ILO is a specialized agency of the United Nations
ILO-en-strap
Site Map | Contact français
> Home > Triblex: case-law database > By thesaurus keyword

Penalty for delay (676,-666)

You searched for:
Keywords: Penalty for delay
Total judgments found: 8

  • Judgment 3688


    122nd Session, 2016
    World Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to abolish her post and to separate her from service.

    Consideration 32

    Extract:

    These sums should be paid to [the complainant] within 30 days of the date of delivery of this judgment, failing which they shall bear interest at the rate of 5 per cent per annum from that date until the date of payment.

    Keywords:

    penalty for delay;



  • Judgment 3654


    122nd Session, 2016
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainant challenges the decision to maintain on his personal file a disputed performance appraisal report issued after the expiry of his temporary appointment, and the decision to reject his application for inclusion on a roster of candidates eligible for temporary contracts.

    Consideration 10

    Extract:

    [The] sums should be paid within 28 days of the date of delivery of this judgment, failing which they shall bear interest at the rate of 5 per cent per annum from that date until the date of payment.

    Keywords:

    penalty for delay;



  • Judgment 3635


    122nd Session, 2016
    Centre for the Development of Enterprise
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR
    Summary: The complainants have filed applications for execution of Judgment 3238.

    Consideration 15

    Extract:

    In light of the lack of speed which the CDE has displayed so far in dealing with this case, it is appropriate to order it to pay each complainant a penalty of 3,000 euros per month of delay if it does not honour its obligations in full within 30 days of the delivery in public of this judgment.

    Keywords:

    penalty for delay;



  • Judgment 1362


    77th Session, 1994
    World Intellectual Property Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 10

    Extract:

    "[T]he Tribunal must rule yet again on WIPO's refusal to discharge the obligation to decide on reinstatement. As it has stated more than once, its judgments are to be given immediate effect. In the regrettable event that the Organization continues to disregard that rule and fails to act within 30 days of the date of delivery of this judgment, it must pay the complainant 10,000 swiss francs by way of penalty for each further month of delay."

    Keywords:

    amount; application for execution; complaint allowed; complaint allowed in part; continuing breach; decision; delay; execution of judgment; general principle; judgment of the tribunal; organisation's duties; penalty for delay; refusal; reinstatement; res judicata; time limit;



  • Judgment 1338


    77th Session, 1994
    World Health Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Considerations 11 and 12

    Extract:

    "An organisation must, where a specific sum has been awarded [by the Tribunal], pay compensation if it takes more than one month to pay after the judgment was notified, save that if, as in Judgment 1219, the Tribunal does not put a figure on the amount due, the need to work out the figure warrants allowing additional time. In this instance [...] apart from alleging the need for consultations the Organization has offered no explanation for the delay in payment. The Tribunal therefore awards the complainant payment of interest".

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 1219

    Keywords:

    administrative delay; amount; application for execution; complaint allowed; complaint allowed in part; delay; execution of judgment; formal demand for payment; interest on damages; judgment of the tribunal; organisation's duties; payment; penalty for delay; res judicata; time limit;



  • Judgment 706


    57th Session, 1985
    United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 10

    Extract:

    "The complainant is also entitled to interest at 10 per cent a year on the sums due under this judgment from 3 May 1984, the date on which he asked UNESCO to execute Judgment 607 and from which there was a demand to pay."

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 607

    Keywords:

    amount; application for execution; complaint allowed; date; execution of judgment; formal demand for payment; interest on damages; judgment of the tribunal; payment; penalty for delay;

    Consideration 10

    Extract:

    The organization failed to give proper effect to Judgment 607. The complainant wins his case. He is entitled to interest on the amounts due him from the date on which he asked UNESCO to execute Judgment 607 and from which there was a demand to pay.

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 607

    Keywords:

    date; delay in payment; execution of judgment; formal demand for payment; interest on damages; judgment of the tribunal; payment; penalty for delay;



  • Judgment 553


    50th Session, 1983
    World Tourism Organization
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Considerations 1 and 2

    Extract:

    The material judgment was immediately operative. "The complainant seeks, and is entitled to, payment of interest in compensation for the damage he has suffered through the [organisation's] delay in giving effect to the judgment".

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 463

    Keywords:

    administrative delay; application for execution; complaint allowed; execution of judgment; injury; interest on damages; judgment of the tribunal; penalty for delay;



  • Judgment 82


    14th Session, 1965
    International Telecommunication Union
    Extracts: EN, FR
    Full Judgment Text: EN, FR

    Consideration 10

    Extract:

    The complainant "is entitled to an indemnity compensating him for the damage he has suffered through the delay on the part of [the organisation] in giving effect to [...] the operative part of the [...] judgment [in question]." It emerges from the dossier that this damage will be equitably remedied by deciding that the sum which the organisation must pay - and the amount of which had been fixed by order - shall bear interest at the rate of 5 per cent, payable as from the thirtieth day after notification of the said order.

    Reference(s)

    ILOAT Judgment(s): 61

    Keywords:

    administrative delay; amount; complaint allowed; execution of judgment; injury; interest on damages; judgment of the tribunal; penalty for delay;


 
Last updated: 07.06.2019 ^ top