EPO - European Patent Organisation
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | next >
| Judgment No. |
Session No. |
Full text |
| 3306 |
117th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant contests the Administration’s interpretation and application of the opinion of the Medical Board regarding the end of his sick leave. |
| 3302 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complaints were dismissed for non-exhaustion of internal remedies under Article 7 of the Tribunal’s Rules. |
| 3301 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant through five irreceivable complaints requested information concerning facts that occurred before his retirement for disability. |
| 3300 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The Tribunal dismissed the complaint filed against the decision not to consider the complainant's disability as resulting from an occupational disease. |
| 3297 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant was dismissed for misconduct following a disciplinary investigation, which found that he had forged and falsified documents. |
| 3291 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The Tribunal dismisses fifty-six similar complaints on the grounds that they are directed against general and not individual decisions. |
| 3285 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | In his first complaint, the complainant impugns the decision denying him an extension of employment beyond the age of 65. By his second complaint, he seeks to challenge the appointment of his successor. |
| 3283 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenged the decision not to promote him earlier to grade A3. |
| 3273 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to place his post in a certain grade group following an allegedly flawed assessment process. |
| 3268 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant successfully impugns the establishment of a staff report containing negative comments. |
| 3256 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant contests the fact that he was not promoted in 2006 in accordance with the "age-50 rule", which had been abolished as from 1 January 2005. |
| 3249 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The Tribunal dismissed the complaint in which the complainant requested the establishment of a new version of his staff report. |
| 3248 |
116th Session, 2014
|
EN, FR |
| | The complaint being almost identical to the previous one and the complainant having no new argument, the Tribunal considered the complaint to be irreceivable under the principle of res judicata. |
| 3229 |
115th Session, 2013
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant contests his staff report, alleging that it was flawed by procedural errors. |
| 3228 |
115th Session, 2013
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant contests his staff report, alleging that it was flawed by procedural errors. |
| 3227 |
115th Session, 2013
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to impose a disciplinary measure on him for having falsified his productivity figures. |
| 3214 |
115th Session, 2013
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant unsuccessfully impugns the decision not to extend his appointment beyond retirement age. |
| 3213 |
115th Session, 2013
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant impugns the decision not to grant her a survivor's pension for her dead husband. |
| 3212 |
115th Session, 2013
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges her suspension, alleging that the mediation procedure was flawed. |
| 3205 |
115th Session, 2013
|
EN, FR |
| | The complainant challenges the decision to increase the parental contribution for the use of Office crèches. |
< previous | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53 | next >
|
