GB.347/INS/19/Decisions

Decisions on the reports of the Officers of the Governing Body concerning the receivability of representations made under article 24 of the ILO Constitution

(Private sitting of the Governing Body)

Record of decisions | 23 March 2023
Representation alleging non-observance by France of the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98), the Equal Remuneration Convention, 1951 (No. 100), the Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111), and the Workers’ Representatives Convention, 1971 (No. 135)

In light of the information contained in document GB.347/INS/19/1, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was not receivable.

(GB.347/INS/19/1, paragraph 5)

Representation alleging non-observance by Uruguay of the Hours of Work (Industry) Convention, 1919 (No. 1), the Hours of Work (Commerce and Offices) Convention, 1930 (No. 30), and the Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155)

In the light of the information contained in document GB.347/INS/19/2, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.

(GB.347/INS/19/2, paragraph 5)

Representation alleging non-observance by Chile of the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187)

In the light of the information contained in document GB.347/INS/19/3, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.

(GB.347/INS/19/3, paragraph 5)

Representation alleging non-observance by Serbia of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98), the Migrant Workers (Supplementary Provisions) Convention, 1975 (No. 143), the Labour Administration Convention, 1978 (No. 150) and the Safety and Health in Construction Convention, 1988 (No. 167)

In the light of the information contained in document GB.347/INS/19/4, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided:

(a) that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it;

(b) that considering that the representation concerns issues similar to those raised in another representation, the two cases should be examined jointly by the same tripartite committee;

(c) to refer the elements of the representation regarding non-observance of the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) to the Committee on Freedom of Association for examination in accordance with the procedure set out in the Standing Orders on articles 24 and 25 of the ILO Constitution.

(GB.347/INS/19/4, paragraph 6)

Representation alleging non-observance by Serbia of the Forced Labour Convention, 1930 (No. 29), the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), the Labour Clauses (Public Contracts) Convention, 1949 (No. 94), the Migration for Employment Convention (Revised), 1949 (No. 97), the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98), the Migrant Workers (Supplementary Provisions) Convention, 1975 (No. 143), the Labour Administration Convention, 1978 (No. 150), the Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 1981 (No. 155), the Safety and Health in Construction Convention, 1988 (No. 167), and the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187)

In the light of the information contained in document GB.347/INS/19/5, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided:

(a) that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it;

(b) that considering that the representation concerns issues similar to those raised in another representation, the two cases should be examined jointly by the same tripartite committee;

(c) to refer the elements of the representation regarding non-observance of the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), to the Committee on Freedom of Association for examination n accordance with the procedure set out in the Standing Orders on articles 24 and 25 of the ILO Constitution.

(GB.347/INS/19/5, paragraph 6)