1985, Labour Inspection: Chapter II. The role of the labour inspectorate


Description:(General Survey)
Convention:C081
Convention:C129
Recommendation:R081
Recommendation:R082
Recommendation:R133
Subject classification: Labour Inspection
Document:(Report III Part 4B)
Session of the Conference:71
Subject: Labour Administration and Inspection
Display the document in:  French   Spanish
Document No. (ilolex): 251985G04

Chapter II. The role of the labour inspectorate

59. The role of the labour inspectorate is defined in several provisions of the instruments dealt with in this survey. Article 3, paragraph 1, of Convention No. 81 and Article 6, paragraph 1, of Convention No. 129 lay down the basic rule that the functions of the system of labour inspection are to secure the enforcement of the legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers, to supply technical information and advice to employers and workers on the subject, and to bring to the notice of the competent authority defects or abuses not covered by existing legal provisions. In addition to these functions relating to the application of legislation, the instruments contain a number of provisions outlining the preventive role of the inspection services: supervision of new establishments, plant, materials or substances and work processes, and the prevention of occupational accidents and diseases. Other functions may be assigned to the labour inspectorate, too, as indicated in Paragraphs 1 and 2 of Recommendation No. 133. However, according to Article 3, paragraph 2, of Convention No. 81 and Article 6, paragraph 3, of Convention No. 129, they must not interfere with the discharge of its primary duties.

I. Functions relating to the application of legislation

A. Enforcement of legal provisions

(a) Legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers

60. Article 3, paragraph 1(a), of Convention No. 81 stipulates that the functions of the system of labour inspection are "to secure the enforcement of the legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers while engaged in their work, such as provisions relating to hours, wages, safety, health and welfare, the employment of children and young persons, and other connected matters, in so far as such provisions are enforceable by labour inspectors". This provision is repeated in Article 6, paragraph 1(a), of Convention No. 129, which adds a specific reference to weekly rest and holidays and to the employment of women. This addition does not alter the scope of the Convention, however, as the list of matters considered as pertaining to conditions of work and the protection of workers is given merely by way of example. (Endnote 1)

61. The fact that the list is not restrictive means that relatively new aspects of labour protection can be taken into account, even if they are not explicitly referred to in the aforementioned provisions of Conventions Nos. 81 and 129. (Endnote 2)

62. In almost all countries, the labour inspection services are empowered by law to enforce labour legislation. In one country that has ratified Convention No. 129, however, the role of the labour inspectorate in agriculture is not yet clear. (Endnote 3)

63. By stipulating that the function of the system of labour inspection is to secure the enforcement of the legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers "in so far as such provisions are enforceable by labour inspectors", the two Conventions leave it to the discretion of individual States to determine the range of legal provisions coming within the purview of the labour inspectorate. Consequently, its enforcement functions vary considerably from country to country, depending, on the one hand, on the scope and contents of the legislation in force -- inasmuch as it is not necessarily applicable to all sectors of the economy (Endnote 4) and, on the other, on the Government's willingness to entrust enforcement of the legislation to the labour inspectorate.

64. Legislation is not usually the only method of laying down working conditions; it is often supplemented by collective bargaining. Save for a few exceptions, collective agreements are normally mandatory. It is for this reason that Article 27 of Convention No. 81 and Article 2 of Convention No. 129 specify that "the term "legal provisions" includes, in addition to laws and regulations, arbitration awards and collective agreements upon which the force of law is conferred and which are enforceable by labour inspectors". States therefore can decide whether or not they wish to empower the labour inspectorate to enforce collective agreements and arbitration awards.

65. Many countries have adopted measures to have mandatory collective agreements and/or arbitration awards enforced through the national system of labour inspection. (Endnote 5) In some instances, special inspection systems have been set up. (Endnote 6) Generally speaking, the inspection services are empowered to enforce collective agreements whatever their nature, though in certain countries this is the case only with the collective agreements that have been extended to other undertakings by government decision. (Endnote 7) One government has indicated that the supervision of the application of collective agreements of a general nature, the scope of which is national, is entrusted to the Administration of Labour Protection. (Endnote 8)

66. In several countries, the labour inspectorate is also responsible for enforcing labour clauses on working conditions in undertaking (Endnote 9) that have signed public contracts with the State and other public authorities. In developing countries in particular, making this standard practice is a most useful means of ensuring that the working conditions, and especially the wages, of persons employed to carry out part of a government contract are at least as favourable as those of other workers.

67. In most cases the competence of the inspectorate is very broad and covers all the laws and regulations in force on working conditions and occupational safety and health. There are several ways of defining the coverage of a system of inspection. One is to couch the definition in general terms. (Endnote 10) Another is to draw up a list -- usually non-restrictive -- the provisions enforceable by the labour inspectorate. (Endnote 11) An intermediate solution has been adopted in countries where the labour inspectorate is responsible for enforcing a specific text of a general nature, such as the Labour Code or the labour laws and regulations made under them. (Endnote 12)

68. In several countries where the labour inspectorate is responsible for enforcing certain specific laws, its competence varies according to the subject-matter. When there are a large number of such laws or when they cover a broad range of issues, the sphere of action of the inspection services, though less general, is still considerable. (Endnote 13) Elsewhere, on the other hand, it may be rather more limited, (Endnote 14) though there is a general tendency for the competence of inspection services to be extended as labour legislation develops. (Endnote 15)

69. Certain matters governed by laws and regulations are sometimes excluded from the competence of the labour inspectorate. In one country, only public law provisions relating to the protection of workers come within the purview of the labour inspectorate, which is not empowered to enforce private law provisions relating to such matters as annual leave. (Endnote 16) The same sometimes applies to the enforcement of wage regulations. (Endnote 17)

70. In some socialist countries, labour inspectors are generally empowered to enforce provisions relating to the protection of labour. This is a broad concept, in which the emphasis is sometimes on occupational safety and health. One government indicates in its report that employers infringing regulations on occupational safety, hours of work, weekly rest, wages and the protection of women and children are liable to penalties. (Endnote 18) In another country the state labour inspection system is responsible for enforcing labour legislation, and, inter alia, the provisions relating to occupational safety and health. (Endnote 19) Elsewhere, the inspectorate is empowered to enforce labour legislation and labour protection regulations. (Endnote 20)

71. As already mentioned, the provisions enforceable by the labour inspectorate are not necessarily the same for all workers even where the legislation is of a general nature. (Endnote 21) In many countries, especially the English-speaking countries of Africa, occupational safety and health are governed by legislation on factories that applies principally to industrial undertakings. In agriculture, specifically, several governments have stated that there are very few relevant laws and regulations, if any. (Endnote 22) In certain countries, agricultural workers are covered by special provisions. (Endnote 23)

(b) Other legal provisions

72. In addition to the legal provisions relating to conditions of work and the protection of workers while engaged in their work, some governments have taken advantage of the possibility afforded by Article 6, paragraph 2, of Convention No. 129 and have entrusted the labour inspectorate with the enforcement of provisions relating to the conditions of life of workers and their families. (Endnote 24) In several countries these provisions are concerned more specifically with workers' housing facilities. (Endnote 25)

73. Other provisions enforceable by labour inspectors relate to such varied subjects as vocational training, (Endnote 26) social services (canteen, transport facilities, etc.), (Endnote 27) the employment of foreign labour, (Endnote 28) the environment, (Endnote 29) and social security. (Endnote 30) Some of these aspects are mentioned in Paragraph 2 of Recommendation No. 133. (Endnote 31)

B. Information and advice for employers and workers

74. The action taken by labour inspectors in the course of their enforcement work is unlikely to have any effect so long as employers and workers are not fully aware of their reciprocal rights and obligations and, above all, if they are not convinced of the usefulness of the legislation applicable to them. Convention No. 81, in Article 3, paragraph 1(b), and Convention No. 129, in Article 6, paragraph 1(b), accordingly call upon the labour inspectorate "to supply technical information and advice to employers and workers concerning the most effective means of complying with the legal provisions". Like the enforcement function, this information and advice is intended to secure the effective implementation of the laws and regulations; in this sense, therefore, the two functions are interdependent and complementary.

