1988, Equality in Employment and Occupation: Chapter IV. Implementation of principlesDescription:(General Survey) Convention:C111 Recommendation:R111 Subject classification: Non-discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Subject classification: Women Document:(Report III Part 4B) Session of the Conference:75 Subject: Equality of Opportunity and Treatment Display the document in: French Spanish Document No. (ilolex): 251988G06 Chapter IV. Implementation of principles General 157. Provision is made for the application of the principles contained in the instruments of 1958 in Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention and in Paragraphs 2 to 10 of the Recommendation. Application consists primarily of declaring a national policy aimed at equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation and pursuing this policy, both directly, in ensuring its observance in services and employment under the control of a national authority and, indirectly, by taking measures to secure its acceptance in other sectors. During the drafting of the instruments, the words "public policy" were replaced by "national policy" to avoid any implication that responsibility for promoting equality of opportunity and treatment in all fields of training and employment falls only on the public authorities. (Endnote 1) The fact that the State bears the chief responsibility of declaring and pursuing a national policy should not cause one to overlook the essential role of employers' and workers' organisations in promoting the principle of equality at the workplace itself, and the corresponding responsibilities. Lastly, the provisions relating to the application of the principle of the Convention allow considerable flexibility and a wide margin for adaptation to national conditions and practice. The form taken by implementing measures is an important element, but the criterion for application of the Convention should be whether unequivocal results are achieved in pursuing equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation without unlawful discrimination. The first Section of this Chapter will examine the formulation and content of a policy designed to promote equality of opportunity and treatment, while the second Section will outline ways in which such a policy can be implemented. Section 1: Formulation and content of a national policy designed to promote equality of opportunity and treatment 158. Under Article 2 of the Convention, "each Member for which this Convention is in force undertakes to declare and pursue a national policy designed to promote, by methods appropriate to national conditions and practice, equality of opportunity and treatment in respect of employment and occupation, with a view to eliminating any discrimination in respect thereof". The national policy of equality of opportunity and treatment should, firstly, be clearly stated, which implies that programmes for this purpose should be or should have been set up and, secondly, should be applied, presupposing state implementation of appropriate measures according to the principles outlined in Article 3 of the Convention and Paragraph 2 of the Recommendation. The national policy should, in particular, take into account the fact that measures designed to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in respect of employment and occupation are a matter of public interest and constitute a right of the individual; to this end, "government agencies should apply non-discriminatory employment policies in all their activities; employers should not practice or countenance discrimination in engaging or training any person for employment, advancing or retaining such person in employment, or in fixing terms and conditions of employment; nor should any person or organisation obstruct or interfere, either directly or indirectly, with employers in pursuing this principle; in collective negotiations and industrial relations the parties should respect the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation, and should ensure that collective agreements contain no provisions of a discriminatory character in respect of access to, training for, advancement in or retention of employment, or in respect of the terms and conditions of employment". 159. While affirmation of the principle of equality before the law may be an element of such a policy, it cannot in itself constitute a policy within the meaning of Article 2 of the Convention. (Endnote 2) The incorporation of a Convention in internal law by virtue of ratification is not sufficient to ensure its application in law and in practice. (Endnote 3) Similarly, the absence of laws and administrative measures expressly introducing inequalities is not sufficient to meet the requirements of the Convention for the elimination of all forms of discrimination. (Endnote 4) Certain forms of discrimination based on race, national or social origin, sex-based occupational segregation and sexual harassment are not, on the whole, caused by an intention to discriminate or by provisions of legislation or regulations, but are rather the result of behaviour, attitudes or an expression of prejudice, in respect of which measures should be adopted for the implementation of the national policy. (Endnote 5) Methods appropriate to national conditions and practice 160. The Committee has already noted earlier that "although the formulation of the national policy in question must comply, in substance, with conditions laid down in the Convention or the Recommendation, it must be underlined that its form is not subject, under these instruments, to any particular conditions". (Endnote 6) Article 2 of the Convention provides that national policy is to promote equality "by methods appropriate to national conditions and practice". Adjustment to national conditions and practice concerns the methods by which the principles of the Convention are to be implemented within the framework of the national policy of equality which the Government is to declare and pursue; it is not to affect the principles to be applied. The Convention leaves it to each country to use methods which, taking into account national conditions and practice, appear to be the most appropriate in view of their nature, time scale (Endnote 7) and their timeliness, in order to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation. By describing national policy as one designed to promote equality of opportunity and treatment, (Endnote 8) the Convention indicates that implementation of the national policy may be gradual, although some obligations have immediate effect, such as those of declaring a policy, repealing statutory provisions and eliminating administrative practices which are discriminatory, and the duty to report on results obtained. The Convention thus allows considerable flexibility as regards the manner of declaring the policy of equality and of pursuing action designed to implement the principle of equality. A declaration of policy may result from constitutional norms (Endnote 9) or from legal provisions, (Endnote 10) or be expressed in a declaration of government policy submitted to Parliament or another appropriate body or in any other manner consistent with national practice. It may also result from a combination of such methods. (Endnote 11) Some countries have stated in their reports that national policy aimed at promotin equality is based on religious principles advocating equality of treatment. (Endnote 12) The Committee observed on a previous occasion that what matters from the point of view of the Convention is that "this formulation should be such as to define a real "national policy" and that it should cover all the objectives of this instrument". (Endnote 13) Repeal of provisions inconsistent with a national policy of equality 161. The obligation to declare a national policy designed to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation in accordance with the objectives of the Convention has as its corollary the duty to repeal statutory provisions and modify administrative practices which are inconsistent with this policy. Article 3(c) of the Convention provides that each Member for which the Convention is in force must "repeal any statutory provisions and modify any administrative instructions or practices which are inconsistent with the policy" designed to secure equality of opportunity and treatment without discrimination on the grounds indicated in Article 1 of the Convention. While this absolute and universal obligation is a necessary condition for the application of the 1958 instruments, it should be borne in mind that it is only one aspect of their implementation, which also implies the adoption of affirmative action measures to correct de facto inequalities in all fields concerning employment and occupation, whether or not governed by law or by administrative action. Some governments have stated that legislation has been reviewed in order to delete provisions involving discriminatory measures restricting the employment of women (Endnote 14) or of members of other visible minorities. In some countries, bodies set up to implement the national policy of equality play an important part in the amendment of legislation and administrative practices which are inconsistent with the principle of equality. (Endnote 15) In examining the application of the Convention, the Committee has often noted with satisfaction the express repeal or amendment of provisions of legislation or regulations which were discriminatory on the grounds referred to by the Convention, so as to remove any doubt or uncertainty as to the situation in positive law in this respect. (Endnote 16) Contents of national policies 162. In order to preserve the flexibility which is essential for its application, the Convention does not specify the content of measures which may be adopted for the promotion of effective equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation, and leaves it to States to determine the content of such measures in accordance with the objective of the Convention. (Endnote 17) The content of the national policy should, however, draw its inspiration from the principles of the Convention: it is essential that it should be designed to promote equality of opportunity and treatment by eliminating all distinctions, exclusions or preferences in law and in practice; that it should cover the different grounds of discrimination expressly referred to (race, colour, sex, national origin, religion, political opinion and social origin); (Endnote 18) and lastly, that it should provide for the implementation of the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment in all fields of employment and occupation. (Endnote 19) The Committee has noted, on a previous occasion, the importance of taking "supplementary action ... to ensure that national policy clearly states that its purpose is to promote equality of opportunity and treatment for all the categories of persons covered by the Convention, in all forms of employment and occupation, whether public or private (having regard -- as provided by the 1958 instruments -- to the methods appropriate to national conditions and practice)". (Endnote 20) The variety of ways in which discrimination on the grounds referred to in Article 1 of the Convention is manifested makes it necessary to adopt differentiated measures. The elimination of certain forms of discrimination based on sex, race, national or social origin lends itself more easily to the adoption of affirmative action while for other forms of discrimination, such as that on account of political opinion or religion, the objectives of the Convention might generally be adequately served by an attitude of abstention, within an appropriate legal framework. (Endnote 21) Lastly, supplementary measures correspond to the scope of the national policy: identification of forms of discrimination based, for example, on social origin will lead to the adoption of measures which, within the area covered by the Convention, will affect the entire educational system and employment policy. (Endnote 22) 163. In the light of the information sent by a number of countries, the Committee has noted substantial change in the approach of the national policy of equality of opportunity and treatment, which has broadened from an essentially standard-setting approach to embrace economic and social measures. At first, standard-setting mechanisms to eliminate discrimination were guided by the general principle of equality, which subsequently became more specific and incorporated equality in employment and occupation. (Endnote 23) The great number of constitutions dealing with the principle of equality bear witness to the fact that this approach is widespread, even though some aspects of discrimination are not covered and the practical application of these provisions in the legal system varies considerably according to the country concerned. These general principles, which had often long existed in legal texts, have been supplemented and made more specific by legislation banning discrimination in employment and occupation, or new provisions concerning equality in acts specific to various branches of activity (for example the civil service) or certain aspects of employment. In several countries, this legislation has been adopted in application of regional treaties, (Endnote 24) of specific agreements on these matters concluded between countries within a same region (Endnote 25) or of regional programmes. (Endnote 26) Under law, the ban on unwarranted discrimination has taken the form of increased legal protection for individuals and the definition of a range of penalties. Courts and case law have often played a vital role in establishing individual rights. Penalties have taken various forms: civil action to redress wrongs incurred and damages, financial compensation, payment of back wages, reinstatement in the enterprise; penal sanctions; administrative penalties; loss of registration as a contractor with the public authorities, etc. Finally, institutional machinery has been set up to supervise the effectiveness of the legislation on equality and to promote this legislation. This has enabled employers' and workers' organisations, alongside other bodies concerned, to take part in drafting and applying national policy. In many cases, this legislation and regulations have not reflected a general will but have preceded the changes they have contributed to bringing about Furthermore, the perception of discrimination has been strictly confined within and limited by legislation on equality. For instance, the recognition of the principle "equal pay for equal work" implies that discrimination only exists in the case of the same work, whereas the introduction of the concept of equal pay for work of equal value, i.e. of comparable worth, reveals new aspects of discrimination. (Endnote 27) 164. At a further stage, this movement for equality of opportunity began to turn upon actual practice, giving rise to the definition and implementation of affirmative action programmes. Once it had been generally acknowledged that an individual was entitled to equality of treatment irrespective of his or her race, sex or national extraction, efforts focused on changing practices throughout society and especially within the enterprise. In most cases, inequality in employment results from the fact that several categories of the population remain unaffected by improvements in job prospects or training, from which other categories have benefited. The policy of equality of opportunity involves making available to each and every one, without discrimination on the basis of race, colour, sex, national extraction, political opinion, religion and social origin, comparable means and prospects in training and activities. Affirmative action programmes call upon economic and social policy as a whole (Endnote 28) and extend far beyond the legal framework and regulations establishing them and enabling them to be carried out on the required scale. (Endnote 29) In some cases, social experiments are now being carried out to eliminate discrimination based on sex or national extraction; these take the form of pilot projects, (Endnote 30) the findings of which are studied in great detail before any decision to extend them and make these measures widespread is taken. In order to avoid a situation whereby prospects for equality of opportunity lose their edge or fade, it is even more vital that there should be a national policy to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation to eliminate all discrimination in this field. 165. Upon reading the available information, it would seem that many countries have adopted and applied measures aimed at certain groups of the population, such as women and ethnic minorities. Although these measures are indeed action to be considered within the scope of the Convention, they appear far too often to be set apart, limited and unrelated to a national policy of equality of opportunity and treatment. In their reports, governments mention the existence of general texts laying down basic guide-lines for social and economic development; however, these texts rarely attempt to integrate the role of the principle of equality without discrimination based on the grounds set forth in the Convention. (Endnote 31) Measures to promote the participation of certain groups or of women in development sometimes lack this orientation towards equality, thus undermining achievement of the very economic and social objectives upon which they appear over-concentrated. Affirmative action to correct de facto inequalities in training and employment 166. The adoption of an affirmative action programme stems from the observation that the banning of discrimination is not enough to eliminate it in actual practice. In Canada, the purpose of the Act respecting employment equity is "to correct the conditions of disadvantage in employment experienced by women, aboriginal peoples, persons with disabilities and persons who are, because of their race or colour, in a visible minority in Canada by giving effect to the principle that employment equity means more than treating persons in the same way but also requires special measures and the accommodation of differences". (Endnote 32) The concept of "positive action programme" encompasses measures which set out to eliminate and make good any de facto inequalities, thereby enabling members of groups suffering from discrimination to work in all sectors of activity and occupations and at all levels of responsibility. It incorporates the concept of affirmative action. (Endnote 33) The concept of "affirmative action" also differs from the concept of special measures of protection or assistance, laid down in Article 5, paragraph 2, of the Convention. This latter provision merely establishes that special measures of protection or assistance designed to protect various vulnerable groups or social functions are not deemed discrimination under the terms of the Convention; while the concept of "affirmative action" views these measures as the means to promote equality of opportunity of various social groups which are subject to discrimination. Measures of protection are established on a permanent basis (at least until such a time when technical development makes them redundant), whereas "affirmative action" should no longer be necessary as soon as the target social groups are in a position to exercise their rights to equality in practice. 167. Several countries have adopted provisions concerning affirmative action, thereby giving it a definition. In Australia, the Affirmative Action Act of 1986 (Endnote 34) provides that an affirmative action programme means a programme designed to ensure that appropriate action is taken to eliminate discrimination against women and to promote equal opportunity for women in regard to employment matters. In Belgium, a Royal Decree indicates that the aim of affirmative action is to redress de facto inequalities affecting women's opportunities. (Endnote 35) In a province of Canada, regulations stipulate that affirmative action programmes should redress the situation of those groups, including women, members of ethnic communities, disabled persons and indigenous peoples, who are subject to discrimination which is banned by law. (Endnote 36) In France, the Labour Code provides that a plan for equality in employment between men and women, which includes temporary measures directed only at women to make good any de facto inequalities affecting their prospects, may be negotiated in the undertaking. (Endnote 37) These definitions incorporate the basic characteristics of affirmative action: the elimination of discrimination, the promotion of equality of opportunity; and ways to ensure that the means to attain objectives are both timely and suitable. 168. Affirmative action programmes may be applied both in the public and private sector; however, the way in which they are applied in both sectors usually differs according to whether or not they are subject to the direct supervision of a national authority. (Endnote 38) They may be prompted by one or several parties concerned, by a recommendation of a body entrusted with applying the policy of equality or by a court ruling. It would seem that the success of these affirmative action programmes is very closely bound up with the dialogue between employers and workers, which must be as encompassing as possible in order to obtain the full support of all concerned. In this field, the bodies entrusted with promoting, applying and supervising these programmes have a vital role to play. (Endnote 39) Although some of these programmes have been established at the national -- even sometimes at the international -- level, (Endnote 40) the fact remains that, because of their very specific and practical nature, they are most effective within the enterprise. Most texts dealing with affirmative action programmes are backed up by regulations, guide-lines or information notes enabling those concerned to apply them as their framework and broad outlines are contained in law. As a general rule, affirmative action programmes contain four components: specific objectives as to the actual number of persons represented in the group covered by the programme; necessary measures to redress the effects of the discrimination noted; a timetable to attain the objectives set and apply measures planned to this effect; and supervisory machinery to monitor progress and assess the difficulties encountered in applying the programme, as well as to determine what adjustments should be made. 169. Most of the affirmative action programmes brought to the Committee's attention have been adopted to correct the effects of discrimination against women. Affirmative action programmes have also been directed at ethnic groups or disadvantaged groups (disabled workers, older workers). The wide range of social and economic situations, and by extension, the problems to be solved, determine the content of these programmes. The Committee has given several examples of affirmative action programmes in previous Chapters to illustrate the way in which several countries fulfil their obligations in application of the Convention. Other examples will be given in the following Section. They were selected on the basis of information available. In this respect, the Committee regretted to note that governments provided little information on practical measures taken to apply the principle of the Convention. (Endnote 41) Section 2: Measures to ensure the implementation of a national policy of equal opportunity and treatment 170. Article 3 of the Convention specifies some of the areas and means of action which must be covered by a national policy aimed at promoting equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation without discrimination on one of the grounds referred to in the Convention, in order to ensure that it is effectively applied. Under this Article, each State which has ratified the Convention undertakes, by methods appropriate to national conditions and practice, to discharge different kinds of obligations: on the one hand, obligations to take action, whether to repeal any statutory provisions and modify any administrative instructions or practices which are inconsistent with the policy of equality (Article 3(c)) (Endnote 42) or to pursue the policy in respect of employment under the direct control of a national authority (Article 3(d)) and in the vocational guidance, vocational training and placement services under the direction of a national authority (Article 3(e)); on the other hand, the State has an obligation as to means as regards the enactment of legislation and promotion of educational programmes designed to secure the acceptance and observance of the policy (Article 3(b)), and co-operation with employers and workers in promoting such acceptance and observance (Article 3(a)). The Recommendation specifies that each Member should also, where practicable and necessary, promote the observance of the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and vocational guidance, vocational training and placement services by encouraging its application in state, provincial or local government departments and in industries and undertakings operated under public ownership or control and by laying down conditions relating to such observance for eligibility for public contracts, grants and licences (Paragraph 3(b)). The Recommendation also provides for the establishment of appropriate agencies for the purpose of promoting general application of the policy of equality and, in particular, to take measures to inform the public, examine complaints and render opinions or issue decisions concerning the manner in which discriminatory practices revealed should be corrected (Paragraph 4). It also calls for continuing co-operation between the competent authorities, representatives of employers and workers and appropriate bodies to consider what further positive measures may be necessary in the light of national conditions to put the principle of the Convention into effect (Paragraph 9). 171. Before examining, in the following subsection, the application of the Convention to sectors under the direct control of a national authority and going on to consider ways in which the Convention can be applied more widely, one should recall here the role of legislation aimed at ensuring acceptance and observance of the policy of equality, which is most commonly expressed in such legislation. (Endnote 43) From the available information, it appears that the enactment of constitutional or legislative provisions or regulations on the subject has been, and still is, one of the most widely used means of encouraging acceptance and observance of national policy designed to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation. The number of texts adopted in a great many countries illustrates the importance of this occurrence, which should not be underestimated, although legislation may have focused to a greater extent, if not exclusively in certain cases, on certain grounds of discrimination. Article 3(b) of the Convention, in indicating that the State must, by methods appropriate to national conditions and practice, enact such legislation as may be calculated to secure the acceptance and observance of the policy defined in Article 2 of the Convention, does not impose a general obligation of legislating in all of the areas covered by the Convention. The State must enact legislation in cases where such intervention is an appropriate means of implementing national policy, taking into account national conditions and practice, but certain areas may be governed by other measures, such as collective agreements, which enable the principle to be satisfactorily applied without the need for legislative intervention. However, where rules are issued on a specific area covered by the Convention, the texts adopted should refer to the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment without discrimination on the grounds referred to in Article 1. Moreover, as regards the enactment of legislation, the Committee has rcalled above that, when provisions are adopted to give effect to the principle of the Convention, they should include all of the grounds of discrimination mentioned in Article 1 of the Convention. (Endnote 44) The scope of the provisions adopted varies considerably according to the nature of the text. Constitutional standards lay down general principles, the extent of whose application in practice varies considerably from one country to another. They may also provide for subsequent adoption of Acts designed to remedy particular forms of discrimination. (Endnote 45) Specific legislation adopted on the subject of discrimination often covers a number of grounds which are limited to sex or race. The problem of inadequate coverage arises in a different form in the case of labour codes or specific legislation on labour or employment which is limited in scope to salaried employees, who account for a proportion of the active population which varies considerably from one country to another, according to the country's level of economic development. Moreover, certain salaried employment, in particular in the public service and certain branches of activity such as the merchant navy, often lies outside the scope of labour codes, and no labour code can secure equality of opportunity and treatment under the terms of the Convention for self-employed occupations. (Endnote 46) However, inclusion in this type of legislation of provisions designed to apply the principle of equality would serve a dual purpose: on the one hand, it would make it possible to cover every aspect of employment (recruitment, working conditions, remuneration, dismissal, retirement, social security, etc.) and, on the other, by granting rights to all workers without distinction, such legislation would cover all of the grounds of discrimination referred to in the Convention. The contents of constitutions, legislation and regulations adopted have been examined in the relevant sections of the various Chapters of this Survey, and there is therefore no need to recall them here. Subsection 1: Application of the principle of the Convention to sectors under the direct control of a national authority Employment under the direct control of a national authority 172. The Committee has already highlighted the importance of the State's responsibility in pursuing a policy of equality of opportunity and treatment in respect of employment under its control. The use of the methods of direct application of this policy available to the State is one of the obligations laid down by the Convention. The extent of the sector covered by the category of employment under the direct control of a national authority may vary considerably: in some countries, only part of the public service would be under such control, while in others, most employment falls in this category. 