EPO - European Patent Organisation
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | next >
Judgment No. |
Session No. |
Full text |
4556 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant asks to be provided with a copy of his old medical file. |
4555 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant contests the decision not to pay him the additional installation allowance in respect of his second child following his transfer to The Hague. |
4554 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges the decision deriving from the Administrative Council’s decision CA/D 2/15 to require the recipients of the new retirement pension for health reasons to cease performing gainful activities or employment or to refrain from performing such activities or employment. |
4553 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges the decision to recover sums which were unduly paid to him as dependent child allowance. |
4552 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges the decision not to select him for the post of director of the Language Service. |
4551 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainants contest modifications made with respect to the use of mass emails within the Office. |
4550 |
134th Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant contests the “social democracy” reform introduced by decision CA/D 2/14 and implemented in particular by Circular No. 356. |
4493 |
133rd Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges the decision not to award him moral damages for the length of the internal appeal procedure. |
4492 |
133rd Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant seeks compensation for the alleged financial consequences of the decision taken in March 2003 to grant her an invalidity pension with retroactive effect from 1 July 2000. |
4491 |
133rd Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges the decision to dismiss her with immediate effect for serious misconduct. |
4490 |
133rd Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges the amount of damages awarded for the unlawful decision not to renew her fixed-term contract as a Principal Director and to reinstate her in a lower-level post instead. |
4489 |
133rd Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges the amount of moral damages paid to her by the EPO for the decision not to finalise her two performance management reports for 2011 and part of 2012. |
4488 |
133rd Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges the decision to transfer her to another post. |
4487 |
133rd Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges the fact that the arrears owed to him in respect of his invalidity allowance, related benefits and unused leave following a retroactive modification of the monthly gross salary scales in December 2012 were not paid to him until January 2013. |
4486 |
133rd Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant challenges the composition of the Munich Staff Committee and of the Central Staff Committee. |
4485 |
133rd Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| Acting in his capacity as a staff representative, the complainant challenges the decision to assign different duties and responsibilities to a Principal Director without a competitive selection process. |
4484 |
133rd Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainants challenge the decisions to reject their claim for reimbursement of deductions made as from December 2015 to a compensatory allowance following their career progression and the ensuing increase in their salary. |
4483 |
133rd Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant contests the “social democracy” reform introduced by decision CA/D 2/14 insofar as it abolished the Local Advisory Committees. |
4482 |
133rd Session, 2022
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant contests the “social democracy” reform introduced by decision CA/D 2/14. |
4443 |
132nd Session, 2021
|
EN, FR |
| The complainant argues that the President’s withdrawal of the final decision on his appeal was unlawful, that the referral of the appeal back to the Appeals Committee was equally unlawful, and that the Tribunal was wrong in considering the list of withdrawn decisions which had been provided, without consulting him, by the EPO. |
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | next >
|