75. The information available to the Committee shows that States are, on the whole, fully aware of the importance of the advisory function of labour inspectors and, in the vast majority of countries, the relevant legislation contains explicit provisions assigning this task to them. Since most legal provisions on the subject call upon the labour inspectorate to supply information and advice, it is unnecessary to cite specific examples. In practice, moreover, labour inspectors engage in educational activities even where there are no specific provisions on the subject. When infringements come to their notice, for instance, labour inspectors generally prefer to rely on persuasion rather than to initiate legal proceedings immediately.

76. The inspectorates' information function takes various forms. In the first place, labour inspectors are naturally called upon to supply advice and information during their inspection visits in undertakings. Secondly, the labour inspectorate often receives written or verbal requests, a form of consultation which has reached such a scale in certain countries that measures have had to be adopted to relieve inspectors of part of the burden. In one country, a central information unit has been set up in the departmental labour directorates to provide the public directly with information on currently applicable regulations or contractual provisions so as to facilitate the work of the inspection services; (Endnote 32) this central public information service should enable the labour inspectors and assistant inspectors to devote more time to visits to undertakings. Lastly, advice and information may take the more general form of the kind of education campaigns advocated in Paragraph 7 of Recommendation No. 81 and in Paragraph 14 of Recommendation No. 133. Many governments have stated that, through the labour inspectorate or in collaboration with other bodies (especially with the employers' and workers' organisations), they have adopted measures to keep workers and employers informed on a regular basis of the requirements of labour legislation, and specifically of problems of safety and health. (Endnote 33) The methods employed include the organisation of courses, seminars, conferences, radio broadcasts, exhibitions and the distribution of posters, pamphlets, and other publications and films.

77. The information and advice dispensed by labour inspectors often entails bringing current legal provisions to the notice of employers and workers, explaining their significance and their scope and indicating the best way of complying with them. In the case of the prevention of occupational hazards, the inspectors may also be called upon to offer technical advice.

78. The labour inspectorates' enforcement function and information and advice function are complementary in so far as they are both intended to promote the effective implementation of legal provisions relating to the protection of workers. It is generally accepted that a successful advisory function will achieve more than mere reliance upon enforcement and nowadays labour inspectors are no longer looked upon merely as policemen responsible for imposing fines on persons infringing labour laws. This development is welcome, particularly as it emphasises the importance of prevention. But a correct balance must be struck between the two approaches to obtain the greatest degree of success of the inspectorates' work. It is essential that, whilst concentrating on their advisory role, inspectors do not lose sight of the importance of enforcement. To some extent they will be assisted in this if the system of penalties is effectively constructed -- a problem which will be examined in Chapter VI of this survey.

C. Notification of the shortcomings of existing legal provisions

79. Article 3, paragraph 1(c), of Convention No. 81 states that one of the functions of the system of labour inspection is to bring to the notice of the competent authority defects or abuses not specifically covered by existing legal provisions. Convention No. 129, which contains a similar provision in Article 6, paragraph 1(c), adds that the labour inspectorate in agriculture must "submit proposals on the improvement on laws and regulations". This function, the importance of which has been stressed by the Committee, is a vital factor in social progress. (Endnote 34) If it is properly understood and properly carried out, it should promote the introduction of new protective measures. Thanks to their direct knowledge of the working environment, labour inspectors are ideally situated to alert the authorities to the need for new regulations that are better suited to the needs of workers.

80. The need to entrust the labour inspectorate with the function of informing the competent authorities of the shortcomings of existing legal provisions would seem to be generally accepted, at least in principle. The normal channel for such information is the periodical reports that the labour inspectors submit to their superiors, though ad hoc reports may also be made. Unfortunately, it is not always possible to judge from available information whether labour inspectors do fulfil this function in practice and, if so, in what cases and to what extent.

81. By reporting on the shortcomings of laws and regulations, labour inspection services are to a certain extent involved in the process of drafting labour regulations. This involvement can sometimes be more direct, such as when a representative of the inspectorate takes part in the work of advisory bodies on labour affairs. In one country, the inspectorate is responsible, inter alia, for assisting the Ministry of Labour in the drafting of regulations made under the Working Environment Act. (Endnote 35) In another, the authority to which the inspection services are attached (Health and Safety Commission) draws up regulations that it submits to the minister for adoption and may itself introduce codes of conduct and issue guidance notes. (Endnote 36) In a third, the federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration is empowered to adopt legally enforceable standards on occupational safety and health which are enforced by its own officials. (Endnote 37)

II. Preventive function

A. Prevention of occupational accidents and diseases

82. By their very nature, the labour inspectorate's activities as described above help to reduce the incidence of occupational accidents and diseases. Prevention has always been and remains an essential part of the function of inspection. Though there has been some progress, the accident rate is still dramatically high in the industrial sector. (Endnote 38) In agriculture, mechanisation and the use of new substances such as insecticides and pesticides have brought new health and safety hazards. (Endnote 39)

83. Two aspects are particularly relevant to the instruments on labour inspection: the notification of occupational accidents and diseases, and the participation of the inspectorate in their investigation.

(a) Notification of occupational accidents and diseases

84. Article 14 of Convention No. 81 and Article 19, paragraph 1, of Convention No. 129 establish that the labour inspectorate must be notified of occupational accidents and diseases in such cases and in such manner as may be prescribed by national laws or regulations. This principle is embodied in most countries' legislation, though it is not always possible to establish from available information whether the obligation to notify also applies to agricultural undertakings. It may be so in countries where notification is provided for in factories' legislation, unless it is also required under more general laws or regulations. (Endnote 40) In addition, the Committee of Experts has in fact addressed observations to a number of countries that have ratified Convention No. 81 and/or Convention No. 129, either because the labour inspectorate was not notified of work accidents and occupational diseases or because the requirement to do so referred only to work accidents or covered only an extremely limited list of occupational diseases. In many cases, appropriate action was taken (Endnote 41) or promised (Endnote 42) by the governments to ensure fuller implementation of the relevant provisions of the two Conventions.

85. The manner in which the labour inspectorate is informed of occupational accidents and diseases varies considerably from country to country. In most instances, cases of occupational injuries must be notified directly by the undertaking, either immediately (Endnote 43) or within a specified period of time (Endnote 44) which may vary according to the seriousness of the accident. (Endnote 45) A similar requirement is sometimes imposed on any doctor who diagnoses an occupational disease. (Endnote 46) In some countries, all occupational accidents and diseases recognised as such by the law must be notified; (Endnote 47) elsewhere, notification is required only in respect of the most serious accidents, especially those involving several workers or resulting in death or disability. (Endnote 48)

86. Notifying the labour inspectorate is not an end in itself but part of the more general aim of accident prevention. Its purpose is to enable the labour inspectors to conduct investigations in the undertaking to establish the causes of work accidents and occupational diseases and to have steps taken to avoid their recurrence. Although accidents in undertakings may not necessarily cause actual injury, they can provide extremely useful information on the state of the buildings, plant and equipment. In some countries, the legislation therefore also requires the inspectorate to be notified of certain occurrences liable to endanger the safety or health of the workers, even where there are no actual injuries. (Endnote 49)

87. In some countries, on the other hand, the employer notifies the labour inspectorate, not directly but through another body such as the social security institution, (Endnote 50) local or municipal authority, (Endnote 51) police, (Endnote 52) public safety authority, (Endnote 53) or the court. (Endnote 54) This form of indirect notification is not incompatible with the Conventions Nos. 81 and 129, which are couched in very flexible terms. However, if notification is to be fully effective, the time between when the occupational accident or disease occurs and the notification to the inspectorate must be sufficiently short for the inspectors to be able to carry out inquiries in the undertaking if they so wish. The Committee has considered that one month is too long a delay for inspectors to be able to take any urgent steps to prevent further occupational accidents and diseases.