173. Many countries refer in their reports to constitutional or statutory provisions under which equality of citizens with respect to public employment is established, without specifying the conditions in which they are applied in practice. These conditions are of prime importance as regards matters such as recruitment, promotion or dismissal, particularly to secure representation of minority groups characterised by their race, colour, national origin or language and to increase representation of women in all types of employment under the control of a national authority. According to the available information, affirmative action programmes have been adopted in several countries. Concern to increase the overall number of members of disadvantaged groups in the public service, which is the prerequisite for their participation in the latter, is often coupled with the desire to secure representation of members of these groups at all levels of the public service, including the higher levels. Consequently, affirmative action programmes focus not only on recruitment policy, but also on issues related to training in employment which, to a great extent, determine promotion policy. Such programmes have features in common, regardless of the category of persons targeted: the aim is to increase the representation of such persons and multiply their job opportunities; the programmes differ in their approach and scope. The examples given below illustrate the common features and differences. 174. In Canada, the Public Service Commission has drawn up and is carrying out a programme to promote the employment of native peoples and visible minorities, with the long-term objective of ensuring that they are equitably represented in proportion to their availability on the labour market. The various programmes aim, on the one hand, to further the employment of these groups, by promoting public service employment as a viable career choice and, on the other, to improve career development and training of new recruits and people already employed. (Endnote 47) In Australia, a systematic approach to the identification and elimination of institutional barriers to equal employment opportunity in statutory authorities under federal jurisdiction has been adopted in the form of an Act. (Endnote 48) Part II of the Act sets out the minimum contents of an equal opportunity programme: informing employees of the contents and results of the programme; appropriate staff to administer the programme; consultation with appropriate trade unions; consultation with employees, especially those in the designated groups; collection and recording of relevant job statistics; examination of policies and practices to identify discrimination or lack of equal employment opportunity, etc. This legislation applies to women and a number of designated groups, namely aborigines, Torres Strait Islanders, people with disabilities and migrants whose first language is not English. In the Netherlands, the Government drew up a policy in 1983 aimed at reducing inequality between minority groups and other groups in society and to improve opportunities for members of minority groups to obtain middle- and senior-level jobs. Measures have been adopted to improve access of such groups to public sector employment, in particular in posts where they have contact with the public. Under the terms of an agreement concluded in April 1986 between the Government and the most representative organisation of the ethnic minority of Moluccan origin, the Government expressed itself in favour of giving a fair share of jobs in the public service to ethnic minorities and of increasing access to public service employment for such groups. (Endnote 49) In New Zealand, the Government has stated that programmes have been drawn up with a view to increasing the number of Maoris and Pacific Islanders and to improve access of these groups to senior positions. In Sweden, affirmative action with regard to women is governed by agreements on equal opportunity in the public sector concluded between the National Agency for Government Employers and trade union organisations. In the Philippines, a Letter of Instructions enjoins all ministries, offices, agencies, local governments and government-owned and -controlled corporations to take affirmative steps for the promotion, regardless of sex, of equality of employment. It suggests that qualified women be appointed or recommended for appointment to local or national positions with planning, policy and decision-making functions. (Endnote 50) In the Federal Republic of Germany, a Directive adopted in 1986 provides, inter alia, for measures to increase opportunities for recruitment of women in sectors where they are under-represented and to improve their opportunities of career development and promotion. (Endnote 51) In Austria, plans of action have been carried out in administrations as regards hours of work, training courses, recruitment, promotion and job classification under a programme for the promotion of women in the federal public service, targeted indiscriminately at men and women public servants in the lower categories where there is a high proportion of women, based on the idea that any measure for the improvement of working conditions of staff in these categories will have a direct and immediate effect on women. (Endnote 52) 175. In a number of countries, the existence of a more or less extensive public sector or the absence of a private sector may add to the State's responsibilities as regards application of national policy. One of the main objectives laid down in the guide-lines for the economic and social development of the USSR for the period 1986-90 is the improvement of working conditions for women. (Endnote 53) Measures are being adopted to create special working conditions for women which are more favourable than those for men as regards work schedules and hours of work, taking into account family responsibilities in general and the upbringing of children, particularly infants. In addition, the social development plans of the enterprises set forth the tasks for the improvement of the working and living conditions of women in the light of local possibilities. Nation-wide measures for the improvement of the conditions for the participation of women in public production, the conditions for the development of women themselves and their children are supplemented by relevant measures adopted at the local level. (Endnote 54) In Poland, the Council of Ministers has issued a programme of action to improve the socio-occupational status and living conditions of women, covering 22 economic sectors and to be implemented from 1987 to 1990. (Endnote 55) In other countries, affirmative action programmes are viewed as essential elements of human resource management within the enterprise and of productivity improvement. (Endnote 56) 176. The economic difficulties encountered in some countries have, in certain cases, entailed reductions in the resources allocated to such affirmative action programmes, which have a detrimental effect on the achievement of equality of opportunity for the persons concerned and reinforce existing discrimination. (Endnote 57) The Committee has already emphasised that pursuing a policy of equality of opportunity in public sector employment is of particular importance "as an instrument for promotion and integration, and may open the way to all other measures. It has an outstanding role to play in setting an example; ... At the same time, public employment constitutes an area in which the problems of discrimination arise in a particularly sensitive manner; inequality is felt here much more, since the attitude of the State itself, through its representatives, is in question". (Endnote 58) The credibility of a policy of equality of opportunity in the eyes of the public depends to a great extent on whether such a policy is applied in the public sector. Employment for the performance of public contracts 177. The performance of public contracts is an area in which the public authorities may have means of directly influencing employment practices. (Endnote 59) The legislation of several countries contains provisions to the effect that clauses relating to equality of opportunity and treatment should be included in public contracts. (Endnote 60) The Committee considers that the possibility of resort to this method of application of the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment should be given careful examination in other countries and that information should be provided in this regard. A Federal Contractors' Programme was set up by the Federal Government of Canada in 1986 under the Employment Equity Act. Companies employing 100 persons or more and who wish to bid on contracts amounting to a certain sum to supply goods and services to the Federal Government are required to commit themselves to implement employment equity and to certify this commitment as a condition of their bid. The terms and conditions of this commitment include several criteria such as the establishment of the goals for the hiring and promotion of designated group members, (Endnote 61) the elimination of policies or practices that hinder designated group members, and the adoption of special measures to ensure that the goals are achieved. Such enterprises may be subject to on-site compliance reviews and, if failures to implement employment equity are observed, sanctions will be applied, including the eventual exclusion of the employer from future government business. Training and vocational guidance 178. In requests addressed directly to several countries, the Committee asked governments to state what measures have been adopted to ensure that the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment laid down in general and sometimes restrictive terms in their constitutions is applied in practice, and whether such application takes the form of specific provisions in legislation or regulations, or is carried out through administrative measures or under court supervision. Several countries stated that the policy of equality of opportunity and treatment in training was being applied through the provision of universal and free primary education and free technical and vocational education, as well as assistance towards pursuing studies and acquiring occupational qualifications, (Endnote 62) including training in employment. In other countries, emphasis is placed on measures to supplement overall training policy. A number of developing countries have limited resources for training, which, in practice, constitutes a barrier to equality of opportunity for the entire population. where there are not sufficient resources to set up or maintain a system of universal education adequate to cover the needs of pupils of both sexes, only a minority has the opportunity of achieving the necessary educational level for admission to vocational training. Such difficulties may be, to a fairly large extent, palliated by literacy programmes aimed at certain population groups, but the resources for vocational training are also limited, making it impossible to cover all of the persons with potential ability. In these conditions, it is necessary to have a system of selection, from which it is essential that care be taken to eliminate any discrimination by basing such selection exclusively on an objective assessment of candidates' abilities and knowledge. 179. Training is the key to promotion of equality of opportunity. The Committee has stated above that any discrimination in access to training will be perpetuated and intensified at the later stage of employment and occupation. In its previous General Surveys on the application of the 1958 instruments, the Committee emphasised the large number of measures taken in most countries with a view to promoting, in law and in practice, the access to training of members of disadvantaged groups. The available information always indicates that efforts are being made to this end, but the Committee notes that in countries affected by economic difficulties, training programmes are reduced or even abandoned for lack of resources. It is likely that members of disadvantaged groups are the first to be affected by such restrictions. Bearing in mind that training is a form of economic investment in future productivity, the consequence of such a reduction of resources will be to deprive society as a whole of a considerable growth potential. Observance of the policy of equality of opportunity and training is not a superfluous element whose elimination would only result in budget savings, but a means of securing full participation of the entire population, without exception, in economic activity. 180. Affirmative action undertaken in this respect is partly aimed at increasing the participation of members of disadvantaged groups in training activities in general, and usually means increasing the number of participants from such groups. As a result, school attendance of girls is increasing in many countries. However, when looking at the overall figures, care must be taken to examine the differences which may exist in the attendance rate of girls, for example between rural and urban areas, or the drop-out rate of girls. In this respect, the Committee recalls that universal compulsory and free primary education is one of the cornerstones of a policy of equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation. (Endnote 63) In some cases, mechanisms will be set up to allocate places according to a quota system or reserving them for members of disadvantaged groups. Affirmative action may consist of raising the occupational qualifications of members of disadvantaged groups with a view to improving their chances of promotion or remedying various forms of occupational segregation which they may be subject to. 181. Preference may be given to members of ethnic minorities in admission to schools and colleges. In India, a wide range of measures has been set up, including grants, subsidised meals, places in university accommodation and the construction of schools for children of scheduled castes and tribes. The Government has stated that the national education policy adopted in 1986 and the plan for its implementation aim to treat members of scheduled castes and tribes on an equal footing with other members of the population at all stages and levels of the programmes. In particular, at least 75 per cent of children aged from 11 to 14 will attend school until they reach the educational level necessary for admission to higher education; in order to achieve this, authorities must take action by encouraging families to send their children to school, by recruiting teachers from scheduled castes and tribes, by adapting curricula to the interests of such tribes and by printing textbooks in vernacular languages. While it is usually for the state concerned to determine measures for the promotion of training of scheduled castes and tribes, the central Government plays an important role by adopting directives and incentive measures. A programme subsidised by the central Government has been included in the Seventh Plan (1985-90) with a view to increasing the capacity of industrial training institutes in the areas with the highest concentration of minorities in ten states. In Spain, projects in support of the marginalised population, which includes a large number of gipsies, have been set up under the Royal Decree on compensatory education, which provides for the allocation of funds and personnel for especially underprivileged sectors of the population. (Endnote 64) These projects comprise a number of different aspects: schooling at district public establishments for children who previously attended centres operated by the National Secretariat for Gipsies; locating and enrolling children who are not attending school; providing support personnel and material resources to reinforce the schools attended by children from the marginalised population; creating vocational classes for children aged 14 to 15 who are not attending school; training of teachers; and concluding agreements with various associations to examine particular situations as regards the gipsy population and to work out specific educational projects. (Endnote 65) In Brazil, with a view to giving the same opportunities to candidates from all social backgrounds, measures have been proposed for a more democratic access to higher education (grant of scholarships, evening courses and other non-traditional approaches to education). (Endnote 66) 182. In a great many countries, emphasis is being placed on equality between women and men in education and training and measures are being adopted to secure equality in primary, secondary and higher educational establishments. Such equality in education and training involves changing programmes and educational materials and methods to promote a positive attitude towards women's aspirations and abilities, and taking measures to provide women with fair access to education and training and with ancillary services such as child care. (Endnote 67) In some countries, particular attention is given to young women seeking their first job and to women who stopped working for some time, for example to look after their children, and who wish to return to work and need to refresh their occupational knowledge. 183. In the USSR, ministries and departments fix annual targets for the enterprises and organisations subordinate to them, relating to vocational training and improvement of skills of women workers. The trade union bodies have set up procedures to supervise the application of such measures and to raise the level of vocational training of women workers and the general education level of women in the work collectives. Since 1979, the annual targets for training and improvement of skills of workers set by enterprises include special measures for women. Improvement of skills or retraining may take place at the woman's own initiative or be suggested by the management or the trade union, taking her wishes into account. (Endnote 68) 184. Measures have been adopted in different countries to correct situations of sex-based occupational segregation in training. (Endnote 69) Thus, in Niger, the Vocational Training and Further Training Centre has been opened to female students, which was not the case up to 1984, since the trades in which it provides training (carpentry, electricity, welding, mechanics, etc.) have, because of prejudice and tradition, been considered to be exclusively male occupations. (Endnote 70) In Algeria, the implementation of the educational reform and the efforts made by the Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training to ensure that girls are not limited to training for traditionally female occupations (sewing, secretarial work, paramedical occupations, administration, teaching, etc.) has broadened the range of careers and vocational training trades, which should increase from 13 in 1980 to 41 at the end of the 1985-89 Plan. In India, a working group set up by the Planning Commission to discuss issues relating to science and technology for women has noted the constraints on girls wishing to embark on a scientific career and proposed a series of practical measures to encourage them to take up such careers. (Endnote 71) In Luxembourg, training in welding has been organised for unskilled women aged under 25. (Endnote 72) In Hungary, the Government has initiated various measures in education, training and vocational guidance with a view to remedying the occupational imbalance affecting women, in particular by information campaigns, improvement of vocational guidance for boys and girls in the last year of compulsory education as well as for students approaching high-school or university graduation, support for women choosing new trades and by a more up-to-date approach to specialised training with a view to achieving radical changes in the pattern of female employment. (Endnote 73) In Cyprus, the Government stated that vocational training programmes were being organised and carried out in order to attract women workers to occupations which have traditionally belonged to men. (Endnote 74) In Jamaica, the Women's Bureau has made an effort to promote vocational training of women in branches of activity where they are not traditionally employed. In Guyana, training courses have been implemented to enable women to acquire skills other than traditional ones. The same applies to members of disadvantaged groups. Taking into account the need to broaden training opportunities for girls is a first step in carrying out affirmative action for the practical application of the policy of equality of opportunity and treatment without discrimination. It is not, however, sufficient. In Sri Lanka, the number of girls attending technical and vocational training courses increased to 27 per cent in 1984. This quantitative increase was coupled with an occupational diversification, since the largest female enrolments in 1978 were in commercial education, but this figure was exceeded in 1984 by attendance in training programmes in industrial and similar activities, which more than doubled from 1978 to 1984. (Endnote 75) In France, a survey has shown that only a limited number of young girls are attracted to industrial technical training in new technologies; the proportion of girls is under 5 per cent in training for the senior technician's certificate in industrial data-processing, electronics or automated mechanics and 8 per cent in university courses in mechanical or electrical engineering. (Endnote 76) New technologies do not themselves affect the "male" image of factory jobs. In its Medium-Term Programme on equal opportunities for women, the European Economic Community emphasised that the introduction and extension of new technologies could be a historic opportunity for women, but also involve the risk, in present conditions, of increased occupational segregation to the disadvantage of women. This risk stems partly from inadequate training, often due to the low interest in the area mainly because of traditional views about the roles of men and women, and partly from the fact that the latter are generally employed in the positions which are most likely to change in content or be phased out. (Endnote 77) Subsection 2. Co-operation of employers' and workers' organisations and other appropriate bodies in promoting the acceptance and observance of the national policy 185. In prescribing that Members should "seek the co-operation of employers' and workers' organisations and other appropriate bodies in promoting the acceptance and observance" of the national policy, the Convention (Article 3(a)) emphasises the necessity for active co-operation with these organisations. (Endnote 78) Co-operation with employers' and workers' organisations is, in general, aimed at in several respects and first of all for the preparation (Endnote 79) and monitoring of the application of measures adopted within the framework of the national policy referred to in Article 2 of the Convention. Secondly, at the level of the branch of activity, the undertaking or the establishment, their action is essential to the application in workplaces of the principles of the Convention. Furthermore, it is worth recalling that according to the Recommendation (Paragraph 2(f)), "Employers' and workers' organisations should not practise or countenance discrimination in respect of admission, retention of membership or participation in their affairs". (Endnote 80) Acceptance and observance of the policy of equality of opportunity and treatment should be reflected in promotional activities on behalf of women and disadvantaged minorities within the employers' and workers' organisations themselves. 186. By using the term "co-operation", which evokes the idea of work performed jointly, the 1958 instruments go beyond the requirement of consultation of employers' and workers' organisations. (Endnote 81) The extent of this co-operation will depend on the characteristics of the industrial relations systems in the various countries and the degree of involvement of employers' and workers' organisations in existing machinery. It must allow for the positions of the various parties (Endnote 82) in respect of the areas covered by the Convention (guide-lines and options for schooling and vocational training, rules and operation of placement services, discrimination-free active employment policy, etc.) to be taken into consideration. This co-operation may proceed from the representation of employers and workers on various bodies responsible for preventing discrimination, and for the promotion, application and enforcement of the policy of equality of opportunity and treatment dealt with in Subsection 3 below. Bodies of this kind also provide an opportunity for governments, employers and workers to co-operate with other bodies such as those which represent the interests of certain categories of persons defined by characteristics such as race, colour, sex, religion, etc. or civic organisations for the defence of human rights. 187. Collective agreements are one of the areas where the outcome of the co-operation with employers' and workers' organisations should be clearly apparent when it comes to applying national policy. As the Recommendation states, the parties should ensure "that collective agreements contain no provisions of a discriminatory character in respect of access to, training for, advancement in or retention of employment or in respect of the terms and conditions of employment". (Endnote 83) In Peru, the Ministry of Labour is entrusted with encouraging the parties to take part in collective bargaining "by facilitating conciliation, mediation and arbitration and the institution of standards and procedures for resolving labour disputes so as to guarantee equality of treatment and of assistance". (Endnote 84) Some collective agreements have clauses stipulating that sex, race, political opinion, religious beliefs or trade union membership may not be taken into consideration. (Endnote 85) In Tunisia, the Government has stated in its report that all collective agreements now in force establish the principle of equality between men and women in respect of remuneration and everything connected with conditions of employment. In Belgium, a collective agreement reached in December 1982 within the National Labour Council provides that the recruitment and selection of workers may not involve discrimination based on age, sex, marital status, medical history, nationality, political or philosophical beliefs, membership in a trade union organisation or any other organisation. Some agreements thus include a wider range of grounds of discrimination than those prescribed in Article 1, paragraph 1(a), of the Convention. 