of the Factories Act authorised boiler inspectors may be private persons authorised for this purpose by the Chief Inspector of Factories), Luxembourg (under s. 15(1)(c) of the Labour and Mines Inspectorate Organisation Act, 1974, senior inspectors may order a technical check of an installation to be made by experts or by specialised bodies or institutions approved by the Ministry of Labour, at the cost of the undertaking), Mauritius (under s. 99 of the Health, Safety and Welfare Regulations of 1980, persons entrusted with the inspection of boilers must, in particular, be engineers registered with the Registered Professional Engineers' Council).

Endnote 39

For example, France (see note directly above), Luxembourg (see note directly above).

Endnote 40

For example, Cyprus, Egypt, Ghana, Norway, Switzerland.

Endnote 41

In Luxembourg, for example, the manual and non-manual workers' assistant inspectors appointed under section 7 of the Act of 1974 to organise the inspectorate of labour and mines have the status not of public officials but of state employees. In this capacity they enjoy after a trial period of three years a legal status that gives them a stability of employment and an independence barely different from those of public officials (in this connection see ILO Memorandum to the Government of Luxembourg in Official Bulletin (Geneva, ILO), Vol. LVII, 1974, Nos. 2, 3 and 4, p. 197).

Endnote 42

For example, Bolivia (according to information communicated by the Government, labour inspectors do not in practice enjoy stability of employment, particularly when there are changes of government; a Bill designed to remedy this situation is being prepared); Colombia (the Government has indicated that certain inspectors are appointed at the discretion of the administration and may be freely dismissed, although recourse is not regularly had to this possibility in practice); Ecuador (only a certain number of inspectors are established officials enjoying the protection and stability provided for under the Act respecting the public service).

Endnote 43

CIAT: Labour Inspection in Latin America (Lima, 1984) (Spanish only), p. 7.

Endnote 44

For example, Dominican Republic, Mauritania.

Endnote 45

In this connection see The Organisation of Labour Inspection in Industrial and Commercial Undertakings, op. cit., pp. 130-131, and ILO: Record of Proceedings, International Labour Conference, 30th Session, 1947, Appendix VII; Report of the Committee on Labour Inspection, pp. 500-501.

Endnote 46

In this connection see the 1966 General Survey on Labour Inspection, p. 222, para. 99.

Endnote 47

ILO: Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations, Report III (Part IV), International Labour Conference, 40th Session, Geneva, 1957, Part Three, p. 160; see also 1966 General Survey on Labour Inspection, p. 222, para. 100.

Endnote 48

In this connection see Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations, Report III (Part IV), International Labour Conference, 46th Session, Geneva, 1962, p. 79 (observation made in respect of Bulgaria under Convention No. 81).

Endnote 49

For example, France. This is also the case with many French-speaking countries.

Endnote 50

It will be noted that in Switzerland inspectors are appointed for a fixed period which is, however, constantly renewed in practice, according to information communicated by the Government; this was also the case in Finland until the adoption of Decree No. 631 respecting labour administration in 1972.

Endnote 51

See ILO: Disciplinary codes and procedures in the public service, Report III, Joint Committee on the Public Service, Second Session, Geneva, 1975, pp. 24 et seq. and 39 et seq.; General Report, Report I, idem, Third Session, Geneva, 1983, Chapter V, pp. 81 et seq.

Endnote 52

Japan. Under section 99 of the Labour Standards Law the dismissal of an inspector may be pronounced only if the Minister of Labour obtains the agreement of the Limitation Committee for Labour Standard Inspectors, a tripartite body including representatives of labour inspectors and other civil servants.

Endnote 53

See CIAT, op. cit., p. 9.

Endnote 54

See, for example, the General Report on the Work of the Labour Inspectors' Seminar held at Libreville (Gabon) from 10 to 20 July 1980, p. 7.

Endnote 55

See ILO: Report of the Tripartite Mission on Labour Inspection in Norway (Geneva, 1979), para. 4.3.

Endnote 56

Philippines.

Endnote 57

For example, Tunisia (Decree No. 73-13 of 8 January 1973 to establish special conditions of service for labour inspection staff).

Endnote 58

For example, Austria. The annual report of the labour inspectorate for 1979 indicates that during the period under review six officials in the senior career group, seven officials in the middle career group and two specialised officials left the service because the private sector offered them better conditions of employment.

Endnote 59

For example, Italy, Sri Lanka.

Endnote 60

France (this is, however, a special recruitment measure of a temporary nature).

Endnote 61

In this connection see CIAT, op. cit., p. 9.

Endnote 62

In Italy, for example.

Endnote 63

Japan.

Endnote 64

For example, Poland (State Labour Inspection Act of 1981, s. 23).

Endnote 65

For example, Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia.

Endnote 66

For example, Antigua and Barbuda, Austria, Barbados (the Government indicates that measures will be taken to ensure that officials entrusted with the supervision of the provisions of the Factories Act concerning agricultural undertakings receive appropriate training), Bulgaria, China, Finland, Guyana, Mauritius, Mexico, Spain.

Endnote 67

For example, Belize, Botswana, Zambia.

Endnote 68

For example, in India (Central Labour Institute), Tanzania (the Government states that it is planned to train 20 inspectors a year at the Centre for Labour Studies), United Kingdom, United States (Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Training Institute).

Endnote 69

For example, France, Japan, Poland.

Endnote 70

France (National Labour Institute (INT) established by Decree No. 75-823 of 3 September 1975).

Endnote 71

For example, in Algeria and the Ivory Coast.

Endnote 72

See para. 13 above.

Endnote 73

For example, Algeria, Austria, Bahrain, Bolivia, Botswana, Burundi, Cuba, Cyprus, Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland, Japan, Poland, Romania, United Kingdom, Yugoslavia.

Cross references
Constitution: Article 19
Constitution: Article 22
Constitution: Article 35


ILO Home NORMES home ILOLEX home Universal Query NATLEX

For further information, please contact the International Labour Standards Department (NORMES) by email:
Copyright © 2006 International Labour Organization (ILO)
Disclaimer
webinfo@ilo.org