88. Despite laws and regulations requiring notification of occupational hazards, labour inspectorates seem in practice often to be denied information, especially of occupational diseases. This is a general problem to which neither developing nor industrialised countries are immune. Very often, the main reason for failure to notify the inspectorate is ignorance of the relevant legal requirements. Several countries have accordingly undertaken information campaigns to draw the attention of the employers and the medical authorities to this problem. (Endnote 55) One government states that industrial accidents notified to the social security institution are compared with those notified to the labour inspectorate and, when the comparison shows that the latter has not been informed of an accident, the employer is systematically reminded of his obligation to do so. (Endnote 56) Collaboration between the labour inspectorate and the social security agency has also been cited by one government as contributing to the revision of the list of occupational diseases of which the inspectorate must be notified. (Endnote 57) It is important for the labour inspectorate to be kept properly informed that the list must be regularly updated. Other steps have been taken to improve records of work accidents and occupational diseases, such as simplified notification procedures and improved enforcement measures. (Endnote 58)

(b) Investigation of occupational accidents and diseases

89. As has already been stated, the labour inspectorate has to be notified of work accidents and occupational diseases so that the inspectors can decide on appropriate preventive measures. Article 19, paragraph 2, of Convention No. 129 accordingly stipulates that "as far as possible, inspectors shall be associated with any inquiry on the spot into the causes of the most serious occupational accidents or occupational diseases, particularly of those which affect a number of workers or have fatal consequences".

90. Only a few governments have supplied detailed information on the implementation of this provision. Generally speaking, however, it would seem that the inquiries conducted by labour inspectors following an occupational accident or disease are looked upon as an essential component of preventive action. Naturally, because of the limited time at their disposal and the very high rate of work accidents, the inspectors cannot carry out an inquiry in every case and therefore have to make a selection on the basis of, for example, the gravity, frequency or complexity of the accidents or diseases reported in an undertaking.

91. When an inquiry is ordered by another authority, such as the police or the prevention services of the social security agency, it should be possible to invite labour inspectors to take part, and certain governments have indicated that this is the case. (Endnote 59) In some cases, their participation is explicitly provided for by law. (Endnote 60)

B. Prior control of new establishments, plant, substances and processes

92. Convention No. 129 and Recommendations Nos. 81 and 133 contain a number of provisions relating to the prior control of new establishments, plant, substances and processes.

93. Part I of Recommendation No. 81 calls, on the one hand, for advance notice to the labour inspectorate of the opening of any new establishment, and, on the other, for the submission to the appropriate labour inspection service of plans for new establishments, plant or processes of production, for an opinion making their execution conditional upon the carrying out of any alterations ordered for the purpose of securing the health and safety of the workers. When Convention No. 129 was adopted, it was found necessary to incorporate this principle in the body of the Convention so as to emphasise the labour inspectorate's responsibility in the prevention of occupational accidents and diseases. (Endnote 61) Article 17 of the Convention accordingly stipulates that "the labour inspection services in agriculture shall be associated, in such cases and in such manner as may be determined by the competent authority, in the preventive control of new plant, new materials or substances and new methods of handling or processing products which appear likely to constitute a threat to health or safety". However, the wording of this provision is very flexible so as to be enforceable by as many countries as possible, whatever their system of inspection. The Article in fact leaves it to the competent authority to determine the cases and manner of the preventive control and therefore does not imply "that the inspection service would intervene in all cases of new plant, new materials or substances or new methods of handling or processing products." (Endnote 62) Paragraph 11 of Recommendation No. 133 goes into more detail and provides that "the association of the labour inspectorate in agriculture in the preventive control of new plant, new materials or substances and new methods of handling or processing products which appear likely to constitute a threat to health or safety ... should include prior consultation with the labour inspectorate on (a) the putting into operation of such plant, materials or substances and methods; and (b) the plans of an plant in which dangerous machines or unhealthy or dangerous work processes are to be used.'

94. The situation varies from country to country. In a few instances, the legislation contains no provision on the subject. (Endnote 63) Elsewhere, the opening of a new establishment or the start of the work must be registered with the labour inspectorate, though the latter's prior agreement is not required. (Endnote 64) Sometimes, notice of the opening of an establishment must be accompanied by the plans, (Endnote 65) although one government stated that this requirement is not stipulated by law. (Endnote 66) The requirements that the inspectorate be notified may concern all establishments (Endnote 67) or only certain establishments, (Endnote 68) such as factories (Endnote 69) or establishments employing a specified number of workers. (Endnote 70) In other countries, the prior agreement of the inspectorate or its opinion is normally required for opening new establishments (Endnote 71) or for building or transforming undertakings. (Endnote 72) In the latter case, in particular, prior submission of the plans is generally required. One government states that measures to implement Paragraph 2 of Recommendation No. 81 are being incorporated in the draft Labour Code currently being prepared. (Endnote 73) The inspectorate's approval may be conditional on steps to bring the establishment into line with safety and health regulations. Here again, this may be compulsory for all establishments or only for certain establishments. (Endnote 74) In some countries, only undertakings officially listed as dangerous, unhealthy or offensive are concerned. (Endnote 75)

95. Prior control may also be required for the machines and manufacturing processes and for the substances used. (Endnote 76) This is often the case with cranes and other lifting apparatus and with steam boilers. In order not to burden employers with the considerable cost of taking the necessary steps to improve the safety of plant or equipment acquired without knowledge of its dangerous nature, the laws and regulations in some countries transfer preventive control to the stage of manufacture, sale or import of the equipment concerned, in which case the labour inspectorate may or may not be associated in the control procedure. (Endnote 77) A separate licensing committee may be set up in such cases in order to give its approval, though available information unfortunately does not show how far the labour inspectorate is involved in such licensing. (Endnote 78)

96. The foregoing also applies to agriculture in so far as the legislation providing for the labour inspectorate to be associated in preventive control covers this sector, or when there is specific legislation. This is not always the case. One government states that the inspectorate is associated in preventive control only in respect of agricultural undertakings covered by the Factories Act. (Endnote 79) As to the countries that have not ratified Convention No. 129, only a few governments have reported in detail on this matter -- particularly as regards the prior control of dangerous substances -- although dangerous substances are in frequent use in agriculture. One government does refer to legislation on the control of pesticides which require prior authorisation of the Pesticides Control Board, of which the Chief Factory Inspector is a member, for the production, sale and distribution of any substances of this kind. (Endnote 80) In another country, when the chief inspector considers that a product may be toxic and dangerous for the workers who use it in agriculture, he may order inquiries and studies on the conditions of work of the persons concerned and on the way in which this product is used. (Endnote 81) Some governments have also stated that the inspectorate is generally associated in the preventive control referred to in Article 17 of the Convention. (Endnote 82) Another government has stated that no agricultural machinery may be manufactured which has not first undergone inspection in the presence of representatives of the competent bodies for the protection of agricultural workers. (Endnote 83) As to the countries that have ratified the Convention but not fully implemented this provision, the Committee has made appropriate observations concerning the shortcomings it has noted.