188. The degree of protection against discriminatory clauses that might be included in collective agreements or in works agreements varies according to the country. Generally, collective agreements may not contain provisions that are less favourable than those laid down in labour laws and regulations and may not contravene legislative provisions or regulations concerning public order. In a number of countries the law provides for collective agreements to be registered with or approved by the competent authority, which makes it possible to keep a check on the legality of the provisions contained therein in so far as the positive law of the country has standards prohibiting discrimination. In Swaziland, the Labour Court may refuse to register a collective agreement which entails discrimination based on one of the grounds set out in sections 29 and 35 of the 1980 Employment Act (race, colour, religion, marital status, sex, national origin, tribal or clan extraction, political affiliation or social status). (Endnote 86) In many countries, legislative provisions make it possible to extend the effects of a collective agreement, which originally bound only the employers and workers represented by the parties which had negotiated it, to all employers and workers in a particular branch of activity or a certain region, or to both. (Endnote 87) In order to be extended, the collective agreements must contain provisions on equality of opportunity and treatment (Endnote 88) or on equality of remuneration. (Endnote 89) It is sometimes specified that parties to negotiations must act fairly and without discrimination (Endnote 90) and they may incur liability if they do not do so. In many countries the law stipulates that provisions in individual and collective agreements that would result in establishing discrimination are null and void. (Endnote 91) In some cases the nullity is extended to works rules which have not always been negotiated. (Endnote 92) In France, the Labour Code stipulates that the internal rules of an undertaking may not include provisions that are prejudicia to employees in their work on the grounds of their sex, habits, family situation, origin, opinions or beliefs or handicap. (Endnote 93) In some countries the importance of the joint contribution of the parties to the collective negotiation of agreements free from discrimination has raised the issue of the liability of the signatory organisations to agreements that introduce or maintain discriminatory practices. (Endnote 94) Under some provisions, it is a discriminatory or unfair practice for an employers' organisation and/or a workers' organisation to establish or pursue a policy or practice or to enter into an agreement affecting conditions of employment that deprives an individual or a class of individuals of any employment opportunities on prohibited grounds. (Endnote 95) 189. It is apparent from the information available that the influence of laws and regulations on equality has in many cases helped to eliminate provisions establishing direct discrimination that were included in collective agreements. In Austria, a study by the Ministry of Labour on the effects of the Equality Act has shown the extent to which the provisions establishing discrimination in employment between men and women have been eliminated from collective agreements. (Endnote 96) But the latter may also contain provisions which, though seemingly neutral, result in indirect discrimination against women or members of disadvantaged groups. (Endnote 97) A study undertaken in France has shed light on two positive points: clauses on occupational equality have been introduced into most new agreements and certain provisions which had discriminatory effects have been removed. The conclusion of the study, however, recalled that in using and sometimes supplementing provisions of the Labour Code in fields such as the right to organise, representative staff institutions, annual leave and the consequences of compulsory national service on the contract of employment, collective agreements have served as "information transmitters" -- though they have not yet done so in respect of occupational equality. (Endnote 98) In Sweden, an initial agreement on equality reached in 1977 between the Swedish Employers' Confederation (SAF), the Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and the Federation of Salaried Employees in Industry and Services (PTK) was revised in the light of the Equality Act in 1983. The Equal Opportunities Agreement of 3 March 1983 includes among its aims equality of opportunity between men and women at work. (Endnote 99) Several branch agreements are based largely on this general agreement. The measures adopted to promote equality are part of a series of other measures and machinery aimed at obstacles outside the labour market but which prevent women and members of disadvantaged groups from having access to it or which keep them in subordinate positions. In this connection, to appreciate the extent of the policy of equality of opportunity and treatment that has been undertaken, mention should be made of the role played in this policy by parental leave, measures in respect of child minding and child care and the reform of curricula. In Norway, the Confederation of Trade Unions in Norway (LO) and the Norwegian Employers' Confederation (NAF) have reached a framework agreement providing that all workers, without distinction based on sex, shall have equal opportunity in respect of employment and training. They are to enjoy equal treatment in respect of recruitment, remuneration, retraining and promotion. Following this agreement, local employers' and workers' organisations reached agreements making provision for action programmes. In Italy, at 1 June 1987, 26 national collective agreements covering 7,803,400 employees, of whom 3,187,050 were women, included clauses providing for affirmative action to remedy past discrimination and to promote equality of opportunity between men and women. In several sectors of activity (commerce, textiles) provision has been made for joint committees to experiment with affirmative action programmes and to see whether te projects negotiated at the level of the undertaking correspond to the criteria set out in the collective agreement. (Endnote 100) 190. Application of the principle of equality and implementation of programmes involving affirmative measures in the undertaking have in some countries led to the adoption of measures conferring a specific competence in this area on the bodies which represent the staff. In the Netherlands the works councils maintain a general watch to prevent discrimination in the undertaking and to promote equality of treatment between men and women. (Endnote 101) In China, under new regulations adopted by the All-China Federation of Trade Unions, all local trade unions are to form women's committees (as a part of the trade union committees) to fight sexual discrimination and to protect women's rights. (Endnote 102) The objective of these committees is to secure the same treatment for women as for men in education, employment and family role and to encourage women to play a more active part in social affairs. In France employers must submit a written report to the works council or, where there is no works council, to the employees' representatives on the comparative situation of general conditions of employment and training for men and women in the undertaking. This report, which may be modified to take account of the views of the works council, is then passed on to the labour inspectorate and made available to any employee upon request. (Endnote 103) State financial assistance is provided in certain cases in the form of an occupational equality contract. (Endnote 104) 191. In several countries collective bargaining in the undertaking has led to the adoption of affirmative action plans or programmes whose general characteristics are similar to those of the programmes implemented in the public service. (Endnote 105) In some countries these programmes can be negotiated between the parties or imposed by the courts following complaints lodged by workers' organisations (Endnote 106) or by the bodies responsible for applying the policy of equality. (Endnote 107) In the latter case co-operation with employers' and workers' organisations will sometimes be very limited or even non-existent. The harmonising and reconciling of two bodies of laws and traditions which differ considerably -- on the one hand, labour legislation and bargaining between employers and workers and, on the other hand, general anti-discrimination legislation whose application is a matter for government agencies -- will come about only through co-operation with employers' and workers' organisations. Consequently the Committee considers that particular attention should be given to the arrangements for the participation of employers' and workers' organisations in the deliberations of the government agencies and bodies set up to ensure the promotion, application and supervision of policies for equality of opportunity and treatment. 192. To the extent that employers' and workers' organisations have a major role in negotiating measures to promote equality, the question arises of the place and role in the trade unions of women members and members from disadvantaged groups. As regards women, obstacles to their participation in the activities of workers' organisations are well known: the lack of child-minding services, difficulties resulting from the timing of meetings for mothers -- or fathers -- who assume the burden of family responsibilities, lack of confidence in their capacities on the part of persons who have not yet been able to exercise these capacities, sexist attitudes on the part of certain male trade unionists, social stereotypes in respect of women and their domestic responsibilities all combine to impede their participation. Some unions have adopted policies and practices with a view to strengthening the position of women in the unions. In the United Kingdom the Trades Union Congress has issued a guide on affirmative action programmes dealing with programmes within trade union structures. The Swedish Union of Clerical and Technical Employees in Industry has, since 1981, adopted a programme to promote equality for the period up to 1987. Following a survey on the promotion of equal opportunities promotion carried out among 63 branch unions, a working programme for the promotion and evaluation of equality of opportunity was presented to the Union's Congress. The Australian Council of Trade Unions has published a training manual on affirmative action which states that if inequality in the unions is to be got rid of, a policy of equality will have to be followed and there will have to be willingness to take action. The following measures are suggested: evaluation of the number of women members and of women's participation at the various levels of representation and trade union management; examination of internal structures to pinpoint obstacles to broader female participation in trade union activities; remedial action (extra seats reserved for women on the executive bodies of sectors in which their participation is weak compared with that of the number of women members, setting up of women's committees or committees on equality of treatment with direct access to decision-making bodies, recruitment of women for permanent trade union positions, verification during elections that the list of candidates reflects the structure of the organisation's members); "positive discrimination" in favour of women for participation in trade union training courses; inclusion of questions of equality of opportunity and treatment in trade union courses. Furthermore the unions should make sure that their own employment practices are not discriminatory and organise their activities, meetings and training courses at times likely to suit women. At the international level, the programme of action of the International Confederation of Free Trade Unions (ICFTU) for the integration of women in trade unions was launched following the Fourth World Conference on Women organised by the ICFTU in April 1985. The programme makes provision for positive measures that should strengthen women's position in trade unions. Subsection 3: Means of promotion and enforcement A. General machinery for prevention, application and supervision Administrative structures 193. Most governments indicated in their reports that the application and supervision of the principles of non-discrimination and equality of opportunity and treatment fall under the competence of labour authorities such as the Ministry of Labour, the employment office (Endnote 108) and the labour inspection service. (Endnote 109) Specifically, as regards the labour inspectorate, the supervision of the application of provisions concerning equal treatment is usually entrusted to inspectors who are generally responsible for ensuring the observance of labour legislation. (Endnote 110) Elsewhere, supervisory tasks are assigned to specialised services within the labour inspectorate. (Endnote 111) These inspectors often enjoy broad powers as regards access to premises and the inspection of files. (Endnote 112) The actions of labour inspectors within the framework of their supervisory function run the risk of being completely ineffective if employers and workers are not fully aware of their reciprocal rights and obligations and, especially if they are not convinced of the usefulness of applicable legislation. For this reason, Article 3, paragraph 1(b) of the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), and Article 6, paragraph 1(b) of the Labour Inspection (Agriculture) Convention, 1969 (No. 129) provide that the labour inspection system shall "supply technical information and advice to employers and workers concerning the most effective means of complying with the legal provisions". The advice and information furnished by labour inspectors is often aimed at informing employers and workers of the existence of legal provisions in force, providing explanations on their meaning and scope, and suggesting the best way of giving effect to these provisions. The supervisory and advisory functions reinforce and complement each other to the extent that both tend to promote the effective application of legal provisions for the protection of workers. It is thus especially important that labour inspectors be properly trained as regards questions concerning equality of opportunity and treatment, and be well versed in the corresponding provisions, so that they may offer pertinet advice and information in this area. Nevertheless, the Committee must note that very little information was received from governments on the specific action of labour inspectors in the effective application of provisions concerning equality. This lack of information on the role of labour inspectors and their efforts to obtain the observance of provisions concerning equality may be explained, in part, as the Committee has already noted in previous General Surveys, by the lack of human and physical resources needed to maintain suitable inspection services. (Endnote 113) Many inspection services are overworked, or lack qualified, trained and experienced staff to handle questions of equality and discrimination in employment and occupation. In this connection, the Committee notes that certain governments have taken initiatives with a view to reinforcing the action of the labour inspectorate, by training inspectors in matters concerning equality, recruiting specialised staff, and strengthening the participation of workers' representatives in the process of inspection. In particular, it notes that certain countries have adopted texts which expressly call for a co-ordination between the labour inspectorate and specialised agencies responsible for questions of equality. (Endnote 114) In Italy, regional commissions may undertake investigations within enterprises to verify that the principles of equality between men and women, established by the Act of 1977 on equality, are being observed; in carrying out this task the regional commissions collaborate with the labour inspection services. (Endnote 115) In addition to problems concerning the functioning of the labour inspectorate, there is also the question of its competence in cases regarding equality of treatment in employment, and especially in access to training and education; for this reason, it is useful to establish specialised agencies to monitor the application of the principles of Convention No. 111 in these particular areas. 194. Where there are specialised agencies to deal with questions of equal treatment, the Committee considers that measures to co-ordinate the work of these agencies and that of the labour administration, the public placement offices and the labour inspectorate should be given full consideration. It would seem appropriate to ensure co-ordination between agencies dealing at the national or regional level and the labour inspectorate, which acts at the level of the enterprise. Policies aimed at promoting equal opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation are usually made at the national level, but they are applied within the enterprise, among other places. Moreover, co-ordination between specialised agencies and authorities responsible for training and education may well contribute to a better understanding and more judicious application of the principles laid down in the Convention. Bodies for the representation of staff 195. Trade unions, workers' representatives and works councils, as well as joint advisory committees, must play a role in the application and promotion of equal opportunity and treatment. (Endnote 116) The Committee considers that a greater awareness on the part of workers' representatives concerning problems of equal opportunity and treatment within the framework of their general mission of representing the interests of workers, coupled with a more effective use of information concerning equal opportunity and treatment, would tend to provide a favourable impetus to the implementation of the right to equality. (Endnote 117) In this context, the collaboration of workers' representatives with the labour inspectorate, with a view to reinforcing the efforts of the latter, would acquire its full meaning. B. Specialised bodies to promote, enforce and supervise equality and prevent discrimination 196. Paragraph 4 of Recommendation No. 111 stipulates that appropriate agencies, assisted where practicable by advisory committees composed of representatives of employers' and workers' organisations, and other interested bodies, should be established for the purpose of promoting application of national policy of non-discrimination in all fields of public and private employment. These agencies should be able to take all practicable measures to foster public understanding and acceptance of the principles of non-discrimination; they should receive, examine and investigate complaints that the national policy to promote equality of opportunity and treatment is not being observed and, if necessary, by conciliation, secure the correction of any practices regarded as being in conflict with the policy; and consider further any complaints which cannot be effectively settled by conciliation and render opinions or issue decisions concerning the manner in which discriminatory practices revealed should be corrected. The Committee also notes that the International Labour Conference, in the resolution it adopted at its 71st Session, (Endnote 118) advocated the establishment of national tripartite machinery on the status of women workers and the strengthening of national equal opportunity bodies to stimulate action aimed at promoting equality of opportunity and treatment for women in economic and social life. 197. Since the last General Survey on the instruments under discussion, a growing number of countries have set up specialised structures to promote and apply the principles and policy of non-discrimination and equality of opportunity and treatment. These structures vary considerably as to the way in which they have been established, the area they cover, their composition, competence and functions. With all their diversity, (Endnote 119) they all reveal a growing awareness of the problems of discrimination in employment and occupation and the use and need of individual structures to better identify and cope with the problems involved. 198. Many specialised bodies had been set up under legal provisions, for instance within the framework of legislation on either racial equality or equality between men and women. (Endnote 120) Others have been established by decree or regulations. (Endnote 121) However, these bodies are sometimes set up by ministerial decision, especially when they operate at the level of one or more ministries. (Endnote 122) When a specialised agency is established under an order of the executive authorities, it is able, if need be, to adjust quickly to new conditions; however, if it is set up under legislation, it has the advantage of being more independent and established on a more permanent basis. What is more, since powers to enact and supervise legislation and national policy on equality of opportunity and treatment are often conferred upon bodies established by law, their scope for action is accordingly strengthened. 199. Some specialised agencies operate at the governmental or ministerial level: for instance, in several countries, competent ministries have been set up for specific population groups (Endnote 123) or ministers have been appointed especially to deal with equality issues. (Endnote 124) By setting up a Ministry or appointing a Minister with authority to promote equality of opportunity and treatment of various population groups, it is possible to identify and resolve problems at a high political level where decisions are more likely to be implemented and applied. 200. In some cases, specialised agencies from part of the administration, such as a department, division, board or service under the general supervision of a Ministry, (Endnote 125) or operate at the inter-ministerial level. (Endnote 126) Since these agencies are incorporated into governmental or administrative structures, they benefit from the administrative facilities and means these structures possess. 201. Many specialised agencies have the status of a committee, commission or advisory council under various ministries or legislative bodies. (Endnote 127) The International Labour Conference has considered that such bodies should be placed at a level that enables them effectively to monitor achievements and, where necessary, to influence or stimulate the initiation of relevant programmes in other parts of the government administration. (Endnote 128) 202. Some specialised agencies are collegial bodies made up of members who are often chosen by the executive authorities but enjoy independence under the law; some of them report to the legislative bodies on a regular basis. These are mostly specialised bodies with powers to enact and supervise provisions and principles of equality of opportunity and treatment. Examples of this type of agency include the Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission in Australia, the Human Rights Commission in Canada, (Endnote 129) the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in the United States, (Endnote 130) the Human Rights Commission and Race Relations Conciliator in New Zealand, the Equal Opportunities Commission and the Commission for Racial Equality in the United Kingdom. In countries with a federal structure, specialised bodies have been set up at state level; similar powers to those of bodies at the federal level are often vested in their members, as is the case in Australia, (Endnote 131) Canada, (Endnote 132) and the United States. (Endnote 133) 203. These specialised agencies sometimes include representatives of employers' and workers' organisations. (Endnote 134) The Committee would like to stress once again how important it is that employers' and workers' representatives should participate in the drafting and implementation of equality of treatment and opportunity policies. This not only contributes to placing equality policies in the overall perspective of development and employment policies, but also helps to make workers and employers, as well as their representatives, more aware of problems of discrimination in employment and occupation. In its above-mentioned resolution, (Endnote 135) the International Labour Conference stated that bodies should provide a mechanism for systematic consultation with employers' and workers' organisations. Some of these bodies also include experts in the field of equality or representatives of the categories of persons to be protected. (Endnote 136) By co-operating with these agencies, experts on equality can make people more aware and help them have a better grasp of discrimination problems, whilst also providing vital expertise to overcome issues that are often complex. Competence and functions 204. Some specialised agencies have general ratione personae competence; (Endnote 137) others are responsible for promoting equality of opportunity and treatment of specific population groups such as women, (Endnote 138) ethnic minorities (including indigenous populations) and religious minorities, (Endnote 139), the disabled, etc. Other agencies, on the other hand, have general ratione materiae competence covering protection against discrimination in employment and occupation, while still others deal specifically with matters relating to equality of treatment and opportunity in employment and occupation. (Endnote 140) Some agencies deal more specifically with public sector employment. (Endnote 141) 205. While a policy designed to promote equality of opportunity and treatment constitutes a whole, it is essential to achieve diversity in the approaches and measures adopted according to the problems to be solved. In some countries, the variety of measures needed to combat discrimination is reflected in the increasing number of agencies dealing with different aspects of equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation: educational campaigns, particularly for employers and workers, promotional activities, co-ordination of activities of government agencies in matters relating to equality, review of draft legislation and regulations and checking conformity of legislation in force with the principle of equality in employment and occupation, investigation of complaints of discrimination. The wide variety of agencies is also a reflection of the fact that the elimination of discrimination on certain grounds, such as race, sex and religion, calls for special measures. Co-ordination between these bodies as provided for in Paragraph 9 of the Recommendation is one of the aspects which must be seriously envisaged by the national policy referred to in Article 2 of the Convention. Consultation and promotion 206. Most of the specialised agencies essentially have consultative and promotional status, and their main functions are to promote equality of treatment and opportunity by carrying out studies, surveys and information activities, by assisting persons who are discriminated against, and by co-operating with or co-ordinating activities of non-governmental or governmental organisations. They are concerned with informing the public on matters relating to equality, mainly by organising seminars, meetings and consultative services, and by publishing periodical reports, studies and bulletins. These agencies may be involved in formulating and implementing preferential or affirmative action policies or participate in special development policies set up for certain population groups who are considered to be disadvantaged. It is not possible within the scope of this Survey to give more than an illustrative description of the functions of some of these agencies, to show how they contribute to the implementation of the national policy of equality of opportunity and treatment or of certain aspects of such a policy. 207. As regards equality between men and women, in Belgium, for example, it is the duty of the Commission for the Employment of Women, either at its own initiative or at the request of the Minister of Labour, to render opinions, carry out surveys or submit proposals for legislation or regulations in all matters directly or indirectly involving the work of women; (Endnote 142) in China, the women's committees set up within the local trade union committees participate in enterprise management, mainly in order to ensure that women are given the same treatment as men in education and employment and as regards their role in the family, and to encourage them to participate more actively in social life. They are involved in formulating and implementing policy and legislation in areas affecting women's interests; (Endnote 143) among the duties assigned to the General Department for Women's Affairs in Egypt is the formulation of a policy for the development of Egyptian women and of plans and programmes for the protection of women and their integration in development; (Endnote 144) in Ecuador, the National Council for Women (Endnote 145) is responsible for proposing policies, co-ordinating activities for the promotion of women in the public and private sectors, supporting the activities of the Women's Bureau, and gathering information on plans and programmes for the promotion of women; in Malawi, the National Committee on Women's Employment has undertaken a study on different aspects of the role of women in society, on topics such as women and employment, women and development and women in agriculture; in Poland, the Office of Plenipotentiary for Women's Affairs is responsible for co-ordinating the activity of all quasi-governmental organisations involved in the advancement of women; it carries out activities aimed at improving the living conditions for women. (Endnote 146) 208. Some agencies are involved in the promotion and implementation of equal opportunity policies for ethnic minorities, including tribal or indigenous populations. This is the case, for example, in India, where a Minorities Commission was set up in 1978 which, in addition to having powers relating to the application of legislation and the receiving of complaints, (Endnote 147) has the tasks of carrying out research and surveys and submitting proposals relating to a policy of equality for minorities; this Commission has published reports containing recommendations for the improvement of affirmative action policies in certain areas, including equality of opportunity in education. (Endnote 148) In Canada, the Indian and Native Affairs Secretariat grants resources to Indian organisations and individuals for development projects. In Mexico, responsibility for implementation of indigenous policy lies with the National Institute for Indigenous Affairs, which carries out indigenous community development projects and submits proposals to the Executive with a view to solving problems. In New Zealand, the Maori Economic Development Commission is responsible, inter alia, for identifying and evaluating the cost of positive development proposals for Maoris. (Endnote 149) In Norway and Sweden, co-ordinating committees have been set up to organise reindeer breeding, with a view to assisting the development of the Sami population. In this country, the ethnic minorities ombudsman is responsible, inter alia, for initiating affirmative measures against ethnic discrimination. In the Philippines, two offices have been set up for the Northern and Southern cultural communities respectively; among the tasks assigned to them is the co-ordination of development programmes and projects for the advancement of these communities. These offices are responsible for co-ordinating the formulation, integration and implementation of development plans aimed at assisting the members of these cultural communities in developing their lands. (Endnote 150) In this area in particular, promotion of equality taking into account the differences between indigenous peoples and other citizens calls for thorough knowledge of the problems. (Endnote 151) 209. As regards promotion of equality of religious minorities, the Committee has noted that the Philippines has set up an Office on Muslim Affairs, whose task it is to preserve and develop the culture, traditions and welfare of Moslem Filipinos, fully respecting their beliefs, customs, traditions and institutions; its functions include providing advice and assistance, co-ordinating and initiating development projects, serving as a central agency for assistance, carrying out studies and maintaining centres for ethnographic research and archives. (Endnote 152) 210. In Malta, a commission has been set up under the Constitution and Act No. XXXI of 1976 to settle cases of discrimination in employment on account of political opinion. 