97. The Committee wishes to draw special attention to the importance of prior knowledge and control. Several factors make this increasingly important. The speed of technical change continues to increase: new chemicals are brought into being and radioactive materials find wider use. Machinery and chemicals created in one country are used in another country, often with a lack of technical information accompanying their transfer. Workplaces are used for a variety of changing operations and the processes and materials used are rapidly changing. However vigilant the inspectors, they will need assistance from other agencies whose specialised functions (e.g. control of environmental planning) or knowledge (e.g. research and development institutes) are essential to supplement the inspectors' knowledge.

III. Other functions entrusted to the labour inspection services

98. In many countries, the inspectorate is entrusted with functions other than those described above. Both Convention No. 81 (in Article 3, paragraph 2), and Convention No. 129 (in Article 6, paragraph 3), stipulate that "any further duties which may be entrusted to labour inspectors in agriculture shall not be such as to interfere with the effective discharge of their primary duties or to prejudice in any way the authority and impartiality which are necessary to inspectors in their relations with employers and workers".

A. Functions in the field of labour relations

(a) Settlement of disputes

99. Whereas the prevention of disputes seems a natural function of the labour inspectorate, the same is not true of the settlement of disputes. Accordingly, both Recommendation No. 81 (in Paragraph 8), and Recommendation No. 133 (in Paragraph 3), state that the functions of labour inspectors should not include that of acting as conciliator or arbitrator in proceedings concerning labour disputes. Given the special circumstances that sometimes prevail in agriculture, however, Recommendation No. 133 does accept the possibility that labour inspectors in agriculture may be called upon as a temporary measure to act as conciliators, provided that the necessary measures are taken to relieve them progressively of such functions.

100. The involvement of the labour inspectorate in the settlement of disputes has been (Endnote 84) and remains a controversial issue. Some consider that inspection functions as such are incompatible with conciliation and arbitration functions, as there may be confusion between the role of inspectors as conciliators, seeking a solution acceptable to both parties, and their role as guarantors of the due enforcement of the law -- a role which is incompatible with any idea of compromise. This view is supported by certain practical considerations: the extra work generated by the settlement of disputes may be such as to leave the inspectors little or no time for their principal supervisory function. The opposite view is that the labour inspector, by virtue of his first-hand knowledge of the working environment, is ideally suited to the function of conciliation. Several governments have suggested in their reports that Paragraph 8 of Recommendation No. 81 and Paragraph 3(1) of Recommendation No. 103 should perhaps be amended to allow States to entrust the labour inspectorate with the role of conciliator in labour disputes. (Endnote 85) Another government has pointed out that it is difficult to reconcile the objective of the Recommendations with laws and regulations which call upon the inspection services to prevent and settle all labour disputes not within the purview of the National Conciliation Office. (Endnote 86) Some governments have emphasised that employers and workers themselves wish the labour inspector to act as conciliator. (Endnote 87)

101. The controversy over this matter of principle, which goes back to the adoption of Recommendation No. 81, explains why there has been little change in this respect since the last general survey. There are two main types of situation. In certain countries, the inspectorate's control function is seen as incompatible with the function of conciliation and arbitration. (Endnote 88) Consequently, the task is entrusted to other bodies. Elsewhere, the legislation makes the intervention of the inspection services as conciliator in collective disputes mandatory. (Endnote 89) Moreover, although individual disputes are normally dealt with by labour courts, the legislation in several countries also provides for a preliminary hearing by the labour inspector. (Endnote 90) The countries whose legislation associates the labour inspectorate in arbitration are somewhat fewer. (Endnote 91) In some countries, the situation is not necessarily so clear-cut and, although the separation of the functions of inspector from those of conciliator and arbitrator is recognised in principle, the shortage of officials may sometimes make it necessary in practice for the labour inspectors to intervene in the latter. One government states that the inspectors' functions do not normally include conciliation and arbitration but that, in certain undertakings within the jurisdiction of the central government, it has not been possible to separate the two functions. (Endnote 92) In other States, only some categories of inspectors have conciliation duties. (Endnote 93)

102. From the standpoint of industrial relations, the involvement of the labour inspectorate in the settlement of disputes has unquestionably been highly beneficial in a great number of cases. The fact remains, however, that in numerous countries the inspectors are unable to fulfil their fundamental function of enforcing labour laws and regulations because of the time they devote to their conciliation duties, which is often considerable. This is part of the wider problems of the overburdening of labour inspectors with additional tasks, as touched upon in paragraph 108 below. As already pointed out, it is important that a labour inspector's role as conciliator when endeavouring to resolve a dispute should not induce him to compromise regarding the enforcement of the law. It should, however, be possible to avoid this to a large extent by training inspectors to distinguish between their supervisory function and their conciliation function and, for example, by issuing regular guide-lines to assist the inspectorate in this aspect of its work.

(b) Participation in collective bargaining

103. While in many countries collective bargaining takes place solely at the initiative of the parties concerned, in others national laws and regulations often provide for government intervention, particularly in the case of the agreement's automatic extension to other undertakings or sectors. In this regard, the existing procedure may provide for the labour inspectorate to participate in some way in the conclusion of collective agreements. In some countries, collective agreements are negotiated within a joint committee chaired by the labour inspectorate. (Endnote 94) In others, the inspector intervenes only in the conclusion of collective bargaining that may be extended to other branches. (Endnote 95) Elsewhere, the inspectorate may be called upon to seek a solution only when the joint committee fails to agree. (Endnote 96)

B. Activities of an economic nature

104. In the normal course of its work, the labour inspectorate has to compile extensive quantitative and qualitative data, especially on economic matters. It may accordingly be asked to report to the authorities on aspects of the economy. In one country, the inspection services compile information on national production and trends in production, and on strikes (for instance, causes and resolution of strikes). (Endnote 97) In another country, the external labour services are responsible for keeping the central government constantly informed on such matters as the implementation of its employment and vocational training policy. (Endnote 98) More generally, the inspectorates' knowledge may be very useful in preparing development plans.

105. In this context, Paragraph 1 of Recommendation No. 133 provides for the enlargement of the labour inspectorate's functions in agriculture "so as to include collaboration with the competent technical services with a view to helping the agricultural producer ... to improve his holding and the conditions of life and work of the persons working on it". However, no information has been received from governments on the implementation of this provision.

C. Subsidiary administrative functions

106. The labour inspectorate is often given administrative duties which, if too onerous, may prevent it from performing its enforcement work as it should. (Endnote 99) As already noted, the labour inspectorate in several countries has a supervisory role in social security, usually that of verifying that employers pay their contributions. (Endnote 100) Furthermore, the labour inspectorate may also be empowered to authorise exemptions from legal provisions relating, for example, to working time, the employment of young persons or night work by women. (Endnote 101) Labour inspectors are sometimes responsible for issuing permits for activities, such as the opening of company stores (Endnote 102) or private employment agencies. (Endnote 103) The inspectorate may also have a role to play in employment promotion, for example in the placement of workers. (Endnote 104) It may be required to compile statistics on conditions of work and employment (Endnote 105) or to conduct surveys. (Endnote 106) In several countries, the inspectors are also expected to take part in various administrative committees. (Endnote 107)

107. Lastly, labour inspectors in certain countries are required to enforce laws and regulations concerning collective dismissals. (Endnote 108) In the present economic situation, this is an increasingly important task that takes up much of the labour inspectors' time. In so far as the inspectorate is called upon to assess dismissals from the economic standpoint, this may make it go beyond its essential role of securing the enforcement of the labour legislation. In many cases, in fact, other bodies such as the employment services are responsible for supervising dismissals on economic grounds.