211. Other agencies are concerned with promoting equality of opportunity in the public service: in Australia, for example, the Equal Employment Opportunity Bureau, set up within the Commonwealth Public Service Board to deal with conditions of employment in the public service, is responsible for formulating policy concerning women and groups considered to be disadvantaged in the public service: aborigines, physically disabled persons and migrants. In Canada, the Office of Native Employment, set up with a view to increasing employment opportunities in the federal administration for Indians, examines recruitment practices hindering indigenous persons' access to employment and carries out publicity and awareness campaigns among natives in an effort to promote careers in the public service. Several consultative bodies have been set up in the federal public service to assist the Government in matters relating to affirmative action. A joint management-union commission on affirmative action and consultative committees have been set up to deal, respectively, with employment in the public service of visible minorities (1985), disabled persons (1978), affirmative action for women (1984 -- the chairwoman of the Royal Commission on the Status of Women is a member). A joint management-union commission has been set up (1985) to study the application of the principles of equality of remuneration in the public service. In the United States, the Civil Service Commission is responsible for examining and approving plans for affirmative action programmes submitted to it by departments and agencies, and for supervising the application of such plans; it publishes reports periodically on the state of affairs. In New Zealand, the Equal Employment Opportunity Unit of the State Services Commission is generally concerned with promoting, co-ordinating and pursuing policies, programmes and practices relating to equal employment opportunity in the public service. The State Services Commission set up this unit in 1983 and assigned it the task of applying its policies in recruitment, conditions of employment, career organisation, selection and promotion to ensure that equality of opportunity is not impaired on grounds of race, sex, country of origin, physical disability, marital status or personal convictions. (Endnote 153) Review and policy formulation 212. Certain specialised agencies are primarily responsible for undertaking a systematic analysis of government policy as regards human rights, including the question of equality of treatment; they examine legislation, regulations and practices in the light of the principles of equality, rendering opinions in this connection; if necessary, they formulate recommendations concerning the amendment of legislation or the adoption of new provisions to strengthen the application of the principles of equality of opportunity and treatment. (Endnote 154) In Singapore, the President's Council for Minority Rights, set up pursuant to article 69 of the Constitution, is essentially responsible for bringing to the attention of Parliament any bill which may place persons of any racial or religious community at a disadvantage to another community. In certain cases, specialised agencies may play a pivotal role within the administration by offering local authorities concerned with the principles of equality a means for influencing the central government's policy, and thus applying Paragraph 3(b) of the Recommendation in the other direction. (Endnote 155) Implementation and supervision 213. In addition to promoting, proposing or examining legislative provisions, some specialised agencies are responsible for the application and supervision of the principles of equality in employment and occupation. (Endnote 156) Since its last General Survey, the Committee has noted that agencies responsible for examining complaints and monitoring the implementation of anti-discriminatory provisions have been created in a number of countries, in particular to guarantee equality of opportunity and treatment between men and women. Some of these agencies may receive and initiate complaints (for example, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, United States); others are authorised to undertake investigations and issue opinions in response to complaints filed by persons alleging discrimination (for example, the Netherlands), or to receive and forward such complaints to the competent authorities (for example, Spain); still others are empowered to undertake investigations at their own initiative, rather than dealing with individual complaints (for example, Ireland, Portugal, United Kingdom), or issue opinions (for example, Austria). In certain countries both an Equality Commissioner (Ombud/Ombudsman) and a commission on equality are responsible for the implementation and supervision of legislation concerning equality between men and women (Finland, Norway, Sweden). (Endnote 157) In one of these countries, namely Sweden, recent legislation has established a two-year pilot programme pursuant to which an ombud/ombudsman and a commission monitor the implementation of the Act against ethnic discrimination. (Endnote 158) 214. The procedures followed by specialised agencies which are responsible for receiving and investigating complaints vary from one country to another; in general, however, they proceed by means of inquiries and conciliation; where this is of no avail, they are sometimes authorised to resort to coercive measures by initiating action in court. (Endnote 159) Certain specialised agencies are competent to examine the application of anti-discriminatory provisions in the public sector: indeed, certain agencies have been instituted especially for this purpose, (Endnote 160) while others are competent at once for the public and private sectors. (Endnote 161) As a general rule, nothing that has been said or done during the conciliation proceedings may be used as evidence in subsequent proceedings. In addition to protecting the parties, such a situation also facilitates conciliation: parties to a dispute are unlikely to engage in constructive negotiation if there is a possibility that their arguments may be presented as evidence during a subsequent inquiry or hearing. (Endnote 162) The effectiveness of specialised bodies 215. The effectiveness of specialised agencies in promoting and enforcing guarantees for equal treatment depends, in particular, on the scope of these guarantees under national legislation and on the powers assigned to these agencies; specifically, the effectiveness of commissions responsible for supervising the application of provisions concerning equality depends not only on their powers of investigation and conciliation, but also on the extent to which they may enforce compliance with their recommendations, either by referring the matter to courts, or by the binding nature of their decisions. The effectiveness of these specialised agencies also depends upon the human and financial resources available to them for the discharge of their responsibilities, for without adequate resources, their functions remain hypothetical and their actions hampered. The International Labour Conference emphasised in its above-mentioned 1985 resolution that agencies responsible for ensuring equality of opportunity should be sufficiently well staffed to carry out their tasks. (Endnote 163) Subsection 4. Remedial procedures 216. The application of a policy of equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation depends partly on the appeal procedures available in the event of allegations of discrimination. It is important to remember, however, that complaints concerning individual situations should be considered as symptoms or indications that can lead to the detection of practices of exclusion or differential treatment applied in general to a group of persons with identical characteristics. Resort to a complaint or legal action by the person discriminated against cannot be considered to be sufficient in itself to guarantee equality of opportunity and treatment. It entails risks in relation to the objective of equality in so far as an unsuccessful legal action can hold up the development and progress of this equality for several years and thus delay recognition of new concepts of a general or abstract principle. Moreover, in many cases individual action will not be considered justified where the facts involve indirect or systemic discrimination against the member of a group by virtue of membership in that group. Means of appeal vary according to the industrial relations systems or the laws of the country. Normally the complainant may go before the competent courts or, in some countries, as already stated, specialised bodies which have powers of inquiry and conciliation for dealing with complaints of discrimination; (Endnote 164) where the person concerned works in an undertaking he or she may, in an appropriate case, exhaust the possibilities of internal grievance procedures, (Endnote 165) refer the matter to the labour inspectorate, which often has powers of investigation or conciliation, (Endnote 166) or take the case to the competent bodies in respect of individual labour litigation. Traditionally, the bodies called upon to give rulings on alleged cases of discrimination have been the ordinary, civil (Endnote 167) or penal courts; sometimes the civil courts have a special panel for labour cases, (Endnote 168) but in many countries the laws and regulaions now confer competence on more specialised bodies: labour tribunals, industrial courts, etc. (Endnote 169) Sometimes the complainant has several possibilities of appeal procedures depending upon the nature of the complaint. (Endnote 170) In some countries, individual disputes concerning the application of provisions on equality of treatment are taken before special bodies comprising representatives of workers and of employers who try to settle the dispute by conciliation. (Endnote 171) Sometimes a labour tribunal that has been seized of a case refers the dispute to a specialised body for settlement or inquiry. (Endnote 172) In one country which has ratified the Convention, a person who alleges that there has been discrimination in recruitment for the public service based on religion, race, sex, caste or tribe may submit a petition to the Supreme Court. (Endnote 173) 217. In the public service, appeals procedures may entail the intervention of a joint body (Endnote 174) or of a specialised body on equality issues which sometimes is also a joint body. The proceedings often take place before the courts or bodies which in general are responsible for legal enforcement in the public service. (Endnote 175) 218. Whatever the machinery set up, affording remedies for the harm suffered runs into certain problems relating in particular to the often excessive slowness of the procedure, to difficulties connected with the burden of proof, the fear of initiating proceedings alone and that of exposure to reprisals, and the possibility for the employer of discharging a breach by simply paying compensation. The institution of accelerated procedures, which are cheap and easily accessible, involving the settlement of the dispute by conciliation, to remedy acts of discrimination in employment and occupation, is an important element in the application of the policy to promote equality of opportunity and treatment in employment and occupation. This need is felt particularly in cases of discrimination in recruitment and even more so as regards access to education and vocational training for, in such cases, it must be possible for the rights of the person who has been discriminated against to be restored quickly to enable him or her to enter a particular job competition, for example, or the training course in which he or she wanted to participate. (Endnote 176) Specialised bodies may be the most suitable way of ensuring the application of the principle of equality of opportunity and treatment. Exercise of rights of complaint 219. As a rule it is the person who considers himself or herself discriminated against and who wishes to seek redress that is personally responsible for exercising his or her right of appeal. As the Committee noted in previous General Surveys, (Endnote 177) it should be possible for proceedings to be set in motion other than by the filing of a complaint by an individual worker. Lodging a general complaint covering a number of workers makes it easier to assume the burden of proof, probably reduces the risk of reprisals, obliges the employer to find valid arguments to defend his or her position and is thus also likely to serve as a deterrent to discriminatory action. 220. The legislation of many countries provides for trade union organisations to institute proceedings on equal treatment on behalf of their members, whether the action is brought before a court or a specialised body. (Endnote 178) In most cases a trade union must be duly authorised to act on a worker's behalf. In certain cases, however, it may take legal action without prior authorisation from the person concerned, (Endnote 179) though the latter may sometimes object. (Endnote 180) In certain cases the alleged victim of discrimination cannot take legal action individually if he or she is a member of a trade union, unless the trade union itself fails to initiate such action. (Endnote 181) In one country, proceedings to ensure compliance with the legal provisions prohibiting discrimination in offers of employment or in the procedures followed for the purpose of filling a vacancy may be instituted by bodies corporate enjoying full legal capacity whose work includes promoting the interests of persons who would be entitled to lodge complaints. (Endnote 182) 221. In some countries class actions may be brought in order to arrive at a decision affecting all the workers in the category that is being subjected to discrimination. Use of this procedure has been instituted in the United States, where class actions may be brought under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. These actions may be brought, however, only under certain conditions relating to the number of persons involved, the common nature of the questions of law or fact and of the defences, and the risk of inconsistent judgements in the event of separate actions being brought. (Endnote 183) Similar conditions apply to the lodging of class actions in Australia. (Endnote 184) Class actions are also recognised in the legislation of New Zealand, (Endnote 185) in the legislation or practice of Canada (Endnote 186) or in case law as, for example, in India with respect to equal remuneration. (Endnote 187) 222. In some countries the legislation on equal treatment empowers the body responsible for enforcement of the law to bring legal action on behalf of the complainants on its own initiative. The specialised body may bring before the courts any disputes that it has not been possible to settle by conciliation. (Endnote 188) It must be borne in mind, moreover, that the labour inspectorate, which has general responsibility for ensuring the enforcement of labour laws and regulations, is sometimes empowered to bring an action before the courts (Endnote 189) or the public prosecutor's office. (Endnote 190) The possibility for an alleged victim of discrimination to be represented by a trade union, together with class actions or actions brought on their own initiative by the authorities in the public interest -- the application of legislation with respect to equality being considered a matter of public interest -- may be an additional means of applying the policy of equality of opportunity and treatment. Financial assistance 223. The prospect of incurring significant financial costs may deter a person who has been victimised by discrimination from seeking relief. The cost of proceedings can well be prohibitive for a person who does not enjoy the benefit of financial assistance, legal aid or the backing of a trade union. For this reason, a number of countries stipulate that complainants are entitled to assistance during the course of proceedings instituted to exercise their rights. (Endnote 191) In a certain number of countries, labour legislation provides that all proceedings concerning labour disputes shall be free of charge. (Endnote 192) Burden of proof 224. One of the most important procedural problems that arises when a person alleges that there has been discrimination in employment or occupation is connected with the fact that the burden of proving the discrimination underlying the act complained of lies with the complainant, which may represent an insurmountable obstacle as regards affording remedies for the harm suffered. While at times the evidence can be collected without undue difficulty (in the case, for example, of advertisements for job vacancies where the discrimination is obvious), more often the discrimination involves an action or activity that is suspected rather than established and difficult to prove, particularly in the case of indirect or systemic discrimination, and more so when the information and records that might constitute evidence is generally held by the person being accused of discrimination. This is why in some countries the legislation or jurisprudence has sometimes reversed the legal burden of proof or at least introduced some degree of flexibility as regards the burden of proof being on the complainant. The Government of Canada has emphasised (Endnote 193) that the courts and other competent authorities must demonstrate flexibility as regards the admissibility of evidence. It has stated that, as regards human rights cases, it will suffice to show that the balance of the probability is either in favour of the respondent or the complainant; in practical terms, this means that if the respondent is unable to provide a satisfactory answer to the complaint, then discrimination can be reasonably inferred. (Endnote 194) In some countries the person alleging discrimination must first of all demonstrate that inequality of opportunity or treatment coincides with inequality in respect of race, sex, religion, political opinion, trade union activity, etc. Once this has been established, the burden of proof then shifts to the employer to show that he or she had a legitimate reason that was not discriminatory. (Endnote 195) In cases where workers having exercised thir right to file a claim regarding equality of treatment are dismissed or find their conditions of work changed, the legislation in certain countries provides that it is incumbent on the employer to produce evidence that the submission of the claim was not the sole or main reason for the dismissal or the change in the employee's conditions of work. (Endnote 196) The requirement that it is the person charged with having committed a discriminatory act who must produce evidence that the reason for the measure taken is unrelated to the complaint gives extra protection to the person discriminated against and may also have a dissuasive effect. 225. The Committee considers that the question of the burden of proof is of fundamental importance in any allegation of discrimination. A person who has been discriminated against will often hesitate to take his or her case to the competent body, not only from fear of reprisals (Endnote 197) but also because most of the time he or she does not have all the evidence required. Consequently it would be desirable for the body with which the complaint is lodged to be able to play an active role in the procedure, to have powers of investigation in respect of both parties, to seek the opinion of specialised bodies (Endnote 198) and to call on expert evidence in matters of equality. Likewise, it would be desirable for witnesses of discrimination, who often are reluctant to testify for fear of reprisals, to enjoy protection. In an earlier General Survey, the Committee already had the occasion to emphasise, as regards discrimination on anti-union grounds, that the obligation of the employer to prove that there is no union-related motive underlying his or her intention means to dismiss a worker or underlying the dismissal, is an additional means of ensuring real protection of the right to organise. (Endnote 199) As stated above, the Committee also considers that the burden of proof as regards the consequences of past or present illness on a person's aptitude to perform a job should not be on this person. The above considerations show that there are circumstances in which the burden of proof of discriminatory grounds should not be on the person alleging discrimination; in any case, this person should enjoy the benefit of the doubt. Protection against reprisals 226. In the Chapter concerning the scope of the Convention (Endnote 200) the Committee stated that the effective protection of the principle of equality presupposes the existence of guarantees which provide protection against reprisals to persons who complain to the competent authorities or initiate legal action to enforce their rights. (Endnote 201) Retaliatory measures against a person who has suffered discrimination and who has exercised a right provided for under national policies of equality of opportunity and treatment are especially serious and may have pernicious effects as regards the practical application of anti-discriminatory provisions, since the victims of discrimination often hesitate to have recourse to mechanisms of redress out of fear of reprisals. For this reason the annulment of such provisions and the reinstatement of the person who has suffered discrimination constitute the most suitable remedy. Effective protection against discrimination in employment presupposes recognition of the principle of protection against dismissal: thus, when the legal system provides for equal treatment but allows the employer to terminate the contract of employment without having to state the reasons for such termination, repeated instances of discrimination in the private sector will not be brought before the courts, while public servants, who are better protected against dismissal, will be able to enforce their right to equal treatment. Remedial action 227. Discrimination causes material and moral harm; although it may be relatively easy, as regards discrimination in remuneration, to repair the damage incurred by means of an adjustment in the level of remuneration, back pay and punitive damages, as evidenced by the pertinent legislation adopted in this connection in a number of countries, (Endnote 202) remedies for discrimination in access to training, employment or occupation, and in conditions of employment do not usually lend themselves to purely financial compensation. (Endnote 203) In its report the Government of the United States emphasised that remedying racial discrimination poses highly complex problems. It stated that, when it can be established that certain persons have been victimised by discrimination, the courts may order that these persons be reinstated in positions they would have occupied had there been no discrimination. The courts may order a variety of measures, including the reinstatement of workers dismissed on racial grounds, the payment of back wages, allowances and promotions of which they had been deprived owing to the employers' discriminatory practices. The courts may also order the employers to cease and desist from such practices. However, in situations where such discrimination is particularly serious or has existed for a long time, these remedies do not suffice. For this reason, the courts have sometimes ordered, or the parties have voluntarily agreed to undertake, affirmative action measures to remedy the effects of past discrimination. Generally, these measures entail programmes which favour the workers of a given minority in comparison with White workers. (Endnote 204) In Sweden, in cases where sex discrimination in employment has been proven (contract, dismissal, etc.), the employer shall pay punitive damages, and in the case of discrimination in recruitment, damages for moral harm. In the United Kingdom, in cases where complaints of racial discrimination in employment are well-founded, the labour court may order the defendant to pay damages and interest. (Endnote 205) 228. The victims of discrimination who take the material and moral risks of instituting judicial proceedings should benefit from suitable remedies which would moreover have a dissuasive effect upon those who would consider engaging in discriminatory practices. In a previous General Survey, (Endnote 206) the Committee noted that as regards measures for compensating a unionised worker for prejudice suffered, the reinstatement of a worker who has been dismissed or discriminated against because of anti-trade union motives, constituted the most appropriate means of redressing acts of anti-trade union discrimination; legislation which includes protective provisions, but which allows the employer in practice to terminate the employment of a worker on the condition of paying the compensation provided for by law in all cases of unjustified dismissal, when the real motive is trade union membership or activity, is inadequate under the terms of Article 1 of the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98). In this connection, an expeditious procedure such as that instituted in Belgium as regards discrimination in training offers obvious advantages. (Endnote 207) Sanctions 229. Many countries attempt to secure observance of provisions on equality by prescribing penalties for breach of such provisions, either in special legislation or in the wider context of labour legislation in general. (Endnote 208) In some cases, such provisions have been included in the Penal Code following the adoption of legislation on equality. (Endnote 209) They usually concern acts of discrimination in training, access to employment and conditions of work, (Endnote 210) they may be applied to acts of discrimination committed by officials. (Endnote 211) Penalties usually take the form of fines, which are sometimes substantial, (Endnote 212) and in many countries may even include terms of imprisonment. (Endnote 213) In countries where specialised agencies have been set up to implement legislation relating to equal treatment, provision has often been made for the imposition of penalties on persons who refuse to co-operate with the competent authority during investigations of complaints or who fail to comply with the regulations in force. (Endnote 214) 230. In previous General Surveys, (Endnote 215) the Committee referred to sanctions, in particular penal sanctions, to guarantee the application of protective provisions relating to non-discrimination for trade union membership and to equal remuneration. The Committee emphasised, inter alia, that sanctions should have a dual purpose, namely to punish the guilty and, above all, to act as a deterrent against discrimination. In its 1987 report, (Endnote 216) the Committee drew attention in its 1987 general report to the importance of establishing effective sanctions and of adapting monetary penalties in order to ensure that they exert an effective preventive influence against acts contrary to the guarantees laid down by international labour Conventions. Subsection 5: Educational programmes 231. By providing for the promotion of "such educational programmes as may be calculated to secure the acceptance and observance" of national policy, Article 3(b) of the Convention stresses how important it is that the parties concerned should adhere to this policy. Educational and information programmes are designed to improve awareness of the features of discrimination in order to change attitudes and behaviour patterns and bring about due respect for the right of everyone to equality of opportunity or treatment, irrespective of race, colour, sex, religion, political opinion, national extraction, social origin, etc. All countries which sent information on this issue underscored the importance they attached to action in the field of education and information. They consider it a vital complement to various measures to promote equality in employment and occupational life. However, the Committee regrets the somewhat cursory nature of many reports and the fact that too often they failed to discuss problems in depth. It also regrets that it is only able to provide a limited follow-up to the comments it made in a previous Survey on the content of information and its effects: "First of all it may appear desirable that campaigns to educate public opinion should not be based solely on moral arguments, which are generally the first to be invoked. It would be worth while laying emphasis on other considerations, such as the economic factor; when thorough studies have been made of the costs of discrimination, at both macro-economic and micro-economic levels, people will probably be easier to persuade if they also realise where their interests lie. Furthermore, it is not enough to eliminate negative attitudes but appears desirable to try, as has been done in certain countries, to encourage positive attitudes by doing more to promote the idea of equal opportunity from its theoretical and practical aspects." (Endnote 217) 232. Educational action, carried out by methods adapted to national circumstances and practices, may take various forms. Many countries referred to the inclusion of courses on various issues such as racial discrimination in school curricula. (Endnote 218) Few details were given on the level of this instruction, its content and the training of teachers entrusted with giving it. In several countries, bodies set up to promote, apply and supervise policy take part in school or university activities by holding conferences from time to time or, on a more regular basis, by participating in the drawing up of programmes and courses or even in the training of instructors. In Canada, the Human Rights Commission has developed a module on employment equity to outline the roles of various organisations in implementing equality in the workplace. Various provinces have taken similar steps in education. (Endnote 219) 233. In several countries, research programmes are being carried out on matters affecting progress towards equality of opportunity which advise the parties concerned (employers, trade unionists, education authorities and others) on how to work towards equality. In Belgium, the Government mentioned that some of these research projects are carried out in the universities. (Endnote 220) In the Caribbean, the project "Women in the Caribbean" is a vast research programme undertaken by the Institute of Economic and Social Research of the University of the West Indies (Barbados, Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago). This programme is intended to extend empirical knowledge and give a better grasp of the daily life of women in the Caribbean as well as to contribute towards identifying policies and programmes that might deal with and alleviate several problems encountered by women. (Endnote 221) As a result of this project, recommendations drawn up for governments and non-governmental organisations on legislation, education, family policy, employment and agricultural policy have been submitted to the parties concerned. In its report, the Government of the United Kingdom points that that the Equal Opportunities Commission may award grants to voluntary organisations and individuals to carry out research projects on matters dealing with equality. 234. The general public may also be informed through the mass media, by means of regular broadcasts or special programmes, (Endnote 222) or even by the distribution of posters. (Endnote 223) In Australia the Committees set up to combat discrimination launched in 1983-84 an equal employment opportunity campaign to inform further groups experiencing discrimination about the Committees' role and to promote equal employment opportunity personnel practices amongst employers, employees and trade unions. (Endnote 224) Furthermore, the Government of one of the states in the same country pointed out that the issue of public education was highlighted during the deliberations on the Equal Opportunity Bill; of the six major functions of the Commissioner outlined in the Bill, four specifically relate to disseminating information, consulting with various groups and developing programmes and policies designed to eliminate discriminatory attitudes in the community. (Endnote 225) A community education officer in the Office of the Commissioner carries out various activities including: development of a community education strategy and programme; publication of a newsletter; development of an extensive mailing list for publications; media liaison for the Commissioner and speech writing and public speaking. The Government of India points out that as the press in this country enjoys total freedom of opinion and expression, it is able to contribute in a positive way towards promoting understanding, tolerance and friendship between the various racial groups. Guidelines have been drawn up by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting on the role of state media in the dissemination of information to combat racial prejudice. According to these guide-lines: "(i) vigorous steps should be taken by the official units to serve the rural population, minority communities, women, children, illiterate as well as other weaker and vulnerable sections of the society; (ii) each media unit should try to encourage both individual and collective efforts by the handicapped (...) as well as institutions serving this section of society (...); (iii) the media units should devise suitable programmes to eradicate social evils such as untouchability, narrow parochial attitudes and loyalties and inequalities and exploitation". As a result of these guide-lines drawn up by the Government, the various services under the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting has produced or broadcast a considerable number of programmes during the past few years. (Endnote 226) In Iceland, a project is being undertaken in co-operation with the Nordic Council aimed at developing and testing methods for breaking down the male-female division of the labour market. Great emphasis has been laid on providing publicity for the project in order to promote debate on the position of women in the labour market. This publicity, designed to bring about a change of attitude towards greater equality between the sexes, is directed both at the general public through the media and at particular groups such as students, teachers, parents, employers and employees. In the Netherlands, an information campaign making use of a new folder, press advertisements, television spots and leaflets on equal treatment of men and women has resulted in a conspicuous increase in the number of applications for advice submitted to the Committee on Equal Treatment for Men and Women at Work. (Endnote 227) In Sweden, activities of the Equal Opportunities Ombud/Ombudsman have included the production of a video cassette dealing with the requirements of the Equal Opportunities Act for active promotion of equality between the sexes. This video cassette has mainly been addressed to employers and was re-transmitted in a television programme. The Government of Tunisia has pointed out that national women's and vocational organisations participate in the process of informing and educating the public with regard to the national policy against discrimination. (Endnote 228) 235. Much information was provided on publication programmes. Some publications are aimed at a very wide public, (Endnote 229) others are more specialised and deal with certain aspects on the ways to combat discrimination. (Endnote 230) They are often of a practical nature. In Venezuela, the Ministry for the Participation of Women in Development has published a practical guide; alongside various basic information on women's legal and social status, it contains a digest of legislation and regulations on women's rights in various fields (work, civil status, taxation, pensions, social security, legal assistance), information on mother-and-child welfare, health protection, consumer protection, social protection and ways to apply these rights. This practical information is supplemented by a list of addresses. (Endnote 231) Several bodies entrusted with promoting, applying and supervising equality of opportunity have a programme of publications which includes reprints of documents, guides, bulletins, activity reports, and summary reports of seminars, research work (Endnote 232) or basic statistical data. (Endnote 233) Most of these publications are sent free of charge to those who make the request or to the organisations concerned. In Sweden, the information journal "Jämsides" ("Side-by-side") has a circulation of 17,000 (for a working population of 4,385,000) and is mainly distributed to union officials, employers' representatives, and equal opportunities and personnel officers at various workplaces. Although little information was sent on the criteria applied for distributing these various publications, the Committee feels that a certain selection has been made to determine those persons most likely to be interested by them; those who might, through their work, pass the information on to a wider public (teachers, journalists, etc.). At the present juncture, when programmes without a purely economic aim are often being suppressed on austerity grounds, these publication programmes should be better defined in relation to the audience addressed. In some countries, texts to facilitate the application of legislation on equality of opportunity and treatment within the enterprise are published by specialised bodies or by governmental services and distributed to both employers and workers. In Ireland, the Ministry of Labour publishes a series of brochures on employment equality which gives a broad outline of the legislation in force; these are intended for heads of enterprises, especially those of small and medium-sized enterprises, heads of personnel, trade unionists, workers or "simply interested citizens". (Endnote 234) In New Zealand, the New Zealand Employers' Federation published a positive action manual in 1985 for its members. Another manual entitled "Employing people with disabilities" has recently been published by the Federation, with the Government's approval. In the same country, practical pamphlets on specific aspects of discrimination in employment, such as sexual harassment, which are drawn up either for the complainants or supervisors, are published by the Equal Employment Opportunities Unit of the State Services Commission. 236. Some governments pointed out that the role of trade unions within the enterprise was not only to defend workers' interests, but also to inform them and make them more aware of matters pertaining to equality of opportunity and non-discrimination at work. (Endnote 235) However, there was little information as to the way in which the trade unions within the enterprise actually fulfilled this responsibility. In Argentina, the Commission for the Family and Minorities of the Senate of the Nation organised a seminar on equality of opportunity in employment for women members of the trade unions. (Endnote 236) In Burkina Faso, executive staff from the Ministry of Labour give lectures intended to make workers more aware of the strict respect of principles of non-discrimination during seminars organised by employers' and workers' organisations. In Canada, seminars were organised by the Federal Department of Labour for employers' and workers' organisations (Women's Bureau, Seminar on Equal Pay for Work of Equal Value, February 1986), for union representatives as part of Labour Canada's Education Programme (Equal pay: Collective Bargaining and the Law, February 1987); others were organised by the Federal Canadian Human Rights Commission (Seminar on new Equal Wages Guide-Lines, February 1987) which brought together employers, workers, members of groups concerned and universities. In Cyprus, workshops and seminars are organised by the Government, women's organisations and trade union organisations, during which issues falling within the scope of the Convention are discussed. In India, the Central Board for Worker's Education and the National Labour Institute organise training programmes to make workers more aware of their rights, especially as regards the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976. The Government also points out that the voluntary organisations of scheduled tribes and castes also play a vital role by informing their members of their constitutional rights. The Government of Suriname mentioned that workers' education, which is dispensed by the Suriname Labour College and sponsored by the social partners, also contributes towards the education of those concerned. Several governments stressed the importance they attached to training officials entrusted with applying the principle of equality. (Endnote 237) In New Zealand, seminars are organised for officials belonging to ethnic minorities (Samoans, evidence from Pacific islanders); following one of these seminars, the report of the State Services Commission provided government departments with guidance on issues affecting the employment conditions of members of ethnic minorities.
EndnotesEndnote 1ILO: Discrimination in the field of employment and occupation, International Labour Conference, 40th Session, 1957, p. 110. See Chapter II, Section 2, para. 87 above; while the existence of a general prohibition on discrimination in a constitutional provision may satisfy the requirements of the Convention as regards equality of treatment to the extent that the constitutional provisions are applied by the courts, this cannot, however, be sufficient to ensure dynamic implementation of equality of opportunity. See RCE 1963, General Report, paras. 21-27 and 35; RCE 1970, General Report, paras. 18-19. See, for example, Sierra Leone, in RCE 1983, p. 224; see also the General Survey of 1986 on equal remuneration, para. 253: "It is hard to accept statements suggesting that the application of the Convention has not given rise to difficulties or that full effect is given to the Convention, without further details being provided. By its nature, by the way in which it develops, and as a result of the critical character of discrimination with regard to remuneration, the application of the principle will necessarily unearth difficulties." These comments also hold true for Convention No. 111, perhaps even more so in view of the breadth of its scope. See, for example, Brazil's statement of purpose of the 1987 Plan of Action on racial discrimination in the labour market: "In Brazilian society, manifestations of racism are not always intentional ... Discriminatory practices are partly rooted in prejudice and common stereotypes influencing individual attitudes, which are daily reflected in institutional machinery in the form of discriminatory, bureaucratic and administrative practices. In the field of labour, they take the form of situations placing Black workers at a disadvantage with respect to White workers ...", Ministry of Labour, Secretariat for Manpower, Brasilia, 1987. General Survey, 1963, para. 55. The Government of Sierra Leone states in its report that in the developing countries promotion of non-discriminatory practices should occur gradually and that ILO assistance would be necessary in this area. See RCE 1984, p. 257: the Committee stated that while it allows the government to choose the methods by which it promotes equality of opportunity and treatment, such a policy "implies that once measures have been taken and a certain level of protection against discrimination has thus been achieved, the existing system of protection cannot be dismantled unless its repeal is accompanied by the adoption of an alternative system that increases, rather than reduces, the overall protection afforded". See above, Chapter I, paras. 33, 37, 39, 48 and 58. The Government of Czechoslovakia stated in its report that the State's entire policy, even where it is not expressly stated, proceeds from the constitutional principle of equality of rights and obligations, which rules out discrimination. In some countries, legislation on equality of opportunity and treatment is prefaced by a "declaration of policy" which states the purposes of the enactment and places it in a wider context of equality in general, civil rights or social justice. See, for example, United States, Florida, s. 760.01 of the Human Rights Act of 1977; Illinois, s. 1-102 of the Human Rights Act; Indiana, s. 22-9-1-1 of the Civil Rights Law; Kansas, s. 44-1002 of the Act Against Discrimination; Kentucky, s. 344.020 of the Fair Employment Practices Act; Maine, s. 4552 of the Human Rights Act; Michigan, s. 102(1) of the Civil Rights Act; Montana, s. 49-1-102 of the Human Rights Act; New Hampshire, s. 354-A:1 of the Law Against Discrimination; New York, s. 291 of the Human Rights Law; North Dakota, s. 14-02.4-01 of the Fair Employment Practices Act; Oregon, ss. 659.015 to .025 of the Fair Employment Practices Act; Pennsylvania, s. 952 of the Human Relations Act; Rhode Island, s. 28-5-2 of the Fair Employment Practices Act; South Carolina, s. 1-13-20 of the Human Affairs Law; Tennessee, s. 4-21-101 of the Fair Employment Practices Law; Texas, s. 1.02 of the Commission on Human Rights Act; Washington, ss. 49.60.010 to 030 of the Law Against Discrimination; West Virginia, s. 5-11-2 of the Human Rights Act; Wisconsin, s. 111.31 of the Fair Employment Act. As a rule, these declarations of policy state that access to employment, occupation and training is a civil right which should be protected; that the absence of equality of opportunity and treatment also threatens the institutions and undermines the foundations of a free democratic State and endangers the peace, order, health, safety and general welfare of its inhabitants; that the State is responsible for acting to ensure that each individual is able to live a fully productive life; that measures should be adopted to ensure that each individual enjoys equality of opportunity and treatment; that discrimination should be eliminated in the public services, etc. See also the statements of purpose of legislation adopted in this area in certain countries (France, Portugal, etc.), which may be considered to declare or update a policy designed to ensure equality of opportunity and treatment, taking into account the development of the situation: for example, Portugal, RCE 1979, p. 187. See also Japan: s. 6 of Law No. 113 of 16 June 1972 respecting the improvement of the welfare of women workers, which contains a guarantee of equality of opportunity and treatment between men and women in employment, as amended in 1985, provides that the Minister of Labour shall formulate a basic policy concerning measures to be taken for the welfare of women workers and the matters to be covered by such a policy. See the description of the implementation of the Convention in Australia in C.E. Landau: The influence of ILO standards on Australian labour law and practice, in International Labour Review, 1987, Vol. 126, No. 6, pp. 669-690. See reports sent by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. General Survey, 1963, para. 55. Australia: Western Australia, review of all legislation with a view to eliminating sex-based discrimination; Guyana, adoption of Circular No. 1/1973 of 12 February 1973 of the Ministry of the Public Service, eliminating all forms of discrimination in the public service; Norway, amendment of the Seamen's Act to eliminate certain forms of discrimination. Canada: Canadian Human Rights Commission, Annual report 1982, p. 10: recommendation to amend the Unemployment Insurance Act to remove discriminatory treatment based on sex, marital or family status; recommendation to amend the Indian Act, see above, Chapter IV, Section 3, paras. 19-21. See above, Chapter I, Section 3, paras. 25, 40 and 41. See also Chile in RCE 1987, p. 358: repeal of texts under which arbitrary and discriminatory decisions could be taken without a possibility of defence for the persons concerned. See, for example, Article 5 of the Workers with Family Responsibilities Convention, 1981 (No. 156) which specifies the content of measures to be taken (subject to national conditions and possibilities) to enable persons with family responsibilities to engage in or obtain employment without being subject to discrimination: to take account of the needs of workers with family responsibilities in community planning, to develop or promote community services such as child care and family services and facilities. See also Article 3, paragraph 1, of the Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100): objective appraisal of jobs. See above, Chapter I. See above, Chapter II. General Survey, 1963, para. 65. See, however, the legislative and administrative measures and incentives towards affirmative action taken by employers recommended by the Standing Advisory Commission on Human Rights against religious discrimination in Northern Ireland. Standing Advisory Commission on Human Rights: Religious and political discrimination and equality of opportunity in Northern Ireland: Report on fair employment, London, 1987, pp. 170-183. See Article 1, paragraph 2(c), of the Employment Policy Convention, 1964 (No. 122). In some cases, large-scale social movements have contributed greatly towards the adoption of these texts; a case in point is the United States, where the vast support surrounding the movement for the defence of the civil rights of Blacks led to the adoption of the 1964 Civil Rights Act; the United States Commission on Civil Rights, Affirmative Action in the 1980s: Dismantling the Process of Discrimination, a Statement, 1981. cf. the influence that the European Economic Community has had on the member States as regards equality of opportunity and treatment between men and women or between nationals of various countries within the community. Endnote 25 cf. the programmes adopted in the field of equality between men and women by the member States of the Nordic Council. cf. the programme for the Industrial Development Decade for Africa, 1980-1990, adopted at the 1980 Lagos Economic Summit. The equitable participation of women in the industrialisation process entails: (a) equal access to and participation in formal programmes at different levels in educational and vocational training institutions and in adult educational programmes which teach not only literacy, but marketable income-generating skills; (b) equal access to economic resources including land and credit in the small-scale sector; (c) equal participation in decision-making and planning processes in enterprises and administrations; (d) equal participation in non-traditional female occupations which have good promotional possibilities and increasing employment prospects in both the large-and small-scale industrial sectors; (e) equal rights to control the fruits of one's labour and equal job security; (f) encouragement to form and participate actively in collective organisations including trade unions; (g) equal priority in the development of technologies that will relieve women's work burden in the home and at the workplace; (h) equal and non-discriminatory protection of all industrial workers under labour legislation; (i) equal publicity given to women's activities, and (j) the recognition of the importance of women's dual roles and the provision of extensive social investments to lessen women's conflicting work burdens. See 1986 General Survey on Equal Remuneration, paras. 44 et seq. and 255. See for example the Government of Egypt's statement in its report to the effect that "measures aimed at promoting equality of opportunity or treatment in employment or occupation should be part of the State's general policy". See Denmark: In 1985, the Parliament adopted a resolution concerning an action plan for equality between men and women; Finland: five-year equality programme for 1980-1985; India: the seventh five-year plan (1985-89) introduces a component on "women" and a multisectoral approach to bring women's promotion programmes in line with each other; Indonesia: the fourth five-year plan (1984-89) provides for improved information for women on their rights and duties, better skills and protection of women workers, the setting up of job opportunities for women, etc.; Iceland: five-year action plan concerning measures to guarantee equality between the sexes, adopted by the Parliament (Althingi) on 10 February 1987; Norway: action plan for equality adopted by the Parliament (Storting) for 1986-90: the plan provides for many measures to promote the position of women in education and on the labour market; Netherlands, political emancipation programme (Beleidsplan Emancipatie) adopted by the Council of Ministers in 1984; Senegal: women's action plan adopted on 25 March 1982 by the Parliament; the plan gives a detailed list of the financial targets in various economic sectors as regards training, health, nutrition and job creation; Switzerland: legislative programme entitled "Equality of rights between men and women"; Tunisia: national development programmes stressing that everyone should have access to employment and, in the field of education, setting objectives pertaining to the promotion of equality of opportunity: schooling of children of both sexes having reached statutory school-attendance age, widespread introduction of mixed schooling, stepping up of measures aimed at cutting school drop-out rates, etc.; Yugoslavia: "Resolution on the main guide-lines of social action to promote the status and economic and social role of women in socialist joint worker-management society" adopted by the Parliament of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia on 30 March 1978; Zimbabwe: one of the targets of the five-year development programme (1981-85) is to do away with discriminatory practices preventing women from participating in economic life. See for example below, para. 233. See for example Chapter I, Section 3, para. 55; see for example Angola: "Orientaçoes Fundamentais para o Desenvolvimento Economico-Social, 1981-1985", points IV and VI on instruction and education, the efficient use of human resources and the raising of workers' skill levels; Nepal: national employment policy of the Kingdom of Nepal; Nicaragua: national training system (Sistema nacional de capacitación-SINACAP). S. 2 of the Employment Equity Act of 1986. According to the Canadian Labour Congress, a true affirmative action programme includes three types of inter-related measures: permanent equality of opportunity measures, which set out to guarantee equality by eliminating discriminatory practices within the enterprise; remedial measures which aim at correcting the effects of discrimination suffered by a group of persons by granting them several preferential advantages for a temporary period; support systems which aim at overcoming various employment problems encountered by members of disadvantaged groups and which are accessible to everyone, whether or not they belong to a disadvantaged group. (ICFTU, International trade union seminar on affirmative action, Brussels, 6-8 Oct. 1986.) In the United States this concept was introduced for the first time in Executive Order No. 10925 of 1961 which went beyond requiring the undertaking not to discriminate to call upon the contractor to take affirmative action to ensure "that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated during their employment, without regard to their race, creed, colour, or national origin". This was taken up again in section 202(1) of Executive Order No. 11246 concerning government contractors and subcontractors (E.O. 11246 of 24 Oct. 1965) and specified in Order No. 4 of the Secretary of Labor. S. 2 of Executive Order No. 11478 concerning federal employees (E.O. 11478 of 8 Aug. 1969) uses the concept of affirmative programmes. S. 3(1) of the Affirmative Action (Equal Employment Opportunity of Women) Act, 1986. S. 1 of the Royal Decree of 14 July 1987 concerning measures to promote equality of opportunity between men and women in the private sector. Quebec, s. 1 of the regulation on affirmative action programmes. See also note 32 above. Most of the provinces have adopted or are in the process of adopting similar measures. Ss. L.123-3 and 4 of Act No. 83-635 of 13 July 1983 to amend the Labour Code, LS 1983-Fr. 2. See below: Section 2, Subsections 1 and 3 of the present Chapter. See below: Section 2, Subsection 2 of the present Chapter. For instance, the BRYT programme drawn up by members of the Nordic Council; see above, Chapter II, Section 1, para. 85. See Introduction above, para. 15. This primordial obligation, which is closely linked to the formulation of national policy, has already been examined in para. 161 above. See also paras. 