108. The number of additional tasks entrusted to the inspection service is liable, in many cases, to reduce the effectiveness of its principal duties. There is a risk that, with so many responsibilities, labour inspectors may devote more time to subsidiary economic or other duties at the expense of those that should constitute the essential part of their work, namely the enforcement of laws and regulations relating to occupational safety and health and conditions of work. The situation in some countries has reached a point where governments and workers' and employers' organisations may have to consider how to tackle the problem of labour inspectors overburdened with subsidiary duties. There are two main solutions. One would be to increase the staff of the inspection services; this raises the more general problem of the means of action available to the inspection service. The alternative would be to relieve labour inspectors of some of their subsidiary duties. As far as countries that have ratified Convention No. 81 or Convention No. 129 are concerned, the Committee has already made comments in many cases where it has felt that various subsidiary duties of the inspection services might distract them from their principal job. In several instances, steps have been taken or envisaged by governments to remedy the situation. (Endnote 109)


Endnotes

Endnote 1

ILO: Record of Proceedings, International Labour Conference, 52nd Session, Geneva, 1968, Report of the Committee on Labour Inspection (Agriculture), Appendix VIII, p. 649, para. 61.

Endnote 2

For example, provisions relating to the protection of workers' representatives against dismissal, which in certain countries such as France are enforceable by labour inspectors.

Endnote 3

Bolivia.

Endnote 4

See para. 71 below.

Endnote 5

For example, Australia (Federal Conciliation and Arbitration Act, s. 125; corresponding provisions also exist in state legislation); Bolivia (Decree No. 05202 of 1959 regulating the organisation of the Ministry of Labour, s. 45(a)); Colombia (Decree No. 062 of 1976 respecting the administrative reform of the Ministry of Labour and Social Security, s. 21(d); Costa Rica (Act regulating the establishment of the Ministry of Labour and Social Security, s. 88); France (Labour Code, s. 611-1); Gabon (Labour Code, s. 144); Guatemala (Labour Code, s. 278); Guyana; Italy; Luxembourg (Labour and Mines Inspectorate Organisation Act of 1974, s. 1(a)); Libyan Arab Jamahiriya; New Zealand (1954 Labour Department Act, s. 9); Romania.

Endnote 6

In Australia, for example, arbitration awards are enforced at the federal level by a special body of inspectors.

Endnote 7

For example, Bolivia (Decree No. 05202 of 1959 regulating the organisation of the Ministry of Labour, s. 45(a)).

Endnote 8

Finland.

Endnote 9

For example, Algeria, Barbados, Djibouti, Ghana, Grenada, Kenya, Mauritius, Morocco, Swaziland, United Republic of Tanzania, Tunisia, Turkey.

Endnote 10

For example, Barbados (Labour Department (Amendment) Act of 1961, s. 4: the function of the labour inspectorate is to ensure that existing laws on conditions of employment and the protection of workers in their occupation are fully implemented); Benin (Labour Code, s. 135: the labour inspectorate is responsible for enforcing all laws or regulations concerning labour and the labour force, specifically those concerning the protection of workers); Bolivia (Decree No. 05202 of 1959 regulating the establishment of the Ministry of Labour, s. 45(a): the function of the general labour inspectorate is to enforce labour laws in general); Costa Rica (Decree No. 42 of 1949 regulating the labour inspectorate, s. 1: the general labour inspectorate is responsible for enforcing all provisions relating to labour and social welfare); Gabon (Labour Code, s. 144: the labour inspectors enforce laws, regulations and agreements concerning labour, employment, social security and occupational safety and health); Ivory Coast (Labour Code, s. 122: the labour inspectorate is responsible for all questions relating to working conditions, labour-management relations, employment of workers, manpower movements, occupational guidance and training, and placement); Luxembourg (Labour and Mines Inspectorate Organisation Act of 1974, s. 1: the labour inspectorate is responsible, inter alia, for enforcing laws, regulations, administrative orders and agreements relating to the working conditions and protection of salaried workers in the exercise of their occupation).

Endnote 11

For example, Austria (Labour Inspection Act of 1974, s. 2(1): the inspectorate is responsible for ensuring the application of laws, regulations and administrative orders concerning the protection of workers, especially in respect of the protection of the life, health and morals of the workers, the employment of children, young persons and women, and the employment of workers in general as regards hours of work, breaks, rest periods, night rest, rest on Sundays, public holidays and leave, and the protection of apprentices and young workers); Ethiopia (Labour Inspection Service Order, No. 37 of 1964, s. 4(1): the inspectorate is responsible for ensuring that employers respect laws and regulations concerning conditions of work and employment, especially those relating to safety, health, welfare, hours of work, holidays, maternity, etc.)

Endnote 12

For example, Bahrain (Labour Law for the Private Sector, s. 147: officials of the Minister of Labour and Social Affairs are empowered to enforce this law and the regulations made under it); Egypt (Labour Code, s. 160); Libyan Arab Jamahiriya (Labour Code, s. 111).

Endnote 13

For example, Burma (according to the Government, the labour inspectorate is responsible for enforcing laws and regulations concerning conditions of work and the protection of workers while engaged in their work); Kenya (the labour inspectorate is responsible, inter alia, for ensuring the application of laws and regulations on occupational safety and health, welfare, the protection of women and young persons, hours of work, annual leave, weekly rest and wages); Norway (apart from the Workers' Protection and the Working Environment Act and the regulations made under it, the labour inspectorate enforces certain other laws such as the Working Conditions (Agriculture) Act, Annual Holidays Act, Working Conditions (Domestic Employees) Act and other laws concerning homeworkers).

Endnote 14

For example, United Kingdom (Bermuda) (according to information supplied by the Government, pending the entry into force of the 1982 Safety and Health at Work Act, scheduled for April 1984, the labour inspectorate has been responsible only for enforcing the Employment of Children and Young Persons Act).

Endnote 15

In the United States, the competence of inspection services has been considerably extended at the federal level following the adoption of the Occupational Safety and Health Act in 1970.

Endnote 16

Switzerland.

Endnote 17

For example, Bangladesh (the Government indicates in its report that the enforcement of minimum wages in agriculture does not come within the purview of the inspection services). This is also the case in such countries as the Federal Republic of Germany, Sweden and Switzerland, where wages are fixed by collective agreement.

Endnote 18

Hungary.

Endnote 19

Poland (1981 State Labour Inspection Act, s. 11).

Endnote 20

USSR (Act No. 2-VIII of 1970 respecting the fundamental principles governing labour legislation, s. 104).

Endnote 21

For example, Egypt (the provisions of Chapters II and III of Title VI of the Labour Code concerning the employment of young persons and the employment of women do not apply to the agricultural sector).

Endnote 22

For example, Bangladesh; Canada (some provinces); Guyana; India (the Government states that there is no general legislation on conditions of work and life in agriculture, apart from a law adopted by the Government of Kerala. There are, however, a number of texts that apply to all workers, such as the Equal Pay Act and Minimum Wages Act. Moreover, the Factories Act is also applicable to factories located in plantations for the primary processing of agricultural products. Finally, the Plantations Act governing the conditions of work and life on plantations contains certain provisions relating to health (drinking water, toilet facilities and medical services), welfare (canteen, day-care facilities, etc.), hours of work, night work of women and children and paid holidays); Rwanda (the Government states that at present there is no legislation that protects agricultural workers but that a Bill explicitly extending to them the provisions of the Labour Code is currently under consideration); Sri Lanka (the legislation referred to by the Government concerns wages only).