163-164 above. See above, Chapter I, para. 58. See, for example, Nicaragua: Constitution of 1986, LS 1987-Nic. 1, art. 91: "The State is under an obligation to enact laws designed to promote action which will ensure that no Nicaraguan is subject to discrimination because of his or her language, culture or origin." The Committee has no information regarding the practical application of this provision. See Chapter II, Section 2, para. 89. The National Indigenous Development Programme set up in 1983 prepares participants to assume middle and senior management responsibilities and enables them to acquire the necessary skills and knowledge. The Northern Careers Programme aims at increasing the representation of native people in the northern regions. The Visible Minority Employment Programme offers resources to federal departments to appoint members of visible minority groups on an indeterminate basis. As part of this programme, training modules have been developed for newly appointed members of such minorities and their managers. The Equal Employment Opportunity (Commonwealth Authorities) Act 1987. A Bill has been submitted to Parliament to amend the Foreign Nationals (Public Service) Act of 1858 with a view to promoting the access of foreigners, including members of ethnic minorities, to employment in the public sector. The Bill sets forth positions open exclusively to Dutch nationals, all others being open to foreigners with a work permit. Letter of Instructions No. 974 of 5 Jan. 1980. Directive of 24 Feb. 1986 respecting the occupational promotion of women in the federal administration. Programme for the promotion of women in the federal public service, adopted by Decision of 10 Nov. 1983. Guide-lines for the economic and social development of the USSR for the period 1986-1990 and up to the year 2000, Moscow, 1985. See V. Steshenko: "The demographic and economic aspects of women's work in the Ukrainian SSR", Women at Work, No. 1/1986, p. 35. CEDAW, A/42/38. See, for example, the Programme of Employment Equity in Crown Corporations implemented by the Canadian Federal Government on 8 Mar. 1985: "Implementation of Employment Equity will: improve the organisation's overall human resources management through analysis of its current workforce and employment systems; widen employment and career development opportunities for underutilised groups in the organisation's workforce; and improve labour productivity by more clearly identifying and effectively using designated group skills and potential." Treasury Board of Canada: Employment Equity for Crown Corporations, Policy and Reference Guide, Ottawa, 1986. See also s. 2 of the Employment Equity Act 1986. See ICFTU, International Trade Union Seminar on Affirmative Action, Brussels, 6-8 Oct. 1986, para. 15: "Women are specially liable to suffer from reductions in the public service, in terms of loss of jobs, essential support services, and programmes promoting equality." General Survey, 1963, para. 94. cf. Recommendation No. 111, Paragraph 3(b)(ii); see para. 171 above. Canada, United States. Under s. 3 of the Act, designated groups are women, aboriginal peoples, persons with disabilities and persons who are, because of their race or colour, in a visible minority in Canada. Venezuela: The Government stated in its report that, in practice, access to university education is relatively difficult for young persons from disadvantaged social backgrounds due to the fact that such persons do not have the resources necessary to enter university. To remedy this situation, there are various systems for the provision of grants. See Chapter II, Section 1, above. Royal Decree No. 1174/1983 of 27 Apr. 1983 on compensatory education: "In the educational system, the inequality of some persons on account of their financial position, social status or place of residence means that the policy of education must be compensatory and comprehensive in scope. This must form the constant point of reference for educational policy, but it will be difficult to avoid the continuance of such inequality unless priority is given to groups of individuals who are in an especially marked position of inferiority with regard to the opportunities afforded by the school system.". CERD/C/149/Add. 14, p. 6. ILO: Social and Labour Bulletin, 2/86, pp. 376-377. In Hungary, measures have been adopted to encourage further participation of women in technical and vocational education, which is already relatively high. A network of child care centres and kindergartens has been set up and women with young children receive special allowances for the care of each child up to the age of 3. Special board and lodging arrangements are also made during periods of study away from their place of work. Part-time and in-service training are both available and encouraged through compensation by reduced working hours, etc. Mothers with young children may, under existing regulations, be employed on a part-time basis. UNESCO, General Conference, 24th Session, 1987, Consultation of member States on the implementation of the revised Recommendation concerning technical and vocational education, 24C/73, Annex 6, pp. 57-58. In the German Democratic Republic, special measures are also applied to enable working mothers to continue their education by cutting down their working time without reduction of their salary; ibid., p. 47. CEDAW/C/5/Add. 12. Point 11 of Order No. 586 of 21 June 1979 of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union and the Council of Ministers on the measures to be adopted to improve the vocational training of women provides that "given the prime importance attached to the improvement of vocational training for women, it has been decided that women with children aged under 8 years may improve their skills and undergo retraining while taking time off from work, during which they shall continue to draw their average monthly salary", i.e. a salary based on that of the two months immediately preceding their training. See Chapter II, Section 1, paras. 82-83 above. See also Egypt: Since 1981, groups of girl trainees have been enrolled in vocational training centres and centres for training in mechanics and electricity, CEDAW/C/13/Add. 2, p. 5. In Cameroon, measures have been taken to promote mixed technical training establishments with a view to creating favourable conditions for more girls to take up industrial trades which up to now have been viewed as male occupations. Working group on personnel policies for bringing greater involvement of women in science and technology, Ministry of Social Welfare, Government of India, New Delhi, 1981. This project has received aid from the European Social Fund as part of its support activities for programmes to promote opportunities for women in jobs in which they are under-represented; ILO: Social and Labour Bulletin, 1/83, p. 150. E. Gömöri: "Special protective legislation and equality of employment opportunity for women in Hungary", in International Labour Review, 1980, Vol. 119, No. 1, pp. 67-77. The Government notes in its report that participation of women in some training programmes is low and attributes this to traditional attitudes which tend to discourage women from choosing jobs generally considered to be for men. These attitudes are weakening as a result of efforts made in education for boys and girls and information of parents and the public in general, in an attempt to break down the concept that jobs can be classified according to sex. UNESCO, op. cit., p. 151. A.-M. Daume-Richard, C. Flament, M. Lemaire, C. Marry: "Les filles dans les formations de techniciens supérieurs liées aux nouvelles technologies. Le cas de BTS et de DUT d'Aix-Marseille", Laboratoire d'économie et de sociologie du travail, Aix-en-Provence, 1987. EEC: Equal Opportunities for Women -- Medium-Term Community Programme 1986-90, para. 14. See General Survey of 1986 on equal remuneration, paras. 132 et seq. cf. Recommendation No. 111, Paragraph 9: "There should be continuing co-operation between the competent authorities, representatives of employers and workers and appropriate bodies to consider what further positive measures may be necessary in the light of national conditions to put the principles of non-discrimination into effect." See Chapter II, Section 2, para. 106. Co-operation is broader and more general than the concept of consultation of employers' and workers' organisations prior to decisions concerning new criteria of discrimination and determination of special protective measures provided for in Article 1, paragraph 1(b), and Article 5, paragraph 2, of the Convention; on the scope of the concept of consultation, see ILO, General Survey of the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations on tripartite consultation (international labour standards), ILC, 68th Session, 1982, paras. 42-45. In Australia, the Government states that a special conference of the federal and state Governments, of employers' and workers' organisations and of the other bodies concerned was held in 1986 to consider means of eliminating all unjustified restrictions on the employment of women; see also RCE 1987, Finland: the Finnish Employers' Confederation (STK) and the Employers' Confederation of Service Industries have alleged that the 1986 Equality Act was prepared without the co-operation of the employers' confederations. The Committee recalls that, in accordance with Article 3(a) of the Convention, the Member for which the Convention is in force must undertake to seek the co-operation of employers' and workers' organisations. The obligation laid down in this Article of the Convention should be seen as an obligation regarding means ("undertakes ... to seek") which depend on national circumstances and customs. See Recommendation No. 111, Paragraph 2(e). Section 8 of the Act respecting the organisation of the Ministry of Labour and Social Promotion. See also Sweden, section 7 of the Equality Act of 17 December 1979, as amended in 1985, which provides that collective agreements may establish positive measures conducive to equality at work. Chad, division 4, para. 2, of the general collective agreement; Gabon, division 6, para. 2, of the provisions common to collective agreements covering different branches of activity; Jamaica, para. 53 of the Kaiser Bauxite agreement of 1 June 1978: "The Company and the Union agree to promote and maintain harmonious relations by: (1) non-discrimination against any employee by reason of nationality, race, religious or political beliefs, non-union or union affiliations or union activities"; Mali, collective agreement for mining companies and undertakings dated 24 May 1985; Togo, interoccupational collective agreement of 1 May 1978. S. 44(f) of the Industrial Relations Act, 1980. This extension procedure is prescribed, for example, in laws in Argentina, Austria, Belgium, Benin, Bolivia, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Ecuador, Ethiopia, France, Gabon, Federal Republic of Germany, Ghana, Guinea, Italy, Luxembourg, Madagascar, Mali, Mauritania, Mexico, Morocco, the Netherlands, Niger, Portugal, Peru, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Switzerland, Tunisia, Zaire, etc. See, for example, France, s. L.133-5 of the Labour Code, LS 1981-Fr. 1. The branch agreement must contain provisions relating, inter alia, to exercise by employees of the right to organise and of freedom of opinion, to the methods of application of the principle of equality of remuneration, to methods of special training for handicapped persons, to occupational equality between men and women and, where inequality is noted, measures for remedying this, to equality of treatment between French and foreign employees, especially as regards employment, to conditions for implementing the right to work of all handicapped persons capable of working, in particular by applying the employment obligation laid down in the Code, to special conditions of work for pregnant women or nursing mothers, etc. See General Survey of 1986 on equal remuneration, paras. 226 et seq. See Canada, section 136.1 of the Canadian Labour Code: "A trade union or representative of a trade union that is the bargaining agent for a bargaining unit shall not act in a manner that is arbitrary, discriminatory or in bad faith in the representation of any of the employees in the unit". See note 94 below in respect of this duty of fair representation. See, for example, Spain, s. 17(1) of the Workers' Charter cited above; Ireland, s. 10 of the Employment Equality Act, 1977, cited above; Sweden, s. 8 of the Act of 1979, cited above; USSR, s. 5 of the Labour Code, LS 1971-USSR 1. In the Philippines, the Government states that the provisions of collective agreements which terminate a woman employee's contract of employment upon her marriage are automatically null and void. See, for example, Italy, s. 19 of the Employment Equality Act, No. 903, cited above; Luxembourg, s. 3.1 of the 1981 Act respecting equal treatment for men and women, cited above, provides that equal treatment must be ensured, inter alia, in collective agreements, individual contracts of employment and the internal rules of undertakings, and s. 6 provides that any stipulation, whether laid down by agreement or contained in regulations or conditions of employment, is automatically null and void if it conflicts with the principle of equal treatment. S. L.122-35(2). The internal rules of an undertaking must be submitted to the labour inspector, who may demand the withdrawal or modification of provisions therein that are contrary to laws and regulations. The inspector's decision is subject to approval by the administrative judge, who has the authority to censure rules which, even though they may be legitimate in principle, appear excessive by virtue of their scope. A clause in the internal rules of Air France, establishing a retirement age of 50 for female cabin staff only, was annulled on the grounds of illegal discrimination (Council of State, 6 Feb. 1982, Dlle Baudet). The dismissal of a woman employee for having married a colleague contrary to a clause in the internal rules stipulating that both spouses in a married couple may not be employed in the undertaking at the same time was deemed to be lacking in real foundation and serious justification. The Court of Appeal ruled that employees are not required to observe an illicit clause in internal rules, even if they were aware of it when taking up employment, and that freedom to marry may not be impeded by an employer save in very exceptional cases where service requirements make this absolutely essential (Cour de Cassation, Chambre sociale, 10 June 1982, Bull. V, No. 392, p. 291). See also Guinea, s. 135 of the Labour Code of 1988 makes the disciplinary power of the head of an undertaking subject to supervision by the labour magistrate. "At the employee's request, the court shall annul the penalty which was imposed because ... the offence with which the employee was charged ... is not employment-related ...". The burden is on the employer to produce evidence and the employee is given the benefit of the doubt (s. 138). In the United States, referring to the duty of fair representation of unions in respect of their members (cf. Steel v. Louisville and Nashville Railway Co. 323 US 192 (1944)) and to s. 703(c) of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, the Court of Appeal of the District of Columbia, in a case of racial discrimination, ruled that "A union's duty, in representing its members and protecting them from insidious treatment, must certainly be broader than simply refusing to sign overtly discriminatory agreements"; Macklin v. Spector Freight System, Inc., 478 F.2d 979 (US Court of Appeals, District of Columbia, 1973)). See also the ruling handed down in Myers v. Gilman Paper Corp., 14 FEP Cases 218 (US Court of Appeals, 5th Circuit); the Court of Appeals considered that, in view of the fact that the (indirect) racial discrimination stemmed from a negotiated rule, the responsibility of the trade union organisations was involved. Consequently, the unions were held liable for the payment of half the compensation paid to the persons discriminated against, the amount due being shared out among the unions according to the number of their members in the undertaking. The Court also allowed that the federation to which a local union was affiliated was jointly liable with the latter by virtue of the federation's supervision of the negotiations and its obligatory participation in all local agreements. See also United Kingdom: the Employment Appeal Tribunal allowed the principle of the possibility of taking legal action against a union on the basis of section 42(1) of the 1975 Sex Discrimination Act which deals with aiding unlawful acts ((1978) 2 All E.R. 504 (Employment Appeal Tribunal)). Canada, s. 10 of the Canadian Human Rights Act; Zimbabwe, s. 9(c) of the Labour Relations Act of 1984 whereby "a trade union or a workers' committee commits an unfair labour practice if by act or omission it ... fails to represent an employee's interests with respect to any violation of his rights under this Act", together with ss. 5 (protection of employees against discrimination based on race, tribe, place of origin, political opinion, colour, religious beliefs and sex), 6 (protection of employees' right to fair labour standards) and 7 (protection of employees' right to democracy in the workplace). Such behaviour is liable to be penalised under s. 134 of the 1984 Act. Ministry of Labour: "Aspects of women's employment in Austria" (Vienna, undated); in the report (for the period 1985-87) due in respect of the Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100), the Government states that most of the differences noted in 1978 have been eliminated and that the Committee on Equality of Treatment is to examine the remaining differences. For example, jobs that are largely considered to be "men's jobs" or "women's jobs"; jobs which are mainly held by women and which do not lead to any other position in the undertaking, thus precluding any promotion; promotion systems based on length and diversity of experience in the undertaking although women and members of disadvantaged minorities are confined to a single department, etc. Report of the Government under article 22 of the ILO Constitution. These agreements are framework agreements establishing the measures that should be taken in each undertaking in pursuit of the aim of equality between the sexes; all forms of discrimination must be combated and to this end the agreements provide for the devising and setting up of a personnel management policy guaranteeing fair conditions of recruitment and vocational training for both men and women; planning in respect of the organisation of work and working environment so as to eliminate obstacles to equality in employment; machinery for evaluating the measures in force so as to be able to pursue the equality policy on a permanent basis. See M. Chiesi: "Equality of opportunity between men and women: The case of Italy", in Trade union information, Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 1987. S. 28(3) of the Works Councils Act, LS 1979-Neth. 1. ILO: Social and Labour Bulletin, 2/86, p. 349. S. L.432-3-1 of the Labour Code (Act No. 83-635 of 13 July 1983). The report comprises a study in figures for the assessment, in each of the occupational categories of the undertaking, of the respective situation of women and men as regards recruitment, training, promotion, qualification, grading, working conditions and actual remuneration. It reviews the measures taken during the past year with a view to ensuring equality in employment, and the goals envisaged for the coming year, and contains a qualitative and quantitative definition of the measures to be taken for this purpose and an evaluation of their cost. Where measures envisaged in the previous report or requested by the committee have not been implemented, the report gives the reasons therefore. S. 18 of the Act of 13 July 1983 (uncodified), implemented by Decree No. 84-69 of 30 January 1984. This financial assistance seems to have mainly concerned large undertakings. The Minister of Social Affairs has introduced, on an experimental basis, a type of assistance that is better adapted to small and medium-sized enterprises in the form of a contract on equality between men and women in employment between the employer, the State and the persons concerned (Circular CF4-87 of 27 July 1987 to implement the Equality in Employment Act -- new provisions for small and medium-sized enterprises and industries). See above, Section 2, Subsection 1. United States: Affirmative action programme of American Telephone and Telegraph. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, taking advantage of an application for an increase in rates made by the company to the Federal Communications Commission, asked for an investigation to be carried out into the discriminatory practices of the company. Following the investigation, the company undertook to implement certain measures under three consent decrees and their annexes, which were approved by the court, giving them force of law. See Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: A Unique Competence -- A Study of Equal Employment Opportunity in the Bell System, report presented to the Federal Communications Commission, Washington, 1972; P.A. Wallace, ed.: Equal employment opportunity and the AT and T case (Cambridge, Mass. 1976); the decrees and their annexes are reproduced in the latter publication. Australia; United States: Affirmative action programme negotiated between iron and steel companies and the United Steelworkers of America. An initial decree was agreed to by nine iron and steel companies, the United Steelworkers of America (AFL-CIO), the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Department of Justice and the Department of Labour. It was approved by the court, giving it force of law. A second decree is similar in status to that of the AT and T case, the union not having consented to it. As regards the role of placement officers in the promotion of equality of opportunity and treatment see above, Chapter II, Section 2, paras. 93-94. The governments of the following countries made special mention of the role played by the Ministry of Labour and/or other ministries, the Labour Commissioner, the labour inspectorate, the employment office and the labour office: Algeria, Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Austria, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Chad, Colombia, Comoros, Costa Rica, Republic of Côte d'Ivoire, Cuba, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Guatemala, Guinea, Iraq, Kuwait, Madagascar, Malaysia, Mexico, Mozambique, Nepal, Niger, Norway, Qatar, Rwanda, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Seychelles, Syrian Arab Republic, Togo, Tunisia, Venezuela, Zambia. In France labour inspectors are responsible for monitoring the application of the Labour Code, including provisions inserted into the Code by the Act of July 1983 on occupational equality. They are also competent to investigate alleged infractions of s. 416 of the Penal Code. In Belgium, for example, in accordance with the Act of 4 August 1978 on economic reform (Title V) and orders issued under it, supervisory responsibilities as regards employees are entrusted, among others, to the inspectors of the labour office, the employment office and the occupational safety office, while the same responsibilities as regards self-employed workers are entrusted to a separate service. In Cameroon, for example, the labour inspector may order the medical examination of women and children with a view to ascertaining that the work allotted to them is not beyond their strength (Act No. 74-14 of 17 November 1974 instituting the Labour Code, LS 1974-Cam. 1, s. 94). In India, as regards equal pay between men and women, the Government may appoint inspectors having investigative powers (access to the workplace, examination of documents, questioning of the staff); the Government may also appoint agents responsible for hearing and deciding complaints concerning contraventions of the law, as well as claims arising out of non-payment of wages at equal rates to men and women workers (Act No. 25 of 1976, ss. 7 and 9, LS 1976-Ind. 1). In Luxembourg, the labour inspector may freely, and without prior notice, enter any establishment or worksite falling under the jurisdiction of the labour inspectorate, question employers and staff, examine accounts, records, files and documents. In its report, the Government of Tunisia stressed the responsibility of the labour inspectorate as regards protection against discriminatory actions, within the framework of its general function of supervising the application of labour legislation; it referred specifically to the labour inspectorate's power to inspect records in cases of dismissal. See the 1985 General Survey on Labour Inspection, and the General Survey of 1986 on equal remuneration. In Greece, equal treatment legislation (Act No. 1414 of 30 January 1984, s. 8(2), LS 1984-Gre. 1) calls for sex equality offices to be set up in all the labour inspection services to supervise the Act's application. In Portugal, the labour inspectorate which is responsible for enforcing the Legislative Decree guaranteeing equality of opportunity and treatment for men and women in employment and occupation, must first obtain the opinion of the Committee on Equality in Work and Employment before the drafting of its report, whenever there are reasonable questions concerning the existence of discriminatory situations or practices (Legislative Decree No. 392-79 of 20 September 1979, s. 18). Act No. 56 of 28 February 1987 on the organisation of the labour market. In the Federal Republic of Germany, workers' representatives have the right of co-determination in matters concerning recruitment and promotions, and participate in preparing personnel forms and in decisions concerning dismissals; they thus play an important role in the application of the principles of the Convention. In Belgium, the works councils must be informed annually of the composition of staff by sex, age bracket and occupational category, of the general development of employment within the enterprise, and especially of the causes for voluntary departure, retirement, and individual or collective dismissals, broken down according to the same criteria; moreover, they receive information concerning vocational training and staff policies, which enables them to monitor the enterprise's activities as regards recruitment, selection, transfers and promotions. In France, the employer is required to submit to the works council an annual report comparing the situation of men and women within the enterprise. Trade union representatives are provided with copies of the report, which contains, on the one hand, a quantitative comparative analysis of the situation of men and women workers, by occupational category, within the enterprise, and on the other hand, information which enables the trade union to take stock of measures aimed at ensuring occupational equality, meeting pre-established objectives, defining quantitative and qualitative measures to be undertaken in this connection, and evaluating their cost. Moreover, the employer is required to seek the opinion of the works council. The report is forwarded to the labour inspectorate, along with the works council's comments. Works councils in the Netherlands, pursuant to the Act on works councils, must seek to prevent all discrimination in the enterprise, and in particular to encourage equal treatment between men and women (RCE 1983, p. 221). The Government of Tunisia has stated that the joint advisory committees, which are elected in enterprises employing 20 or more workers, have special responsibilities as regards training, promotions and other aspects of the worker's career. In the USSR, many tasks are entrusted to the trade unions with a view to supervising and promoting equal treatment. They are responsible, in the first place, for ensuring the full observance of pertinent legislation and regulations, in particular by supervising the technical and legal aspects of work; thus, at their request, even senior administrators may be relieved of their duties in the event of serious infractions of labour legislation. Trade unions also participate in the drafting of legislation concerning women. They play a direct role in the preparation of development plans, which include measures to improve the situation of women workers. Their rights are also brought to bear on regulations. The enterprise's trade union committee, acting on behalf of workers and in accordance with their instructions, concludes a collective agreement with management every year. All collective agreements are required to contain a special chapter devoted to "the conditions of work and life for women workers, and allowances for the education of children". The trade union committee must also consider the question of vocational training and further training of women workers (A. Biryukova, "The role of the Soviet woman