Endnote 23

For example, El Salvador (Labour Code, Book I, Title II, Chapter IV); Paraguay (Labour Code, Book I, Title III, Chapter V).

Endnote 24

For example, Hungary, Mexico, Romania. See also note directly following.

Endnote 25

For example, Austria, Bahrain, Italy, Kenya, New Zealand, Norway, Romania.

Endnote 26

For example, Austria (vocational training of apprentices in agriculture), Cameroon, Ethiopia, Ivory Coast, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Sri Lanka, Syrian Arab Republic, Tunisia.

Endnote 27

For example, Ivory Coast, Somalia, Tunisia.

Endnote 28

For example, Guatemala, Suriname, United Republic of Tanzania.

Endnote 29

For example, Federal Republic of Germany; Luxembourg (the labour inspectorate is responsible for identifying and recording infringements of the 1976 Anti-Pollution Act and the 1976 Anti-Noise Act and the regulations made thereunder).

Endnote 30

For example, Chad, Italy, Mali, Somalia, Spain.

Endnote 31

Paragraph 2 of Recommendation No. 133 stipulates that subject to the provisions of Article 6, paragraph 3, of the Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention (1969), the labour inspectorate in agriculture might be associated in the enforcement of legal provisions on such matters as: (a) training of workers; (b) social services in agriculture; (c) co-operatives; and (d) compulsory school attendance.

Endnote 32

France.

Endnote 33

For example, Antigua and Barbuda, Australia, Austria, Botswana, Canada, Colombia, Denmark, Ecuador, Finland (however, the Central Union of Finnish Trade Unions (SAK) considers that the information campaigns have not been sufficiently numerous), Federal Republic of Germany, Hungary, Italy, Mali, Mauritius, Mexico, Norway, Philippines, Poland, Portugal (according to the Confederation of Portuguese Trade, the labour inspectorate fails to carry out the educational mission provided for by Recommendation No. 81, since the Legislative Decree of 1983 to issue the rules of the General Inspectorate of Labour attributes to it an essentially repressive role. The Government states that section 28 of the rules clearly lays down the functions of the inspectorate in the fields of education and guidance. Furthermore, in its report on Recommendation No. 133, the Government states that the educational measures suggested in Paragraph 14 of Recommendation No. 133 come within the competence of other authorities, the educational action of the labour inspectorate being carried out as part of its normal inspection duties), Singapore, Sweden, Turkey, Uruguay, United Kingdom (Montserrat).

Endnote 34

See the Committee's general observation on Convention No. 81 in Report of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations, Report III (Part 4(a)), International Labour Conference, 61st Session, 1976, Geneva, p. 107.

Endnote 35

Denmark (Working Environment Act, s. 72.2).

Endnote 36

United Kingdom.

Endnote 37

United States.

Endnote 38

See ILO: Evaluation of the International Programme for the Improvement of Working Conditions and Environment (PIACT) Report VII, International Labour Conference, 70th Session, 1984, pp. 14-15 and pp. 35 et seq.

Endnote 39

ibid., pp. 37 et seq.

Endnote 40

The Government of New Zealand has stated that the notification of industrial accidents is not required by the Agricultural Workers Act. Provisions to this effect are, however, included in the Bush Workers Act and the Machinery Act.

Endnote 41

For example, Belgium, Gabon, Ghana, Guatemala, Haiti, Pakistan (action yet to be taken in respect of the notification of occupational diseases), Paraguay, Uganda, Uruguay, Yugoslavia (action yet to be taken in respect of the notification of occupational diseases in certain republics and provinces).

Endnote 42

For example, Bahamas, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Yugoslavia.

Endnote 43

For example, China (Regulations concerning safety and health in factories, s. 7); Ethiopia (Labour Standards Proclamation No. 232 of 1966, s. 11); Finland (1973 Act to provide for the supervision of labour protection, s. 22); Mauritius (Labour Act, s. 23, and 1961 Workmen's Compensation (Amendment) Act, s. 10); Netherlands (Working Environment Act, s. 9); Norway (Worker Protection and Working Environment Act, s. 21); Poland (Labour Code, ss. 228 and 229); Somalia (Labour Code, s. 102).

Endnote 44

Bahrain (Act respecting employment in the private sector, ss. 121 and 131; various authorities, including the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, must be notified within 24 hours); Benin (Labour Code, s. 129: notification within 48 hours); Bolivia (Labour Code, s. 85: notification within 24 hours); Egypt (Labour Code, s. 130: notification within 24 hours for serious accidents); Guyana (Labour Act, s. 31: notification within six days); Mexico (Federal Labour Act, s. 504V: notification within 72 hours).

Endnote 45

For example, Bangladesh (Factories Regulations, ss. 84 and 85); Luxembourg (Labour and Mines Inspectorate Organisation Act of 1974, s. 26).

Endnote 46

For example, Finland (Act to provide for the supervision of labour protection, s. 22); Ireland (Factories Act, s. 76); Israel (Accidents and Occupational Diseases (Notification) Ordinance, s. 5); Poland (Labour Code, s. 229); Singapore (Factories Act, s. 60); Sri Lanka (Factories Act, s. 63); Sweden (1977 Working Environment Ordinance, s. 2(a)).

Endnote 47

For example, Bolivia (Labour Code (Industrial Accidents)); Ethiopia (Proclamation No. 232 of 1966 on labour standards, s. 11); Japan (Industrial Safety and Health Regulations, s. 97); Luxembourg (Labour and Mines Inspectorate Organisation Act, s. 26); Mali (Labour Code, s. 228); Somalia (Labour Code, s. 102).

Endnote 48

For example, Bangladesh (Factory Regulations, ss. 84-86: all accidents resulting in death or over 48 hours' disability must be notified); Cuba (Decree No. 4 of 1977 regulating the national labour inspection system, s. 22: fatal or collective accidents): Cyprus (Accidents and Occupational Diseases (Notification) Law, s. 3: fatal accidents or accidents resulting in over three days' incapacity); Denmark (Order No. 236 of 2 May 1973: any accidents resulting in death or at least one day's disability not including the day of the accident); Egypt (Labour Code, s. 130): immediate notification of any serious accident; Ghana (Factories, Offices and Shops Act, ss. 10-12: accidents or diseases resulting in death or more than three days' disability); Guyana (Labour Act, s. 31: death or over 24 hours' disability; Ireland (Factories Act, s. 74: death or over three days' disability); Netherlands (Working Environment Act, s. 9: all serious accidents; other accidents resulting in physical injury to be noted in the undertaking's records); Poland (Labour Code, s. 228: any accidents resulting in death or serious injury or involving several people); Romania (Order No. 2896 of 1966, s. 5: collective, fatal or incapacitating accidents); Sweden (Working Environment Ordinance, s. 2: fatal accidents or accidents causing serious injury or affecting several employees); Zambia (Factories Act, s. 76: accidents resulting in death or over three days' disability).

Endnote 49

For example, Cyprus (Accidents and Occupational Diseases (Notification) Law, 1953, s. 4: the competent authority may require notice to be given in every case of explosion, fire, collapse of building, accidents to machinery or plant, whether or not there are any victims, by reason of the risk of serious bodily injury to workers); Luxembourg (1974 Labour and Mines Inspectorate Organisation Act, s. 26(3): the labour and mines inspectorate must be notified without delay of any serious incident that could have caused a serious industrial accident); Netherlands (Working Environment Act, s. 9.2: notification of any accident causing extensive material damage); Singapore (Factories Act, s. 49, and Annex 4: notification of prescribed dangerous incidents); Zambia (Factories Act, s. 77, and first annex: notification of prescribed dangerous accidents).

Endnote 50

For example, Algeria (Industrial Accidents and Occupational Diseases Act No. 83-13 of 1983, ss. 13 and 70); Gabon (Labour Code, s. 137).

Endnote 51

For example, Morocco (Dahir of 6 February 1963 amending the Dahir of 25 June 1927 concerning workmen's compensation).

Endnote 52

For example, Syrian Arab Republic (Social Insurance Code, ss. 41 and 42).

Endnote 53

For example, Austria (Labour Inspection Act of 1974, s. 15.3).

Endnote 54

Uruguay (Industrial Accidents and Occupational Diseases Act No. 10004 of 1941, ss. 58 and 71).

Endnote 55

For example, Ireland (the competent authority has reminded the medical profession of the need to notify certain prescribed diseases and to seek its advice about occupational diseases that are not officially notifiable); New Zealand; Sri Lanka (seminars have been organised for medical and nursing personnel to explain and emphasise the importance of notifying occupational diseases; occupational health has also been included in the subjects taught to medical students and to members of paramedical professions). See also following note.

Endnote 56

Denmark.

Endnote 57

Ireland.

Endnote 58

For example, Denmark.

Endnote 59

For example, Austria, Colombia, Islamic Republic of Iran, Japan, New Zealand (according to the information communicated by the Government, the decision is left to the police), Sweden.

Endnote 60

For example, Czechoslovakia (Act No. 174 of 1968 on the technical supervision of occupational safety by the State, s. 4(h)); Hungary (Decree No. 47 of 1979, ss. 11 and 12); Madagascar (Social Welfare Code, s. 181: the social security fund may request the labour inspectors to conduct an inquiry when an accident causes or seems liable to cause the death or permanent disability of the victim); Poland (State Labour Inspection Act of 1981, s. 8).

Endnote 61

See ILO: Record of Proceedings. International Labour Conference, 52nd Session, Geneva, 1968, Report of the Committee on Labour Inspection (Agriculture), discussion in plenary session, pp. 418 et seq.

Endnote 62

See ILO: Record of Proceedings, International Labour Conference, 53rd Session, Geneva, 1969, Report of the Committee on Labour Inspection (Agriculture), Appendix VI, p. 629.

Endnote 63

According to the information available, this seems to be the case, for example in the following countries: Bahamas, Belize, Bahrain, Chile, Netherlands (the Government states that no statutory basis exists for the preventive responsibilities of the Factories Inspectorates, but that a notice for construction engineers, architects and owners of businesses has been issued on the construction and fitting out of industrial premises), Panama, Qatar, United Kingdom (the Government states that objections remain to the formal utilising of inspection staff on preventive duties. According to the Trade Unions Congress this situation is connected with an inadequate number of inspectors).

Endnote 64

For example, Algeria (Ordinance No. 75-31 of 1975 respecting conditions of work in the private sector, s. 316); Cameroon (Labour Code, s. 122); Comoros (Labour Code, s. 186); Finland (Act to provide for the supervision of labour protection, s. 21); Gabon (Labour Code, s. 165); Ivory Coast (Decree No. 68-300 of 20 June 1968, s. 5D102); Luxembourg (Labour and Mines Inspectorate Organisation Act of 1974, s. 27); Portugal (Legislative Decree of 1983 to issue rules on General Labour Inspectorate, s. 97); Somalia (Labour Code, s. 115); Zaire (Order of 10 August 1969).

Endnote 65

For example, Gabon.

Endnote 66

Madagascar.

Endnote 67

For example, Cameroon, Ivory Coast.

Endnote 68

For example, Luxembourg (Labour and Mines Inspectorate Organisation Act of 1974, s. 27: only industrial, handicrafts and commercial establishments).

Endnote 69

This is the case in countries with legislation on factories.

Endnote 70

For example, Finland.

Endnote 71

For example, Bulgaria (Labour Code, s. 101); Cyprus (Factories Act, ss. 8 et seq.); Kenya (Factories Act, s. 9); Malawi (Factories Act, s. 8); Mauritius (Factories Act, s. 44); Singapore (Factories Act, s. 9); Spain (Order of 1971 on the opening of labour centres, s. 3); USSR (Act No. 2 VIII of 1970 respecting the fundamental principles governing labour legislation, s. 59); Zambia (Factories Act, s. 13).

Endnote 72

For example, Australia (the legislation of several states contains provisions to this effect); Austria (however, the Austrian Congress of Chambers of Labour is of the opinion that even though the inspection services are consulted by the competent building authorities, there is no obligation to follow their advice, with the result that, in certain cases, new buildings do not meet regulations dealing with the protection of workers (according to the Congress, a change in that practice would reinforce the effectiveness of the supervisory service); Bangladesh (Factory Regulations, s. 3); Botswana (Factories Act, s. 10); China; Cyprus (Factories Act, s. 12: any authority to which the plans of the factory must be communicated by law must, before giving its approval, send a copy to the Chief Factory Inspector and await his opinion); Czechoslovakia (Act No. 174 of 1968 respecting technical supervision of occupational safety by the State, s. 4); Finland (Building Decree, s. 51: the authority responsible for issuing building permits must, if it deems it necessary, request an opinion from the inspectorate. It is not, however, bound by this opinion. The Government states that advance supervision is made difficult by the fact that the inspection services often have to give their opinion on the basis of undetailed plans. The Central Organisation of Finnish Trade Unions (SAK) considers that the low number of labour inspectors is one of the reasons for which the advance notification system is working badly. The Finnish Employers' Confederation (STK) considers that this system is in accordance with the aims of Recommendations Nos. 81 and 133); Federal Republic of Germany; Ghana (Factories, Offices and Shops Act, s. 4); Hungary (Decree No. 47 of 1979 of the Council of Ministers, s. 19); India (Factories Act, s. 6: provincial governments may issue appropriate regulations); Italy; Japan (Industrial Safety and Health Act, s. 88); Mauritius (Labour Act, s. 43); Norway (Workers' Protection and Working Environment Act, s. 19); Polnd (State Labour Inspection Act of 1981, ss. 8 and 18); Sri Lanka (Factories (Amendment) Act of 1976, ss. 2 et seq.); Sweden (Working Environment Ordinance, s. 17: a building permit for a work-place is issued only after the labour inspectorate has confirmed that it meets occupational safety and health requirements); Switzerland (Labour Act, s. 7: plans for the construction or transformation of an industrial undertaking may be approved by the cantonal authority only upon receipt of the report of the Federal Labour Inspectorate; approval of the plans by the cantonal authorities is conditional on compliance with the proposals of the inspectorate when these are specifically designated as orders); Zambia (Factories Act, s. 15).

Endnote 73

Mali.

Endnote 74

In Switzerland, for example, the procedure for the approval of plans provided for in s. 7 of the Labour Act concerns industrial establishments. Under s. 8, the procedure may, however, be extended to other high-risk establishments to be determined by ordinance.

Endnote 75

For example, France (for the opening of establishments classified as dangerous, unhealthy or offensive, the commissars of the Republic must first seek the opinion of the competent labour inspectorate); Luxembourg (Act of 16 April 1979 respecting dangerous, unhealthy or offensive establishments); Morocco (Dahir of 25 August 1914 governing unhealthy, offensive or dangerous establishments, as amended, ss. 4 and 5); Netherlands (Working Environment Act of 1980, s. 5).