in the decision-making in trade union committees and in industry", in Labour and Society, Sept. 1985, pp. 307-321). Moreover, within the Presidium of the Central Council of Trade Unions, there are social affairs committees which deal with questions of life and work for women and the protection of maternity and children. They are responsible for finding solutions to the socio-economic problems facing working women, such as the improvement of occupational qualifications, the creation of safe and healthy conditions of work, social security and allowances for the education of children. The Government of the Syrian Arab Republic referred in its report to the role of trade union committees in the application of legal provisions. The Committee recalled, in connection with the adoption of Act No. 609 of 1986 concerning equality between men and women in Finland, that in accordance with Article 3(a) of the Convention, a Member for which the Convention is in force shall undertake to seek the co-operation of employers' and workers' organisations in promoting acceptance and observance of the national policy designed to promote equality of opportunity and treatment; the Committee expressed the hope that such a co-operation would preside over future activities (RCE 1987, pp. 359-360). Resolution on equal opportunities and equal treatment for men and women in employment, ILC, 71st Session, 1985. Such diversity bears witness to the possibilities of adapting the Convention to national circumstances and practices. Australia: Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Act, 1986; Austria: Equality of Treatment Committee, Equality of Treatment Act of 23 February 1979, as amended on 27 June 1985 and Federal Order of 14 October 1987; Canada: Canadian Human Rights Commission, Canadian Human Rights Act; Denmark: Danish Equality Council, Equality between the Sexes Act (No. 161) of 12 April 1978, LS 1978-Dan. 3; Spain: the Women's Institute Act (No. 16) of 1983; United States: Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII; Finland: Equality Ombudsman and the Equality Board, Act on equality between men and women (No. 609) of 14 August 1986; France: National Occupational Equality Council, Equality in Employment Act (No. 83-635 of 13 July 1983, SL 1983-Fr. 2); Greece: Sex Equality Section under the Ministry of Labour and the National Labour Council, Act No. 1414 of 13 January 1984 respecting the application of the principle of equality of the sexes in employment relationships, LS 1984-Gr. 1; Ireland: Employment Equality Agency, Employment Equality Act (No. 116) of 1 June 1977, LS 1977-Ire. 1; Iceland: Equal Status Council, Act No. 65 of 1985 on the equal status and equal rights of women and men; Norway: Equality of Opportunity Ombudsman and Committee, Equality between the Sexes Act (No. 45) of 9 June 1978, LS 1978-Nor. 1; New Zealand: Race Relations Conciliator, Race Relations Act (No. 150) of 1971, LS 1971-NZ 1, Human Rights Commission, Act No. 49 of 1977; Netherlands: Equality of Opportunity Committee, Equality Act (No. 86) of 1980, LS 1980-Neth. 2, and Equal Pay Act (No. 129) of 1975, LS 1975-Neth. 1; Equality of Opportunity Committee (Civil Service), Act concerning equal treatment of men and women (civil service), 1980; Portugal: Committee on Equality in Work and Employment, Legislative Decree No. 392/79, LS 1979-Por. 3; United Kingdom: the Commission for Racial Equality, Race Relations Act, 1976, LS 1976-UK 2, Equal Opportunities Commission, Sex Discrimination Act, 1975, LS 1975-UK 1; Sweden: Equal Opportunities Ombudsman and Committee, Act of 17 December 1979 concerning equality between men and women at work, LS 1979-Sw. 2, Ombudsman and Committee entrusted with the application of Ethnic Discrimination Act (No. 442) of 1986. This is the case, for example, in Belgium where the Committee on Women's Work was set up by a Royal Decree. For example, in Belgium, the Ministerial Committee for the Status of Women was set up by order of the Council of Ministers in 1980; in Cyprus, the Committee on the status of women was set up in 1979 by an order of the Council of Ministers; in Italy, the National Committee entrusted with the elimination of obstacles, even indirect, that might limit equality between men and women, was set up by Ministerial Decree in 1983; and the Federal Committee for issues concerning women was established in Switzerland by an order of the Federal Council in 1976. For example, Australia: Ministerial Department of Ethnic Affairs, Ministerial Department of Aboriginal Affairs; Bangladesh: Ministry on the Status of Women's Affairs; Burundi: Ministry on the Status of Women; Chad: Ministry for the Promotion of Women and Social Affairs; New Zealand: Ministry of Women's Affairs, Ministry of Maori Affairs; Senegal: Secretary of State for Women's Affairs; Sri Lanka: Ministry of Women's Affairs. Sweden: Minister for Issues of Equality between Men and Women attached to the Ministry of Labour. For example, Antigua and Barbuda: Women's Desk; Argentina: Directorate for Women's Issues; Australia: Office of the Status of Women; Bangladesh: Women's Department; Canada: Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development; Dominican Republic: Women's Bureau; Ecuador: National Women's Board; Egypt: General Department for Women's Affairs; Equatorial Guinea: Department for the Promotion of Women; Finland: Delegation on Equality Issues; Greece: General Secretariat for Equality of Sexes and Offices for Equality; Haiti: Women's Board; India: Women's Welfare and Development Bureau; Jamaica: Bureau of Women's Affairs; Japan: Bureau of Women's Affairs; Jordan: Department for Women and Child Care; Netherlands: Bureau for the Prevention of Racial Discrimination; Nicaragua: Women's Bureau; Niger: Board for the Promotion of Women; Panama: Women's Bureau; Philippines: Bureau of Women and Minors, Office on Muslim Affairs, Offices for the Northern and Southern Cultural Communities; Poland: Bureau of Plenipotentiary in charge of women's affairs; Sri Lanka: Women's Bureau; Switzerland: Bureaux of Women's Affairs under the federal administration and cantons of Geneva and Jura; Togo: General Directorate for the Promotion of Women; Trinidad and Tobago: Division of Women's Affairs, Government Community Development Division; United States: Bureau of Indian Affairs; Venezuela: National Women's Bureau, Central Bureau of Indigenous Affairs. For example, Cyprus: Committee on Women's Affairs. For example, Egypt: National Commission for Women in Egypt; Norway: Equality of Opportunity Council; Philippines: National Commission on the Role of Filipino Women; Trinidad and Tobago: National Commission on the Status of Women; Tunisia: Committee on Women's Work; USSR: Standing Commissions dealing with women's working and living conditions under the two houses of the Supreme Soviet, the Council of the Union and the Council of Nationalities. Above-mentioned resolution on equal opportunities and equal treatment for men and women in employment, ILC, 71st Session, 1985. The Commissioners, members of the Canadian Human Rights Commission, are appointed by the Governor in Council; the Chief Commissioner and the Deputy-Chief Commissioner, who are full-term members, have a seven-year term, whereas the other commissioners have a three-year term. The members of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission are appointed by the President with the consent of the Senate. In this country the Equal Employment Opportunity Co-ordinating Council is composed of the Secretary of Labor, the Chairperson of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the Attorney-General, the Chairperson of the United States Civil Service Commission and the Chairperson of the United States Civil Rights Commission; see also Norway, the Chairperson or Vice-Chairperson of the Equal Status Appeals Board must be a judge; Iceland, the Equal Status Council is presided over by a jurist who is not appointed by the Government, but by the Supreme Court. Equal Opportunity Commissions in New South Wales, South Australia, Western Australia and the State of Victoria. For example, there are Human Rights Commissions in most provinces; widespread machinery has been set up at all levels, both federal and provincial, with varied competencies and powers. As regards equality of opportunity between men and women, this machinery usually includes an office for the status of women with ministerial responsibilities, a structure to co-ordinate policies of agencies involved in women's labour problems and advisory councils on the status of women; United Nations, CEDAW/C/5/Add. 16-1983. For example, Connecticut: Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities; Delaware: State Human Relations Commission; Minnesota: Commissioner of Human Rights. See for example: Austria, Committee on Women's Employment; Belgium, Commission on Women's Work; Denmark, Equality of Status Council; Ecuador, National Women's Council; France, Council of Occupational Equality; Departmental Commission for Disabled Workers, Disabled Ex-Servicemen and similar; Israel, Tripartite Public Council; Luxembourg, Committee for Women's Work; Malawi, National Women's Employment Commission; similarly, commissions for equality of status or opportunity in Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal and Sweden are made up of employers' and workers' representatives. See above, para. 196. For example, in France, the Departmental Commission on Disabled Workers includes both an employers' and a workers' representative as well as a representative of disabled workers; the Committee on Equality in Work and Employment in Portugal includes representatives from the Commission on the Status of Women. For example, human rights commissions. For example, commissions on equality between men and women. In its General Survey of 1986 on equal remuneration, the Committee referred to the ILO Directory of Governmental Bodies dealing with Women Workers' Questions, Geneva, 1983, which indicated that over 90 countries had set up administrative bodies dealing with matters affecting women workers. For example, the minority commissions set up in India, Mexico, Pakistan, Philippines and Yugoslavia. In the United States, for example, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is competent to hear and investigate complaints of discrimination in employment procedures and practices; there is also a Civil Rights Commission which can receive complaints of discrimination and is chiefly concerned with evaluating application of civil rights legislation and assessing the situation as regards observance of human rights (United Nations doc. E/CN.4/1987/37, p. 16). For example, Australia: Equal Opportunity Bureau of the Commonwealth Public Service Board; Canada: Office of Native Employment; Netherlands: Commission for Equality of Opportunity and Treatment in the Public Service; New Zealand: Equal Employment Opportunity Unit of the State Services Commission; United States: Civil Service Commission. Royal Order of 2 December 1974, s. 2. ILO, Social and Labour Bulletin, 2/1986, p. 349. United Nations, CEDAW/13/Add.2-1987. Decision No. 401, 1 April 1987. CEDAW/A/42/38-1985. See below, para. 213, note 156. Fifth Report of the Commission for Scheduled Castes/ Scheduled Tribes. In this country, co-operation between the Human Rights Commission and the New Zealand Employers' Federation and other groups concerned led to the publication by the Federation in 1985 of a Positive Action Manual on equal opportunity between men and women and different ethnic groups. Executive Orders Nos. 122-B and 122-C, 1987. For a thorough examination of administrative arrangements concerning indigenous peoples, see United Nations doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1986/7/Add.1, pp. 223 et seq. Executive Order No. 122-A, 1987. United Nations, CEDAW/5/Add.41 -- 1987. See for example, France: the Central Council on Occupational Equality between Men and Women reviews proposed legislation and decrees concerning occupational equality between men and women, as well as texts concerning specific conditions of work linked to the worker's sex (Decree No. 84-136 of 22 January 1984, which supplements the Labour Code pursuant to s. L.330-3, concerning the Central Council on Occupational Equality between Men and Women). In Brazil similar functions are carried out by the National Women's Commission (Act No. 7353 of 29 August 1985). In the United States, the Equal Employment Opportunity Co-ordinating Council submits an annual report of its activities to Congress, and makes recommendations for legislative or administrative changes (1964 Civil Rights Act, s. 715). In New Zealand the Human Rights Commission may comment on the impact of legislation or policies envisaged by the Government in the area of human rights. In Portugal the Occupational and Employment Equality Commission may recommend the adoption of legislative, regulatory and administrative provisions with a view to enhancing the application of the Legislative Decree on equal opportunity and treatment (Legislative Decree No. 392/79, s. 15). In the United Kingdom the Commission for Racial Equality is responsible for keeping under review the working of relevant legislation, and for drawing and submitting proposals concerning amendments (Act of 1976 on race relations). In Northern Ireland the Standing Advisory Commission on Human Rights reports to Parliament and evaluates the suitability of current legislation and the extent to which it prevents discrimination based on religious conviction and political opinion, within the framework of the 1976 Act on fair employment practices. Also in the United Kingdom, the Commission for Racial Equality and the Equal Opportunities Commission may establish codes of practice which, in their opinion, tend to eliminate discrimination in employment and promote equality of opportunity among persons of different sexes or belonging to ethnic groups. Codes of this kind were adopted and entered into force in 1984 (race) and 1985 (sex). Proposals to modify current legislation or practices have been issued, for example, by the Employment Equality Agency in Ireland, the Ombudsman in Sweden, and the Human Rights Commission in Canada. The 1983 amendments to the Canadian Human Rights Act reflected a certain number of changes which the Canadian Human Rights Commission had been calling for since its creation. Specifically, these amendments concerned the protection of physically or mentally disabled persons, an expanded definiton of sex discrimination, and the explicit recognition of the employer's responsibility for discrimination committed by its employees. The Canadian Human Rights Act was further amended in 1985 at the request of the Commission. The Commission also helped to draft the 1986 Employment Equity Act and approved an ordinance on equal wages which came into force in December 1986. Likewise, the Canadian Commission on the Status of Women has formulated recommendations on measures to be taken to implement equality of opportunity and treatment between men and women, and was thus involved in the initial formulation of a vast framework of legislative provisions which were adopted in this connection. See also the General Survey of 1986 on equal remuneration, para. 117. See, for example, United Kingdom: Local authorities in London requested the Equal Opportunity Commission to urge the Government to abandon its plans to prevent local authorities from encouraging contractors to recruit greater numbers of women. The Government is opposed to the use of public contracts by local authorities to promote equality of opportunity for women, Blacks and ethnic minorities, and insists that decisions be taken exclusively on the basis of commercial considerations. Although s. 71 of the 1976 Race Relations Act stipulates that local authorities are required to promote good relations between the races, there is no similar obligation in the Act of 1975 concerning sex discrimination, as modified by the Act of 1986. In a letter addressed to the Equal Opportunity Commission, the Association of Local Authorities of London insistently requested that the Sex Discrimination Act be amended so as to require generally that local authorities promote equality between the sexes (ALA urges changes in Sex Discrimination Act, The Law Society's Gazette, 13 January 1988). See, for example, India: The monitoring commissions established pursuant to the 1976 Act concerning the abolition of bonded labour are primarily responsible for advising the authorities on the application of this Act, for monitoring infractions of the Act, and for recommending appropriate measures in response to such infractions. The Commission also provides legal assistance in proceedings concerning bonded labour. The Indian Minorities Commission established in 1978 is responsible for evaluating the effectiveness of a number of guarantees laid down in the Constitution and in national and state legislation for the protection of minorities; for making recommendations with a view to ensuring the effective application and enforcement of all relevant legislation and guarantees; for evaluating the application of national and state policies regarding minorities; for examining specific complaints concerning the violation of minority rights and guarantees; for undertaking studies, research and analyses on the elimination of discrimination against minorities; for recommending suitable legal and social measures which the national or state governments may take in the interest of minorities; for collecting information on the situation of minorities, and for submitting regular reports to the Government. In Finland s. 16 of Act 609 of 1986, Act No. 610 of 1986 and Regulation 739 of 1986 provide for an ombud/ombudsman and a commission. In Norway Act No. 45 of 1978 and Directives issued in March 1978 provide for an ombud/ombudsman and an appeals commission. In Sweden Act No. 412 of 1980 and Directives Nos. 415 and 416 of 1980 provide for an ombud/ombudsman and an equal opportunity commission. Act No. 442 of 1986. In Australia the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (created pursuant to Act No. 125 of 1986) which is responsible, inter alia, for guaranteeing Australia's observance of obligations arising from the Convention, may conduct inquiries at the request of the Commissioner, or in response to a complaint, or on its own initiative; it may seek to resolve the matter or effect settlement by conciliation, or present recommendations to prevent the discriminatory act or practice from being repeated, and require the payment of compensation or otherwise remedy the damages in question. In Canada the federal Human Rights Commission holds similar powers as regards investigation and conciliation; where these do not suffice, it may appoint a Human Rights Tribunal. Such tribunals may recommend or order the correction of situations arising from discriminatory practices, grant the rights which have been refused, set up affirmative action programmes, indemnify the victim for lost wages and expenses, and order the payment of damages (between July 1984 and December 1986 the Commission received 1,094 complaints, 80 per cent of which concerned employment). Likewise, in New Zealand, in cases where the Human Rights Commission's efforts at conciliation have failed, the matter may be brought before an equal opportunity tribunal. In the United States, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission may attempt conciliation independently or in response to a complaint, or refer the matter to the courts. In Portugal the Occupational and Employment Equality Commission may inspect workplaces, request information from all public or private entities and issue opinions as regards equality, especially when so requested by occupational organisations and the agency responsible for procedures of conciliation; it may make public proven cases of violation of provisions concerning equality. In the United Kingdom the Race Equality and Equal Opportunity Commissions may undertake investigations concerning discriminatory acts or practices at their wn initiative or at the request of the Secretary of State. They may order changes in practices or procedures and issue non-discrimination notices concerning discriminatory practices with a view to ending or modifying such practices. If such notices are breached within a period of five years, or if other cases of discrimination persist, the courts may issue a restraining order addressed to the persons responsible to respect the law. In Ireland the Employment Equality Agency has similar powers. Although these agencies are not authorised to receive individual complaints, they may provide assistance to persons wishing to exercise their right to file suit when the case at hand raises a question of principle, or when the complainant cannot reasonably be expected to take the necessary steps without assistance. In the Netherlands, when investigations undertaken by the Equality Commission point to the existence of sex discrimination, the Commission so informs the competent ministries as well as the person responsible for the discrimination; it may also notify employers' and workers' organisations (above-mentioned Act of 1 March 1980). In Spain the Institute for Women's Affairs is responsible for receiving and forwarding to the competent authorities complaints presented by women concerning specific cases of sex discrimination in fact or in law (Act No. 16 of 1983 concerning the creation of the autonomous Institute for Women's Affairs). In Japan an Equal Opportunity Mediation Commission, established in each prefectural Women's and Young Workers' Office may conduct mediation and formulate a proposal for mediation, and recommend its acceptance by the parties concerned (Act No. 45 of 1 June 1985 concerning the adjustment of legislation to promote the guarantee of equal opportunity and treatment in employment between men and women, ss. 16 to 21, LS 1985-Jap. 1). In Austria the Commission for Equality of Treatment may, on its own initiative or at the request of occupational organisations, issue an opinion on questions concerning equality between men and women; it may also examine individual cases to ascertain compliance with the principle of equality, and request the employer to submit a report and prepare proposals aimed at putting an end to such discrimination. At its own initiative, or upon request, it may examine individual cases as regards the violation of statutory provisions on equality. Where the complainant's request contains sufficient evidence (s. 6 of the Act of 1985), the Commission may request the employer to submit a report. In the event of the employer's failure to reply, any occupational organisation may bring the case before a labour court. The Commission may publish in the Ministry of Labour's bulletin details concerning any judgement involving infractions of the principle of equality. In Finland, Norway and Sweden, an ombud/ombudsman and an equality commission are responsible for implementing and supervising legislation on equality between men and women; the systems vary slightly from one country to another. In Sweden the ombud/ombudsman may enjoin the employer, under penalty of a fine, to furnish the required information, and may file suit in an ordinary court of law to obtain payment of such fines (Act No. 216 of 1985, s. 2). See, for example, Belgium: the Advisory Commission for disputes concerning equality of treatment in the public service (Royal Order of 2 March 1984), when so requested by the competent jurisdiction, is responsible for giving opinions on disputes concerning the application of provisions of equality of treatment in the public service; it is also responsible for forestalling disputes through appropriate means (opinions, studies, proposals); United States: the Civil Service Commission is responsible for applying provisions concerning non-discrimination in the federal civil service, by means of suitable reparations, including the reinstatement or recruitment of an official, with or without payment of lost wages; Netherlands: the Commission for Equality between Men and Women in the Public Service may undertake investigations and report instances of discrimination to the authorities and to staff representatives. See, for example, Canada: at the federal level, the Human Rights Commission examines complaints presented by public servants alleging discrimination under the Human Rights Act; this function was exercised by the Public Service Commission until 1985. Norway: the ombud/ombudsman and the Equality Commission are responsible for the private and public sectors. Pursuant to the Canadian Human Rights Act, the investigation and conciliation must be conducted by different individuals; Australia (Victoria): nothing which has been said or done during the course of negotiations carried out by the Equality Commissioner engaged in an investigation or attempt at conciliation may be used as evidence in proceedings before the Commission (Victoria, 1984 Equal Opportunity Act, s. 42). United States: the disclosure of such information may be subject to criminal sanctions, according to the 1964 Civil Rights Act, s. 706. As set forth in paragraph 13(a) of the above-cited 1985 resolution. See above paras. 213-214. Workers in the private sector who allege discrimination in employment and occupation may first of all appeal to the internal settlement procedures, calling upon their representatives where appropriate or requesting their trade union to defend their rights vis-à-vis the employer. In France, for example, employees' delegates may submit individual claims to the employer concerning the application of laws and collective agreements in the undertaking. In some countries a worker who considers he or she has been discriminated against can challenge the employer's decision under a procedure for the examination of grievances. Recourse to this type of procedure is frequently provided for in collective agreements in Canada and in the United States. In the latter country, where in a vast number of undertakings no collective agreement applies, voluntary complaints procedures have sometimes been set up. See above, paras. 193-194, on the subject of the powers of investigation of the labour inspectorate and its competence to ensure compliance with labour legislation. For example, Jordan, s. 26 of the Labour Code of 1960 (LS 1960-Jor. 1), as amended in 1972. In Greece, in cases concerning equality of treatment between men and women involving sums below a particular level, the case is brought before the judge of a civil court which serves as a labour tribunal, and appeals are brought before the civil court of the first instance; where larger amounts are involved, the case is brought before the civil court which serves as a labour tribunal, and appeals are brought before the court of appeal. In Italy also, complaints concerning equality of treatment between men and women are heard, in accordance with an expedited special procedure, by a magistrate acting as the judge of a labour court, and appeals are brought before the court of the second instance sitting as a labour court. In some French-speaking countries of Africa, in particular, the Labour Code provides that individual labour disputes may be brought before the competent labour tribunal; for example: Madagascar, s. 130 of the Labour Code of 1975, LS 1975-Mad. 1; Mali, s. 241 of the Labour Code of 1962, LS 1962-Mali 1; this however is not the case in the Federal Republic of Germany, or in the United Kingdom under s. 54 of the Race Relations Act. Thus, for example, in Belgium in cases of equality of treatment between men and women the person who considers himself or herself to be the victim of discrimination may take civil action before a labour tribunal, penal action before a criminal court on certain grounds, which are listed exhaustively and, in the case of an appeal against refusal of admission to vocational training, the law has made provision for an expedited complaints procedure before the civil courts. For example: industrial tribunals ("conseils de prud'hommes") in France and Luxembourg; in the latter country, cases involving private employers are brought before an arbitration tribunal which is also made up of representatives of both parties; USSR works' labour disputes committees; the decision of one of these committees may be appealed to the competent local works' or factory trade union; it is also possible to appeal directly to the district people's court. In Japan, if the efforts of the mediation committee fail to produce a result, the dispute may be brought before the courts as a civil case. In Somalia, a worker who considers himself or herself to have been discriminated against in employment may bring the matter before the joint committee of his or her undertaking or a ministerial committee made up of representatives of management, the trade unions, the Youth Union and the Women's Union. In Ireland, for example, the labour court examines cases in the initial stage and decides whether to appeal to an industrial relations officer or to an equality officer for investigation and recommendation. Nepal, information furnished by the Government. In France, joint administrative committees, made up of an equal number of representatives of the administration and of the staff, are consulted on individual decisions affecting members of the civil service; the Central Council for the Public Service, which is also a joint body, is the final body for appeals in cases of discipline or promotion; its competence embraces all general matters concerning the state public service. For example: administrative tribunals in France, Greece and Italy (appeal to the Council of State); Council of State, Disputes Committee in Luxembourg; in the Federal Republic of Germany, disputes concerning employees -- "Beamte" -- in the public service are heard by administrative bodies and those concerning employees and workers -- "Angestellte", "Arbeiter" -- are heard by labour courts; Peru, a public service court is responsible for dealing in the last instance with individual complaints by public servants as regards the application of administrative laws and regulations. As the Committee stated above, para. 211, in Belgium a special expedited procedure has been set up for the examination of cases of alleged discrimination in respect of access to training. General Surveys on equal remuneration of 1975, para. 73, and 1986, para. 171. e.g. Australia (s. 50 of the Sex Discrimination Act, 1984); Austria (ss. 5 and 6 of the Equality of Treatment Act, 1979); Belgium (s. 132 of the Economic Reform Act, 1978 (LS 1978-Bel. 2) provides that representative organisations of workers and employers may, for the purpose of defending their members' rights, be parties to any disputes arising out of the Act); Brazil (ss. 513 and 839 of Legislative Decree No. 5452 to approve the consolidation of labour laws (LS 1985-Bra. 1)); Jordan (s. 26 of the 1960 Labour Code, as amended in 1972); Sweden (s. 4 of Act No. 371 of 1974); Zimbabwe (s. 9 of the Labour Relations Act, 1984, provides that a trade union or a workers' committee commits an unfair labour practice if it fails to represent an employee's interests with respect to any violation of his or her rights under the Act or under a valid collective bargaining agreement). In Belgium, for example, the workers' representative organisations have capacity to bring proceedings based on decrees giving binding effect to collective decisions or agreements, on the application and performance of collective agreements and on the rights conferred on members of the organisation by collective employment agreements. The organisations are granted an independent power to defend the rights of their members who need not therefore authorise them to do so (s. 4 of the Act of 5 December 1968 respecting collective industrial agreements and joint committees (LS 1968-Bel. 1)). This does not however affect the right of the members to bring an action individually on their own behalf, or to take part in the proceedings (Act of 4 August 1978, cited above). In France, for example, organisations or groups which are capable of suing and being sued and whose members are bound by a collective labour agreement may bring all actions arising out of the agreement on behalf of their members, without having to prove that they have special authority from the member concerned, on condition that such member has been informed and has not objected. The member concerned may however intervene at any time in the proceedings instituted by the organisation or group. The latter may at any time intervene in the proceedings on the ground of the collective interest of its members in the settlement of the dispute. A trade union may in any court of law exercise all the rights of a civil plaintiff in respect of matters directly or indirectly affecting the collective interests of the occupation that it represents (ss. L.135-4 and L.411-11 of the Labour Code (LS 1981-Fr. 1)). In Sweden, if a trade union is empowered to institute proceedings before a labour court on behalf of any person who is or has been a member of the organisation (Ch. 4, s. 5 of Act No. 371 of 1974, as amended (LS 1977-Swe. 3)), the person concerned or the ombud/ombudsman is not entitled to do so unless the organisation itself fails to take action. Netherlands, s. 3(2) of the Act of 1 March 1980 (LS 1980-Neth. 2). Actions may be maintained as class actions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, subject to Rule 23(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure which permits class action only if (1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (3) the claims or defences of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defences of the class; and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. In addition to the above four requirements, three other conditions must also be taken into consideration: (1) separate actions would create a risk of inconsistent adjudications or adjudications which would substantially impair the ability of non-parties to protect their interests; (2) where injunctive relief is sought, the party opposing the class has acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class; (3) questions of law or fact common to the members of the class predominate over questions affecting only individual members, and class action is the superior method for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy. Class actions are also permitted under the Equal Pay Act, 1963, but they are governed by the "opt-in" provision: an employee must specifically give consent in writing to become a party plaintiff (Bureau of National Affairs: Fair Employment Practices Manual, pp. 431:225 and pp. 431:525). S. 50(1)(c) of the Sex Discrimination Act 1984 provides that a complaint may be lodged with the Human Rights Commission by a person or persons included in a class of persons aggrieved by an unlawful act, on behalf of the persons included in that class of persons. In considering whether a complaint was made in good faith, the Commission must satisfy itself, inter alia, that the class of persons concerned is so numerous that joinder of all its members is impracticable, that there are questions of law or fact that are common to all members of the class, that the claims of the complainant are typical of the claims of the class and that multiple complaints would be likely to produce varying determinations that could have incompatible or inconsistent results for the individual members of the class (s. 70(2)(a)). Even if these conditions are not met, the Commission may decide that the justice of the case demands that the matter be dealt with and a remedy provided by means of a representative complaint. S. 38 of the Human Rights Commission Act 1977 empowers the Commission to bring proceedings on behalf of a class of persons and to seek remedies on behalf of persons who belong to the class. While no provision is made under the Canadian Human Rights Act for class actions as such, complaints filed jointly or separately by more than one individual or group may be dealt with together if the Human Rights Commission is satisfied that they involve substantially the same issues of fact and law (s. 32(4)). In the province of Quebec the Code of Civil Procedure which applies to the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms provides for class actions. On the basis of established jurisprudence, any interest group or special group in India can bring litigation in court seeking enforcement of the right of women to equal remuneration for work of equal value. In Canada, for example, the Human Rights Commission may request the President of the Human Rights Tribunal Panel to appoint a single Human Rights Tribunal if it is satisfied that the examination of the complaint is justified. In the United States, if the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission is unable to resolve a complaint submitted under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by means of conciliation, it may sue the person against whom the complaint is directed. In Iceland, the Equal Status Council is empowered to initiate legal proceedings if its proposals for redress in respect of a violation of the provisions concerning equality are not accepted. In New Zealand, the Race Relations Conciliator of the Human Rights Commission may bring proceedings before the Equal Opportunities Tribunal in the event of the failure of the conciliation procedure. In Sweden, the ombud/ombudsman may initiate proceedings with the labour court on behalf of the alleged victims of discrimination if a settlement out of court proves impossible and if the ombud/ombudsman considers that a ruling on the dispute is important for the enforcement of the law. For example, Cyprus (Factories Law, 1956, s. 92(1)); Ghana (Labour Decree, s. 48(e); Factories, Offices and Shops Act, s. 73); Kenya (Employment Act, s. 50); Malawi (Labour Legislation Act (various provisions), s. 4); Pakistan (Factories Act, s. 74); Singapore (Factories Act, s. 75(1)). For example, Benin (Labour Code, s. 140); Comoros (Labour Code, s. 163); Gabon (Labour Code, s. 147); Japan (s. 102 of the Labour Standard Law 1947 authorises labour inspectors to exercise the power of a judicial police officer); Mali (Labour Code, s. 352). In Australia assistance in meeting the costs of an inquiry by the Human Rights Commission, or of proceedings in the federal court, is available to complainants as well as to persons accused of an offence under the terms of the Act of 1984 on sex discrimination (ss. 83 and 84); in Italy, as regards disputes concerning relations between employers and workers in the service of the State, poor persons whose claims are not obviously unfounded are entitled to legal aid at the expense of the State (Act No. 533 on the settlement of individual labour disputes and disputes concerning compulsory social insurance and assistance (LS 1973-It. 1)); in Spain, art. 24.2 of the Constitution establishes the right of each person to legal aid. For example, Mexico, (s. 685 of the Decree dated 30 December 1979 amending the Federal Labour Code (LS 1979-Mex. 1)); Senegal, s. 210 of Act No. 80-01 of 22 January 1980 repealing and replacing sections of the Labour Code, and adding sections to said Code (LS 1980-Sen. 1)). Report under article 22 of the Constitution for the period ending 30 June 1986. In respect of the legislation of one Canadian province, the Committee noted (RCE 1984, p. 257 and RCE 1986, p. 264) that the 1979 Human Rights Code in British Columbia, whereby no employer or employment agency could discriminate on any grounds whatsoever against a person in respect of employment or a condition of employment, unless reasonable cause existed for such discrimination, was amended in 1984; the Committee noted that the 1984 Act, by eliminating the necessity of proving the existence of reasonable cause, places on the person alleging discrimination, and on this person alone, the burden of proving that it is based on one of the grounds listed in the Act. The Committee requested the Government to furnish information on the practical application of the Act. In the Federal Republic of Germany, the 1980 Equality Act reversed the previous situation by providing that "where ... the worker establishes facts that afford grounds for assuming that discrimination has occurred on account of his or her sex, the employer shall bear the burden of proving that material reasons unrelated to a particular sex justify differential treatment"; see also RCE 1982, p. 151. In the United States, the application and interpretation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act by the courts have resulted in an elaborate jurisprudence, particularly as regards proof. In cases of alleged discrimination in hiring on grounds of race, the minority group member must first make out a prima facie case. Thus, for example, he or she must show that he or she belongs to a particular applicant pool, that he or she had the qualifications for the position, that his or her application was rejected, that the position remained open and that the employer kept looking for applicants with similar qualifications. The employer may rebut this evidence by showing that he or she had "a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason" for his or her action. The complainant may then attempt to show that the supposedly legitimate reason for the action was a pretext for the employer's actual discriminatory motive. In cases of indirect discrimination, courts have held that employment practices which are not discriminatory at first sight may violate Title VII if the effect of the practice is to discriminate against a minority group and the practice is not related to job performance. Thus there is considered to be discrimination where a practice adversely affects minorities to a significant degree more than Whites, and the practice is not job-related or justified by business necessity. The Supreme Court has found that an employment test which disqualified more than twice as many Blacks as Whites violated Title VII because the test was not related to job performance. (Griggs v Duke Power Co., 401 US 424 (1971); Albemarle v Moody, 422 US 405 (1975)). In cases of discrimination in employment on the basis of sex, the courts have adopted a similar jurisprudence as regards proof. Furthermore, the courts have held that the bona fide occupational qualification exception is "an extremely narrow exception to the general prohibition of discrimination on the basis of sex" (Dothard v Rawlinson, 433 US 321, 329-30, 334 (1977)). In France, as regards equality of remuneration, the burden is on the employer to provide the judge with evidence likely to justify the inequality; the employee has the benefit of the doubt (Labour Code, s. L 140-8; Act No. 83-625 of 13 July 1983; LS 1983-Fr. 2). Likewise, in Jamaica the burden is on the employer to prove that he or she has applied the principle of equal pay for equal work (Employment (Equal Pay for Men and Women) Act, No. 34, 1975, s. 7). In Finland and Sweden, the complainant must prove that he or she had the best qualifications and the employer must prove that his or her preference or the unequal treatment had nothing to do with the person's sex. In Belgium, no employer employing a worker who has filed a complaint (at the level of the undertaking, the labour inspectorate or the courts) may terminate that worker's employment relationship or modify his or her conditions of employment, unless for reasons not related to the complaint. The burden of proving such reasons is on the employer (s. 136 of the Act of 4 August 1978) if the worker is dismissed or his or her conditions of employment are modified within 12 months following the filing of a complaint or, where a court action has been brought, for up to three months after the judgement has become final. In Portugal, in the absence of proof to the contrary, it is deemed unlawful to punish a woman worker within one year of her having alleged discrimination (Legislative Decree No. 392-79, s. 11). See above, Chapter II, Section 3, para. 115. For example, in Belgium, specialised joint committees are responsible for giving opinions to courts which request them both in the private and in the public sectors. General Survey of 1983 on freedom of association and collective bargaining, para. 280. See above, Chapter II, Section 3, para. 115. The Committee noted in its General Survey of 1986 on equal remuneration, para. 169, that women workers must be made aware of the existence of measures to protect them against retaliatory action: particularly in times of high unemployment, there may be an inclination to tolerate discrimination rather than risk dismissal. In this connection see the General Survey of 1986 on equal remuneration, para. 174. As the Committee noted above (para. 211), when discrimination concerns vocational training Belgium provides a special expedited procedure to obtain a court injunction within eight days from the initiation of the proceedings. On the other hand, there seems to be no provision for specific remedies in cases of discrimination as regards recruitment and promotion (Revue du travail, Ministry of Labour and Employment, March-April 1986, p. 293). In the Federal Republic of Germany, following two orders issued in April 1984 by the Court of Justice of the European Communities concerning the question of indemnities in cases of discrimination in access to employment, in which the Court decided that an effective and dissuasive indemnity should be in proportion to the damages incurred, and therefore go beyond a purely token indemnity, several labour courts ordered indemnities of up to six months' wages (decisions of the CJEC of 10 April 1984, Case No. 14/83, Von Colson and Karmann v. Land Nordrhein-Westfalen and Case No. 79/83, Harz v. Deutsche Tradex. Local 28, Sheet Metal Workers v. EEOC, 41 FEP 107 (1986). Act of 1976 on race relations, ss. 54 and 56. General Survey of 1983 on freedom of association and collective bargaining, para. 277. The Committee noted that in the Federal Republic of Germany, a certain number of trade unions, associations and authorities advocated not only an inversion of the burden of proof, but also that the victim of discrimination should have the right to obtain employment or promotion rather than a financial remedy, and that the authors of discriminatory offers of employment should be fined. Australia: Sex Discrimination Act 1984, ss. 87-90; Belgium: Act of 4 August 1978, s. 141; Brazil: Act No. 7437 of 1985: acts of discrimination based on prejudice as to race, colour, sex or marital status constitute penal offences; Dominican Republic: Labour Code, 1951, ss. 678-679; Finland: Act of 1986 respecting equality between women and men; France: Act on equality in employment between women and men, 1983 (ss. 152-1, 152-1-1, 152-1-2, 154-1, R 154-0 of the Labour Code); Ghana: Education Act, No. 87 of 1961; Greece: Act No. 1414 of 30 January 1984; Iceland: Act on the equal status and equal rights of women and men, No. 65 of 1985; India: Equal Remuneration Act 1976; Ireland: Employment Equality Act, No. 16 of 1977; Israel: Employment Service Law, s. 42; Italy: Act No. 903 of 1977 on equality; Jamaica: Employment (Equal Pay for Men and Women) Act 1975; Libyan Arab Jamahiriya: Labour Code, s. 159; Luxembourg: Act respecting equal treatment; Mexico: Federal Labour Act of 1969; Norway: Act respecting equality between the sexes; New Zealand: Race Relations Act of 1971, s. 5; in this country, the Human Rights Commission has used the concept of a continuing violation in accepting a complaint alleging discrimination flowing from a collective agreement negotiated after the adoption of the Human Rights Act; Panama: Labour Code, s. 1064; Papua New Guinea: Employment Act of 1978, s. 97; Philippines: Labour Code, ss. 133 and 278; Portugal: Legislative Decree No. 392/79 on equality; Sao Tome and Principe: Rural Code of 1962, s. 307; Spain: Act No. 8 of 1980 to promulgate a Workers' Charter, s. 57; Syrian Arab Republic: Labour Code of 1959, s. 224; Turkey: Act No. 1475 of 1971, as amended in 1983; Venezuela: Act No. 274 of 1983; Zimbabwe: Labour Relations Act 1985, s. 5(3). France: Penal Code, ss. 187 and 416; Netherlands: Penal Code, s. 429quater; Sweden: Penal Code, Ch. 16, s. 9, prohibits discrimination on account of race, colour, nationality and ethnic and social origin. Belgium: Act of 4 August 1978, s. 141; Brazil: Act No. 7437 of 1985: a person shall be liable to a term of imprisonment and a fine if he or she refuses to enrol a student in an educational establishment, irrespective of the level or nature thereof, for reasons relating to race, colour, sex or marital status; the same applies to a person who refuses a post or job in the autonomous state bodies, semi-private corporations, enterprises holding concessions from the public service or private enterprises for the same reasons. Brazil: Act No. 7437 of 1985 provides for dismissal of an official guilty of committing an act of discrimination in access to education or training. France: Penal Code, s. 187; USSR: Labour Code, s. 249. Officials guilty of a breach of labour legislation are criminally liable in accordance with the procedure laid down by the legislation of the USSR and that of the RSFSR. In Spain, penalties vary in severity depending on the gravity of the offence, the bad faith or dishonesty of the employer, the number of workers concerned, the scale of the undertaking's business and whether the case involves a repetition of the offence. Penalties are imposed by the labour inspectorate or, where appropriate, by the Council of Ministers according to the proper administrative procedures; in Finland, an employer may be liable to fines for publishing discriminatory vacancy notices; in Ghana, the Education Act, No. 87 of 1961, imposes a fine on any person who refuses access to school to a pupil on account of the religion, nationality, race or language of the pupil or one of his or her parents; in Greece: an employer may be liable to a fine for breach of the Equality Act, No. 1414 of 1984; in India, under the Equal Remuneration Act 1976, an employer may be liable to a fine if, inter alia, he or she refuses to give information or discriminates on account of sex; in Ireland, Act No. 16 of 1977 prescribes fines for failure to carry out a court order relating to discrimination in employment; in Luxembourg, fines may be imposed for discriminatory offers of employment; in Portugal, persons guilty of infringing the legislation on equality are liable to a fine for each infringement, which is doubled in the event of repetition of the offence (such as publication of discriminatory vacancy notices, or the institution of job description or evaluation systems containing inequalities based on sex). In Cape Verde and Sao Tome and Principe, fines may be imposed for infringements of the Labour Code, including those of the provision prohibiting the establishment of differences in the rate of remuneration on the grounds of sex, belief, the group to which the worker traditionally belongs, or his or her occupational group or ethnic origin. Fines are also prescribed as penalties for acts of discrimination in Iceland, Israel, Italy, Papua New Guinea, Turkey (equal remuneration), and Venezuela. Belgium: Act of 4 August 1978, s. 141: eight days to one month's imprisonment and/or a fine of Belgian F26 to Belgian F500; Brazil: Act No. 7437 of 1985, ss. 7 and 8: three months' to one year's imprisonment and a fine; dismissal of an official who impedes a person's access to civilian or military public employment for discriminatory reasons; France: Penal Code, s. 187: two months' to two years' imprisonment and/or a fine of FF3,000 to FF30,000 may be imposed on any agent of the public authority who wittingly denies a person a right to which he or she is entitled on account of his or her origin or belonging to a certain ethnic group, nation or race. Under s. 416 of the Penal Code, two months' to one years' imprisonment and/or a fine of FF2,000 to FF10,000 may be imposed on a person who, on the same grounds, withholds a service or makes such service conditional on the same grounds or refuses to hire or dismisses a person on the same grounds or makes an offer of employment conditional upon the same grounds; Jamaica: a person shall be liable to up to 12 months' imprisonment or to a fine for breach of legislation on equality of remuneration (as well as daily fines if the breach continues after the offender has been convicted); New Zealand: a person guilty of inciting racial disharmony is liable to up to three months' imprisonment or a fine; Philippines: infringements of the Labour Code may be punished with a fine and/or imprisonment. In Zimbabwe, a person who infringes the provisions prohibiting discrimination on grounds of race, tribe, place of origin, political opinion, colour, creed or sex shall be liable to a fine or up to one year's imprisonment. In the Netherlands, the Act respecting the employment of disabled persons provides that prison terms or fines may be imposed on an employer who refuses to provide information required: such terms may amount to reach four years' imprisonment if information supplied is deliberately falsified (Act of 16 May 1986, s. 17); in this country, under s. 429 quater of the enal Code, a person is liable to penalties if he or she discriminates against a person on grounds of race in the exercise of an occupation or activity; according to the Government (report for the period ending 30 June 1986), this section is to be interpreted more widely to cover indirect discrimination as well. In Norway, for example, any action attempting to encroach upon the Ombud/Ombudsman's and Committee's supervisory activities is punishable with imprisonment and/or fines; in Canada, fines of up to 50,000 Canadian dollars may be imposed in the event of failure to comply with regulations approved by the Canadian Human Rights Commission. General Survey of 1983 on freedom of association and collective bargaining, para. 278, and General Survey of 1986 on equal remuneration, para. 178. RCE 1987, para. 148. General Survey, 1971, para. 80. See for example, Cape Verde, Cyprus, India, Nepal, courses on basic human rights have been incorporated into the curricula of the final years in secondary schools; Niger, Rwanda, Sudan, United Republic of Tanzania, Trinidad and Tobago, CERD/C/116/Add.3, p. 5: "schools are also encouraged to set aside periods for teachers to discuss our efforts to combat racism and racial discrimination"; Ukrainian SSR, CERD/C/118/Ad.8, p. 22. Alberta: university courses prepared in co-operation with the Canadian Human Rights Commission to explain federal and provincial human rights legislation and help employers develop effective employment practices which adhere to the legislation; British Columbia: inclusion of a course on the principles of human rights and discrimination in the social studies curriculum; the introduction of a course on the same subject in elementary schools is planned for September 1988. Research project on "la signification pédagogique des figures de référence proposées aux garçons et aux filles dans l'enseignement post-secondaire" (the educational significance of role models for young men and women in post-secondary instruction) which deals with the determination of the traditional roles of young men and women. See J. Massiah, (ed.), "Women in the Caribbean", Social and Economic Studies, Vol. 35, Nos. 2-3, University of West Indies, 1986. Angola; Cuba; Guinea-Bissau; Iraq; Indonesia; Mali; Nepal; Nicaragua; Qatar; Seychelles. See for example, Belgium, RCE 1983, p. 206 (distribution of posters intended to encourage women to choose occupations that are not traditionally feminine). RCE 1985, p. 279. Western Australia; see also Northern Territory: officers of the Office of Equal Opportunity meet with and address groups, associations and organisations for the purpose of creating a climate of opinion favourable for the observance of the principles of non-discrimination and equality of opportunity in employment. CERD/C/149/Add.11, p. 16. RCE 1983, p. 222. RCE 1987, p. 376. See for example the bulletins and periodicals published by specialised bodies in the following countries: Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Sweden, United States, etc. Austria, in its report, the Government mentioned three types of publications; those concerning the social status of women, research on social and employment market policies and those dealing with equality of opportunity; France, the Ministry of Women's Rights and the Ministry of Labour, Employment and Vocational Training have jointly published a brochure for the general public on the application of the Act of 13 July 1983, entitled "L'égalité professionnelle", designed to help the Act to be implemented in practice; Federal Republic of Germany, following a survey carried out in co-operation with various branches of private industry, a manual giving precise indications on how to develop and bring out promotional measures for women at work has been published. Ministry for the Participation of Women in Development, Guía de la mujer, Caracas, 1981. Belgium: pamphlets from the Women's Labour Committee; Portugal: opinions published by the Committee for Equality of Treatment in Employment to make the social partners and public opinion more aware of attempts to combat discrimination. Canada: a regular statistical bulletin, Women in the Labour Force, compiles data on women's participation in the labour force, earnings, benefits and rate of unionisation. Ministry of Labour, Guide to Labour Law, Dublin 1987; see also Ministry of Labour, Unfair Dismissal, Employment Equality, Payment of Wages, Dublin 1987 and Youth Employment Agency, 50/50 is not Equality, Dublin 1987. Algeria; Angola; Indonesia; Malaysia; Nicaragua. Honorable Senado de la Nación, Seminario para mujeres sindicalistas por la igualdad de oportunidades en el trabajo, Buenos Aires, 1986. Canada: the Government reported that the Canadian Human Rights Commission had organised workshops for managers explaining the principles of employment equity and the requirements for its implementation in conjunction with major employers in the federal sector and the Canada Employment and Immigration Commission; India: the Government pointed out that officials undergo a training programme on the application of the principles of non-discrimination; Indonesia.
Australia: Affirmative Action Act of 1986 France: Labour Code Canada: Employment Equity Act Austria: Equality Act Sweden: Equality Act of 1983 Italy: Act of 1977 on equality Malta: Constitution Malta: Act No. XXXI of 1976 Sweden: Equal Opportunities Act India: Equal Remuneration Act, 1976
Cross references
|
| ILO Home | NORMES home | ILOLEX home | Universal Query | NATLEX |
Disclaimer webinfo@ilo.org |