Endnote 76

For example, Denmark (Working Environment Act, s. 40: when the safety and health of the staff so justify, the Ministry of Labour may rule that plans must first be drawn up for the conduct of work, operations and working methods and submitted to the labour inspectorate for authorisation before they are put into effect. See also Order No. 323 of 7.7.1983); France (Social Security Code, s. 498): labour inspectors must be informed by employers, prior to the start of work, of any processes liable to cause occupational diseases); Kenya (Factories Act, s. 32); Poland (State Labour Inspection Act of 1981, s. 8: the state inspectorate's supervision of construction plans from the standpoint of their compliance with occupational safety and health requirements extends to the equipment and technology used); Suriname (under section 3 bis, paragraph 4 of the Safety Act, the chief labour inspector can order previous testing of certain equipment and machinery. However, according to the Government, the relevant resolution required has not yet been adopted); Sweden (Working Environment Act, Chapter 3, s. 12; the National Safety and Health Board to which the inspectorate is attached may order that certain equipment, facilities, processes, work methods and substances liable to constitute a danger to the safety of the workers may not be employed without prior approval).

Endnote 77

For example, Czechoslovakia (Act No. 174 of 1968 on the technical supervision of occupational safety by the State, s. 4); Denmark (Working Environment Act, s. 46: the Ministry of Labour may issue rules concerning the approval by the labour inspectorate of technical equipment prior to its transfer, sale or utilisation); Finland (Act to provide for the supervision of labour protection, s. 23); Japan (Occupational Safety and Health Act, s. 44 (prescribed equipment), and s. 57.2 (new toxic substances)).

Endnote 78

The Government of Mongolia, however, states that the labour protection inspectors participate, inter alia, in the work of the committees set up for the testing and approval of new types of machinery and technical equipment.

Endnote 79

Barbados.

Endnote 80

Mauritius (Pesticides Control Act of 1972, ss. 4 and 9).

Endnote 81

Cyprus (Regulation No. 271 on agricultural work (safety, health and welfare, 1982).

Endnote 82

For example, Cape Verde, Cuba, Cyprus, Gabon, Islamic Republic of Iran, United Kingdom.

Endnote 83

Bulgaria.

Endnote 84

During the discussion of Paragraph 8 of Recommendation No. 81, certain members of the Conference Committee on Labour Inspection observed that in some circumstances it was necessary and useful to employ inspectors as conciliators and arbitrators and that they were often the best qualified officials or the ones most readily available to perform such functions (ILO: Record of Proceedings, International Labour Conference, 30th Session, Geneva, 1947, p. 510). See also the report of the Sixth Session of the Permanent Agricultural Committee (Minutes of the 148th Session of the Governing Body, Geneva, 7-10 March 1961, Appendix III, p. 63) and the report of the Fifth Session of the Committee on Work on Plantations, May 1966 (ILO: Official Bulletin, Vol. L, No. 1, January 1967, p. 103, para. 14).

Endnote 85

For example, Ivory Coast, Madagascar.

Endnote 86

Luxembourg.

Endnote 87

France (the Government adds that conciliation functions do not impede the independence of the labour inspectorate); Mali.

Endnote 88

This is the case, inter alia, in the socialist countries of Eastern Europe and in Cape Verde, Chile, Denmark, Egypt, Federal Republic of Germany, Japan, New Zealand, Panama, Portugal, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, Uruguay.

Endnote 89

For example, Algeria (Ordinance No. 75-33 of 1975 respecting the powers of the Labour and Social Affairs Inspectorate, s. 3.5); Benin (Labour Code, s. 186); Burundi (Labour Code, s. 206); Cameroon (Labour Code, s. 166); Chad (Labour Code, s. 267); Comoros (Labour Code, s. 219); Ecuador (Labour Code, s. 464); France (Decree No. 77-1288 of 1977 to organise external labour and employment services, s. 2A, paragraph 2); Gabon (Labour Code, s. 239); Guatemala (Labour Code, s. 281(e); the Government indicates that measures are under way to give the conciliation function to specific services); Mali (Labour Code, s. 268); Morocco; Somalia (Labour Code, ss. 135-136); Syrian Arab Republic (Agricultural Labour Code of 1958, s. 245(e); Tunisia (Labour Code, s. 172); United Kingdom (Bermuda).

Endnote 90

For example, Algeria (Ordinance No. 75-33 of 1975 respecting the terms of reference of the Labour and Social Affairs Inspectorate, s. 3.4); Benin (Labour Code, s. 168); Burundi (Labour Code, s. 170); Cameroon (Labour Code, s. 146); Chad (Labour Code, s. 244); Gabon (Labour Code, s. 211); Mali (Labour Code, s. 241); Somalia (Labour Code, s. 134).

Endnote 91

For example, Ecuador (Labour Code, s. 468; the labour inspector is chairman of the Conciliation and Arbitration Court); Gabon (Labour Code, s. 242: the corresponding labour inspector is a member of the Arbitration Board); Morocco.

Endnote 92

India.

Endnote 93

For example, in Barbados and Kenya (according to the reports of these Governments, with the exception of factory inspectors, labour department officials responsible for enforcing provisions relating to labour disputes do have conciliation functions).

Endnote 94

For example, Burundi (Labour Code, s. 238). In France, although the law is not explicit on the subject, the labour inspector traditionally acts as chairman of the joint committee.

Endnote 95

For example, Mali (Labour Code, s. 67).

Endnote 96

For example, Congo (Labour Code, s. 55); Mauritania (Labour Code, s. 62).

Endnote 97

Italy.

Endnote 98

France (Decree No. 77-1288 of 1977 to organise external labour services, s. 1).

Endnote 99

A survey has shown that labour inspectors in Italy have at least 64 administrative functions (for example, in regard to the employment of foreigners, hours of work, night work, maternity, etc.).

Endnote 100

See para. 73 above.

Endnote 101

For example, Denmark (Working Environment Act, ss. 52, 54 and 73); France (Labour Code, ss. L.212-4.1, L.212-7, L.213-2, L.221-5-1); Guatemala (Labour Code, s. 128); Norway (Workers' Protection and Working Environment Act, ss. 35, 37, 38, 43, 45, 47 and 50).

Endnote 102

For example, Cameroon (Labour Code, s. 86); Somalia (Labour Code, s. 100).

Endnote 103

For example, Zambia (Employment Act, ss. 56-63).

Endnote 104

For example, Ivory Coast (Labour Code, s. 122); Gabon (Labour Code, s. 149): Somalia; Sri Lanka; Tunisia (Labour Code, s. 280).

Endnote 105

For example, Cameroon, Cyprus, Finland, Morocco, Somalia, Tunisia.

Endnote 106

For example, Ghana, Morocco.

Endnote 107

For example, Guyana, Italy. See also para. 103 above.

Endnote 108

France (Act of 3 January 1975 respecting dismissals on economic grounds and Decree of 5 May 1975 respecting the supervision of employment).

Endnote 109

For example, France (increased staff); Mauritania (separation of employment services and labour inspection services for certain provinces); France (New Caledonia) (the labour inspectorate has been relieved of certain employment and vocational training functions).


Legislation

See related national legislation from Natlex

Barbados: Factories Act

Cross references
Constitution: Article 19
Constitution: Article 22
Constitution: Article 35


ILO Home NORMES home ILOLEX home Universal Query NATLEX

For further information, please contact the International Labour Standards Department (NORMES) by email:
Copyright © 2006 International Labour Organization (ILO)
Disclaimer
webinfo@ilo.org